欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (04): 591-599.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00591

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

共生期与种植密度对棉田套播油菜生长及产量的影响

蒯婕1，杜雪竹2，胡曼3，曾讲学1，左青松4，吴江生1，周广生1,*   

  1. 1 华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 湖北武汉 430070; 2 湖北大学生命科学学院, 湖北武汉 430070; 3 湖北省农业厅, 湖北武汉 430070; 4扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-17 修回日期:2015-01-11 出版日期:2016-04-12 网络出版日期:2015-01-19
  • 通讯作者: 周广生, E-mail: zhougs@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD11B03), 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(NYCYTC-00510), 国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203096)和高校自主科技创新基金项目(2013PY001)资助。

Effect of Symbiosis Periods and Plant Densities on Growth and Yield of Rapeseed Intercropping Cotton

KUAI Jie1,DU Xue-Zhu2,HU Man3,ZENG Jiang-Xue1,ZUO Qing-Song4,WU Jiang-Sheng1,ZHOU Guang-Sheng1,*   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2 College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430070, China; 3 Hubei Agricultural Department, Wuhan 430070, China; 4 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2015-09-17 Revised:2015-01-11 Published:2016-04-12 Published online:2015-01-19
  • Contact: 周广生, E-mail: zhougs@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2014BAD11B03), the China Agriculture Research System (NYCYTC-00510), the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201203096), and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (2013PY001).

RichHTML

PDF

930

被引次数

1

摘要：

为探讨共生期和密度对棉田套播油菜生长和产量的影响, 设置3个共生期: 棉油共生10 d (T10)、20 d (T20)和30 d (T30)及4个种植密度 30 (D1)、45 (D2)、60 (D3)和75万株 hm–2 (D4)裂区试验。结果表明: (1)同一密度下, 延长共生期, 越冬期、蕾薹期和花期绿叶数、叶面积指数均增加, 促进了根系及地上部干物质累积, 根冠比、株高、根茎粗增加, 茎秆酸不溶木质素和总木质素含量下降, 可溶性糖、半纤维素和纤维素含量升高。油菜根倒角度虽增加, 但茎倒角度、总倒伏角度减小, 油菜单株和群体产量均增加, 以T30D2群体产量最高。(2)密度对油菜生长和产量的影响因共生期不同存在差异。相同共生期处理下, 随密度增加, 单株绿叶数减少, 根系干物质、地上部干物质累积量降低, 单株产量降低。T30条件下, 叶面积指数(LAI)随密度增加呈先增后减的趋势, 在D3密度时, LAI最大; 在T20、T10条件下, LAI则随密度增加而增加。群体产量与LAI变化趋势一致。在T30、T20处理下, 茎倒角度随密度增加呈先降后增趋势, 在T10处理下, 则逐渐增加, 与茎秆纤维素含量变化趋势相反, 两试点均为T30D3田间总倒伏角度最小。(3)武穴及天门试点棉田套播油菜产量所要求的共生期及密度最优配置分别为29.8 d、48.8万株 hm–2, 29.7 d、57.6万株 hm–2; 在此配置下, 两试点油菜产量理论值分别为3243.0、3082.8 kg hm–2, 与当地棉田套播油菜常用栽培模式(共生期15 d, 密度15.0~22.5万株 hm–2, 产量约2625 kg hm–2)相比, 可实现增产23.5%、17.4%。

关键词: 油菜, 棉田套播, 共生期, 密度, 产量

Abstract:

To explore the effect of symbiotic periods and densities on the growth and yield of rapeseed intercropping cotton, a split-plot experiment with three symbiotic periods [10 d (T10), 20 d (T20), and 30 d (T30)] and four levels of densities [30×104 (D1), 45×104 (D2), 60×104 (D3), and 75×104 plants ha–1 (D4)] was designed. The results showed that: (1) Prolonging symbiotic periods was favorable for rapeseed growth in terms of the number of green leaves, LAI, root biomass, aboveground biomass, root-shoot ratio, plant height, crown diameter all increased, whereas angle of stem lodging decreased. These led to increase in yield both single plant and unit hectare. (2) The effects of plant density on rapeseed growth and yield depended on the symbiotic period. The number of green leaves, root biomass, aboveground biomass decreased with plant densities, which resulted in decreased yield per plant. At T30, the maximum LAI was observed under D3, while it was increased with plant density at T20 and T10. The population yield had the same trend with LAI. The yield reached the maximum when the symbiosis period was 30 days and the plant density at 45×104 plants ha–1,whereas the angle of stem lodging reached the minimum at T30D3. (3) Based on the regressions, for Wuxue sites, the optimum symbiotic period was 29.8 days and the optimum plant density was 48.8×104 plants ha–1 while these for Tianmen were 29.7 days and 57.6 plants ha–1. Under these arrangements, Wuxue and Tianmen could achieve the yield about 3243.0, 3082.8 kg ha–1,which were increased by 23.5%, 17.4%, respectively, when compared to the traditional arrangement (the symbiotic period was 15d, the plant density was 15.0 to 22.5×104 plants ha–1 and the average yield was about 2625 kg ha–1).

Key words: Rapeseed (Brassica napus), Cotton field, Symbiotic period, Plant density, Yield

[1] 王菊芬, 吴伯志. 间套作系统中土壤水分研究进展. 云南农业大学学报, 2009, 24: 286–291

Wang J F, Wu B Z. Advance in studies on soil moisture in intercropping system. J Yunnan Agri Univ, 2009, 24: 286–291 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] 逄焕成, 宋吉作, 刘光亮. 小麦玉米套种共生期的气候生态效应与小麦边际效应分析. 耕作与栽培, 1994, (4): 15–16

Pang H C, Song J Z, Liu G L. Analysis of the ecological effect of climate and the marginal effect of wheat under wheat-maize interplanting. Gengzuo Yu Zaipei, 1994, (4): 15–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3] 李银水, 鲁剑巍, 邹娟, 张耀学, 王友珠. 棉田免耕套栽油菜施肥效果及肥料适宜用量研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31: 349–354

Li Y S, Lu J W, Zou J, Zhang Y X, Wang Y Z. Effect of NPK fertilization on rapeseed and optimal rate of fertilizer for interplanting rapeseed of no-tillage cotton-rapeseed rotation system. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2009, 31: 349–354 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4] 雷海霞, 陈爱武, 张长生, 罗凯世, 陈新国, 夏起昕, 周广生, 吴江生, 田新初. 共生期与播种量对水稻套播油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1449−1456

Lei H X, Chen A W, Zhang C S, Luo K S, Chen X G, Xia Q X, Zhou G S, Wu J S, Tian X C. Effect of symbiosis period and seeding amount on growth and yield of rapeseed under sowing rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1449−1456 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] 曹卫星. 作物栽培和耕作学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011. p 150

Cao W X. Crop Cultivation and Farming System. Beijing: Science Press, 2011. p 150 (in Chinese)

[6] 黄秀芳, 孙敬东, 沙安勤, 陈俊才, 俞晓玲, 王洁. 棉田套播油菜生育特点及高产配套技术. 江苏农业科学, 2005, (5): 27–29

Huang X F, Sun J D, Sha A Q, Chen J C, Yu X L, Wang J. The growth characteristics and the high yield cultivation technology of rapeseed under-sowed in cotton field. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2005, (5): 27–29 (in Chinese)

[7] 梅少华, 殷少华, 熊飞, 陶玉池, 梅金安, 范端阳, 夏起昕, 刘文革, 肖齐圣. 棉田套播油菜产量表现及高产栽培技术. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51: 3682–3683

Mei S H, Yin S H, Xiong F, Tao Y C, Mei J A, Fan D Y, Xia Q X, Liu W G, Xiao Q S. Study on the yield performance of rapeseed under-sowed in cotton field and the high yield cultivation technology. Hubei Agric Sci, 2012, 51: 3682–3683 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] 刘后利. 实用油菜栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1987. p 500

Liu H L. Practical Rapeseed cultivation. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1987. p 500 (in Chinese)

[9] Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. NREL/TP-510-42618. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. 2008

[10] 吴安平, 殷少华, 熊飞, 阮祥金, 夏起昕, 胡海珍. “双低”优质油菜棉林套播高产栽培技术. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49: 533–534

Wu A P, Yin S H, Xiong F, Ruan X J, Xia Q X, Hu H Z. High-yield cultivation techniques of sowing canola rapeseed in cotton fields. Hubei Agric Sci, 2010, 49: 533–534 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] 曾凡仕, 李凤江. 双季晚稻田套播紫云英高产栽培技术. 湖南农业科学, 2010, (3): 20–21

Zeng F S, Li F J. High-yield cultivation techniques of sowing the milk vetch in paddy fields. Hunan Agric Sci, 2010, (3): 20–21 (in Chinese)

[12] 郑伟, 肖国滨, 陈明, 李钟平, 黄天宝, 肖小军, 李亚贞, 刘小三, 张昆, 叶川. 谷林套播下不同共生期对稻田三熟制油菜生长规律和产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(18): 156–160

Zheng W, Xiao G B, Chen M, Li Z P, Huang T B, Xiao X J, Li Y Z, Liu X S, Zhang K, Ye C. Effect of symbiosis period on growth and yield of rapeseed under sowing rice. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(18): 156–160 (in Chinese)

[13] 刘巽浩, 牟正国. 中国耕作制度. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1993. pp 151–158

Liu X H, Mou Z G. Chinese Farming System. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1993: 151–158 (in Chinese)

[14] 张喜娟, 李红娇, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 陈温福, 张文忠, 王嘉宇. 北方直立穗型粳稻抗倒性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2305–2313

Zhang X J, Li H Q, Li W J, Xu Z J, Chen W F, Zhang W Z, Wang J Y. The lodging resistance of erect panicle japonica rice in northern China. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2305–2313 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Baker C J, Berry P M, Spink J H, Sylvester Bradley R, Griffin J M, Scott R K, Clare R W. A method for the assessment of the risk of wheat lodging. Theor Biol, 1998, 194: 587–603

[16] Sterling M, Baker C J, Berry P M, Wadec A. An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat. Agric For Meteorol, 2003, 119: 149–165

[17] Chatterjee N, Mandai B K. Prensent trends in research on intercropping. Indian J Agric Sci, 1992, 62: 507–518
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[8] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[9] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[10] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[11] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[12] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[13] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[14] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[15] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2