欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (07): 1190-1196.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01190

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

土壤宏基因组中抗草甘膦新基因的克隆与转化水稻的研究

王云鹏1,2,马景勇1,马瑞2,马建1,*,刘文国1,2,*   

  1. 1吉林农业大学农学院, 吉林长春 130118; 2吉林省农业科学院, 吉林长春 130033
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-26 修回日期:2014-04-16 出版日期:2014-07-12 网络出版日期:2014-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 马建, E-mail: majian19790106@163.com; 刘文国, E-mail: liuwenguo168@163. com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由吉林省重点科技攻关项目(20140204008NY)资助。

Cloning of New Herbicide Resistant Gene in Soil Metagenomics and the Generation of Transgenic Rice Plants

WANG Yun-Peng1,2,MA Jing-Yong1,MA Rui1,MA Jian 1,*,LIU Wen-Guo1,2,*   

  1. 1Faculty of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; 2Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2014-01-26 Revised:2014-04-16 Published:2014-07-12 Published online:2014-05-16
  • Contact: 马建, E-mail: majian19790106@163.com; 刘文国, E-mail: liuwenguo168@163. com

摘要:

EPSPS (5-烯醇丙酮莽草酸-3-磷酸合酶EC 2.5.1.19)是植物芳香族氨基酸和植物次生代谢产物生物合成中莽草酸途径的关键酶; 同时也是广谱性除草剂草甘膦的作用目标。本实验通过对草甘膦污染土壤宏基因组文库的建立及筛选, 成功克隆了一个新的草甘膦抗性的EPSPS基因(命名为soilEPSPS)。序列分析表明soilEPSPS基因全长1404 bp, 其编码的467个氨基酸中未涉及已公布专利中保护的氨基酸序列。原核功能验证表明该基因对草甘膦的耐受能力优于EPSPS CP4基因。将该基因与水稻Rubisco SSU引导肽相融合构建由actin启动子驱动的植物表达载体, 用农杆菌介导法实现了水稻的遗传转化。抗性再生植株的PCR和Southern杂交结果表明所获得的26株再生植株均为转基因阳性植株, 其中共有3个单拷贝转化事件。草甘膦抗性鉴定证明纯合体T2代植株能够耐受高达500 mmol L-1的草甘膦。本研究为转基因抗除草剂水稻新品种的培育奠定了基础。

关键词: 宏基因组, 水稻, 农杆菌, 遗传转化

Abstract:

The EPSPS, EC 2.5.1.19 (5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase) is considered as one of the crucial enzyme in the shikimate pathway for the biosynthesis of essential aromatic amino acids and secondary metabolites in plant. It is also proved as a specific target of broad spectrum herbicide glyphosate. In this research, a new glyphosate resistant EPSPS gene named soilEPSPS was isolated by screening the metagenomic library. The sequence analysis suggested that soilEPSPS consists of 1404 bp and encodes a polypeptide of 467 amino acids that are not involved in the amino acid sequence protected by the published patentsions. The result of prokaryotic expression confirmed that soilEPSPS had a better ability of glyphosate resistance than EPSPS CP4 gene. Fusing the gene and the Rubisco SSU signal peptide constructed the plant expressing vector with the actin promoter driven, and transformation of rice mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. PCR and Southern analyses showed that a total of 26 transgenic plants were obtained and three of them were single copy insertion events. Resistant experiment showed that the homozygous T2 plants in these events could tolerate the spray of 500 mmol L-1 glyphosate solution. This study laid a foundation for breeding transgenic herbicide resistant rice varieties.

Key words: Metagenomics, Rice, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Genetic transformation

[1]Bhatti K H, Parveen T, Farooq, A, Nawaz, K, Hussain K, Siddiqui E H. A Critical Review on Herbicide Resistance in Plants. World Appl Sci J, 2013, 27: 1027–1036



[2]Simmons W J. Bowman v. Monsanto and the protection of patented replicative biologic technologies. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31: 602–606



[3]Duke S O, Powles S B. Glyphosate: a once–in–a–century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci, 2008, 64: 319–325



[4]Shaw D R, Owen M D K, Dixon P M, Weller S C, Young B G, Wilson R G, Jordan D L. Benchmark study on glyphosate–resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 1: Introduction to 2006–2008. Pest Manag Sci, 2011, 67: 741–746



[5]Owen M D K, Young B G, Shaw D R, Wilson R G, Jordan D L, Dixon P M, Weller S C. Benchmark study on glyphosate–resistant crop systems in the United States. Part 2: Perspectives. Pest Manag Sci, 2011, 67: 747–757



[6]Amann R I, Ludwig W, Schleifer K H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev, 1995, 59: 143–169



[7]Torsvik V, Øvreås L. Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2002, 5: 240–245



[8]Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2004, 68: 669–685



[9]Zhang X, Li H, Li C J, Ma T, Li G, Liu Y H. Metagenomic approach for the isolation of a thermostable beta-galactosidase with high tolerance of galactose and glucose from soil samples of Turpan Basin. BMC Microbiol, 2013, 13(1): 237



[10]Culligan E P, Sleator R D, Marchesi J R, Hill C. Functional metagenomics reveals novel salt tolerance loci from the human gut microbiome. ISME J, 2012, 6: 1916–1925



[11]赵裕栋, 周俊, 何璟. 土壤微生物总DNA提取方法的优化. 微生物学报, 2012, 52: 1143–1150



Zhao Y D, Zhou B, He J. Optimization of soil microbial DNA isolation. Acta Microbiol Sin, 2012, 52: 1143–1150 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Toki S, Hara N, Ono K, Onodera H, Tagiri A, Oka S, Tanaka H. Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high–speed transformation of rice. Plant J, 2006, 47: 969–976



[13]Kishore G M, Shah D M. Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthase: U.S. Patent 4971908. 1990-11-20



[14]Barry G F, Kishore G M, Padgette S R, Stallings W C. Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthases: U.S. Patent 5633435. 1997-5-27



[15]Barry G F, Kishore G M, Padgette S R, Stallings W C. Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthases: U.S. Patent 5627061. 1997-5-6



[16]Barry G F, Kishore G M, Padgette S R, Stallings W C. Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthases: U.S. Patent 5804425. 1998-9-8.



[17]Funke T, Han H, Healy–Fried M L, Fischer M, Schönbrunn E. Molecular basis for the herbicide resistance of Roundup Ready crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2006, 103: 13010–13015



[18]Benbrook C M. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the US––the first sixteen years. Environ Sci Eur, 2012, 24: 1–13



[19]James C. A global overview of biotech (GM) crops. Landes Bioscience, Austin, America, GM Crops, 2010, 1: 1–8



[20]赵海铭, 宋伟彬, 赖锦盛. 高粱 5-烯醇式丙酮酰莽草酸-3-磷酸合酶基因 (EPSPS)叶绿体转运肽(CTP)的克隆及其在转基因玉米中的功能验证. 农业生物技术学报, 2013, 21: 1009–1018



Zhao H M, Song W B, Lai J S. Cloning of sorghum bicolor chloroplast transit peptide (CTP) of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) and its functional validation in transgenic maize (Zea mays). J Agric Biotechnol, 2013, 21: 1009–1018 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Daniell H, Datta R, Varma S, Gray S, Lee S B. Containment of herbicide resistance through genetic engineering of the chloroplast genome. Nat Biotechnol, 1998, 16: 345–348

[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[12] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[13] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[14] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
[15] 盛倩男, 方娅婷, 赵剑, 杜思垚, 胡行珍, 余秋华, 朱俊, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 不同养分管理措施对稻田和旱地油菜产量的影响及其对冻害的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1286-1298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!