作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 2052-2060.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02052
闫贵欣,陈碧云,许鲲,高桂珍,吕培军,伍晓明*,李锋,李俊
YAN Gui-Xin,CHEN Bi-Yun,XU Kun,GAO Gui-Zhen,LÜ Pei-Jun,WU Xiao-Ming*,LI Feng,LI Jun
摘要:
氮肥是油菜生长发育需要的重要营养元素之一, 增施氮肥可提高油菜籽产量和蛋白含量, 但降低种子含油量。筛选氮肥不敏感油菜基因型、发掘氮肥响应基因及调控网络研究尚不多见。本研究以油菜中双11和德国品种Parter为材料, 设置4个氮水平(施用尿素0、90、180和270 kg/hm–2), 随机区组试验, 利用Agilent油菜基因芯片在全基因组水平分析施氮(180 kg/hm–2)和未施氮(对照)处理授粉25 d种子的基因表达谱。结果显示, 随着施氮量的增加, 种子含油量降低, 而蛋白含量增加, 且在2个品种中的变化程度不同, Parter含油量的下降水平比中双11显著。处理与对照相比, 中双11和Parter分别有827个和3 676个差异表达基因, 明显存在基因型的差异; 2个品种中共同的差异表达基因有278个, 其中上调表达的151个, 下调表达的80个, 差异表达在10倍以上的基因有4个。根据基因功能注释, 2个品种中的差异表达基因分子功能主要为催化、结合和转录调节活性, 参与细胞、代谢和应激等生物过程, 约50%的差异基因未得到功能注释。选择8个差异表达基因进行实时荧光定量PCR分析, 结果显示2种方法的检测结果吻合率为94%, 表明检测结果具有一定的生物重复性。本结果为进一步筛选油菜氮肥敏感基因型、开展氮应答机制研究提供了有用信息。
| [1]USDA. Foreign Agricultural Service Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade Monthly Circular. [2010-05-11] http://www.fas.usda.gov/oilseeds/circular/ Current.asp[2]Liu H-L(刘后利). Practical Cultivation of Rapeseed (实用油菜栽培学). Shanghai: Scientific Technology Press, 1987 (in Chinese)[3]Li Z-Y(李志玉), Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), Liao X(廖星), Qin Y-P(秦亚平). Effects of different amount of nitrogen on yield, quality and economics of Zhongshuang No.9. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2007, 29(2): 78–82 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]Liu C-Z(刘昌智), Cai C-B(蔡常被), Chen Z-X(陈仲西), Tu Y-C(涂运昌), Li Z-Y(李致云). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on yield protein and oil content of oilseed. Oil Crop China (中国油料), 1982, (3): 25–29 (in Chinese)[5]Zhao H-J(赵合句), Li P-W(李培武), Li G-M(李光明), Lu S-G(陆师国). Effects of fertilizer dressing on biochemical qualities in quality rape (Brassica napus). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1991, 7(4): 255–259 (in Chinese with English abstract)[6]Zhou N-N(周年年). The Research on the Nitorgen’s Effect on Rapeseed Yield and Quality and Relevant Analysis. MS Disseratation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2005 (in Chinese with English abstract)[7]Zhao J-X(赵继献), Cheng G-P(程国平), Ren T-B(任廷波), Gao Z-H(高志宏). Effect of different nitrogen rates on yield and quality parameters of high grade yellow seed hybrid rape. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2007, 13(5): 882–889 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]Wilcox J R. Increasing seed protein in soybean with eight cycles of recurrent selection. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1536–40[9]Chung J, Babka H L, Graef G L, Staswick P E, Lee D J, Cregan P B, Shoemaker R C, Specht J E. The seed protein, oil and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1053–1067[10]Beisson F, Koo A J, Ruuska S, Schwender J, Pollard M, Thelen J J, Paddock T, Salas J J, Savage L, Milcamps A, Mhaske V B, Cho Y, Ohlrogge J B. Arabidopsis genes involved in acyl lipid metabolism. A 2003 census of the candidates, a study of the distribution of expressed sequence tags in organs, and a web-based database. Plant Physiol, 2003, 132: 681–697[11]Nanjo T, Fujita M, Seki M, Kato T, Tabata S, Shinozaki K. Toxicity of free proline revealed in a Arabidopsis T-DNA-Tagged mutant deficient in proline dehydrogenase. Plant Cell Physiol, 2003, 44: 541–548[12]Lorkowski S, Cullen P M. Analysing Gene Expression: a Handbook of Methods Possibilities and Pitfalls. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2003[13]Schena M, Shalon D, Davis R W, Brown P O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science, 1995, 270: 467–470[14]Scheible W R, Fry B, Kochevenko A, Schindelasch D, Zimmerli L, Somerville S, Loria R, Somerville C R. An Arabidopsis mutant resistant to thaxtomin A, a cellulose synthesis inhibitor from Streptomyces species. Plant Cell, 2003, 15: 1781–1794[15]Fu S-X(付三雄), Qi C-K(戚存扣). Identification of genes differentially expressed in seeds of Brassica napus planted in Nanjing and Lhasa by Arabidopsis microarray. Chin Bull Bot (植物学报), 2009, 44(2): 178–184 (in Chinese with English abstract)[16]Trick M, Cheung F, Drou N, Fraser F, Lobenhofer E K, Hurban P, Magusin A, Town C D, Bancroft I. A newly-developed community microarray resource for transcriptome profiling in Brassica species enables the confirmation of Brassica-specific expressed sequences. BMC Plant Biol, 2009, 9: 50–59[17]Hu Y, Wu G, Cao Y, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li X, Lu C. Breeding response of transcript profiling in developing seeds of Brassica napus. BMC Mol Biol, 2009, 10: 49–65[18]Vicient C M, Delseny M. Isolation of total RNA from Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Anal Biochem, 1999, 268: 412–413 [19]Livak K J., Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCt method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402–408 [20]Udall J A, Flagel L E, Cheung F, Woodward A W, Hovav R, Rapp R A, Swanson J M, Lee J J, Gingle A R, Nettleton D, Town C D, Chen Z J, Wendel J F. Spotted cotton oligonucleotide microarrays for gene expression analysis. BMC Genomics, 2007, 8: 1471–2164[21]Li L-Y(李龙云), Yu W-W(于霁雯), Zhai H-H(翟红红), Huang S-L(黄双领), Li X-L(李兴丽), Zhang H-W(张红卫), Zhang J-F(张金发), Yu S-X(喻树迅). Identification of fiber length-related genes using cotton oligonucleotide microarrays. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(1): 95–104 (in Chinese with English abstract)[22]Desclos M, Dubousset L, Etienne P, Caherec F L, Satoh H, Bonnefoy J, Ourry A, Avice J C. A Proteomic Profiling approach to reveal a novel role of Brassica napus drought 22 kD/Water-Soluble chlorophyll-binding protein in young Leaves during nitrogen remobilization induced by stressful conditions. Plant Physiol, 2008, 147: 1830–1844[23] Cheng X, Blumenthal R M. S-Adenosylmethionine-Dependent Methyltransferases: Structures and Functions, Singapore: World Scientific, 1999. pp 5–8[24]Spartz A K, Gray W M. Plant hormone receptors: New perceptions. Gene Dev, 2008, 22: 2139–2148[25]Kepinski S, Leyser O. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature, 2005, 435: 446–451 [26]Wang D, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Culler A H, Dong X. Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Curr Biol, 2007, 17:1784–1790 |
| [1] | 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846. |
| [2] | 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816. |
| [3] | 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219. |
| [4] | 于永超, 刘明, 靳容, 赵鹏, 张强强, 王静, 朱晓亚, 唐忠厚. 甘薯高氮徒长的生理机制和转录组分析研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 813-824. |
| [5] | 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894. |
| [6] | 李晓龙, 严清彪, 李正鹏, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 韩梅, 柴强. 氮肥减施协同绿肥过腹还田可降低青海高原小麦农田温室气体排放[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 908-921. |
| [7] | 许倍铭, 郝紫瑞, 冯健超, 马耕, 王丽芳, 谢迎新, 王晨阳, 马冬云. 氮磷减施对不同强筋小麦品种产量和品质及其土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 603-619. |
| [8] | 石吕, 石晓旭, 韩笑, 单海勇, 刘旭杰, 张晋, 严旖旎, 李赢, 刘海翠, 魏亚凤, 杨美英, 薛亚光, 刘建, 张祖建. 氮肥减量与追施方式对小麦产量和氮肥利用效率及麦田N2O排放的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 202-220. |
| [9] | 刘迪, 黎瑞源, 石茂竹, 李洪有, 陈庆富, 石桃雄. 苦荞半矮秆突变体sd3的表型鉴定及转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 316-328. |
| [10] | 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248. |
| [11] | 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513. |
| [12] | 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151. |
| [13] | 尤根基, 谢昊, 梁毓文, 李龙, 王玉茹, 蒋晨炀, 郭剑, 李广浩, 陆大雷. 氮肥减施措施对江淮春玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2152-2163. |
| [14] | 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 孙亚丽, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 闫丽娟, 柴强. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2190-2203. |
| [15] | 王曜阔, 王文政, 张敏, 刘希伟, 杨敏, 李昊昱, 张灵鑫, 闫彦菲, 蔡瑞国. 水氮运筹对冬小麦籽粒GMP合成和面粉加工品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2176-2189. |
|
||