欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 951-964.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00951

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

中国大豆育成品种10个重要家族的遗传相似性和特异性

熊冬金1,2,**,王吴彬1,**,赵团结1,盖钧镒1,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学大豆研究所 / 国家大豆改良中心 / 农业部大豆生物学与遗传育种重点实验室(综合) / 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210095; 2南昌大学生命科学与食品工程学院，江西南昌330031
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-03 修回日期:2014-03-04 出版日期:2014-06-12 网络出版日期:2014-04-09
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒, E-mail: sri@njau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB1093)，国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(200803060, 201203026-4)，国家自然科学基金项目(30871550，31260332)，长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助(PCSIRT13073)，教育部高等学校创新引智计划项目(B08025)，江苏省优势学科建设工程专项和国家重点实验室自主课题资助。

Genetic Similarity and Specificity of Ten Important Soybean Cultivar Families Released in China

XIONG Dong-Jin1,2,**,WANG Wu-Bin1,**,ZHAO Tuan-Jie1,GAI Jun-Yi1,*   

  1. 1 Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University / National Center for Soybean Improvement / National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 School of Life Science and food Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
  • Received:2013-11-03 Revised:2014-03-04 Published:2014-06-12 Published online:2014-04-09
  • Contact: 盖钧镒, E-mail: sri@njau.edu.cn

RichHTML

PDF

1697

被引次数

8

摘要：

以我国10个大豆育成品种重要家族的179个品种为材料，选用161个均匀分布于大豆基因组的SSR分子标记，采用PowerMarker Ver. 3.25软件分析参试材料的遗传多样性、相似性与特异性。结果表明，161个位点上共检测到1697个等位变异，单位点变幅为5~24个，平均10.5个；多态信息含量在0.549~0.947间，平均0.832；群体具有丰富的遗传变异。聚类分析表明，179个品种可归为6大类11小类，同一家族的品种有聚为一类的趋势。品种间亲本系数和遗传相似系数显著相关(r = 0.67)；山东寿张县无名地方品种(A295)、即墨油豆(A133)、滑县大绿豆(A122)和铜山天鹅蛋(A231) 4个家族亲本系数和相似系数均较小，遗传基础较宽广；矮脚早(A291)、上海六月白(A201)、奉贤穗稻黄(A084)和51-83 (A002) 4个家族亲本系数和相似系数较大，遗传基础较狭窄，这与选择育种品种较多有关；东北白眉(A019)家族与其他家族间的亲本系数和遗传相似系数均最小。家族间特异性分析表明，东北白眉(A019)家族和其他9个家族地理距离较远，存在较多互补、特有、特缺等位变异；而III区和II区地理位置较近，种质交流较多，两区家族间特有、特缺等位点数较少，其中A002、A231和A122三个家族无特有等位变异，A084、A201、A034和A231四个家族无特缺等位变异。本研究结果对拓宽大豆育成品种遗传基础具有指导意义。

关键词: 大豆, 育成品种, SSR, 遗传多样性, 特异性

Abstract:

Analysis of the affinity relationship and genetic similarity among cultivars is important for crop genetic improvement. In this study, a total of 161 SSRs covering the entire soybean genome were analyzed for the genetic diversity, similarity and specificity of 10 important families composed of 179 cultivars using PowerMarker Ver. 3.25. The results showed that there were totally 1697 alleles, averaging 10.5 per locus, ranging from 5 to 24 with average polymorphism information content of 0.832, ranging from 0.545 to 0.943 in the population. According to the SSR cluster analysis, the 179 cultivars were clustered into six groups, eleven subgroups, with a tendency that the cultivars in a family tended to be grouped into a same cluster. There existed significant correlation (r = 0.67) between coefficient of parentage (CP) and genetic similarity coefficient (GSC) of the population. The CP and GSC values of A295, A133, A122, and A231 families were relatively low, which means that the genetic bases of the four families were relatively broad. In contrast, the CP and GSC values of A291, A201, A084, and A002 families were relatively high, indicating their genetic bases were relatively narrow due to more cultivars obtained from pure line selection. The CP and GSC values between the A019 family from Northeast China and other nine families were the lowest among all pairwise combinations of families. The genetic specificity analysis showed that there existed much more complementary alleles, specifically existent and specifically deficient alleles in A019 in comparison with in other families, indicating the former is distant from the latter. On the other hand, the families in Eco-region II and III, contained fewer complementary alleles, specifically existent and specifically deficient alleles, which might be due to some frequent germplasm exchange between the neighboring eco-regions. For example, there were no specifically existent alleles in A002, A231, A122 and no specifically deficient alleles in A084, A201, A034, and A231. The present results are of significance in broadening the genetic basis of soybean cultivar.

Key words: Soybean, Released cultivar, SSR, Genetic diversity, Specificity

[1]Cui Z L, Carter T E, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Chinese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1780–1793



[2]Zhou X G, Carter T E, Cui Z L, Miyazaki S, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Japanese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 1331–1342



[3]盖钧镒, 崔章林. 中国大豆育成品种的亲本分析. 南京农业大学学报, 1994, 17: 19–23



Gai J Y, Cui Z L. Ancestral analysis of soybean cultivars released in China. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1994, 17: 19–23 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Sneller C H. Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1515–1522



[5]Bharadwaj C H, Satyavathi C T, Tiwari S P. Genetic base of soybean (Glycine max) varieties released in India as revealed by coefficient of parentage. Ind J Agric Sci, 2002, 72: 467−469



[6]Bonato A L V, Calvo E S, Geraldi I O, Arias C A A. Genetic similarity among soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) cultivars released in Brazil using AFLP markers. Genet Mol Biol, 2006, 29: 692–704



[7]Narvel J M, Fehr W R, Chu W S, Grant D, Shoemaker R C. Simple sequence repeat diversity among soybean plant introductions and elite genotypes. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1452–1458



[8]Abe J, Xu D H, Suzuki Y, Kanazawa A, Shimamoto Y. Soybean germplasm pools in Asia revealed by nuclear SSRs. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 106: 445–453



[9]Mimura M, Coyne C J, Bambuck M W, Lumpkin T A. SSR diversity of vegetable soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2007, 54: 497–508



[10]Wang L X, Guan R X, Li Y H, Lin F Y, Luan W J, Li W, Ma Y S, Liu Z X, Chang R Z, Qiu L J. Genetic diversity of Chinese spring soybean germplasm revealed by SSR markers. Plant Breed, 2008, 127: 56–61



[11]Ude G N, Kenworthy W J, Costa J M, Cregan P B, Alvernaz J. Genetic diversity of soybean cultivars from China, Japan, North America, and North American ancestral lines determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1858–1867



[12]Fu Y, Peterson G W, Morrison M J. Genetic diversity of Canadian soybean cultivars and exotic germplasm revealed by simple sequence repeat markers. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 1947–1954



[13]Yamanaka N, Sato H, Yang Z, Xu D H, Catelli L L, Arias C A A, Abdelnoor R V, Nepomuceno A L. Genetic relationships between Chinese, Japanese, and Brazilian soybean gene pools revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Genet Mol Biol, 2007, 30: 85–88



[14]Priolli R H G, Mendes-Junior C T, Sousa S M B, Sousa N E A, Contel E P B. Soybean genetic diversity in time and among breeding programs in Brazil. Pesq Agropec Bras, 2004, 39: 967–975



[15]Priolli R H G, Mendes-Junior C T, Arantes N E, Contel E P B. Characterization of Brazilian soybean cultivars using microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Biol, 2002, 25: 185–193



[16]关荣霞, 郭娟娟, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 国外种质对中国大豆育成品种遗传贡献的分子证据. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1393–1398



Guan R X, Guo L L, Chang L Z, Qiu L J. Marker-based evidence of broadening the genetic base of Chinese soybeans by using introduced soybeans. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1393–1398 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]张军, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 亚洲大豆栽培品种遗传多样性、特异性和群体分化研究. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 3511–3520



Zhang J, Wang Z Q, Gai J Y. Genetic diversity, specificity and population differentiation of soybean cultivars in Asia. Agric Sci China, 2008, 41: 3511–3520 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Maccaferri M, Sanguineti M C, Xie C, Smith J S, Tuberosa R. Relationships among durum wheat accessions: II. A comparison of molecular and pedigree information. Genome, 2007, 50: 385–399



[19]Van Becelaere G, Lubbers E L, Paterson A H, Chee P W. Pedigree- vs. DNA marker-based genetic similarity estimates in cotton. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2281–2287



[20]张军, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 我国黄淮和南方主要大豆育成品种家族产量和品质优异等位变异在系谱中遗传的研究. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 191–201



Zhang J, Zhao T J, Gai J Y. Inheritance of elite alleles of yield and quality traits in the pedigrees of major cultivar families released in Huanghuai Valleys and Southern China . Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 191–201 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]熊冬金, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 中国大豆育成品种亲本分析. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 2589–2598



Xiong D J, Tao T J, Gai J Y. Parental analysis of soybean cultivars released in China. Agric Sci China, 2008, 41: 2589–2598 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]熊冬金, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 1923—2005年中国大豆育成品种的核心祖先亲本分析. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 2589–2598



Xiong D J, Tao T J, Gai J Y. The core ancestors of soybean cultivars released during 1923–2005 in China. Soybean Sci, 2007, 26: 2589–2598 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Aljanabi S M, Forget L, Dookun A. An improved and rapid protocol for the isolation of polysaccharide- and polyphenol-free sugarcane DNA. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1999, 17: 181



[24]Song Q J, Marek L F, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Concibido V C, Delannay X, Specht J E, Cregan P B. A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 122–128



[25]Cox T S, Kiang Y T, Gorman M B, Rodgers D M. Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybean. Crop Sci,1985, 25: 529–532



[26]Cui, Z L, Carter T E, Burton J W, Genetic base of 651 Chinese soybean cultivars released during 1923 to 1995. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1470–1481



[27]Liu K, Muse S V. PowerMarker: An integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21: 2128–2129



[28]Nei M,Tajima F, Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol, 1983, 19: 153–170



[29]盖钧镒, 赵团结, 崔章林, 邱家驯. 中国1923—1995年育成的651个大豆品种的遗传基础. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31: 35–43



Gai J Y, Tao T J, Cui Z L, Qiu J X. Nuclear and cytoplasmic contributions of germplasm from distinct areas to the soybean cultivars released during 1923–1995 in China. Agric Sci China, 1998, 31: 35–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]Barrett B A, Kidwell K K, Fox P N. Comparison of AFLP and pedigree-gased genetic diversity assessment methods uing wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1271–1278
[1] 彭佳泺, 李颖, 李丹丹, 杨军宁, 郭学峰, 张文姣, 俞晓雪, 周亚荣, 王振玉, 王彩香, 马雄风, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉I类LBD家族成员鉴定及GhLBD6调控开花期的功能和单倍型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[5] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[6] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[7] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[8] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[9] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[10] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[11] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[12] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[13] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[14] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[15] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2