欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 1864-1872.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01864

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

种植密度对不同株高夏玉米品种茎秆性状与抗倒伏能力的影响

任佰朝1,李利利1,董树亭1,刘鹏1,赵斌1,杨今胜2,王丁波3,张吉旺1,*   

  1. 1作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院,山东泰安 271018;2山东省玉米育种与栽培技术企业重点实验室,山东莱州 261448;3莘县农业局,山东莘县 252400
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-28 修回日期:2016-09-18 出版日期:2016-12-12 网络出版日期:2016-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 张吉旺,E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn; Tel: 0538-8241485
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31271662), 山东省农业重大应用技术创新项目, 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(CARS-02-20)和国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2015CB150404)资助。

Effects of Plant Density on Stem Traits and Lodging Resistance of Summer Maize Hybrids with Different Plant Heights

REN Bai-Zhao1,LI Li-Li1,DONG Shu-Ting1,LIU Peng1,ZHAO Bin1,YANG Jin-Sheng2,WANG Ding-Bo3,ZHANG Ji-Wang1,*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Corn Breeding and Cultivation Technology, Laizhou 261448, China; 3 Shenxian Agriculture Bureau, Shenxian 252400, China
  • Received:2016-03-28 Revised:2016-09-18 Published:2016-12-12 Published online:2016-09-21
  • Contact: 张吉旺,E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn; Tel: 0538-8241485
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271662), the Key Agricultural Project for Application Technology Innovation of Shandong Province, the National Modern Agricultural Technology & Industry System (CARS-02-20), and the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150404).

摘要:

倒伏是影响夏玉米在密植条件下获得高产的重要限制因素之一,本研究旨在探讨种植密度对不同株高夏玉米品种茎秆性状与抗倒伏能力的影响。以矮秆品种登海661 (DH661)和高秆品种鲁单981 (LD981)为试验材料,通过设置4.50×104株 hm-2、6.75×104株 hm-2和9.00×104株 hm-2 3个种植密度,研究茎秆节间长度、茎秆穿刺强度、茎秆显微结构以及倒伏率等方面的变化。结果表明,随种植密度增加,夏玉米的基部第3茎节间和穗位节间变细,茎秆穿刺强度显著下降,较密度4.50万株 hm-2,DH661和LD981 6.75万株 hm-2、9.00万株 hm-2地上第3节间茎秆穿刺强度分别降低了8.5%、22.6%和13.3%、29.6%;茎秆皮层和维管束内部厚壁细胞厚度及维管束数目均随种植密度的增加显著下降,倒伏风险增加,但矮秆品种的下降幅度小于高秆品种,而产量的增加幅度大于高秆品种,说明矮秆品种在高密度下能够保持较好的抗倒伏性能,有助于其在高密度种植条件下获得高产、稳产。

关键词: 夏玉米, 株高, 种植密度, 茎秆显微结构

Abstract:

 

Lodging is an important factor limiting grain yield of summer maize at high plant density. Two summer maize hybrids with different plant heights, namely the short-plant height hybrid Denghai661 (DH661) and the high-plant height hybrid Ludan981 (LD981), were used to study the relationship between stem traits and lodging resistance of summer maize hybrids at 45 000 plants ha-1, 67 500 plants ha-1 and 90 000 plants ha-1. With the increase of plant density, stem diameter and rind penetrometer resistance of summer maize were significantly decreased. Rind penetrometer of 3rd basal node of DH661 at 67 500 plants ha-1 and 90 000 plants ha-1 decreased by 8.5% and 22.6%, while those of LD981 decreased by 13.3% and 29.6%, respectively, compared with that at 45 000 plants ha-1. In addition, with the increase of planting density, the cortex thickness, vascular bundle sheath thickness, and vascular bundle number were significantly decreased, resulting in the increase of lodging rate. However, the extent of variation in these parameters was less for short-plant height hybrid than for high-plant height hybrid, and the yield of short-plant height hybrid was greater than that of high-plant height hybrid, indicating that short-plant height hybrid has better resistance to lodging with high yield at high plant density.

Key words: Summer maize, Plant height, Plant density, Stalk microstructure

[1]Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res, 2002, 88: 161–169
[2]李少昆, 王崇桃. 中国玉米生产技术的演变与发展. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(6): 1941-1951
Li S K, Wang C T. Evolution and development of maize production techniques in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42(6): 1941–1951 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]张世煌. 中美两国玉米育种思路和技术水平的比较. 种子世界, 2007, (4): 9–10
Zhang S H. The comparison between China and US in technical level of maize breeding. Seed World, 2007, (4): 9–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]刘战东, 肖俊夫, 南纪琴, 冯跃华. 倒伏对夏玉米叶面积、产量及其构成因素的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(18): 107–110
Liu Z D, Xiao J F, Nan J Q, Feng Y H. Effect of different levels lodging on leaf area index, yield and its components of summer maize. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 26(18): 107–110 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Din A K, Kang M S, Zhang Y, Magari R. Combining ability for rind puncture resistance in maize. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 368–371
[6]程云, 王枟刘, 杨静, 张子学, 刘正, 李文阳. 种植密度对夏玉米基部节间性状与倒伏的影响. 玉米科学, 2015, 23(5): 112-116
Cheng Y, Wang T L, Yang J, Zhang Z X, Liu Z, Li W Y. Effects of planting density on characteristics of basal internodes and lodging in summer maize. J Maize Sci, 2015, 23(5): 112–116 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Sangoi L, Gracietti M A, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P. Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Res, 2002, 79: 39-51
[8]张志才. 作物倒伏成因及抗倒伏对策研究进展. 耕作与栽培, 2006, (4): 1–2
Zhang Z C. Progress of crops lodging cause and lodging resistance measures. Tillage and Cultivation, 2006, (4): 1–2 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Din A K, Kang M S, Zhang Y, Magari R. Combining ability for rind punctures resistance in maize. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 368-371
[10]程富丽, 杜雄, 刘梦星, 靳小利, 崔彦宏. 玉米倒伏及其对产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2011, 19(1): 105–108
Cheng F L, Du X, Liu M X, Jin X L, Cui Y H. Lodging of summer maize and the effects on grain yield. J Maize Sci, 2011, 19(1): 105–108 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Tang J, Teng W, Yan J, Ma X, Meng Y, Dai J, Li J. Gebetic dissection of plant height by molecular markers using a population of recombinant inbred lines in maize. Euphytica, 2007, 155: 117–124
[12]戴景瑞, 鄂立柱. 我国玉米育种科技创新问题的几点思考. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(1): 1–5
Dai J R, E L Z. Scientific and technological innovation of maize breeding in China. J Maize Sci, 2010, 18(1): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Tokatlidis I S, Koutroubas S D. A review of maize hybrids, dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Res, 2004, 88: 103–114
[14]谭禾平, 王桂跃, 胡贤女, 许巧贤. 影响玉米产量效应因子的多元回归与通径分析. 浙江农业学报, 2006, 18(4): 238–240
Tan H P, Wang G Y, Hu X N, Xu Q X. Multiple regression and path analysis of effective factors affecting maize yield. Acta Agric Zhejianggesis, 2006, 18(4): 238–240 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Jesus M G, Leonardo A S, Aida I D M. Modelling evapotranspiration of corn (Zea mays) under different plant densities. J Hydrol, 2003, 271: 188–196
[16]张洪生, 赵明, 吴沛波, 翟延举, 姜雯. 种植密度对玉米茎秆和穗部性状的影响. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(5): 130–133
Zhang H S, Zhao M, Wu P B, Zhai Y J, Jiang W. Effects of the plant density on the characteristics of maize stem and ear. J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(5): 130–133 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Ignacio A C, Tony J V. A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages. Field Crops Res, 2011, 121: 2–18
[18]杨利华, 张丽华, 杨世丽, 马瑞昆, 张全国. 不同株高玉米品种部分群体质量指标对种植密度的反应. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(6): 139–146
Yang L H, Zhang L H, Yang S L, Ma R K, Zhang Q G. Responses of some population quality indices of corn hybrids differing in plant height to planting density. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2007, 22(6): 139–146 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]杨今胜, 王永军, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 李从锋, 朱元刚, 郝梦波, 柳京国, 李登海, 董树亭. 三个超高产夏玉米品种的干物质生产及光合特性. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 355–361
Yang J S, Wang Y J, Zhang J W, Liu P, Li C F, Zhu Y G, Hao M B, Liu J G, Li D H, Dong S T. Dry matter production and photosynthesis characteristics of different hybrids maize (Zea mays L.) with super-high-yielding potential. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 355–361 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]范霞, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 李霞, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 董树亭. 不同株高夏玉米品种的氮素吸收与利用特性. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1830–1838
Fan X, Zhang J W, Ren B Z, Li X, Zhao B, Liu P, Dong S T. Nitrogen uptake and utilization of summer maize hybrids with different plant heights. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1830–1838 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]李利利, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 杨今胜. 不同株高夏玉米品种同化物积累转运与分配特性. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1080–1087
Li L L, Zhang J W, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B, Yang J X. Characteristics of accumulation, transition and distribution of assimilate in summer maize varieties with different plant height. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1080–1087 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]何启平, 董树亭, 高荣岐. 不同类型玉米品种果穗维管束的比较研究. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1187–1196
He Q P, Dong S T, Gao R Q. Comparison of ear vascular bundles in different maize cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1187–1196 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]汪黎明, 李建生, 姚国旗, 穆春华, 孟昭东, 刘德友, 戴景瑞. 玉米茎秆与根系抗倒的特性研究. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(2): 69–74
Wang L M, Li J S, Yao G Q, Mu C H, Meng Z D, Liu D Y, Dai J R. Characterizations of resistance to stalk and root lodging in maize. J Maize Sci, 2012, 20(2): 69–74 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]Novacek M J, Mason S C, Galusha T D, Yaseen M. Twin rows minimally impact irrigated maize yield, morphology, and lodging. Agron J, 2013, 105: 268–276
[25]Kaack K, Schwarz K U, Brander P E. Variation in morphology, anatomy and chemistry of stems of Miscanthus genotypes differing in mechanical properties. Ind Crop Prod, 2003, 17: 131–142
[26]Flint Gaarcia S A, Darrah L L, McMullen M D, Hibbard B E. Phenotypic versus marker assisted selection for stalk strength and second generation European corn borer resistance in maize. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 1331–1336
[27]Xue J, Gou L, Zhao Y S, Yao M N, Yao H S, Tian J S, Zhang W F. Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging. Field Crops Res, 2016, 188: 133–141
[28]郭艳青, 朱玉玲, 刘凯, 裴书君, 赵斌, 张吉旺. 水钾互作对高产夏玉米茎秆结构和功能的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27: 143–149
Guo Y Q, Zhu Y L, Liu K, Pei S J, Zhao B, Zhang J W. Effects of water-potassium interaction on stalk structure and function of high-yield summer miaze. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27: 143–149 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]Martin S A, Darrah L L, Hibbard B E. Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on European corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 711–717
[30]勾玲, 黄建军, 孙锐, 丁在松, 董志强, 赵明. 玉米不同耐密植品种茎秆穿刺强度的变化特征. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(11): 156–161
Gou L, Huang J J, Sun R, Ding Z S, Dong Z Q, Zhao M. Variation characteristic of stalk penetration strength of maize with different density-tolerance varieties. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(11): 156–161 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]Dudley J W. Selection for rind puncture resistance in two maize populations. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1458–1460
[32]刘魏魏, 赵会杰, 李红旗. 密度、种植方式对夏玉米茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(8): 75–78
Liu W W, Zhao H J, Li H Q. Effects of planting densities and modes on stem lodging resistance of summer maize. J Henan Agric Sci, 2011, 40(8): 75–78 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1688–1695
Gou L, Huang J J, Zhang B. Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1688–1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]任佰朝, 张吉旺, 李霞, 范霞, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌. 大田淹水对高产夏玉米抗倒伏性能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 2440–2448
Ren B Z, Zhang J W, Li X, Fan X, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B. Effect of waterlogging on stem lodging resistance of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 2440–2448 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[3] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[4] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[5] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[6] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[7] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[8] 娄洪祥, 姬建利, 蒯婕, 汪波, 徐亮, 李真, 刘芳, 黄威, 刘暑艳, 尹羽丰, 王晶, 周广生. 种植密度对油菜正反交组合产量与倒伏相关性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1724-1740.
[9] 李静, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 夏玉米不同栽培模式花后叶片光合性能的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1351-1359.
[10] 韩玉洲, 张勇, 杨阳, 顾正中, 吴科, 谢全, 孔忠新, 贾海燕, 马正强. 小麦株高QTL Qph.nau-5B的效应评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1188-1196.
[11] 郑迎霞, 陈杜, 魏鹏程, 卢平, 杨锦越, 罗上轲, 叶开梅, 宋碧. 种植密度对贵州春玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 738-751.
[12] 沈文强, 赵冰冰, 于国玲, 李凤菲, 朱小燕, 马福盈, 李云峰, 何光华, 赵芳明. 优良水稻染色体片段代换系Z746的鉴定及重要农艺性状QTL定位及其验证[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 451-461.
[13] 张金丹, 范虹, 杜进勇, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强. 小麦玉米同步增密有利于优化种间关系而提高间作产量[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2481-2489.
[14] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853.
[15] 付虹雨, 崔国贤, 李绪孟, 佘玮, 崔丹丹, 赵亮, 苏小惠, 王继龙, 曹晓兰, 刘婕仪, 刘皖慧, 王昕惠. 基于无人机遥感图像的苎麻产量估测研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1448-1455.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!