欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (05): 857-864.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00857

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米花期高温响应的基因型差异及其生理机制

赵龙飞，李潮海*，刘天学，王秀萍，僧珊珊，潘旭   

  1. 河南农业大学农学院 / 农业部玉米区域技术创新中心, 河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-26 修回日期:2012-01-19 出版日期:2012-05-12 网络出版日期:2012-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 李潮海, E-mail: lichaohai2005@yahoo.com.cn, Tel: 0371-63555629
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代玉米产业技术体系项目(NYCYTX-02)，河南省重大公益性项目(091100910100)和国家公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201006041)资助。

Genotypic Responses and Physiological Mechanisms of Maize (Zea mays L.) to High Temperature Stress during Flowering

ZHAO Long-Fei,LI Chao-Hai*,LIU Tian-Xue,WANG Xiu-Ping,SENG Shan-Shan,PAN Xu   

  1. Agronomy College, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 45002, China
  • Received:2011-09-26 Revised:2012-01-19 Published:2012-05-12 Published online:2012-03-05
  • Contact: 李潮海, E-mail: lichaohai2005@yahoo.com.cn, Tel: 0371-63555629

PDF

2643

被引次数

36

摘要： 倒伏是制约旱种水稻大面积推广的主要因素之一。以籼型杂交稻汕优63和粳稻9516为材料，研究了旱种水稻倒伏的原因及其机理。结果表明，与水种相比，旱种水稻的倒伏率明显高，结实率和粒重明显降低，产量明显降低。自抽穗至成熟，旱种水稻基部节间强度(厚度、单位长度重量)、碳水化合物(尤其是淀粉)含量低于常规水种稻，α-淀粉酶活性明显高于水种稻。水稻基部节间淀粉含量与节间厚度和单位长度重量呈极显著正相关，与α-淀粉酶活性呈显著或极显著负相关。淀粉输出与α-淀粉酶活性呈显著或极显著正相关。施用硅、钾肥能降低旱种水稻基部节间α-淀粉酶活性，提高基部节间淀粉含量，增强基部节间强度，大幅度降低倒伏率，提高旱种水稻的结实率和粒重，从而提高产量。孕穗期去1/2叶，效果则相反。表明在旱种条件下，水稻基部节间α-淀粉酶活性高，促进了节间贮存淀粉的降解，降低了基部节间强度，造成旱种水稻的倒伏。

关键词: 玉米, 基因型, 高温, 产量, 生理机制

Abstract: Lodging is one of the most important factors restricting the wide extension of dry-cultivated rice (DCR). The objective of the study was to investigate the reasons for lodging in DCR using Shanyou 63 (indica hybrid combination) and 9516 (japonica) as materials. The results showed that the lodging percentage in DCR was significantly higher than that in conventional moist-cultivated rice (MCR), leading to significant decrease in seed-setting percentage and grain weight, and grain yield in DCR. The mechanical strength (thickness and weight per centimeter) and carbohydrate (especially starch) content in basal internodes from heading to maturity were much lower in DCR than in MCR, while α-amylase activity in basal internodes was higher in DCR than in MCR. The starch content was very significantly and positively correlated with thickness and weight per centimeter of basal internodes, and significantly or very significantly and negatively correlated with α-amylase activity in basal internodes. The starch exportation was significantly or very significantly and positively correlated with α-amylase activity. The application of silicon and potassium fertilizers could decrease α-amylase activity and increase the starch content in basal internodes, enhance the mechanical strength of basal internodes, decrease the lodging percentage, and increase seed-setting percentage and grain weight, result in the increase of grain yield in DCR. The results were reversed when 1/2 leaves were cut at booting stage. The results above indicated that the higher α-amylase activity in basal internodes in DCR caused more starch degradation, decreasing the mechanical strength of basal internodes, and resulting in the lodging in DCR.

Key words: Maize, Genotype, High temperature, Yield, Physiological mechanism

[1]IPPC. Climate Change: the Supplementary Report to the IPPC Scientific Assessment. London: Cambridge University Press, 1992

[2]Trenberth K E. Atmospheric moisture residence times and cycling: Implications for rainfall rates with climate change. Clim Change, 1998, 39: 667–694

[3]Jin Z-Q(金之庆), Ge D-K(葛道阔), Zheng X-L(郑喜莲), Chen H(陈华). Assessing the potential of global climate change on maize production in China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1996, 22(5): 513–524 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Mitchell J C, Petolino J F. Heat stress effect on isolated reproductive organs of maize. Plant Physiol, 1988, 133: 625–628

[5]Yang J C, Zhang J H. Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytologist, 2006, 169: 223–236

[6]Zhang B-R(张保仁). Studies on Effect of High Temperature on Yield and Quality and Regulation in Maize (Zea mays L.). PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, 2003 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Dong S-T(董树亭), Wang K-J(王空军), Liu P(刘鹏), Hu C-H(胡昌浩). Effects of increasing field temperature on photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2008, 19(1): 81–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Hu X-L(胡秀丽), Li Y-H(李艳辉), Yang H-R(杨海荣), Liu Q-J(刘全军). Heat shock protein 70 may improve the ability of antioxidant defense induced by the combination of drought and heat in maize leaves. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(4): 636–644 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Wang Y-Z(王艳哲), Cui Y-H(崔彦宏), Zhang L-H(张丽华), Li J-C(李金才). Comparative study on methods for testing pollen viability of maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2010, 18(3): 173–176 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Berry J, Bjorkman O. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol, 1980, 31: 491–543

[11]Zhang X-Z(张宪政). Crop Physiology Research Method (作物生理研究法). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992. pp 140–142, 197–198 (in Chinese)

[12]Zhao S-J(赵世杰), Xu C-C(许长成), Zou Q(邹琦), Meng Q-W(孟庆伟). Improvements of method for measurement of malondialdehyde in plant tissues. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 1994, 30(3): 207–210 (in Chinese)

[13]Sun Q-Q(孙庆泉), Wu Y-Q(吴元奇), Hu C-H(胡昌浩), Dong S-T(董树亭), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭), Zhang Y(张颖). Physiological activities and multiplication of endosperm cell at filling stage of kernels with different yield potential in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报) , 2005, 31(5): 612–618 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Zou Q(邹琦). Guide to Physiological and Biochemical Experiments (植物生理生化实验指导). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1995. pp 30–31 (in Chinese)

[15]Plaut Z, Butow B J, Blumenthal C S, Wrigley C W. Transport of dry matter into developing wheat kernels and its contribution to grain yield under post anthesis water deficit and elevated temperature. Field Crops Res, 2004, 86: 185–198

[16]Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Lang Y-Z(郎有忠), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). ATPase activity in the developing grain and its regulation in intersubspecific hybrid rice. J Yangzhou Univ (Nat Sci)(扬州大学学报•自然科学版), 1998, 1(1): 13–17 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Blum A, Ebercon A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci, 1981, 21: 43–47

[18]Zhang R-H(张仁和), Zheng Y-J(郑友军), Ma G-S(马国胜), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Lu H-T(路海东), Shi J-T(史俊通), Xue J-Q(薛吉全). Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic traits and protective enzyme activity in maize seeding. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2011, 31(5): 1303–1311 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Vettakkorumakankav N N, Falk D, Saxena P, Fletcher R A. A crucial role for gibberellins in stress protection of plants. Plant Cell Physiol, 1999, 40: 542–548

[20]Guo T-C(郭天财), Wang C-Y(王晨阳), Zhu Y-J(朱云集), Wang H-C(王化岑), Li J-X(李九星), Zhou J-Z(周继泽). Effects of high temperature on the senescence of root and top-partial of wheat plant in the later stage. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(6): 957–962 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]Huang S-M(黄升谋), Zou Y-B(邹应斌). Effects of sink source ratio on roots and leaves senescence in hybrid rice. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci) (湖南农业大学学报•自然科学版), 2002, 28(3): 192–194 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Zhang J-W(张吉旺). Effects of Light and Temperature Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Yield and Quality in Maize (光温胁迫对玉米产量和品质及其生理特性的影响). PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, 2005 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[9] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[14] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[15] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2