欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 497-510.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23014

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同降雨年型施氮量与收获期对夏玉米产量及氮肥利用效率的影响

刘梦1(), 张垚1, 葛均筑1,*(), 周宝元2, 吴锡冬1, 杨永安3, 侯海鹏4   

  1. 1天津农学院农学与资源环境学院,天津 300384
    2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京 100081
    3天津市优质农产品开发示范中心,天津 301500
    4天津市农业发展服务中心,天津 300061
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-18 接受日期:2022-06-07 出版日期:2022-07-14 网络出版日期:2022-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 葛均筑
  • 作者简介:E-mail: m15222312583@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31701378);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300410)

Effects of nitrogen application and harvest time on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize under different rainfall years

LIU Meng1(), ZHANG Yao1, GE Jun-Zhu1,*(), ZHOU Bao-Yuan2, WU Xi-Dong1, YANG Yong-An3, HOU Hai-Peng4   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Resources and Environment, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China
    2Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    3Tianjin High-quality Agricultural Products Development Demonstration Center, Tianjin 301500, China
    4Tianjin Agricultural Development Service Center, Tianjin 300061, China
  • Received:2022-02-18 Accepted:2022-06-07 Published:2022-07-14 Published online:2022-07-14
  • Contact: GE Jun-Zhu
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31701378);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0300410)

摘要:

为探讨施氮量与收获期对华北平原热量资源限制区夏玉米籽粒灌浆与脱水、产量形成及氮素利用效率的调控效应, 本研究采用二因素区组试验设计, 因素公顷施氮量为0 (N0)、120 kg (N120, 2021)、180 kg (N180)、240 kg (N240)、300 kg (N300)、360 kg (N360)和450 kg (N450, 2020), 因素收获期设为传统收获(normal harvest, NH)和延迟收获(delayed harvest, DH), 测定干物质积累量(dry matter accumulation, DM)、籽粒灌浆与脱水、产量(grain yield, GY)及其构成因素、氮肥偏生产力(nitrogen partial factor productivity, PFPN)和农学利用效率(nitrogen agronomic use efficiency, ANUE)。与干旱年型(2020年)相比, 丰水年型(2021年) DM和粒重(grain weight, GW)显著下降16.3%~81.5%和2.1%~28.1%, 穗粒数(ear grains number, EGN)显著减少44.7%~47.4%, 导致GY、PFPN和ANUE显著降低31.4%~58.3%、27.2%~30.0%和2.9%~18.0%。与N0相比, 施氮显著提高DM, GW提高14.6~82.1 mg grain-1, 最大灌浆速率(maximum grain filling rate, Gmax)及其生长量(weight increment of Gmax, Wmax)提高0.2~3.4 mg (grain d)-1和10.4~44.1 mg grain-1, 到达Gmax时期(time reaching the Gmax, Tmax)提前0.4~7.0 d, GY显著提高51.5%~169.5% (P<0.01), N240增产效应最优; 增施氮肥导致PFPN和ANUE比N180/N120显著降低11.7%~57.9%和2.5%~54.9%、19.9%~52.6%和4.9%~37.0%。与NH相比, DH处理DM和GW显著提高0.8%~55.7%和3.4%~79.3%, 籽粒含水率(grain moisture content, GMC)显著降低至22.0%~27.9%, GY、PFPN和ANUE显著提高10.6%~18.5%、4.4%~26.8%和1.5%~48.6%。线性加平台模型分析表明, DH处理比NH GY提高11.3%~12.6% (P<0.01), 达12.0×103 kg hm-2和7.0×103 kg hm-2, 但最优施氮量自200~210 kg hm-2增至247 kg hm-2。综之, 华北平原热量限制区夏玉米传统收获情景下减氮至200 kg hm-2, 产量稳定在6.0×103~10.5×103 kg hm-2以上; 延迟收获情景下, 降低籽粒含水率, 减氮至240 kg hm-2, 产量达8.0×103~12.0×103 kg hm-2以上, PFPN和ANUE最优为19.2~49.6 kg kg-1和15.3~20.8 kg kg-1, 可为区域夏玉米降低籽粒含水率, 实现籽粒机收与减氮稳产高效的生产目标提供理论支撑。

关键词: 夏玉米, 降雨年型, 施氮量, 收获期, 产量, 氮肥利用效率

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of nitrogen application and harvest time on summer maize grain filling and dehydration, yield formation, and nitrogen use efficiency in thermal resource restricted area in the North China Plain, we adopted a two-factor randomized block area experiment design, one factor was nitrogen application rate per hectare [0 kg (N0), 120 kg (N120, 2021), 180 kg (N180), 240 kg (N240), 300 kg (N300), 360 kg (N360), and 450 kg (N450, 2020)], and another factor was harvest time [normal harvest (NH) and delayed harvest (DH)]. Dry matter accumulation (DM), grain filling and dehydration processes, grain yield (GY) and its components, nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN), and agronomic nitrogen utilization efficiency (ANUE) were investigated. Compared to the dry year (2020), DM, grain weight (GW), a%, respectively, resulting in GY, PFPN, and ANUE significantly reduced by 31.4%-58.3%, 27.2%-30.0%, and 2.9%-18.0%, respectively. Compared with N0, nitrogen application significantly enhanced DM, and GW were 14.6-82.1 mg grain-1 higher than N0, while the maximum grain filling rate (Gmax) and its weight increment (Wmax) were enhanced by 0.2-3.4 mg (grain d)-1 and 10.4-44.1 mg grain-1, meanwhile the time reaching Gmax (Tmax) were earlier by 0.4-7.0 d. The GY of nitrogen application treatments were dramatically raised by 51.5%-169.5% than N0, and in the N240 level it was the optimized nitrogen application. Compared with that of N180/N120, with the increase of nitrogen application rate, the PFPN and ANUE in two years were significantly reduced by 11.7%-57.9% and 2.5%-54.9%, 19.9%-52.6% and 4.9%-37.0%, respectively. Compared with NH treatment, the DM and GW of DH treatment were increased significantly by 0.8%-55.7% and 3.4%-79.3%, and dramatically reduced grain moisture content to 22.0%-27.9% at harvest stage. The GY, PFPN, and ANUE of DH treatment were remarkable higher than NH treatment by 10.6%-18.5%, 4.4%-26.8%, and 1.5%-48.6%, respectively. The linear plus platform model showed that the highest GY of DH treatment obtained to 12.0×103 kg hm-2 and 7.0×103 kg hm-2, which were significantly higher than NH by 11.3%-12.6%, whereas the optimal nitrogen application rate were reached to 247 kg hm-2 form 200-210 kg hm-2, increased by 13.9%-22.9%. In conclusion, in thermal resource restricted area in the North nd ear grains number (EGN) under rainy year (2021) were significant decreased by 16.3%-81.5%, 2.1%-28.1%, and 44.7%-47.4 China Plain, the nitrogen application rate could reduce to 200 kg hm-2 and GY stabilized above 6.0×103-10.5×103 kg hm-2 under normal harvest time, meanwhile the nitrogen application rate could optimized to 240 kg hm-2 and achieved higher GY above 8.0×103-12.0×103 kg hm-2 with higher PFPN and ANUE at 19.2-49.6 kg kg-1 and 15.2-20.8 kg kg-1 levels under delayed harvest. In conclusion, the results revealed that the theoretic support for reduced summer maize grain moisture content, achieving the production goal as grain machine harvesting, nitrogen reduction, high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize in the North China Plain.

Key words: summer maize, rainfall year types, nitrogen application rate, harvest time, grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency

图1

2020年和2021年玉米生育期气象数据"

图2

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米干物质积累量的影响 Stem+Leaf: 茎+叶; Grain: 籽粒。NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。N0: 施氮量为0 kg hm-2; N120: 施氮量为120 kg hm-2; N180: 施氮量为180 kg hm-2; N240: 施氮量为240 kg hm-2; N300: 施氮量为300 kg hm-2; N360: 施氮量为360 kg hm-2; N450: 施氮量为450 kg hm-2。V6: 拔节期; R1: 吐丝期。不同小写字母表示不同施氮处理在同一时期达到显著差异(P < 0.05)。"

图3

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米灌浆期籽粒干重的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。处理同图2。"

图4

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米籽粒灌浆速率的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。处理同图2。"

图5

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米灌浆期籽粒含水率的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。处理同图2。"

图6

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米灌浆期籽粒脱水速率的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。处理同图2。"

图7

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米产量的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。不同小写字母表示不同施氮处理收获期产量达到显著差异(P < 0.05)。处理同图2。"

表1

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米产量构成因素的影响"

年型
Year
收获期
Harvest time
(HT)
施氮量
Nitrogen
(N)
穗数
Number of ears
(×104 hm-2)
穗行数
Number of
grain lines
行粒数
Number of
line grains
穗粒数
Number of
ear grains
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
2020 NH N0 7.5 13.0 ± 0.1 b 22.3 ± 1.7 b 277.0 ± 9.4 e 265.3 ± 0.7 d
N180 7.5 14.1 ± 0.4 a 29.7 ± 1.9 a 442.0 ± 2.5 b 320.2 ± 8.5 c
N240 7.5 14.5 ± 0.3 a 30.2 ± 1.5 a 429.3 ± 3.2 bc 327.9 ± 1.1 bc
N300 7.5 14.4 ± 0.2 a 30.5 ± 2.0 a 456.8 ± 5.4 a 318.4 ± 2.3 c
N360 7.5 14.3 ± 0.3 a 28.7 ± 0.7 a 417.2 ± 10.1 c 338.0 ± 7.6 ab
N450 7.5 14.0 ± 0.3 a 28.1 ± 0.4 a 392.5 ± 5.1 d 346.3 ± 9.7 a
DH N0 7.5 13.3 ± 0.4 b 20.5 ± 1.4 b 285.8 ± 10.7 c 311.2 ± 2.0 c
N180 7.5 14.7 ± 0.8 a 28.7 ± 1.2 a 438.9 ± 21.4 a 347.4 ± 2.5 b
N240 7.5 14.3 ± 0.6 ab 29.9 ± 0.6 a 428.1 ± 22.1 a 370.6 ± 7.7 a
N300 7.5 14.1 ± 0.9 ab 29.7 ± 2.3 a 449.7 ± 10.8 a 369.3 ± 4.0 a
N360 7.5 14.4 ± 0.7 ab 30.3 ± 2.7 a 460.6 ± 20.6 a 370.6 ± 7.5 a
N450 7.5 14.2 ± 0.2 ab 28.5 ± 2.0 a 386.3 ± 6.4 b 373.2 ± 3.5 a
2021 NH N0 7.5 10.4 ± 0.6 b 11.1 ± 1.0 e 125.4 ± 5.2 e 276.7 ± 1.0 b
N120 7.5 11.1 ± 0.8 ab 16.9 ± 2.1 d 171.5 ± 17.2 d 301.8 ± 0.7 ab
N180 7.5 11.5 ± 0.5 a 19.0 ± 0.9 cd 212.1 ± 6.0 cd 326.7 ± 9.3 a
N240 7.5 11.2 ± 0.4 ab 21.8 ± 3.5 bc 249.3 ± 46.0 bc 328.1 ± 30.6 a
N300 7.5 11.4 ± 0.2 a 22.7 ± 1.8 ab 273.6 ± 7.5 ab 323.0 ± 19.3 a
N360 7.5 11.5 ± 0.5 a 26.2 ± 0.8 a 302.6 ± 11.6 a 308.0 ± 8.3 ab
DH N0 7.5 10.7 ± 0.8 a 10.8 ± 0.6 d 119.1 ± 11.5 d 295.9 ± 37.2 b
N120 7.5 11.3 ± 0.6 a 16.8 ± 1.5 c 178.7 ± 21.7 c 339.9 ± 14.0 a
N180 7.5 11.3 ± 0.7 a 18.6 ± 2.7 bc 185.8 ± 0.5 c 376.5 ± 1.5 a
N240 7.5 11.1 ± 0.6 a 21.5 ± 3.2 b 261.1 ± 38.2 ab 348.9 ± 3.1 ab
N300 7.5 11.3 ± 0.2 a 21.4 ± 1.4 b 242.2 ± 20.5 b 373.5 ± 1.4 a
N360 7.5 11.5 ± 0.5 a 25.6 ± 0.7 a 300.7 ± 16.2 a 343.3 ± 19.7 a

图8

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米氮肥偏生产力的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。不同小写字母表示不同施氮处理氮肥偏生产力达到显著差异(P<0.05)。处理同图2。"

图9

不同降雨年型下延迟收获及施氮量对夏玉米氮肥农学利用效率的影响 NH: 传统收获处理; DH: 延迟收获处理。不同小写字母表示不同施氮处理氮肥农学利用效率达到显著差异(P < 0.05)。处理同图2。"

[1] 陆伟婷, 于欢, 曹胜男, 陈长青. 近20年黄淮海地区气候变暖对夏玉米生育进程及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48: 3132-3145.
Lu W T, Yu H, Cao S N, Chen C Q. Effects of climate warming on growth process and yield of summer maize in Huang-Huai- Hai Plain in last 20 years. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48: 3132-3245. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 任佰朝, 高飞, 魏玉君, 董树亭, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 冬小麦-夏玉米周年生产条件下夏玉米的适宜熟期与积温需求特性. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 137-143.
Ren B Z, Gao F, Wei Y J, Dong S T, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Suitable maturity period and accumulated temperature of summer maize in wheat-maize double cropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 137-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00137
[3] 李璐璐, 明博, 谢瑞芝, 王克如, 侯鹏, 李少昆. 黄淮海夏玉米品种脱水类型与机械粒收时间的确立. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 1764-1773.
Li L L, Ming B, Xie R Z, Wang K R, Hou P, Li S K. Grain dehydration types and establishment of mechanical grain harvesting time for summer maize in the Yellow-Huai-Hai Rivers Plain. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 1764-1773 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01764
[4] 王克如, 李璐璐, 鲁镇胜, 高尚, 王浥州, 黄兆福, 谢瑞芝, 明博, 侯鹏, 薛军, 张镇涛, 侯梁宇, 李少昆. 黄淮海夏玉米机械化粒收质量及其主要影响因素. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(7): 1-7.
Wang K R, Li L L, Lu Z S, Gao S, Wang Y Z, Huang Z F, Xie R Z, Ming B, Hou P, Xue J, Zhang Z T, Hou L Y, Li S K. Mechanized grain harvesting quality of summer maize and its major influencing factors in Huanghuaihai region of China. Trans CSAE, 2021, 37(7): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Zhou B Y, Yue Y, Sun X F, Wang X B, Wang Z M, Ma W, Zhao M. Maize grain yield and dry matter production responses to variations in weather conditions. Agron J, 2016, 108: 196-204.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2015.0196
[6] 李璐璐, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 明博, 赵磊, 李姗姗, 侯鹏, 李少昆. 玉米生理成熟后田间脱水期间的籽粒重量与含水率变化. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 2052-2060.
Li L L, Wang K R, Xie R Z, Ming B, Zhao L, Li S S, Hou P, Li S K. Corn kernel weight and moisture content after physiological maturity in field. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 2052-2060. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 周宝元, 马玮, 孙雪芳, 高卓晗, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 播/收期对冬小麦-夏玉米一年两熟模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52: 1501-1517.
Zhou B Y, Ma W, Sun X F, Gao Z H, Ding Z S, Li C F, Zhao M. Effects of different sowing and harvest dates of winter wheat-summer maize under double cropping system on the annual climate resource distribution and utilization. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52: 1501-1517. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Liu Z, Gao J, Gao F, Liu P, Zhao B, Zhang J W. Late harvest improves yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of summer maize. Field Crops Res, 2019, 232: 88-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.014
[9] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 1843-1853.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.13012
Zhou B Y, Ge J Z, Sun X F, Han Y L, Ma W, Ding Z S, Li C F, Zhao M. Characteristics of annual climate resource distribution and utilization for different cropping systems in the south of Yellow-Huaihe-Haihe Rivers plain. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 1843-1853. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.13012
[10] Liu Z, Zhu K L, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B, Zhang J W. Effects of integrated agronomic practices management on root growth and development of summer maize. Eur J Agron, 2017, 84: 140-151.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.12.006
[11] Meng Q F, Hou P, Wu L, Chen X P, Cui Z L, Zhang F S. Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Res, 2013, 143: 91-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.023
[12] 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 施氮量对夏玉米籽粒灌浆特性和营养品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30: 3771-3776.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.021
Yu N N, Ren B Z, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Effects of nitrogen application rate on grain filling characteristics and nutritional quality of summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30: 3771-3776. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.021
[13] Chen X P, Cui Z L, Fan M S, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma W Q, Wang Z L, Zhang W J, Yan X Y, Yang J C, Deng X P, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo S W, Ren J, Li S Q, Ye Y L, Wang Z H, Huang J L, Tang Q Y, Sun Y X, Peng X L, Zhang J W, He M R, Zhu Y J, Xue J Q, Wang G L, Wu L, An N, Wu L Q, Ma L, Zhang W F, Zhang F S. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014, 514: 486-491.
doi: 10.1038/nature13609
[14] 钟茜, 巨晓棠, 张福锁. 华北平原冬小麦/夏玉米轮作体系对氮素环境承受力分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12: 285-293.
Zhong Q, Ju X T, Zhang F S. Analysis of environmental endurance of winter wheat/summer maize rotation system to nitrogen in North China Plain. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2006, 12: 285-293. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 赵荣芳, 陈新平, 张福锁. 华北地区冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系的氮素循环与平衡. 土壤学报, 2009, 46: 684-697.
Zhao R F, Chen X P, Zhang F S. Nitrogen cycling and balance in winter-wheat-summer-maize rotation system in northern China Plain. Acta Pedol Sin, 2009, 46: 684-697. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Zhang Y Y, Liu J F, Mu Y J, Xu Z, Pei S W, Lun X X, Zhang Y. Nitrous oxide emissions from a maize field during two consecutive growing seasons in the North China Plain. J Environ Sci, 2012, 24: 160-168.
doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60594-3
[17] Huang T, Ju X T, Yang H. Nitrate leaching in a winter wheat-summer maize rotation on a calcareous soil as affected by nitrogen and straw management. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 42247.
doi: 10.1038/srep42247 pmid: 28176865
[18] 王旭敏, 雒文鹤, 刘朋召, 张琦, 王瑞, 李军. 节水减氮对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累转运及产量的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 3183-3197.
Wang X M, Luo W H, Liu P Z, Zhang Q, Wang R, Li J. Regulation effects of water saving and nitrogen reduction on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, transportation and yield of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 3183-3197. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 于宁宁, 赵子航, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 综合农艺管理促进夏玉米氮素吸收、籽粒灌浆和品质提高. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26: 797-805.
Yu N N, Zhao Z H, Ren B Z, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Integrated agronomic management practices improve nitrogen absorption, grain filling and nutritional qualities of summer maize. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26: 797-805. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 胡小康, 黄彬香, 苏芳, 巨晓棠, 江荣风, 张福锁. 氮肥管理对夏玉米土壤CH4和N2O排放的影响. 中国科学: 化学, 2011, 41(1): 117-128.
Hu X K, Huang B X, Su F, Ju X T, Jiang R F, Zhang F S. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on CH4 and N2O emissions from summer maize soil. Sci China Chem, 2011, 41(1): 117-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭, 陈新平, 张福锁. 中国玉米区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究. 土壤学报, 2015, 52: 802-817.
Wu L Q, Wu L, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Zhang F S. Basic NPK fertilizer recommendation and fertilizer formula for maize production regions in China. Acta Pedol Sin, 2015, 52: 802-817. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 沈皓俊, 罗勇, 赵宗慈, 王汉杰. 基于LSTM网络的中国夏季降水预测研究. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3): 263-275.
Shen H J, Luo Y, Zhao Z C, Wang H J. Prediction of summer precipitation in China based on LSTM network. Clim Change Res, 2020, 16(3): 263-275. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 于维祯, 张晓驰, 胡娟, 邵靖宜, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 弱光涝渍复合胁迫对夏玉米产量及光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 3834-3846.
Yu W Z, Zhang X C, Hu J, Shao J Y, Liu P, Zhao B, Ren B Z. Combined effects of sade and waterlogging on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 3834-3846. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Ren B Z, Zhang J W, Li X, Fan X, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B. Effects of waterlogging on the yield and growth of summer maize under field conditions. Can J Plant Sci, 2014, 94: 23-31.
doi: 10.4141/cjps2013-175
[25] 任佰朝, 张吉旺, 李霞, 范霞, 董树亭, 赵斌, 刘鹏. 淹水胁迫对夏玉米籽粒灌浆特性和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 4435-4445.
Ren B Z, Zhang J W, Li X, Fan X, Dong S T, Zhao B, Liu P. Effect of waterlogging on grain filling and quality of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 4435-4445. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 任佰朝, 朱玉玲, 李霞, 范霞, 董树亭, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 大田淹水对夏玉米光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41: 329-338.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00329
Ren B Z, Zhu Y L, Li X, Fan X, Dong S T, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Effects of waterlogging on photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize under field conditions. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41: 329-338. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00329
[27] 僧珊珊, 王群, 李潮海, 刘天学, 赵龙飞. 淹水胁迫下不同玉米品种根结构及呼吸代谢差异. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 4141-4148.
Seng S S, Wang Q, Li C H, Li T X, Zhao F L. Difference in root structure and respiration metabolism between two maize cultivars under waterlogging stress. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 4141-4148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 武文明, 王世济, 陈洪俭, 魏凤珍, 李金才. 氮肥运筹对苗期受渍夏玉米子粒灌浆特性和产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(6): 120-125.
Wu W M, Wang S J, Chen H J, Wei F Z, Li J C. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on grain filling characteristics in summer maize under waterlogging at the seedling stage. J Maize Sci, 2016, 24(6): 120-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] Xu J, Li C F, Liu H T, Pei L, Zhou P L, Tao Z Q, Wang P, Meng Q F, Zhao M. The effects of plastic film mulching on maize growth and water use in dry and rainy years in Northeast China. PLoS One, 2015, 10: e0125781.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125781
[30] Wang S L, Wang H, Zhang Y H, Wang R, Zhang Y J, Xu Z G, Jia G G, Wang X L, Lia J. The influence of rotational tillage on soil water storage, water use efficiency and maize yield in semi-arid areas under varied rainfall conditions. Agric Water Manage, 2018, 203: 376-384.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.007
[31] 张元红, 王瑞, 徐宗贵, 李军. 不同降水年型下旱地玉米产量性状对种植密度和品种的响应. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(22): 136-144.
Zhang Y H, Wang R, Xu Z G, Li J. Responses of yield traits to planting density and cultivar of spring maize in drylands under different rainfall types. Trans CSAE, 2021, 37(22): 136-144. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 刘志辉, 展茗, 梁如玉, 王燕, 刘永忠, 黄益勤, 杨仁能, 尚春辉. 延迟收获对长江中游春玉米农艺性状及机收质量的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(11): 10-22.
Liu Z H, Zhan M, Liang R Y, Wang Y, Liu Y Z, Huang Y C, Yang R N, Shang C H. Effect of delayed harvest on the agronomic traits and mechanical harvest quality of spring maize in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. J China Agric Univ, 2021, 26(11): 10-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 梁效贵, 赵雪, 吴巩, 陈先敏, 高震, 申思, 林珊, 周顺利. 推迟收获对华北夏玉米籽粒脱水和力学特性的影响及其品种差异. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(5): 1-9.
Liang X G, Zhao X, Wu F, Chen X M, Gao Z, Shen S, Lin S, Zhou S L. Grain dehydration and mechanical characteristics of different summer maize hybrids and their responses to delayed harvest in the North China Plain. J China Agric Univ, 2019, 24(5): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] Liu Y E, Hou P, Xie R Z, Li S K, Zhang H B, Ming B, Ma D L, Liang S M. Spatial adaptabilities of spring maize to variation of climatic conditions. Crop Sci, 2013, 53: 1693-1703.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.12.0688
[35] 程前, 李广浩, 陆卫平, 陆大雷. 增密减氮提高夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26: 1035-1046.
Cheng Q, Li G H, Lu W P, Lu D L. Increasing planting density and decreasing nitrogen rate increase yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26: 1035-1046.. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 李广浩, 刘娟, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 石德杨. 密植与氮肥用量对不同耐密型夏玉米品种产量及氮素利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 2247-2258.
Li G H, Liu J, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhang J W, Zhao B, Shi D Y. Effects of close planting and nitrogen application rates on grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of different density- tolerance maize hybrids. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 2247-2258. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 申丽霞, 王璞, 张软斌. 施氮对不同种植密度下夏玉米产量及子粒灌浆的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11: 314-319.
Shen L X, Wang P, Zhang R B. Effect of nitrogen supply on yield and grain filling in summer maize with different crop density. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2005, 11: 314-319. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] 王震, 李金秀, 张彬, 冯浩, 李金榜. 小麦玉米一体化氮肥运筹对小麦产量和氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24: 1169-1177.
Wang Z, Li J X, Zhang B, Feng H, Li J B. Effects of different nitrogen applications on yields and nitrogen utilization efficiencies of wheats under integrated nitrogen management for wheat-maize rotation system. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2018, 24: 1169-1177. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39] 潘家荣, 巨晓棠, 刘学军, 陈新平, 张福锁, 毛达如. 水氮优化条件下在华北平原冬小麦/夏玉米轮作中化肥氮的去向. 核农学报, 2009, 23: 334-340.
doi: 10.11869/hnxb.2009.02.0334
Pan J R, Ju X T, Liu X J, Chen X P, Zhang F S, Mao D R. The fate of fertilizer nitrogen in winter wheat/summer maize rotation in the North China Plain under water and nitrogen optimization conditions. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2009, 23: 334-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘月, 明博, 李姚姚, 王克如, 侯鹏, 薛军, 李少昆, 谢瑞芝. 基于根冠协调发展的东北春玉米高产种植密度分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 795-807.
[2] 郭宏, 于霁雯, 裴文锋, 关永虎, 李航, 李长喜, 刘金伟, 王伟, 王宝全, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉杂种F2的遗传分析及遗传主效聚类[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 608-621.
[3] 高春华, 冯波, 李国芳, 李宗新, 李升东, 曹芳, 慈文亮, 赵海军. 施氮量对花后高温胁迫下冬小麦籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 821-832.
[4] 方娅婷, 任涛, 张顺涛, 周橡棋, 赵剑, 廖世鹏, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 氮磷钾肥对旱地和水田油菜产量及养分利用的影响差异[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 772-783.
[5] 殷芳冰, 李雅楠, 鲍建喜, 马雅杰, 秦文萱, 王锐璞, 龙艳, 李金萍, 董振营, 万向元. 玉米雌穗产量相关性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 377-391.
[6] 宋杰, 王少祥, 李亮, 黄金苓, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 刘鹏. 施钾量对夏玉米氮、磷、钾吸收利用和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 539-551.
[7] 陶士宝, 柯健, 孙杰, 尹传俊, 朱铁忠, 陈婷婷, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 郭爽爽, 武立权. 长江中下游地区不同穗型中籼杂交稻高产群体农艺特征[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 511-525.
[8] 徐彤, 吕艳杰, 邵玺文, 耿艳秋, 王永军. 不同时期化控对密植玉米冠层结构及籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 472-484.
[9] 张翔宇, 胡鑫慧, 谷淑波, 林祥, 殷复伟, 王东. 减氮条件下分期施钾对冬小麦籽粒产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 447-458.
[10] 孙智超, 张吉旺. 弱光胁迫影响玉米产量形成的生理机制及调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 12-23.
[11] 李秀, 李刘龙, 李慕嵘, 尹立俊, 王小燕. 不同小麦品种旗叶叶绿素含量、叶片显微结构及产量对花后遮光的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 286-294.
[12] 陈嘉军, 林祥, 谷淑波, 王威雁, 张保军, 朱俊科, 王东. 花后叶面喷施尿素对冬小麦氮素吸收利用和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 277-285.
[13] 王海琪, 王荣荣, 蒋桂英, 尹豪杰, 晏世杰, 车子强. 施氮量对滴灌春小麦叶片光合生理性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 211-224.
[14] 陈冰洁, 张富粮, 杨硕, 李晓立, 何堂庆, 张晨曦, 田明慧, 吴梅, 郝晓峰, 张学林. 不同形态氮肥下丛枝菌根真菌对玉米灌浆期生理特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 249-261.
[15] 周群, 袁锐, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 不同施氮量下籼/粳杂交稻甬优2640产量和氮素吸收利用的特点[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2285-2299.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!