欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 47-52.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00047

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米籽粒生理成熟后自然脱水速率QTL的初步定位

刘显君1，王振华1,*，王霞2，李庭锋1，张林1   

  1. 1东北农业大学，黑龙江哈尔滨150030；2黑龙江八一农垦大学，黑龙江大庆163319
  • 收稿日期:2009-06-04 修回日期:2009-09-08 出版日期:2010-01-12 网络出版日期:2009-11-17
  • 通讯作者: 王振华, E-mail: zhenhuawang_2006@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目（30571166），黑龙江博士后科研启动资金（LBH-Q06099）和黑龙江省研究室创新科研基金资助。

Primary Mapping of QTL for Dehydration Rate of Maize Kernal after Physiologyical Maturing

LIU Xian-Jun1,WANG Zhen-Hua1,*,WANG Xia2,LI Ting-Feng1,ZHANG Lin1   

  1. 1Northeast Agricultural University，Harbin 15030，China；2Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University，Daqing 163319，China
  • Received:2009-06-04 Revised:2009-09-08 Published:2010-01-12 Published online:2009-11-17
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Hua, E-mail: zhenhuawang_2006@163.com

PDF

1915

被引次数

21

摘要：

以吉846 (脱水快，1.18% d-1)和掖3189 (脱水慢，0.39% d-1)为亲本衍生出的232个重组自交系(F7)为作图群体，构建了具有101个SSR标记位点的玉米遗传连锁图谱，覆盖玉米基因组1 941.7 cM，标记间平均距离为19.22 cM。通过1年2点试验(双城和哈尔滨，2007年)评价了232个重组自交系籽粒生理成熟后的自然脱水速率。采用WinQTL2.5对该性状数量性状位点(QTL)进行了初步定位和遗传效应分析，结果共检测出9个显著影响玉米籽粒生理成熟后自然脱水速率的QTL，分别位于第2、3、4、5和6染色体上，加性增效作用均来源于亲本吉846。其中在第2和6染色体上的2个QTL (qKdr-2-1, qKdr-6-1)在2个环境下均稳定表达，分别位于SSR标记bnlg198-umc1516和phi126-phi077之间，其累积表型贡献率为15.49%。具有较快脱水速率的等位基因均来自吉846。所检测到的QTL将在分子辅助选育具有较快脱水速率的材料中具有较大的应用潜力。

关键词: 玉米, 重组自交系, 脱水速率, SSR标记, 数量选择基因位点

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to identify QTL for dehydration rate of maize kernel after physiological maturing using 232 recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between line Ji846 (more faster kernel dehydration rate, 1.18% d-1) and line Ye3189 (more slower kernel dehydration rate, 0.39% d-1). Dehydration rate of maize kernel of this population and two parents were evaluated according to the method of Wang et al.(2001) and Jin et al. (1997) at tested locations Shuangcheng and Harbin in 2007, respectively. A molecular genetic map including 10 linkage groups was constructed, covering 1 941.7 cM with mean distance 19.22 cM using 101 SSR markers. A total of nine QTLs were identified through software WinQTL2.5, which were located on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively. Additive effect of these QTLs was derived from line Ji846. Of them, two QTLs (qKdr-2-1 located in bnlg198-umc1516 of chromosomes 2, qKdr-6-1 located in phi126-phi077 of chromosomes 6) were repeatedly found in two environments, which explained 15.49% of total phenotypic variation. Since beneficial alleles were from line Ji846，it was concluded that these QTLs would have the greatest potential value for marker assisted selection for high kernel dehydration rate of maize after physiological maturing.

Key words: Maize, Recombination inbred line, Kernal dehydration rate, SSR, QTL

[1] Jiang Y-X(姜艳喜), Wang Z-H(王振华), Jin Y(金益), Zhang L(张林), E W-D(鄂文弟). Genetics on water content at harvesting and correlative traits and breeding strategy. Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2004, 12(1): 21-25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] Purdy J D, Crane P L. Inheritance of drying rate immature corn. Crop Sci, 1967, 7: 294-297

[3] Gu S-Y(谷思玉), Wang Y-S(王云生), Qi G-X(齐玫馨). Correlation analysis of dehydration rate of kernel in maize physiological mature. Seed World(种子世界), 1999, (4): 19-21 (in Chinese)

[4] Zhang L(张林), Wang Z-H(王振华), Jin Y(金益), Yu T-J(于天江). Combining ability analysis of water content in harvest stage in corn. Southwest China Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2005, 18(5): 534-537 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Huo S-P(霍仕平), Yan Q-J(晏庆九). Significance and research advance of grain moisture quick-loss after physiological maturity in maize. Sichuan Agric Univ(四川农业大学学报), 1993, 11(4): 626-629 (in Chinese)

[6] Frary A, Nesbitt T C, Grandillo S, can de Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert K, Tanksley S. Cloning and transgenic expression of fw-2: A quantitative traits locus key to the evolution of tomato. Fruit Sci, 2000, 89: 85-87

[7] Lan J-H(兰进好), Li X-H(李新海), Gao S-R(高树仁), Zhang B-S(张宝石), Zhang S-H(张世煌). QTL analysis of yield components in maize under different environments. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(10): 1253-1259 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Liu L-F(刘立峰), Li Z-C(李自超), Mu P(穆平). Advances in crop molecular breeding based on QTL. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2004, 2(1): 77-83 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Rodrigo G S, Fernando H A, Elsa L C, Julio C C. Quantitative trait loci for grain moisture at harvest and field grain drying rate in maize (Zea mays L.) Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 462-471

[10] Jin Y(金益), Wang Z-H(王振华), Zhang Y-L(张永林), Wang S-H(王殊华), Wang Y-S(王云生). Difference analysis on the natural dry rate of kernel after wax ripening in maize hybrids. Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 1997, 28(1): 29-32 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Wang Z-H(王振华), Zhang Z-C(张忠臣), Chang H-Z(常华章), Jin Y(金益), Wang L-F(王立丰). Analysis of physiological mature stage and kernel naturally dry-down rate in 38 corn inbred lines in Heilongjiang. Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2001, 9(2): 53-55 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Sahai Maroof M A, Biyashev R M, Yang G P. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 5466-5470

[13] Senior L M, Manfred H. Mapping maize microsatellites and polymerase chain reaction confirmation of the targeted repeats using a CT primer. Genome, 1993, 36: 884-889

[14] Yang J-P(杨俊品), Rong T-Z(荣延昭), Huang L-J(黄烈健) , Tang H-T(唐海涛) , Xiang D-Q(向道权), Dai J-R(戴景瑞). Construction of the frame molecular linkage map in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(1): 82-87 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Doerge R W, Churchill G A. Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics, 1996, 142: 285-294

[16] McCouch S R, Cjp Y G, Yano M. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Cenet Newsl, 1997, 14: 11-13

[17] Zhang Z-M(张志明), Zhao M-J(赵茂俊), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭), Pan G-T(潘光堂). SSR Linkage map construction and QTL identification for plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2007, 33(2): 341-344 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] Li Z K, Yu S B, Lafitte H R, Huang N, Courtois B, Hittalmani S, Vijayakumar C H M, Liu G F, Wang G C, Shashidhar H E, Zhuang J Y, Zheng K L, Singh V P, Sidhu J S, Srivantaneeyakul S, Khush G S. QTL × environment interactions in rice: I. Heading date and plant height. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 108: 141-153

[19] Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti M C, Landi P, Maccaferri M, Conti S. Mapping QTL regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Ann Bot, 2002, 89: 941-963

[20] Tang H(汤华), Yan J-B(严建兵), Huang Y-Q(黄益勤), Zheng Y-L(郑用琏), Li J-S(李建生). QTL mapping of five agronomic traits in maize.Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2005, 32(2): 203-209 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21] Zhao M-J(赵茂俊), Zhang Z-M(张志明), Gao S-B(高世斌), Li W-C(李晚忱), Rong Y-Z(荣廷昭), Pan G-T(潘光堂). Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling resistance to banded leaf-sheath blight in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(5): 698-702 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22] Lü X-L(吕香玲), Li X-H(李新海), Hao Z-F(郝转芳), Ji H-L(吉海莲), Shi L-Y(史利玉), Zhang S-H(张世煌). Identification of major QTL for resistance to sugarcane mosaic virus in maize based on introgression lines analysis. Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2007, 15(3): 9-14 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23] Shen J-B(申建斌), Jiang C-S(蒋昌顺). Application and limiting factors and improvement of crop QTL mapping. Chin Trop Agric (热带农业科学), 2006, 26(4): 59-63 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Knapp S J , Bridges W C, Birkes D. Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular maker linkage maps. Theor Appl Genet, 1990, 79: 583-592
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2