欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 70-80.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.82036

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

绿色超级稻品种的农艺与生理性状分析

许阳东,朱宽宇,章星传,王志琴,杨建昌()   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理国家重点实验室培育点 / 粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-08 接受日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2018-11-08 网络出版日期:2018-11-08
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划项目(863计划)(2014AA10A600);国家自然科学基金项目(31461143015);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(PAPD);扬州大学高端人才支持计划项目资助(2015-01)

Analysis in agronomic and physiological traits of green super rice

Yang-Dong XU,Kuan-Yu ZHU,Xing-Chuan ZHANG,Zhi-Qin WANG,Jian-Chang YANG()   

  1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology / Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2018-07-08 Accepted:2018-10-08 Published:2018-11-08 Published online:2018-11-08
  • Contact: Jian-Chang YANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(2014AA10A600);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31461143015);the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions(PAPD);the Top Talent Supporting Program of Yangzhou University(2015-01)

RichHTML

52

PDF

1570

摘要：

探明绿色超级稻的农艺与生理性状, 对于培育和选用绿色超级稻品种有重要意义。本研究以4个绿色超级稻品种为材料, 1个超级稻品种和1个非超级稻品种为对照, 观察了绿色超级稻的农艺与生理表现。结果表明, 与对照品种相比, 绿色超级稻品种具有较高的产量和氮素利用效率。绿色超级稻品种较高的产量得益于总颖花数和结实率的同步提高, 较高的氮素利用率主要在于较高的植株氮素籽粒生产效率(氮素内部利用效率)。绿色超级稻具有较高的茎蘖成穗率和粒叶比, 抽穗期较高的糖花比, 灌浆期较高的作物生长速率、净同化率、根系氧化力和茎中同化物向籽粒的运转率和成熟期较高的收获指数。这些性状与产量及植株氮素籽粒生产效率均呈极显著的正相关。建议将上述性状作为培育和选用绿色超级稻品种的参考指标。

关键词: 绿色超级稻, 产量, 植株氮素籽粒生产效率, 群体质量, 生理性状

Abstract:

Understanding agronomic and physiological characteristics of green super rice (GSR) is essential to make strategies for breeding GSR varieties and crop management. This study aimed to identify major agronomic and physiological traits associated with high grain yield and high nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of rice. Four GSR varieties and two control varieties (one super rice variety and one non-super rice inbred) were grown in the paddy field. The results showed that the GSR varieties produced higher grain yield and higher NUE than control varieties. Synchronous increases in both total spikelet number and filled-grain percentage contributed to higher grain yield, and an increase in grain yield production per unit absorbed N (internal NUE) resulted in higher NUE for GSR. Compared with control varieties, GSR varieties exhibited greater percentage of productive tillers and the ratio of spikelet number to leaf area, higher ratio of sugar amount to spikelet number at the heading time, higher crop growth rate, net assimilate rate, and root oxidation activity and more remobilization of assimilates from stems and sheaths to grains during the grain filling period, and higher harvest index at maturity. These traits were positively and very significantly correlated with both grain yield and internal NUE, and could be used as indexes for breeding and selecting GSR varieties.

Key words: green super rice (GSR), grain yield, internal nitrogen use efficiency, population quality, physiological trait

表1

绿色超级稻品种的产量及其构成因素"

年/品种
Year/variety		 产量
Grain yield
(t hm-2)		 穗数
Panicle number (m2)		 每穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 总颖花数
Total spikelets
(×103 m-2)		 结实率
Seed-setting rate (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
2016
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 8.75 b 263 b 141 a 37.1 cd 85.8 c 28.5 bc
武运粳24 WYJ-24 9.81 a 288 a 139 a 40.0 b 88.4 b 27.4 f
连粳7号 LJ-7 9.43 b 310 a 124 b 38.4 c 90.9 a 27.6 ef
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 8.68 b 299 a 122 b 36.5 d 85.4 c 28.0 de
淮稻13 HD-13 9.78 a 266 b 142 a 37.8 c 88.4 b 29.2 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 9.86 a 288 a 146 a 42.0 a 87.6 b 27.9 de
2017
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 9.05 b 261 b 143 a 37.3 cd 84.8 c 28.7 b
武运粳24 WYJ-24 9.61 a 292 a 137 a 40.0 b 88.8 b 27.6 ef
连粳7号 LJ-7 9.69 a 314 a 122 b 38.3 c 91.3 a 27.4 f
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 8.62 b 297 a 124 b 36.8 d 84.4 c 28.2 cd
淮稻13 HD-13 9.88 a 268 b 144 a 38.6 c 88.0 b 29.4 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 9.94 a 292 a 142 a 41.5 a 87.4 b 27.7 ef
方差分析 Analysis of variance
年F值 F for year (Y) NS NS NS NS NS NS
品种F值 F for variety (V) 15.7** 11.8** 8.65** 20.7** 10.2** 3.67*
年×品种F值 F for Y × V NS NS NS NS NS NS

表2

绿色超级稻品种的氮素吸收量和氮利用率"

年/品种
Year/variety		 总吸氮量
Total N uptake
(kg hm-2)		 植株氮素籽粒生产效率
Internal N use efficiency
(kg kg-1 N)		 每百kg籽粒的需氮量
N uptake per 100 kg grain
[kg (100 kg)-1 grain]		 氮肥偏生产力
Patial factory
productivity
(kg kg-1)
2016
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 190 a 46.1 b 2.17 a 43.8 b
武运粳24 WYJ-24 191 a 50.6 a 1.98 b 49.1 a
连粳7号 LJ-7 188 a 50.2 a 1.99 b 47.2 a
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 192 a 45.2 b 2.21 a 43.4 b
淮稻13 HD-13 191 a 51.2 a 1.95 b 48.9 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 194 a 51.4 a 1.95 b 49.3 a
2017
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 194 a 46.6 b 2.14 a 45.3 b
武运粳24 WYJ-24 195 a 50.1 a 2.00 b 48.1 a
连粳7号 LJ-7 192 a 50.5 a 1.98 b 48.5 a
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 190 a 45.4 b 2.20 a 43.1 b
淮稻13 HD-13 193 a 51.2 a 1.95 b 49.4 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 192 a 51.2 a 1.95 b 49.7 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
年F值 F for year (Y) NS NS NS NS
品种F值 F for variety (V) NS 8.48** 8.04** 15.27**
年×品种F值 F for Y × V NS NS NS NS

表3

绿色超级稻品种茎蘖成穗率(PPST)、叶面积指数(LAI)和粒叶比"

年/品种
Year/variety		 茎蘖成穗率
PPST
(%)		 抽穗期LAI
LAI at heading
(m2 m-2)		 颖花/叶面积
Spikelet/LA
(spikelets cm-2)		 实粒/叶面积
Filled grain/LA
(grains cm-2)		 总粒重/叶面积
Total grain Wt/LA
(mg cm-2)
2016
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 71.3 b 7.15 a 0.519 cd 0.445 b 12.2 b
武运粳24 WYJ-24 79.2 a 7.32 a 0.546 ab 0.487 a 13.4 a
连粳7号 LJ-7 76.8 a 6.95 a 0.553 ab 0.501 a 13.6 a
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 72.3 b 7.03 a 0.519 cd 0.443 b 12.3 b
淮稻13 HD-13 78.5 a 6.86 a 0.551 ab 0.484 a 14.3 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 80.9 a 7.38 a 0.569 a 0.501 a 13.4 a
2017
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 73.7 b 7.27 a 0.513 d 0.435 b 12.4 b
武运粳24 WYJ-24 78.2 a 7.24 a 0.552 ab 0.487 a 13.3 a
连粳7号 LJ-7 78.4 a 7.09 a 0.540 bc 0.495 a 13.7 a
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 71.3 b 7.29 a 0.505 d 0.426 b 11.8 b
淮稻13 HD-13 79.7 a 7.04 a 0.548 ab 0.491 a 14.0 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 79.5 a 7.24 a 0.573 a 0.499 a 13.7 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
年F值 F for year (Y) NS NS NS NS NS
品种F值 F for variety (V) 6.85** NS 5.76** 11.5** 7.63**
年×品种F值 F for Y × V NS NS NS NS NS

表4

绿色超级稻品种的地上部分干重和作物生长速率(CGR)"

年/品种
Year/variety		 干物质重 Biomass (t hm-2) 作物生长速率 CGR (g m-2 d-1)
分蘖期
Tillering (T)		 拔节期
Jointing (J)		 抽穗期
Heading (H)		 成熟期
Maturity (M)		 分蘖-拔节
T-J		 拔节-抽穗
J-H		 抽穗-成熟
H-M
2016
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 0.64 e 3.51 a 9.72 a 15.4 cd 13.1 c 17.8 a 12.1 d
武运粳24 WYJ-24 0.72 ab 3.67 a 9.95 a 16.5 ab 13.6 ab 18.0 a 13.1 b
连粳7号 LJ-7 0.68 cd 3.55 a 9.68 a 15.9 bc 13.3 bc 17.6 a 13.1 b
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 0.63 e 3.45 a 9.49 a 14.8 d 12.6 d 17.5 a 11.6 e
淮稻13 HD-13 0.74 a 3.68 a 9.95 a 16.5 ab 13.6 ab 17.9 a 13.7 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 0.73 ab 3.67 a 9.89 a 16.9 a 13.5 abc 17.8 a 14.0 a
2017
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 0.68 cd 3.57 a 9.84 a 16.0 bc 13.1 c 17.9 a 12.6 bc
武运粳24 WYJ-24 0.70 bc 3.73 a 10.0 a 16.3 ab 13.8 a 18.0 a 12.8 b
连粳7号 LJ-7 0.66 de 3.63 a 9.84 a 16.5 ab 13.5 abc 17.7 a 13.6 a
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 0.65 de 3.37 a 9.59 a 15.6 c 12.4 d 17.8 a 12.3 cd
淮稻13 HD-13 0.70 bc 3.76 a 9.99 a 16.9 a 13.9 a 17.8 a 14.1 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 0.75 a 3.73 a 9.99 a 16.7 a 13.5 abc 17.9 a 13.7 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
年F值 F for year (Y) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
品种F值 F for variety (V) 4.89** NS NS 3.52* 3.46* NS 14.5**
年×品种F值 F for Y × V NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

表5

绿色超级稻品种绿叶面积持续期和净同化速率"

年/品种
Year/variety		 绿叶面积持续期 GLAD (m2 m-2 d-1) 净同化速率 NAR (g m-2 d-1)
分蘖-拔节
T-J		 拔节-抽穗
J-H		 抽穗-成熟
H-M		 分蘖-拔节
T-J		 拔节-抽穗
J-H		 抽穗-成熟
H-M
2016
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 57.2 a 204 a 222 a 5.03 b 3.05 a 2.67 de
武运粳24 WYJ-24 55.8 a 205 a 228 a 5.36 a 3.07 a 2.81 c
连粳7号 LJ-7 55.8 a 198 a 219 a 5.24 a 3.11 a 2.94 b
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 55.8 a 200 a 221 a 4.97 b 3.06 a 2.56 f
淮稻13 HD-13 55.3 a 197 a 217 a 5.42 a 3.18 a 3.11 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 54.6 a 204 a 231 a 5.43 a 3.06 a 2.98 b
2017
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 58.5 a 208 a 226 a 4.94 b 3.01 a 2.73 cde
武运粳24 WYJ-24 54.9 a 202 a 227 a 5.52 a 3.12 a 2.76 cd
连粳7号 LJ-7 55.1 a 200 a 222 a 5.39 a 3.10 a 3.00 b
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 57.5 a 207 a 227 a 4.73 b 3.00 a 2.65 ef
淮稻13 HD-13 56.4 a 201 a 221 a 5.42 a 3.10 a 3.13 a
武运粳30 WYJ-30 56.1 a 204 a 226 a 5.31 a 3.07 a 2.97 b
方差分析 Analysis of variance
年F值 F for year (Y) NS NS NS NS NS NS
品种F值 F for variety (V) NS NS NS 5.35** NS 6.64**
年×品种F值 F for Y × V NS NS NS NS NS NS

表6

绿色超级稻茎中非结构性碳水化合物(NSC)转运率、糖花比和收获指数"

年/品种
Year/variety		 茎与鞘中NSC
NSC in stems and sheaths (g m-2)		 NSC转运率
NSC remobilization
(%)		 抽穗期糖花比
NSC per spikelet
at heading
(mg spikelet-1)		 收获指数
Harvest
index
(×100)
抽穗期
Heading		 成熟期
Maturity
2016
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 194 de 138 cd 28.9 b 5.23 b 48.9 cd
武运粳24 WYJ-24 230 bc 143 ab 37.8 a 5.75 a 51.1 a
连粳7号 LJ-7 229 bc 136 cd 40.6 a 5.96 a 51.0 a
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 190 e 133 de 30.0 b 5.21 b 49.4 c
淮稻13 HD-13 225 c 131 e 41.8 a 5.95 a 50.6 ab
武运粳30 WYJ-30 245 a 140 bc 42.9 a 5.83 a 50.2 b
2017
扬粳4038 YJ-4 (CK1) 198 d 140 bc 29.3 b 5.31 b 48.6 d
武运粳24 WYJ-24 234 b 145 a 38.0 a 5.85 a 50.7 ab
连粳7号 LJ-7 233 b 140 bc 39.9 a 6.08 a 50.5 ab
宁粳1号 NJ-1 (CK2) 188 e 129 e 31.4 b 5.11 b 48.5 d
淮稻13 HD-13 223 c 129 e 42.2 a 5.78 a 50.8 ab
武运粳30 WYJ-30 241 a 138 cd 42.7 a 5.81 a 51.2 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
年F值 F for year (Y) NS NS NS NS NS
品种F值 F for variety (V) 11.5** 5.21** 10.4** 11.2** 12.6**
年×品种F值 F for Y × V NS NS NS NS NS

图1

绿色超级稻抽穗期根干重(A, B)和根冠比(C, D)及灌浆期根系氧化力(E, F) 不同字母者表示在P = 0.05水平上差异显著, NS表示在P = 0.05水平上差异不显著, 同一测定时期、不同品种间比较。YJ-4: 扬粳4038; WYJ-24: 武运粳24; LJ-7: 连粳7号; NJ-1: 宁粳1号; HD-13: 淮稻13; WYJ-30: 武运粳30; EGF: 灌浆早期; MGF: 灌浆中期; LGF: 灌浆后期。"

图2

水稻灌浆期根系氧化力(ROA)与灌浆期作物生长速率(A)、灌浆期净同化率(B)和结实率(C)的关系 图中数据来自表1、表4、表5和图1; **表示在P = 0.01水平上显著(n = 12)"

表7

水稻部分农艺生理性状与产量及植株氮素籽粒生产效率(IEN)的相关系数(r)"

性状
Trait		 r
产量 Grain yield IEN
茎蘖成穗率 Percentage of productive stems and tillers 0.99** 0.97**
抽穗期糖花比 Sugar-spikelet ratio at heading time 0.89** 0.93**
颖花/叶面积 (粒叶比) Spikelets/leaf area (grain-leaf ratio) 0.90** 0.92**
灌浆期作物生长速率 Crop growth rate during grain filling 0.91** 0.92**
灌浆期净同化速率 Net assimilate rate during grain filling 0.85** 0.88**
灌浆期根系氧化力 Root oxidation activity during grain filling 0.91** 0.90**
茎中同花物转运率 Percentage of assimilate remobilization from stems 0.92** 0.96**
收获指数 Harvest index 0.88** 0.89**
[1] FAOSTAT. FAO Statistical Databases, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome, 2016. . FAO Statistical Databases, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome, 2016. .
[2] 余四斌, 熊银, 肖景华, 罗利军, 张启发 . 杂交稻与绿色超级稻. 科学通报, 2016,61:3797-3803.
doi: 10.1360/N972016-01092
Yu S B, Xiong Y, Xiao J H, Luo L J, Zhang Q F . Hybrid rice and green super rice. Chin Sci Bull, 2016,61:3797-3803 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.1360/N972016-01092
[3] Peng S B, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B . Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Prod Sci, 2009,12:3-8.
doi: 10.1626/pps.12.3
[4] 张启发 . 资源节约型、环境友好型农业生产体系的理论与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015. pp 1-15.
Zhang Q F. Theory and Practice of Resource-saving and Environment-friendly Agricultural Production System. Beijing: Science Press, 2015. pp 1-15(in Chinese).
[5] Zhang Q F . Strategies for developing green super rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007,104:16402-16409.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708013104
[6] 张启发 . 绿色超级稻的构想与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. pp 1-32.
Zhang Q F. Strategies and Practice for Developing Green Super Rice. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 1-32(in Chinese).
[7] Wang F, Peng S B . Yield potential and nitrogen use efficiency of China’s super rice. J Integr Agric, 2017,16:1000-1008.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61561-7
[8] 彭少兵 . 对转型时期水稻生产的战略思考. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2014,44:845-850.
doi: 10.1360/052014-98
Peng S B . Reflection on China’s rice production strategies during the transition period. Sci Sin Vitae, 2014,44:845-850 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.1360/052014-98
[9] Yang J C, Liu K, Wang Z Q, Du Y, Zhang J H . Water-saving and high-yielding irrigation for lowland rice by controlling limiting values of soil water potential. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007,49:1445-1454.
doi: 10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00555.x
[10] Pucher G W, Leavenworth C S, Vickery H B . Determination of starch in plant tissues. Analyt Chem, 1948,20:850-853.
doi: 10.1021/ac50100a004
[11] Yoshida S, Forno D, Cock J, Gomez K . Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. The Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1976. pp 14-20.
[12] Zhang H, Xue Y G, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H . An alternate wetting and moderate soil drying regime improves root and shoot growth in rice. Crop Sci, 2009,49:2246-2260.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0099
[13] Yang J C, Zhang J H . Crop management techniques to enhance harvest index in rice. J Exp Bot, 2010,61:3177-3189.
doi: 10.1364/AO.36.000144 pmid: 20421195
[14] Wang Z Q, Zhang W Y, Beebout S S, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice as influenced by irrigation regimes and their interaction with nitrogen rates. Field Crops Res, 2016,193:54-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.03.006
[15] 张自常, 徐云姬, 褚光, 王志琴, 王学明, 刘立军, 杨建昌 . 不同灌溉方式下的水稻群体质量. 作物学报, 2011,37:2011-2019.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.02011
Zhang Z C, Xu Y J, Chu G, Wang Z Q, Wang X M, Liu L J, Yang J C . Population quality of rice under different irrigation regimes. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:2011-2019 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.02011
[16] Fu J, Huang Z H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Pre-anthesis non-structural carbohydrate reserve in the stem enhances the sink strength of inferior spikelets during grain filling of rice. Field Crops Res, 2011,123:170-182.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.015
[17] Yang J C, Peng S B, Zhang Z J, Wang Z Q, Visperas R M, Zhu Q S . Grain and dry matter yields and partitioning of assimilates in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Crop Sci, 2002,42:766-772.
[18] Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S . Hormones in the grains in relation to sink strength and postanthesis development of spikelets in rice. Plant Growth Regul, 2003,41:185-195.
doi: 10.1023/B:GROW.0000007503.95391.38
[19] 凌启鸿, 杨建昌 . 水稻群体“粒叶比”与高产栽培途径研究. 中国农业科学, 1986,19(3):1-8.
Ling Q H, Yang J C . Studies on “grain-leaf ratio” of population and cultural approaches of high yield in rice plants. Sci Agric Sin, 1986,19(3):1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 杨建昌 . 水稻粒叶比与产量的关系. 江苏农学院学报, 1993,14(专刊):11-14.
Yang J C . Relationship between grain-leaf ratio and grain yield of rice. J Agric Coll, 1993,14(Special issue):11-14 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 凌启鸿 . 作物群体质量. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2000. pp 42-216.
Ling Q H. Crop population Quality. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2000. pp 42-216(in Chinese).
[22] Yang J C . Approaches to achieve high yield and high resource use efficiency in rice. Front Agric Sci Eng, 2015,2:115-123.
doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2015055
[23] Li H W, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Agronomic and physiological performance of high-yielding wheat and rice in the lower reaches of Yangtze River of China. Field Crops Res, 2012,133:119-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.005
[24] Kato T, Takeda K . Associations among characters related to yield sink capacity in space-planted rice. Crop Sci, 1996,36:1135-1139.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050011x
[25] Fageria N K . Yield physiology of rice. J Plant Nutr, 2007,30:843-879.
doi: 10.1080/15226510701374831
[26] Yang J C, Zhang H, Zhang J H . Root morphology and physiology in relation to the yield formation of rice. J Integr Agric, 2012,11:920-926.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60082-3
[27] Chu G, Chen T T, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice. Field Crops Res, 2014,162:108-119.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.026
[28] Osaki M, Shinano T, Matsumoto M, Zheng T, Tadano T . A root-shoot interaction hypothesis for high productivity of field crops. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1997,37:445-454.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0047-9_215
[29] Samejima H, Kondo M, Ito O, Nozoe T, Shinano T, Osaki M . Root-shoot interaction as a limiting factor of biomass productivity in new tropical rice lines. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2004,50:545-554.
doi: 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408511
[30] Yang J C, Zhang J H . Grain-filling problem in “super” rice. J Exp Bot, 2010,61:1-5.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp348
[31] Zhang Z J, Chu G, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Wang X M, Zhang H, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Mid-season nitrogen application strategies for rice varieties differing in panicle size. Field Crops Res, 2013,150:9-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.002
[32] Ju C X, Buresh R J, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application. Field Crops Res, 2015,175:47-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.007
[33] Chu G, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C, Zhang J H . Agronomic and physiological performance of rice under integrative crop management. Agron J, 2016,108:117-128.
doi: 10.2134/agronj15.0310
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2