欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (07): 1309-1318.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01309

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

光子陆地棉种质资源主要性状的遗传评价

孙亚莉1,2,何守朴1,孙君灵1,潘兆娥1,贾银华1,庞保印1,杜雄明1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院棉花研究所 / 棉花生物学国家重点实验室，河南安阳455000; 2 山西农业大学信息学院，山西太谷 030800
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-30 修回日期:2013-01-15 出版日期:2013-07-12 网络出版日期:2013-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 杜雄明, E-mail: dxm630723@163.com, Tel: 0372-2562252
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部作物种质资源保护项目(NB2012-2130135-30)和国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2011AA10A102)资助。

Genetic Evaluation of Major Traits in Fuzzless Upland Cotton Germplasm

SUN Ya-Li1,2,HE Shou-Pu1,SUN Jun-Ling1,PAN Zhao-E1,JIA Yin-Hua1,PANG Bao-Yin1,Du Xiong-Ming1,*   

  1. 1 Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, China; 2 College of Information, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030800, China
  • Received:2012-08-30 Revised:2013-01-15 Published:2013-07-12 Published online:2013-03-26
  • Contact: 杜雄明, E-mail: dxm630723@163.com, Tel: 0372-2562252

RichHTML

PDF

1430

被引次数

4

摘要：

以102份光子陆地棉材料为母本，分别与遗传标准系TM-1杂交，获得102个F1群体。采用随机区组设计，设置3个重复，对光子陆地棉材料主要性状进行遗传评价。结果表明，调查的11个性状表型差异均较大，材料间产量性状(株高、果枝数、铃数、铃重、衣分和子指)差异大于纤维品质性状(纤维长度、纤维强度、马克隆值、整齐度和伸长率)，特别是衣分、铃数等性状差异更明显; 除果枝数、马克隆值、伸长率以外，光子亲本群体其他性状的平均值都小于F1群体。而亲本群体所有性状的变异系数均大于F1，不同光子材料的杂种优势有很大差别，中亲优势和超亲优势也有很大的差别，有些种质某些性状的中亲、超亲优势为负值，其后代性状表现劣势; 纤维品质性状的中亲、超亲优势与毛子程度均呈负相关，而产量性状的中亲、超亲优势与毛子程度均呈正相关，说明可利用光子材料杂种优势改良纤维品质，而其后代产量性状的杂种优势利用受到限制; SSR分子标记遗传相似系数与各个性状的中亲、超亲优势的相关都不显著，说明在光子材料的育种中，杂种优势是不能通过亲本之间的遗传背景相似程度来预测的。

关键词: 陆地棉, 光子材料, 杂种优势

Abstract:

A total of 102 fuzzless seed upland cotton varieties (G. hirsutum) as female parents were crossed with genetic standard line TM-1 (as male parent) to analyze the main traits in the F1 population with random blocks design with three replications. The results showed that there were significant differences among eleven agronomic traits between different parents, and the difference of yield traits (plant height, fruit branch number, boll number, boll weight, lint percentage, and seed index) was higher than that of fiber quality traits (length, strength, micronaire, uniformity, elongation rate), especially for lint percentage, boll number, except for fruit branch number, micronaire and elongation rate, the mean values of other traits in parent populations were lower than those in F1 populations, however, the coefficient of variation in fuzzless seed parents was higher than that of F1. The heterosis including mid-parent heterosis and heterobeltiosis highly varied in different varieties. Some traits of some varieties with negative heterosis showed inferior descendants, The mid-parent heterosis and heterobeltiosis in fiber quality traits showed negative correlation with fuzzless rate, but yield traits showed positive correlation with fuzzless rate, indicating that the heterosis could be applied for fiber quality improvement but might be limited for the yield improvement, No significant correlation was found between genetic similarity coefficients based on SSR markers and heteroses in all traits, indicating that it is difficult to predict heterosis by using genetic background similarity of parents in fuzzless cotton breeding.

Key words: Upland cotton, Fuzzless materials, Heterosis

[1]Wang S-H(王素会), Du X-M(杜雄明). Advances in researches on molecular biology of two fiber-mutant. Cott Sci (棉花学报), 2003, 15(6): 376–379 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Ji S J, Lu Y C, Li J, Wei G, Liang X J, Zhu Y X. A β-tubulin-like cDNA expressed specifically in elongating cotton fibers induces longitudinal growth of fission yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2002, 296: 1245–1250



[3]Wang S, Wang J W, Yu N, Li C H, Luo B, Gou J Y, Wang L J, Chen X Y. Control of plant trichome development by a cotton fiber MYB gene. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2323–2334



[4]Ware J O, Benedict L N, Rolfe W H. A recessive naked-seed character in upland cotton. J Hered, 1947, 38: 313–320



[5]Kearney T H, Harrison G J. The inheritance of smoothness seeds in cotton. J Agric Res, 1927, 35: 193–217



[6]Musaev D A, Abzalov M M. Some questions concerning the inheritance of fuzzy in cotton seeds (G. hirsutum L.). Genetika, 1972, 8: 7–16 (in Russian)



[7]Zhang T Z, Pan J J. Genetic analysis of a fuzzless-lintless mutant in Gossypium hirsutum L. J Jiangsu Agic Coll (江苏农业学报), 1991, 7(3): 13–16 (in Chinese)



[8]Chen J-X(陈金湘), Li R-L(李瑞莲), Chen B-Y(陈步阳). Study on fiber characteristics of F1 and F2 hybrid cotton. Cott Sci (棉花学报), 2004, 16(6): 338–342 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Wang R-X(王仁祥), Zhou Z-H(周仲华), Chen J-X(陈金湘). Comparison of characters between obverse cross and inverse cross of insectresistance hybrid cotton of F1 population. Cott Sci (棉花学报), 2006, 18(1): 32–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Zhu Q-Z(朱青竹), Zhao G-Z(赵国忠), Li A-G(李爱国), Ge L-W(盖丽雯). Analysis on heterosis and diversity of main characters of different transgenic cotton. Cott Sci (棉花学报), 2004, 16(4): 202–205 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Hao J-J(郝俊杰). Genetic Analysis of Heterosis and Other Traits in Upland Cotton. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Gao M(高敏). Study on Competitive Heterosis of Cotton Hybrids. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Liu L-W(刘芦苇). Analysis of Genetic Effects and Heterosis for Main Economical Characters in Transgenic Insect Resistant Cotton (G. hirsutum L.). MS thesis of Zhejiang University, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Li Y-Y(李悦有). Studies in the characteristics of fiber and heterosis in colored cotton. MS thesis of Zhejiang University, 2001 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Lu B-X(卢碧霞). Studies on Heterosis and Genetic Effects in Combinations of Cotton Varieties with Different Ripening Stage. MS Thesis of Northwest Science and Technology University, 2001 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Hu Y-J(胡延吉). Plant Breeding (植物育种学). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003



[17]Sun Y-L(孙亚莉), Du X-M(杜雄明). Genetic analysis of fuzzless in cotton germplasm. Hereditas (遗传), 2012, 34(8): 1073–1078 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Zhou Z-L(周忠丽), Du X-M(杜雄明). Descriptors and Data Standard for Cotton (棉花种质资源描述规范和数据标准). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005



[19]Pan Z-E(潘兆娥), Sun J-L(孙君灵), Wang X-W(王希文), Jia Y-H(贾银华), Zhou Z-L(周忠丽), Pang B-Y(庞保印), Du X-M(杜雄明). Screening of SSR core primers with polymorphism on a cotton panel. Biodiversity Sci (生物多样性), 2008, 16(6): 555–561



[20]Du X M, Pan J J, Wang R H, Zhang T Z, Shi Y Z. Genetic analysis of presence and absence of lint and fuzz in cotton. Plant Breed, 2001, 120(6): 519–522



[21]Du X-M(杜雄明), Liu G-Q(刘国强). Analyses and evaluation of naked seed variety resources in upland cotton. J Henan Vocation-Tech Teachers coll (河南职技师院学报), 1994, 22(1): 10–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Huang N-T(黄乃泰). Studies on the Performance and the Genetic Bases of Heterosis in a Hybrid Cotton Xiangzamian 2. MS Thesis of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2003 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Pan J-J(潘家驹). Cotton Breeding (棉花育种学), Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998 (in Chinese)



[24]Xing C-Z(邢朝柱), Yu S-X(喻树迅), Guo L-P(郭立平), Miao C-D(苗成朵), Feng W-J(冯文娟), Wang H-L(王海林), Zhao Y-L(赵云雷). Heterosis performance and correlation analysis on economic traits of upland cotton under various ecological environments. Cott Sci (棉花学报), 2007, 19(1): 3–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]Tsaftaris A S, Kafka M. Mechanisms of heterosis in crop plants. J Crop Prod, 1998, 1: 95–111



[26]Wang R-H(汪若海). High Quality Cotton Production Technology (优质棉生产技术). Beijing: China Agriculture Science Technology Press, 1988



[27]Wu Y-T(武耀廷), Zhang T-Z(张天真), Zhu X-F(朱协飞), Wang G-M(王广明). Relationship between F1, F2 yield, heterosis and genetic distance measured by molecular markers and parent performance in cotton. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(1): 22–28 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Xing C-Z(邢朝柱), Jing S-R(靖深蓉), Xing Y-H(邢以华). Review and prospect on cotton heterosis utilization and study in china. Cott Sci (棉花学报), 2007, 19(5): 337–345 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 彭佳泺, 李颖, 李丹丹, 杨军宁, 郭学峰, 张文姣, 俞晓雪, 周亚荣, 王振玉, 王彩香, 马雄风, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉I类LBD家族成员鉴定及GhLBD6调控开花期的功能和单倍型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[2] 薛晓菲, 戴云静, 李熙林, 丁艳艳, 王翔, 雷长英, 韩焕勇, 贺道华. 陆地棉杜松烯合酶基因GhCDN10的特征及其在棉酚合成中功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2060-2076.
[3] 李宜谦, 徐守振, 刘萍, 马麒, 谢斌, 陈红. 基于40K SNP芯片的陆地棉产量构成因素全基因组关联分析及单铃重位点挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2128-2138.
[4] 郭淑慧, 潘转霞, 赵战胜, 杨六六, 皇甫张龙, 郭宝生, 胡晓丽, 录亚丹, 丁霄, 吴翠翠, 兰刚, 吕贝贝, 谭逢平, 李朋波. 陆地棉D11染色体一个纤维长度主效位点的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 383-394.
[5] 赵海红, 李梦媛, 刘锦婧, 王园园, 杜磊, 王娟, 董承光, 李成奇. 利用3VmrMLM方法检测陆地棉株高QTN及QTN-环境互作(QEI)[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2619-2631.
[6] 李长喜, 董占鹏, 关永虎, 刘金伟, 李航, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量性状的遗传贡献及决策系数分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[7] 宋梦媛, 郭中校, 苏禹霏, 邓昆鹏, 兰天娇, 程钰鑫, 包淑英, 王桂芳, 窦金光, 姜泽锴, 王明海, 徐宁. 一种绿豆柱头外露突变体的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 957-968.
[8] 戎宇轩, 惠留洋, 王沛琦, 孙思敏, 张献龙, 袁道军, 杨细燕. 陆地棉CLE基因家族的鉴定及GhCLE13参与调控棉花抗旱性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 2925-2939.
[9] 陈旭升, 赵亮, 狄佳春. 陆地棉抗虫与抗草甘膦基因的分子聚合及经济性状相关分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2637-2642.
[10] 左春阳, 李亚玮, 李焱龙, 金双侠, 朱龙付, 张献龙, 闵玲. 陆地棉漆酶基因家族成员表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2344-2361.
[11] 宋兆建, 冯紫旖, 屈天歌, 吕品苍, 杨晓璐, 湛明月, 张献华, 何玉池, 刘育华, 蔡得田. 四倍体水稻回复二倍体品系的籼粳属性鉴定和杂种优势利用初探[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2039-2050.
[12] 马春敏, 李维希, 李芳军, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 陆地棉硝酸盐转运体NRT基因家族鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1496-1517.
[13] 郭宏, 于霁雯, 裴文锋, 关永虎, 李航, 李长喜, 刘金伟, 王伟, 王宝全, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉杂种F2的遗传分析及遗传主效聚类[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 608-621.
[14] 陈冰嬬, 于淼, 葛占宇, 李洪奎, 黄炎, 李海青, 石贵山, 谢利, 徐宁, 闫峰, 高士杰, 周紫阳, 王鼐. 春播早熟区高粱杂种优势群及杂种优势模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 343-353.
[15] 朱继杰, 王士杰, 赵红霞, 贾晓昀, 李妙, 王国印. 田间条件下不同棉花品种叶片响应化学脱叶剂噻苯隆的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2705-2716.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2