欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 442-448.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00442

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用“永久F2”群体进行小麦幼苗根系性状QTL分析

李卓坤1，彭涛1,2，张卫东1，谢全刚1，田纪春1,*   

  1. 1山东农业大学国家作物生物学重点实验室小麦品质育种室，山东泰安271018；2济源市农业科学研究所，河南济源454652
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-07 修回日期:2009-10-03 出版日期:2010-03-12 网络出版日期:2010-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 田纪春, E-mail: jctian@sdau.edu.cn; Tel: 0538-8242040
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）项目（2009CB118301）资助。

Analsysis of QTLs for Root Traits at Seedling Stage Using an "Immortalized F2"Population in Wheat

LI Zhuo-Kun1,PENG Tao1,2,ZHANG Wei-Dong1,XIE Quan-Gang1,TIAN Ji-Chun1,*   

  1. 1 Group of Quality Wheat Breeding of Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Institute of Jiyuan Agricultural Science, Jiyuan 454652, China
  • Received:2009-07-07 Revised:2009-10-03 Published:2010-03-12 Published online:2010-01-22
  • Contact: TIAN Ji-Chun,E-mail:jctian@sdau.edu.cn;Tel:0538-8242040

PDF

2425

被引次数

15

摘要：

为了研究小麦苗期根系性状的遗传，以小麦品种花培3号和豫麦57的杂交DH群体组配了一套含168个杂交组合的“永久F2”群体。利用WinRHIZO根系分析系统测定四叶一心期小麦水培幼苗根系总长度、直径、表面积、体积、根尖数、最大根长、茎叶干重、根干重及根茎干重比9个性状。采用复合区间作图法分析幼苗根系8个性状的QTL，定位了7个加性效应QTL和12对上位性互作QTL，包括加性效应、显性效应，加加互作、加显互作和显显互作，分布在1A、1D、2A、2B、2D、3A、3B、5D、6D和7D染色体上，单个QTL可解释0.01%~11.91%的遗传变异。在染色体2D上XWMC41至XBARC349.2区间检测到同时控制总根长和根干重的一个QTL。上位性对苗期根系生长发育有重要作用。试验结果表明，苗期根系性状的遗传机制较复杂, 因此在育种中要综合考虑根系各性状之间的关系，保证根系协调统一、发达健壮。

关键词: 小麦, “永久F2”群体, 根系性状, QTL定位, 基因效应

Abstract:

Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of roots plays an important role in the genetic mechanism study of root system. A number of QTLs for root traits have been detected using different populations in rice (Oryza sativa L.), but rarely in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The “immortalized F2” population is favorable for QTL analysis due to their similar proportions of genotypes in the population, and the replicability at multiple locations over several years. The objective of this study was to detect QTLs for several root traits at seedling stage in wheat. From a set of doubled haploid lines derived from Huapei 3 × Yumai 57, an “immortalized F2” population was constructed with 168 single crosses. Wheat seedlings were hydroponically cultured with Hoagland’s solution in a light incubator, and sampled when the fifth leaf emerged. Nine root traits including root total length, root surface area, root average diameter, root volume, root tips, maximum root length, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and ratio of root dry weight to shoot dry weight per plant were measured using the WinRHIZO Root Analysis System. QTLs associated with the nine traits were detected using composite interval mapping (CIM) method. A total of seven additive QTLs and twelve pairs of epistatic QTLs were mapped on chromosomes 1A, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, 5D, 6D, and 7D. Additive, dominant and epistatic effects were observed across these QTLs, including the interactions between additive and additive, additive and dominance, dominance and additive, as well as dominance and dominance. The phenotypic variation explained by each QTL ranged from 0.01% to 11.91%. In the interval between XWMC41 and XBARC349.2 on chromosome 2D, a QTL for total root length and the root dry weight was detected. Epistasis was of great importance in root growth and development at seedling stage in wheat. Theresults showed a complex mechanism on the genetics of root traits in wheat, and the eight root traits were significantly correlated with each other. In marker-assisted breeding practice, several root traits should be considered simultaneously for an integrated performance of roots with proper size and shape.

Key words: Common wheat, Immortalized F2 population, Root traits, Quantitative trait locus mapping, Gene action

[1] Liu T-J(刘桃菊), Qi C-H(戚昌瀚), Tang J-J(唐建军). Studies on relationship between the character parameters of root and yield formation in rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(11): 1416-1419 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] Partha D A S, Ali M N, Sarkar H K. Genetical studies on roots in bread wheat. J Interacademicia, 2004, 8: 166-168

[3] Moudal S K, Kour K. Genetic variability and correlation coefficients of some root characteristics and yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rainfed condition. Environ Ecol, 2004, 22: 646-648

[4] Caradus J R. Genetic control of phosphorus uptake and phosphorus status in plants. In: Genetic Manipulation of Crop Plants to Enhance Integrated Nutrient Management in Cropping System. Patancheru, India: ICRISAT Asia Centre, 1995. pp 55-74

[5] Champoux M C, Wang G, Sarkarung S, Mackill D J, Toole T C O, Huang N, McCouch S R. Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 90: 969-981
[6] Ray J D, Yu L X, Mccouch S R, Mackill D J, Toole T C O, Huang N, MeCouch S R. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 627-636
[7] Fang P(方萍), Wu P(吴平), Tao Q-N(陶勤南). QTLs for rice root morphological characters. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1999, 25(2): 181-185 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Mu P(穆平), Li Z-C(李自超), Li C-P(李春平), Zhang H-L(张洪亮), Wu C-M(吴长明), Li C(李晨), Wang X-K(王象坤). QTL mapping and G×E interaction for root traits in a DH population from japonica upland and lowland rice cross under three ecosystems. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2003, 48(20): 2162-2169 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Xu P (徐萍). Reviewed on wheat genome. Hereditas (遗传), 2002, 24(3): 389-394 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Zhou X-G(周晓果), Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Hao Z-F(郝转芳), Chang X-P(昌小平), Zhang Z-B(张正斌). Mapping QTL for seedling root traits in common wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38(10): 1951-1957 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q F. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interaction can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 2574-2579

[12] Hai Y(海燕), Kang M-H(康明辉). Breeding of a new wheat variety Huapei 3 with high yield and early maturing. Henan Agric Sci (河南农业科学), 2007, (5): 36-37 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Guo C-Q(郭春强), Bai Z-A(柏志安), Liao P-A(廖平安), Jin W-K(靳文奎). New high quality and yield wheat variety Yumai 57. China Seed (中国种业), 2004, (4): 54 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] An D G, Su J Y, Liu Q Y, Zhu Y G, Tong Y P, Li J M, Jing R L, Li B, Li Z S. Mapping QTLs for nitrogen uptake in relation to the early growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil, 2006, 284: 73-84
[15] Zhang K P, Tian J C, Zhao L, Liu B, Chen G F. Detection of quantitative trait loci for heading date based on the doubled haploid progeny of two elite Chinese wheat cultivars. Genetica, 2009, 135:257-265

[16] Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, Paterson A H. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL × environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 99: 1255-1264

[17] Yang J, Zhu J. Predicting superior genotypes in multiple environments based on QTL effects. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 1268-1274

[18] McIntosh RA, Devos K M, Dubcovsky J, Rogers W J, Morris C F, Appels R, Anderson O D. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. 2005
[2009-06-30].http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/2005upd.html
[19] Li Z K, Luo L J, Mei H W, Shu Q Y, Tabien R, Zhong D B, Ying C S, Stansel J W, Khush G S, Paterson A H. Overdominance epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice: I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics, 2001, 158: 1737-1753

[20] Mei H W, Li Z K, Shu Q Y, Guo L B, Wang Y P, Yu X Q, Ying C S, Luo L J. Gene actions of QTL affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two backcross population. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 649-659
[21] Xing Y Z, Tan Y F, Hua J P, Sun X L, Xu C G, Zhang Q F. Characterization of the main effects, epistatic effects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 105: 248-257

[22] Yu S B, Li J X, Xu C G, Tan Y F, Gao Y J, Li H X, Zhang Q F, Saghai Maroof M A. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 9226-9231

[23] Xu J-L(徐建龙), Xue Q-Z(薛庆中), Luo L-J(罗利军), Li Z-K(黎志康). QTL dissection of panicle number per plant and spikelet number per panicle in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(8): 752-759 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Zhang K-P(张坤普), Xu X-B(徐宪斌), Tian J-C(田纪春). QTL mapping for grain yield and spike related traits in common wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(2): 270-278 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Rebetzke G J, Bruce S E, Kirkegaard J A. Longer coleoptiles improve emergence through crop residues to increase seedling number and biomass in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil, 2005, 272: 87-100
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[8] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2