欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 215-225.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.02091

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

连作杂交晚稻精准条播长秧龄机插的生长及产量特性分析

王亚梁1(), 朱德峰1,*(), 张玉屏1, 陈若霞2, 向镜1, 陈惠哲1, 谌江华2, 汪峰2   

  1. 1中国水稻研究所, 浙江杭州 311400
    2宁波市农业科学研究院, 浙江宁波 315040
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-25 接受日期:2021-03-19 出版日期:2022-01-12 网络出版日期:2021-04-13
  • 通讯作者: 朱德峰
  • 作者简介:E-mail: wangyaliang@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    宁波市科技计划项目(2019B10003);国家重点研发计划项目(2019B10003);中国水稻研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202117);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资助(CARS-01-03A)

Analysis on the plant growth and yield formation of double cropping late season hybrid rice in machine transplanting with long seedling age by precision drill sowing

WANG Ya-Liang1(), ZHU De-Feng1,*(), ZHANG Yu-Ping1, CHEN Ruo-Xia2, XIANG Jing1, CHEN Hui-Zhe1, CHEN Jiang-Hua2, WANG Feng2   

  1. 1China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China
    2Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2020-12-25 Accepted:2021-03-19 Published:2022-01-12 Published online:2021-04-13
  • Contact: ZHU De-Feng
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019B10003);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019B10003);Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of China National Rice Research Institute(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202117);China Agri-culture Research System(CARS-01-03A)

RichHTML

16

PDF

343

摘要：

为明确精准条播(precision drill sowing, PS)在连作晚稻长秧龄机插中的有益效果。本试验以甬优1540为供试品种, 设置标准9寸秧盘横向16条(PS-16, 45.7 g 盘-1)和18条(PS-18, 60.5 g 盘-1)精准条播, 并以传统撒播(broadcast sowing, BS, 60.5 g 盘-1)作为对照, 同期播种, 设置20、25、30和35 d 4个机插秧龄, 比较分析各播种方式水稻秧苗素质、机插特性、群体生长及产量形成的变化。结果表明: (1) 精准条播提高秧苗群体透光性, 与撒播相比, 精准条播提高了长秧龄秧苗的素质, 增加了带分蘖秧苗的比例, 其中PS-16秧苗素质最好, 带分蘖秧苗的比例最高。(2) 与撒播相比, 精准条播显著降低机插漏秧率, 提高机插取秧2~3株苗比例, PS-16和PS-18间差异不明显。秧龄延长增加机插秧苗伤根程度和伤苗率, 降低秧苗存活率, 其中PS-16的伤根程度和伤苗率增加幅度最小, 机插秧苗存活率最高。(3) 机插秧龄延长增加了秧苗缓苗返青天数进而推迟水稻生育期, 各机插秧龄下, PS-16的缓苗返青期最短, 生育期因秧龄延长而推迟的天数最少。(4) 精准条播有效促进分蘖, 其中PS-16效果最好, PS-16机插10 d分蘖数平均比PS-18和BS高16.4%和20.8%。机插秧龄延长降低群体分蘖高峰苗数, 各秧龄下高峰苗数PS-16>PS-18>BS。成穗率在不同播种方式处理间差异不大。(5) 秧龄延长降低抽穗期叶面积指数和干物质积累, PS-16下降幅度最小。(6) 不同机插秧龄下, 精准条播通过增加有效穗数进而提高水稻产量, 有效降低了机插秧龄延长导致的产量损失, 各机插秧龄下产量PS-16>PS-18>BS。试验说明, 与传统撒播相比, 精准条播增强了秧苗素质, 提高了机插质量, 缩短了长秧龄下的返青时间, 促进了分蘖早发, 增加了叶面积指数和干物质积累, 进而有效减少了连作杂交晚稻因机插秧龄延长而引起的产量损失, 其中精准16条条播效果好于18条条播。

关键词: 连作晚稻, 杂交稻, 精准条播, 长秧龄, 机插, 产量

Abstract:

In order to ascertain the beneficial effects of precision drill sowing (PS) in machine transplanting with long seedling age of double cropping late season hybrid rice. In this study, seed of Yongyou 1540 (YY1540) was subjected to precision drill sowing of 16 rows (PS-16, 45.7 g tray-1), precision drill sowing of 18 rows (PS-18, 60.5 g tray-1) and traditional broadcast sowing (BS, 60.5 g tray-1) in standard seedling tray at the same day. Seedling ages of 20, 25, 30, and 35 days were set for machine transplanting to analyze the rice seedling quality, machine transplanting characters, rice population growth, and yield formation between PS-16, PS-18, and BS. The results were as follows: (1) PS improved the light transmittance of seedling population, compared to BS, PS enhanced the seedling quality and increased the percentage of seedlings with tillering buds, among the treatments, PS-16 got the best seedling quality and highest percentage of seedling with tillering buds. (2) Compared to BS, PS significantly reduced the missing hill percent and increased the ratio of hills with 2-3 seedlings transplanted, and there was no significant difference between PS-16 and PS-18. Seedling age prolonging increased the root injury degree and seedling injury rate, and decreased the seedling survival rate after machine-transplanting, in which, PS-16 had the minimal increasing in root injury degree and seedling injury rate, meanwhile PS-16 got the highest survival rate of seedling machine-transplanted. (3) The seedling age prolonging postponed the rice growth duration by increasing the duration of seedling rejuvenation period. Among the seedling age treatments, the shortest period of rejuvenation period was observed in PS-16, and then the growth period minimal delayed in PS-16 with the seedling age prolonging. (4) PS effectively promoted plant tillering, and PS-16 got the best effect. The number of tillers at 10 d after machine transplanting of PS-16 machine was 16.4% and 20.8% higher than that of PS-18 and BS, in average. Seedling age prolonging decreased the tiller number at tillering peak stage, and the tiller number at tillering peak stage was PS-16>PS-18>BS at different seedling age treatments. The productive tiller percentage presented no difference among the sowing methods and seedling ages. (5) Seedling age prolonging decreased the leaf area index and dry matter accumulation by the degree of PS-16<PS-18<BS. (6) PS contributed to yield enhancing by increasing the number of productive tillers, and effectively reduced the yield loss caused by the prolonging of seedling age, and rice yield was PS-16>PS-18>BS under different seedling age treatments, in average. In conclusion, compared to BS, PS could improve the seedling quality, reduce the missing hill percentage in machine transplanting, improve the machine transplanting quality, shorten the seedling rejuvenation period, promote plant tillering, and increase the leaf area index and dry matter accumulation, and then effectively reduce the yield loss of double late season hybrid rice with long seedling age in machine transplanting, and the benefits of PS-16 were better than that of PS-18.

Key words: late season rice of double cropping, hybrid rice, precision drill sowing, long seedling age, machine transplanting, yield.

图1

水稻生长期间空气温度和太阳辐射量 A: 空气温度; B: 太阳辐射量和日长。"

表1

不同秧龄及播种方式对水稻秧苗素质的影响"

机插秧龄
Seedling age (d)		 播种方式
Sowing method		 叶龄
Leaf age		 苗高
Seedling height
(cm)		 黄叶数
The number of yellow leaves		 茎基宽
Basal stem
width (cm)		 根长
Root length
(cm)		 茎叶干重
Dry weight of stem and leaves (mg)		 根干重
Dry weight
of root
(mg)
20 PS-16 4.40±0.17 a 14.40±1.30 a 0.27±0.04 b 0.35±0.01 a 9.48±1.35 a 51.27±1.62 a 18.40±0.66 a
PS-18 4.33±0.15 a 14.94±0.18 a 0.40±0.05 a 0.33±0.02 a 7.98±0.48 b 46.60±1.25 b 15.23±0.90 b
BS 4.43±0.23 a 15.48±0.51 a 0.33±0.05 a 0.33±0.02 a 7.73±0.22 b 46.20±1.15 b 15.16±0.91 b
25 PS-16 5.37±0.31 a 19.17±0.63 a 0.67±0.10 b 0.40±0.01 a 11.89±0.28 a 94.60±7.29 a 38.53±2.86 a
PS-18 5.29±0.02 a 19.94±0.18 a 1.25±0.10 a 0.36±0.01 b 9.65±0.12 b 76.60±1.25 b 29.77±3.06 b
BS 5.23±0.12 a 19.80±0.82 a 1.27±0.07 a 0.36±0.01 b 9.43±0.46 b 80.20±4.42 b 30.83±2.91 b
30 PS-16 5.77±0.11 a 21.70±0.53 a 0.81±0.10 b 0.45±0.03 ab 12.13±0.76 a 132.33±10.97 ab 59.20±2.59 b
PS-18 5.63±0.12 a 21.69±0.13 a 1.22±0.10 a 0.40±0.01 bc 11.05±0.48 ab 117.67±4.62 b 51.17±5.01 c
BS 5.50±0.20 a 21.61±0.64 a 1.18±0.06 a 0.38±0.01 c 10.18±0.25 b 119.00±13.53 b 51.17±2.90 c
35 PS-16 6.37±0.12 a 23.43±0.90 a 1.40±0.11 bc 0.47±0.00 a 14.67±0.71 a 149.00±8.19 a 69.20±2.59 a
PS-18 6.03±0.12 b 23.83±0.42 a 2.21±0.13 a 0.42±0.01 b 11.83±0.31 b 122.33±4.47 b 58.23±6.60 b
BS 5.97±0.12 b 23.95±0.08 a 1.91±0.51 ab 0.40±0.01 b 10.10±0.17 c 129.00±13.53 b 58.17±3.15 b
机插秧龄
Seedling age (A)		 167.39** 314.73** 123.23** 55.76** 74.43** 247.82** 349.38**
播种方法
Sowing method (M)		 5.36** 2.33 25.69** 21.19** 55.94** 17.45** 20.02**
机插秧龄×播种方法A × M 1.05 0.53 2.43 1.7 4.46** 1.17 0.98

图2

不同秧龄及播种方式对秧苗群体带分蘖秧苗比例的影响 处理同表1。数据为平均数±标准差(n = 3); 不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图3

不同秧龄及播种方式对秧苗群体可见光绝对辐射强度的影响 处理同表1。A: 秧龄20 d; B: 秧龄25 d; C: 秧龄30 d; D: 秧龄35 d。"

表2

不同秧龄及播种方式对水稻机插特性的影响"

机插秧龄 Seedling age (d) 播种方法
Sowing method		 机插每穴苗数
Number of
seedling transplanted per hill		 漏秧率Missing hill percent (%) 2~3株苗比率
Ratio of hills with 2-3 seedling
transplanted (%)		 伤根程度
Degree of root injury (%)		 伤苗率
Ratio of seedling injury (%)		 秧苗存活率 Seedling
survival rate
(%)
20 PS-16 2.47±0.14 a 3.11±1.95 b 78.89±3.85 a 24.19±2.75 b 6.20±1.55 a 97.92±3.61 a
PS-18 2.43±0.03 a 4.78±2.50 b 76.67±8.82 a 36.09±4.20 a 9.63±3.39 a 92.16±2.24 a
BS 2.45±0.14 a 13.33±3.33 a 36.67±6.67 b 38.01±4.39 a 7.44±0.83 a 85.52±2.09 b
25 PS-16 2.51±0.08 a 3.89±2.55 b 77.78±5.09 a 25.99±3.05 b 13.70±1.95 ab 93.27±6.31 a
PS-18 2.54±0.02 a 4.86±1.46 b 73.33±3.33 a 46.13±4.28 a 15.56±1.92 a 88.09±4.24 ab
BS 2.56±0.05 a 16.67±3.33 a 44.44±11.71 b 48.30±4.59 a 10.19±2.08 b 83.68±1.88 b
30 PS-16 2.43±0.15 a 3.67±0.58 b 74.44±9.18 a 39.87±3.42 b 12.75±2.53 c 94.76±9.07 a
PS-18 2.48±0.13 a 3.39±3.25 b 73.89±2.55 a 56.13±4.28 a 26.72±3.04 b 70.88±7.70 b
BS 2.43±0.12 a 16.79±6.16 a 57.22±8.39 b 51.38±2.85 a 36.82±7.76 a 69.39±7.23 b
35 PS-16 2.28±0.13 a 3.89±1.92 b 76.11±5.09 a 49.32±8.32 a 12.91±1.73 b 94.76±5.02 a
PS-18 2.32±0.05 a 4.17±2.20 b 74.44±4.19 a 49.47±6.83 a 34.62±6.29 a 74.21±4.48 b
BS 2.28±0.10 a 15.97±2.51 a 52.78±6.94 b 51.63±5.23 a 41.62±11.26 a 72.72±5.92 b
机插秧龄Seedling age (A) 8.51** 0.35 0.85 26.42** 41.99** 12.28**
播种方法Sowing method (M) 0.14 63.14** 66.66** 26.48** 23.86** 33.87**
机插秧龄×播种方法A × M 0.16 0.37 2.41 3.37 8.86** 2.66*

图4

不同秧龄及播种方式对水稻生育期的影响 处理同表1。A: 播种-抽穗期; B: 缓苗返青期; C: 缓苗-抽穗期天数。数据为平均数±标准差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图5

不同秧龄及播种方式对机插10 d的分蘖数、分蘖高峰苗数和分蘖成穗率的影响 处理同表1。A: 机插10 d群体分蘖数; B: 群体高峰苗数; C: 群体成穗率。数据为平均数±标准差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图6

不同秧龄及播种方式对群体抽穗期叶面积指数、株高及干物质积累的影响 处理同表1。A: 抽穗期叶面积指数; B: 株高; C: 抽穗期干物质积累; D: 成熟期干物质积累。数据为平均数±标准差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表3

不同秧龄及播种方式对产量及产量结构的影响"

秧龄
Seedling age (d)		 播种方式
Sowing method		 有效穗数
Number of
productive tillers
(×105 hm-2)		 穗粒数
Number of spikelet
per panicle		 结实率
Filled grain rate (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(t hm-2)
20 PS-16 23.61±2.00 a 242.02±3.88 a 85.30±1.39 a 22.98±0.51 a 11.20±0.99 a
PS-18 23.57±1.42 a 241.91±1.41 a 84.16±1.31 a 22.79±0.28 a 10.94±0.68 a
BS 21.18±0.81 a 237.03±7.28 a 84.95±1.56 a 22.63±0.14 a 9.66±0.76 a
25 PS-16 23.51±1.59 a 244.03±10.00 a 84.66±4.64 a 22.25±0.68 a 10.82±1.21 a
PS-18 23.16±0.37 a 242.04±8.27 a 82.40±1.73 a 22.90±0.28 a 10.58±0.21 a
BS 21.81±1.68 a 238.10±6.20 a 82.76±2.18 a 22.66±0.40 a 9.75±1.02 a
30 PS-16 22.53±0.47 a 247.10±5.20 a 82.34±1.98 ab 22.43±0.33 b 10.29±0.61 a
PS-18 21.70±0.67 a 243.47±1.63 a 82.93±1.91 a 22.73±0.30 ab 9.83±0.46 a
BS 20.21±0.68 b 239.48±5.95 a 78.91±1.21 b 23.09±0.21 a 8.83±0.33 b
35 PS-16 22.15±1.23 a 239.91±1.81 a 79.89±1.23 a 22.91±0.18 ab 9.72±0.33 a
PS-18 21.07±0.51 ab 237.54±6.17 a 81.47±5.23 a 22.61±0.08 b 9.22±0.57 ab
BS 19.69±0.63 b 237.74±1.24 a 78.61±3.61 a 23.18±0.16 a 8.54±0.65 b
机插秧龄Seedling age (A) 6.10** 1.30 5.57** 3.18* 7.81**
播种方法Sowing method (M) 12.47** 2.46 1.43 2.28 10.80**
机插秧龄×播种方法A × M 0.23 0.18 0.72 1.56 0.13
[1] 中国农业年鉴编辑委员会. 中国农业年鉴(2019). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2020. pp 246-256.
Editorial Committee of China Agricultural Yearbook. China Agricultural Yearbook(2019). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2020. pp 246-256(in Chinese).
[2] 黄玛兰, 李晓云, 曾琳琳. 农村劳动力价格上涨与劳动力转移对作物种植结构的区域性影响差异. 农业现代化研究, 2019, 40(1):98-108.
Huang M L, Li X Y, Zeng L L. Different reginal impacts of rural labor price increase and rural labor mitigation on crop structure. Res Agric Modern, 2019, 40(1):98-108 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 王飞, 彭少兵. 水稻绿色高产栽培技术研究进展. 生命科学, 2018, 30:1129-1136.
Wang F, Peng S B. Research progress in rice green and high-yield management practices. Chin Bull Life Sci, 2018, 30:1129-1136 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 艾治勇, 郭夏宇, 刘文祥, 马国辉, 青先国. 长江中游地区双季稻安全生产日期的变化. 作物学报, 2014, 40:1320-1329.
Ai Z Y, Guo X Y, Liu W X, Ma G H, Qing X G. Changes of safe production dates of double-season rice in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40:1320-1329 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 朱德峰, 张玉屏, 陈惠哲, 向镜, 张义凯. 中国水稻高产栽培技术创新与实践. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48:3404-3414.
Zhu D F, Zhang Y P, Chen H Z, Xiang J, Zhang Y K. Innovation and practice of high-yield rice cultivation technology in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48:3404-3414 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 王强盛, 管永祥, 章泳, 杨洪建, 何松银, 荣曼, 吴琼. 水稻大苗机插存在问题及技术途径. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(4):24-26.
Wang Q S, Guan Y X, Zhang Y, Yang H J, He S Y, Rong M, Wu Q. Problems and technical approaches of raising big seedlings for machine-transplanted rice. China Rice, 2018, 24(4):24-26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Wang Z, Ye T, Wang J, Cheng Z, Shi P J. Contribution of climatic and technological factors to crop yield: empirical evidence from late paddy rice in Hunan province, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2016, 30:2019-2030.
[8] 姚雄, 任万军, 胡剑锋, 卢庭启, 杨文钰. 稻油两熟区机插水稻的适宜秧龄与品种鉴选研究. 杂交水稻, 2009, 24(5):43-47.
Yao X, Ren W J, Hu J F, Lu T Q, Yang W Y. Studies on suitable seedling age and variety for mechanized transplanting rice in rapeseed-rice planting area. Hybrid Rice, 2009, 24(5):43-47 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 贾现文, 朱起超, 杨志远, 孙永健, 郭翔, 石勇, 马均. 移栽秧龄对机插杂交稻产量及群体质量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(12):18-25.
Jia X W, Zhu Q C, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Guo X, Shi Y, Ma J. Effect of seedling age on yield and population quality of mechanized transplanted hybrid rice. Trans CSAE, 2014, 30(12):18-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Li Y X, Liu Y, Wang Y H, Ding Y F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Li G H. Effects of seedling age on the growth stage and yield formation of hydroponically grown long-mat rice seedlings. J Integr Agric, 2020, 19:1755-1767.
[11] 吕腾飞, 周伟, 李应洪, 张绍文, 李玥, 孙永健, 马均. 杂交中籼稻长秧龄移栽的分蘖成穗特性. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41:659-672.
Lyu T F, Zhou W, Li Y H, Zhang S W, Li Y, Sun Y J, Ma J. Tillering and earing characteristics of middle-season indica hybrid rice under long-age seedlings. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci Edn), 2015, 41:659-672 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 朱聪聪, 孙圳, 杨大柳, 王惟清, 刘俊, 吴爱国. 水稻钵苗机插秧苗素质的调控. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22):11-22.
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhu C C, Sun Z, Yang D L, Wang W Q, Liu J, Wu A G. Seedling quality regulation of rice potted-seedling in mechanical transplanting. Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(22):11-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 张均华, 林育炯, 黄洁, 白志刚, Sajid H, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 金千瑜. 基质类型及烯效唑对不同秧龄晚稻机插质量和产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(1):44-52.
Zhang J H, Lin Y J, Huang J, Bai Z G, Sajid H, Zhu L F, Cao X C, Jin Q Y. Effects of substrate types and uniconazole on mechanized transplanting qualities and grain yield for late rice with different seedling ages. Trans CSAE, 2018, 34(1):44-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 成臣, 雷凯, 程慧煌, 王盛亮, 朱博, 卢占军, 高冰可, 王斌强, 石庆华, 曾勇军. 苗期不同浓度多效唑对南方晚粳稻秧苗素质、茎蘖动态及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34:150-158.
Cheng C, Lei K, Cheng H H, Wang S L, Zhu B, Lu Z J, Gao B K, Wang B Q, Zeng Y J. Effects of different concentrations of paclobutrazol in seedling stage on seedling quality, tillering dynamics and grain yield of japonica rice during late cropping season in southern China. Chin J Rice Sci, 2020, 34:150-158 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 张祖建, 王君, 郎有忠, 于林惠, 薛艳凤, 朱庆森. 机插稻超秧龄秧苗生长特点研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34:297-304.
Zhang Z J, Wang J, Lang Y Z, Yu L H, Xue Y F, Zhu Q S. Growing characteristics of rice seedlings of over-optimum age for mechanical transplanting. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34:297-304 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Huang M, Tang Q Y, Ao H J, Zou Y B. Yield potential and stability in super hybrid rice and its production strategies. J Integr Agric, 2017, 16:1009-1017.
[17] 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻低播量精量播种育秧及机插取秧特性. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34:332-338.
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P, Xu Y C, Zhang Y K. Characteristics of seedling raising and mechanizaed transplanting of hybrid rice with a low seedling rate by precise seeding method. Chin J Rice Sci, 2020, 34:332-338 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 曾永跃, 唐国荣, 江立庚, 韦杰权, 宋红, 阮春芳. 机插水稻缓苗期生长特点及生理机制研究. 中国农机化学报, 2016, 37:205-209.
Zeng Y Y, Tang G R, Jiang L G, Wei J Q, Song H, Ruan C F. Study on growth characteristics and physiological mechanism of machine-transplanted rice during recovering period. J Chin Agric Mech, 2016, 37:205-209 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻精量条播育秧机插漏秧率与均匀度分析. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(3):66-68.
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P. Xu Y C, Zhang Y K. Analysis of missing hill rate and uniformity of seedling transplanted by machine in precious drilling sowing of hybrid rice. China Rice, 2020, 26(3):66-68 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Hu Q, Jiang W Q, Qiu S, Xing Z P, Guo B W, Liu G D, Gao H, Zhang H C, Wei H Y. Effect of wide-narrow row arrangement in mechanical pot-seedling transplanting and plant density on yield formation and grain quality of japonica rice. J Integr Agric, 2020, 19:1197-1214.
[21] Huang M, Fang S L, Cao F B, Chen J N. Prolonging seedling age does not reduce grain yields in machine-transplanted early-season rice under precision sowing. Ann Appl Biol, 2020, 176, 308-313.
[22] Lampayan R M, Faronilo J E, Tuong T P, Espiritu A J, de Dios J L, Bayot R S, Bueno C S, Hosen Y. Effects of seedbed management and delayed transplanting of rice seedlings on crop performance, grain yield, and water productivity. Field Crops Res, 2015, 183:303-314.
[23] 汪建军, 曾勇军, 易艳红, 章起明, 胡启星, 谭雪明, 黄山, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华. 基于不同播种量的双季机插早稻均匀度对产量形成的影响. 作物杂志, 2018, (2):141-147.
Wang J J, Zeng Y J, Yi Y H, Zhang Q M, Hu Q X, Tan X M, Huang S, Shang Q Y, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H. The uniformity of mechanical-transplanted early-season rice under different seedling rates and its effects on the formation of grain yield. Crops, 2018, (2):141-147 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 易子豪, 朱德峰, 王亚梁, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 陈惠哲. 流水灌溉减轻晚稻秧苗高温伤害的研究. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(4):5-7.
Yi Z H, Zhu D F, Wang Y L, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Chen H Z. Study on flowing water irrigation to alleviate high temperature damage on late rice seedlings. China Rice, 2019, 25(4):5-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 曾研华. 低温诱导籼粳杂交稻灌浆结实障碍特性研究. 南京农业大学博士学位论文,江苏南京, 2015.
Zeng Y H. Study on Mechanism of Grain Filling Obstacle Induced Low Temperature of Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu,China, 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] Huang M, Fang S L, Shan S L, Zou Y B. Delayed transplanting reduced grain yield due to low temperature stress at anthesis in machine-transplanted late-season rice. Exp Agric, 2019, 55:843-848.
[27] 吴文革, 杨剑波, 张健美, 周永进, 蔡海涛, 许有尊, 吴然然, 陈刚. 穴基本苗对机插杂交中籼稻群体构建及产量的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2014, 41:401-405.
Wu W G, Yang J B, Zhang J M, Zhou Y J, Cai H T, Xu Y Z, Wu R R, Chen G. Effects of seedling number per hole on population qualioty and yield of mechanical transplanting middle-season Indica hybrid rice. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2014, 41:401-405 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 彭斌, 李潘林, 周楠, 赖上坤, 朱建国, 杨连新, 王余龙. 不同秧苗素质和移栽密度条件下臭氧胁迫对水稻光合作用、物质生产和产量的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33:3668-3675.
Peng B, Li P L, Zhou N, Lai S K, Zhu J G, Yang L X, Wang Y L. Effects of ozone stress on photosynthesis, dry matter production and yield of rice under different seedling quality and plant density. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33:3668-3675 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] Wang Y L, Wang L, Chen H Z, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Shi Q H, Zhu D F, Zhang Y P. Sowing dates have different effects on spikelet formation among different photoperiod-sensitive rice genotypes. Agron J, 2019, 111:2263-2275.
[30] 滕飞, 陈惠哲, 曾研华, 蔡雪青, 朱德峰. 不同秧龄对双季机插晚稻生长特性与产量形成的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(30):95-100.
Teng F, Chen H Z, Zeng Y H, Cai X Q, Zhu D F. Effect of different seedling age on the growth and yield of double cropping of late rice. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(30):95-100 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2