欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 174-188.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.32055

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿交替灌溉与植物生长调节剂对水稻光合特性及内源激素的影响

赵黎明1,*(), 段绍彪1, 项洪涛2, 郑殿峰1,*(), 冯乃杰1, 沈雪峰1   

  1. 1广东海洋大学滨海农业学院, 广东湛江 524088
    2黑龙江省农业机械工程科学研究院绥化分院, 黑龙江绥化 152054
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-14 接受日期:2024-08-15 出版日期:2025-01-12 网络出版日期:2024-09-02
  • 通讯作者: *赵黎明, E-mail: nkzlm@126.com; 郑殿峰, E-mail: gdouzdffnj@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东海洋大学科研启动经费资助项目(060302052010);国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD20B0402)

Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and plant growth regulators on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormones of rice

ZHAO Li-Ming1,*(), DUAN Shao-Biao1, XIANG Hong-Tao2, ZHENG Dian-Feng1,*(), FENG Nai-Jie1, SHEN Xue-Feng1   

  1. 1College of Coastal Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, Guangdong, China
    2Suihua Branch, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Machinery Sciences, Suihua 152054, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2023-12-14 Accepted:2024-08-15 Published:2025-01-12 Published online:2024-09-02
  • Contact: *E-mail: nkzlm@126.com; E-mail: gdouzdffnj@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Program for Scientific Research Start-Upfunds of Guangdong Ocean University(060302052010);National 12th Five-Year Science and Technology Support Plan Project(2012BAD20B0402)

RichHTML

17

PDF

237

摘要：

为探明干湿交替灌溉与植物生长调节剂(plant growth regulators, PGRs)对水稻光合特性、内源激素及产量的影响。采用盆栽与大田相结合方式, 以龙粳31为试验材料, 设置轻干湿交替灌溉(MI)和重干湿交替灌溉(HI) 2种灌溉处理, 于分蘖盛期和剑叶展叶期喷施已酸二乙氨基乙醇酯(diethyl aminoethyl caproate, DA)、6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-benzylaminoadenine, BA)和BA (分蘖盛期)+DA (剑叶展叶期) 3种PGRs, 并设置清水对照, 探究干湿交替灌溉、PGRs及互作下干物质积累、光合特性、内源激素及产量差异。结果表明, 与HI相比, MI显著增加了抽穗后叶面积、叶面积指数、SPAD值及净光合速率, 提高了剑叶与籽粒IAA、GA3和ZR含量, 降低了ABA含量, 增加了干物质积累及茎鞘物质转运能力, 并在改善节间性状基础上增加了结实率、每穗粒数及粒重, 增产5.30% (盆栽)和5.11% (大田)。与CK相比, 喷施BA+DA显著提高了抽穗后剑叶净光合速率、干物质积累及茎鞘物质转运能力, 提高了剑叶与籽粒IAA、GA3和ZR含量, 增加了千粒重、结实率、收获指数、每穗粒数和粒重, 增产6.60% (盆栽)和6.05% (大田), 其次是BA。干湿交替灌溉与PGRs互作对叶面积指数、内源激素含量、每穗粒数及千粒重存在显著影响, 其中MI×(BA+DA)处理更有助于维持抽穗后绿叶功能持续期, 提高叶片SPAD值、叶面积、叶面积指数和净光合速率, 增强干物质积累及茎鞘物质转运能力, 提高叶片与籽粒IAA、GA3和ZR含量, 促进同化物向籽粒输出, 并在稳定穗数基础上增加了千粒重、每穗粒数和粒重, 提高了结实率和收获指数, 实现产量较其他处理及CK增幅3.17%~12.57% (盆栽)和3.14%~11.55% (大田), 而HI×(BA+DA)处理可实现MI×CK产量效果。综上所述, 干湿交替灌溉配合喷施BA+DA可作为本区域水稻高产高效生产环节中的一种节水化控栽培组合措施。

关键词: 水稻, 干湿交替灌溉, 植物生长调节剂, 光合特性, 内源激素, 产量

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on photosynthetic characteristics, endogenous hormones, and yield of rice. Pot and field experiments were conducted using Longjing 31 as the experimental material. Two irrigation treatments were set up: moderate alternative wetting and drying irrigation (MI) and heavy alternating wetting and drying irrigation (HI). The effects of these irrigation treatments on yield formation and photosynthetic characteristics of rice were examined. Additionally, three PGRs—diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (DA), 6-benzylaminoadenine (BA), and BA + DA—were sprayed at the full tillering stage and sword leaf expansion stage to analyze their effects on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormones of rice post-heading. Differences in dry matter accumulation, photosynthetic characteristics, endogenous hormones, and yield under alternate wetting and drying irrigation, PGRs, and their interactions were studied. The results showed that MI significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, SPAD value, and net photosynthetic rate. It also increased the contents of IAA, GA3, and ZR in flag leaves and grains, decreased ABA content, and enhanced dry matter accumulation and stem-sheath matter transport capacity. Consequently, MI improved internode characteristics, seed setting rate, grain number, and weight per panicle, resulting in an actual yield increase of 5.30% (Pot) and 5.11% (Field) compared to HI. In terms of plant growth regulators, BA+DA significantly increased the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration of flag leaves post-heading. It also increased dry matter accumulation, stem-sheath matter transport capacity, and the contents of IAA, GA3, and ZR in flag leaves and grains. This led to increases in 1000-grain weight, seed setting rate, harvest index, grain number per panicle, and grain weight per panicle, boosting yield by 6.60% (Pot) and 6.05% (Field), followed by BA, compared to CK. The interaction of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and PGRs had significant effects on leaf area index, endogenous hormone content, grains per panicle, and 1000-grain weight. Notably, the MI×(BA+DA) treatment was more effective in maintaining the functional duration of green leaves post-heading, increasing leaf SPAD value, leaf area, leaf area index, and net photosynthetic rate. It also enhanced dry matter accumulation, stem-sheath matter transport, and the contents of IAA, GA3, and ZR in leaves and grains, promoting the export of assimilates to grains. This treatment, on the basis of stable panicle number, improved 1000-grain weight, grain number and grain weight per panicle, seed setting rate, and harvest index. Compared to other treatments and CK, it achieved a yield increase of 3.17%-12.57% (Pot) and 3.14%-11.55% (Field). However, HI×(BA+DA) could achieve the yield effect of MI×CK. These results indicate that alternate wetting and drying irrigation combined with spraying BA+DA can be used as a water-saving chemical control cultivation measure for high-yield and high-efficiency rice production in this region.

Key words: rice, alternate wetting and drying irrigation, plant growth regulators, photosynthetic characteristics, endogenous hormones, yield

表1

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对水稻产量及其构成的影响"

处理
Treatment		 有效穗数
Effective panicle number		 每穗粒数
Grain number per panicle		 每穗粒重
Grain weight per panicle (g)		 结实率
Seed-setting rate (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 收获指数
Harvest index		 产量
Yield
盆栽 Pot
(pot−1)		 大田 Field
(m−2)		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽 Pot
(g pot−1)		 大田 Field
(kg hm−2)
MI DA 49.3 a 542.3 a 69.03 c 78.41 c 1.64 ab 1.91 b 91.25 ab 94.15 b 26.01 a 25.80 a 0.582 a 0.591 ab 80.50 b 10,340.94 b
BA 50.3 a 551.7 a 70.41 a 80.83 a 1.61 b 1.87 c 89.35 c 82.34 c 25.61 b 25.11 b 0.571 a 0.586 b 81.15 b 10,298.45 b
BA+DA 49.5 a 547.9 a 69.47 bc 79.47 b 1.69 a 1.95 a 92.55 a 95.69 a 26.26 a 25.70 a 0.582 a 0.598 a 83.72 a 10,665.84 a
CK 49.3 a 545.6 a 69.73 b 78.72 bc 1.60 b 1.85 c 90.24 bc 93.17 bc 25.44 b 25.29 b 0.580 a 0.585 b 78.89 b 10,111.80 c
HI DA 49.1 a 543.0 a 67.01 b 75.69 bc 1.57 ab 1.82 b 88.65 a 92.69 a 26.40 a 26.04 b 0.570 ab 0.583 a 76.65 b 9882.65 b
BA 50.0 a 545.3 a 67.93 a 76.37 ab 1.55 b 1.79 bc 86.58 b 89.62 c 26.23 a 26.12 b 0.567 b 0.577 ab 77.23 ab 9760.92 b
BA+DA 49.2 a 542.4 a 68.50 a 76.80 a 1.62 a 1.88 a 89.09 a 92.26 a 26.57 a 26.67 a 0.575 a 0.586 a 79.67 a 10,197.17 a
CK 49.0 a 539.2 a 67.12 b 75.27 c 1.53 b 1.77 c 87.39 ab 90.97 a 26.54 a 25.86 b 0.571 ab 0.569 b 74.37 b 9561.86 c
MI 49.6 a 546.9 a 69.17 a 79.34 a 1.64 a 1.89 a 90.85 a 93.84 a 25.83 b 25.48 b 0.579 a 0.590 a 81.06 a 10,354.27 a
HI 49.3 a 542.5 a 67.64 b 76.03 b 1.57 b 1.82 b 87.93 b 91.38 b 26.46 a 26.17 a 0.571 a 0.579 b 76.98 b 9850.65 b
DA 49.2 a 542.7 a 68.02 b 77.05 b 1.60 b 1.86 b 89.95 ab 93.42 a 26.20 ab 25.92 b 0.576 a 0.587 ab 78.58 b 10,111.79 b
BA 50.1 a 548.5 a 69.17 a 78.60 a 1.58 b 1.83 c 87.92 c 90.98 c 25.97 b 25.62 c 0.569 a 0.582 b 79.19 ab 10,029.68 b
BA+DA 49.3 a 545.2 a 68.98 a 78.13 a 1.65 a 1.91 a 90.82 a 93.98 a 26.42 a 26.18 a 0.579 a 0.592 a 81.69 a 10,431.50 a
CK 49.1 a 542.4 a 68.42 b 76.98 b 1.57 b 1.81 c 87.96 c 90.07 b 25.99 b 25.58 c 0.576 a 0.577 b 76.63 b 9836.85 c
AWI 0.82ns 2.25ns 40.77* 103.47** 26.53** 50.45** 33.69** 681.47** 26.27** 56.93** 2.15ns 7.82* 35.07** 71.63*
PGRs 1.97ns 0.57ns 1.92ns 9.19** 4.90** 26.07** 6.37** 19.32** 3.34* 12.70** 1.39ns 9.17* 6.81* 27.40**
AWI×PGRs 0.03ns 0.17ns 6.03* 4.55* 1.02ns 0.24ns 0.14ns 1.82ns 3.29* 5.18* 1.02ns 0.59ns 2.04ns 0.24ns

表2

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对水稻农艺性状的影响"

处理
Treatment		 株高Plant height (cm) 穗长Spike length (cm) 节间长Internode length (cm)
盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field		 盆栽
Pot		 大田
Field
MI DA 86.1 b 92.4 a 15.3 a 15.3 a 68.8 a 73.5 ab
BA 86.7 b 94.3 a 15.5 a 15.8 a 69.4 a 74.5 a
BA+DA 89.0 a 93.5 a 15.8 a 15.4 a 71.0 a 74.2 ab
CK 86.5 b 92.3 a 15.3 a 15.2 a 68.5 a 73.1 b
HI DA 82.2 a 89.3 b 15.4 a 15.2 a 64.3 a 70.6 bc
BA 83.2 a 91.9 a 15.5 a 15.3 a 66.1 a 72.8 a
BA+DA 83.9 a 91.7 a 16.0 a 15.2 a 65.8 a 71.6 ab
CK 81.9 a 88.2 b 15.4 a 15.1 a 64.5 a 69.8 c
MI 87.1 a 93.1 a 15.6 a 15.4 a 69.4 a 73.8 a
HI 82.8 b 90.3 b 15.4 a 15.2 a 65.2 b 71.2 b
DA 84.2 a 90.8 bc 15.3 a 15.2 a 66.6 a 72.1 bc
BA 85.0 a 93.1 a 15.5 a 15.6 a 67.8 a 73.6 a
BA+DA 86.4 a 92.5 ab 15.8 a 15.3 a 68.4 a 72.9 ab
CK 84.2 a 90.3 c 15.3 a 15.2 a 66.5 a 71.4 c
AWI 40.61** 129.96** 0.71ns 3.99ns 19.43* 19.88*
PGRs 2.44ns 4.46* 0.74ns 0.79ns 0.76ns 6.85*
AWI×PGRs 0.28ns 0.71ns 0.04ns 0.12ns 0.14ns 0.86ns

表3

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对干物质积累及茎鞘物质转化的影响"

处理
Treatment		 盆栽 Pot 大田 Field
抽穗期生物量
Heading stage
biomass
(g pot-1)		 蜡熟期生物量
Waxy stage
biomass
(g pot-1)		 抽穗期
Heading stage (t hm-2)		 蜡熟期
Waxy stage (t hm-2)		 输出量
Exportation
(t hm-2)		 输出率
Export
rate (%)		 转化率
Translocation
rate (%)
茎鞘干物质
Dry matter of
stem and sheath		 生物量
Biomass		 茎鞘干物质
Dry matter of
stem and sheath		 生物量
Biomass
MI DA 69.64 c 108.35 b 5.88 b 14.90 b 4.32 bc 16.95 bc 1.57 b 26.97 bc 19.35 bc
BA 76.94 a 118.65 a 6.46 a 15.86 a 4.62 a 17.52 ab 1.84 a 28.53 ab 20.17 b
BA+DA 75.11 b 115.90 a 6.38 a 15.45 a 4.47 ab 17.86 a 1.92 a 29.95 a 21.80 a
CK 68.55 c 107.59 b 5.64 b 14.76 b 4.19 c 16.57 c 1.46 b 26.49 c 18.52 c
HI DA 64.83 b 96.77 b 5.01 b 13.55 b 3.62 b 14.47 b 1.39 b 26.68 ab 18.60 ab
BA 68.90 a 106.74 a 5.31 a 14.42 a 3.90 a 15.76 a 1.42 b 27.16 ab 18.22 ab
BA+DA 69.23 a 108.53 a 5.44 b 14.24 a 3.88 a 15.86 a 1.56 a 28.26 a 19.22 a
CK 63.83 b 94.23 b 5.94 b 13.55 b 3.61 b 14.33 b 1.33 b 25.55 b 17.71 b
MI 72.56 a 112.62 a 6.09 a 15.25 a 4.40 a 17.22 a 1.69 a 27.99 a 19.96 a
HI 66.70 b 101.57 b 5.18 b 13.94 b 3.75 b 15.11 b 1.42 b 26.91 a 18.44 b
DA 67.23 b 102.56 b 5.44 b 14.23 b 3.97 b 15.71 b 1.48 c 26.83 bc 18.98 bc
BA 72.92 a 112.70 a 5.89 a 15.14 a 4.26 a 16.64 a 1.63 b 27.84 ab 19.20 b
BA+DA 72.17 a 112.22 a 5.91 a 14.85 a 4.18 a 16.86 a 1.74 a 29.10 a 20.51 a
CK 66.19 b 100.91 b 5.29 b 14.15 b 3.90 b 15.45 b 1.39 c 26.02 c 18.12 c
AWI 171.42** 30.97* 55.93* 60.44* 27.66* 134.83** 415.37** 2.63ns 26.98*
PGRs 54.03** 8.88** 17.28** 9.42* 12.75* 11.27* 21.85** 8.08** 11.51**
AWI×PGRs 2.77ns 0.38ns 1.48ns 0.13ns 0.60ns 0.56ns 4.60* 0.42ns 2.37ns

表4

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对盆栽水稻叶片SPAD值的影响"

处理
Treatment		 剑叶展开后天数 Days after the sword leaf unfolds (d)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
MI DA 43.31 b 44.97 c 44.03 b 42.00 b 36.10 c 32.30 b 29.37 c 27.20 c 17.83 b 13.10 b
BA 45.87 a 46.76 a 46.53 a 45.33 a 42.07 a 38.93 a 33.97 a 29.50 a 22.13 a 16.77 a
BA+DA 45.27 a 45.81 b 46.07 a 44.77 a 41.03 b 38.10 a 32.13 b 28.33 b 21.67 a 16.34 a
CK 43.18 b 43.57 d 43.78 b 40.27 c 36.12 c 31.37 b 26.80 d 25.32 d 16.70 c 11.90 c
HI DA 42.31 b 43.64 b 43.40 c 40.33 c 35.30 c 31.32 c 26.73 b 19.43 b 11.97 c 9.67 c
BA 44.80 a 45.70 a 45.43 a 44.57 a 41.46 a 36.78 a 30.60 a 25.30 a 19.47 a 14.83 a
BA+DA 43.97 a 45.64 a 44.77 b 43.67 b 39.97 b 34.70 b 29.71 a 25.23 a 17.50 b 12.13 b
CK 41.71 b 42.89 c 42.67 d 39.63 d 34.70 c 30.21 c 25.60 c 19.27 b 11.40 c 8.93 c
MI 44.41 a 45.27 a 45.11 a 43.09 a 38.83 a 35.18 a 30.57 a 27.59 a 19.58 a 14.53 a
HI 43.21 a 44.48 a 44.07 a 42.05 a 37.86 a 33.24 b 28.16 b 22.31 b 15.08 b 11.39 b
DA 42.82 b 44.32 c 43.72 c 41.17 c 35.71 c 31.80 c 28.05 c 23.32 c 14.90 b 11.38 c
BA 45.33 a 46.23 a 45.98 a 44.95 a 41.77 a 37.85 a 32.28 a 27.40 a 20.80 a 15.80 a
BA+DA 44.62 a 45.72 b 45.42 b 44.22 b 40.50 b 36.40 b 30.92 b 26.78 b 19.58 a 14.23 b
CK 42.47 b 43.23 d 43.23 c 39.95 d 35.42 c 30.78 c 26.20 d 22.30 d 14.05 b 10.42 d
AWI 3.02ns 1.78ns 3.56* 3.39* 3.77* 57.74* 46.08* 167.48** 191.72** 52.05*
PGRs 30.39** 87.60** 56.74** 205.52** 269.03** 352.76** 100.61** 203.72** 108.25** 116.72**
AWI×PGRs 0.20ns 2.91ns 0.67ns 1.90ns 0.82ns 9.08** 3.95* 34.01** 4.79* 0.03ns

表5

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对水稻叶片光合指标的影响"

处理
Treatment		 盆栽 Pot 大田 Field
叶面积Leaf area (m2 pot-1) 叶面积指数Leaf area index SPAD值SPAD value
抽穗期
Heading stage		 蜡熟期
Waxy stage		 抽穗期
Heading stage		 蜡熟期
Waxy stage		 抽穗期
Heading stage		 蜡熟期
Waxy stage
MI DA 0.318 b 0.218 b 4.92 b 2.67 c 50.27 b 44.52 b
BA 0.340 a 0.238 a 5.01 a 2.93 a 51.28 ab 46.50 a
BA+DA 0.336 a 0.230 a 5.00 a 2.88 b 52.10 a 45.57 ab
CK 0.311 b 0.214 b 4.81 c 2.66 c 49.87 b 43.81 b
HI DA 0.303 a 0.199 c 4.74 c 2.53 b 48.70 b 40.23 a
BA 0.312 a 0.211 b 4.83 b 2.70 a 50.73 a 41.37 a
BA+DA 0.312 a 0.224 a 4.91 a 2.75 a 50.17 ab 41.27 a
CK 0.292 b 0.190 c 4.70 c 2.51 b 48.43 b 39.90 a
MI 0.326 a 0.225 a 4.94 a 2.78 a 50.88 a 45.10 a
HI 0.304 b 0.206 b 4.79 b 2.62 b 49.51 b 40.69 b
DA 0.311 b 0.209 b 4.83 b 2.60 b 49.48 b 42.38 ab
BA 0.326 a 0.225 a 4.92 a 2.81 a 51.01 a 43.93 a
BA+DA 0.324 a 0.227 a 4.95 a 2.81 a 51.13 a 43.42 ab
CK 0.301 c 0.202 b 4.76 c 2.58 b 49.15 b 41.86 b
AWI 60.61* 222.70** 7.33* 10.12* 9.98* 97.92*
PGRs 26.67** 19.75** 66.08** 9.32** 5.03* 3.09ns
AWI×PGRs 1.82ns 2.71ns 3.72* 13.19** 0.41ns 0.23ns

图1

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对水稻剑叶光合参数的影响 处理同表1。FT: 灌浆期; MT: 乳熟期; WT: 蜡熟期。*和**表示分别在0.05和0.01概率水平差异显著。"

图2

干湿交替灌溉与PGRs对水稻内源激素含量的影响 处理同表1。FT: 灌浆期; MT: 乳熟期; WT: 蜡熟期。*和**表示分别在0.05和0.01概率水平差异显著。"

[1] Brar S K, Mahal S S, Brar A S, Vashist K K, Sharma N, Buttar G S. Transplanting time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India. Agric Water Manag, 2012, 115: 217-222.
[2] 潘晨, 杨宇, 漆栋良. 不同灌溉条件下氮肥配施模式对水稻干物质和产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(2): 73-78.
Pan C, Yang Y, Qi D L. The combined effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on dry matter and yield of rice. J Irrig Drain, 2023, 42(2): 73-78 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Lawton L N, Joseph M, Alvaro D M, Aaron S, Ranjan P, Francis T. Comparative economic and environmental assessments of furrow- and flood-irrigated rice production systems. Agric Water Manag, 2022, 274: 107964.
[4] Wang H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, McDaniel M D, Sun L, Su W, Fan X, Liu S, Xiao X. Water-saving irrigation is a ‘win-win’ management strategy in rice paddies-with both reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced water use efficiency. Agric Water Manag, 2020, 228: 105889.
[5] Das D, Basar N U, Ullah H, Attia A, Salin K R, Datta A. Growth, yield and water productivity of rice as influenced by seed priming under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2022, 68: 1515-1529.
[6] 杨颖. 不同籼稻品种的农艺生理特征对干湿交替灌溉的响应. 扬州大学硕士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2022.
Yang Y. The Response of Agronomic and Physiological Characteristics in Mid-season Indica Rice Varieties to Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation. MS Thesis of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 徐云姬, 许阳东, 李银银, 钱希旸, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻花后同化物转运和籽粒灌浆的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 554-568.
Xu Y J, Xu Y D, Li Y Y, Qian X Y, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Effect of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on post-anthesis remobilization of assimilates and grain filling of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 554-568 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 褚光, 展明飞, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 1026-1036.
Chu G, Zhan M F, Zhu K Y, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42: 1026-1036 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] He H, Wang Q, Wang L, Yang K, Yang R, You C, Ke J, Wu L. Photosynthetic physiological response of water-saving and drought-resistant rice to severe drought under wetting-drying alternation irrigation. Physiol Plant, 2021, 173: 2191-2206.
[10] 付景, 刘洁, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 张耗, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对2个超级稻品种结实率和粒重的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1056-1065.
Fu J, Liu J, Cao Z Q, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation during grain filling on the seed-setting rate and grain weight of two super rice cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1056-1065 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 吴龙龙, 虞轶俊, 田仓, 张露, 黄晶, 朱练峰, 朱春权, 孔亚丽, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜. 干湿交替灌溉下施氮模式对水稻光合产物和氮转运的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36: 295-307.
Wu L L, Yu Y J, Tian C, Zhang L, Huang J, Zhu L F, Zhu C Q, Kong Y L, Zhang J H, Cao X C, Jin Q Y. Effects of different nitrogen application regimes on translocation of rice photosynthetic products and nitrogen under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Chin J Rice Sci, 2022, 36: 295-307 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 景文疆. 不同籼稻品种产量､米质和根系特征对干湿交替灌溉的响应. 扬州大学硕士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2023.
Jing W J. Response of Grain Yield, Quality and Root Characteristics to Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation in Different Indica Rice Varieties. MS Thesis of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2023 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 徐国伟, 江孟孟, 陆大克, 赵喜辉, 陈明灿. 干湿交替灌溉与氮肥形态耦合对水稻光合特性及氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26: 1239-1250.
Xu G W, Jiang M M, Lu D K, Zhao X H, Chen M C. Optimum combination of irrigation and nitrogen supply form achieving high photosynthetic and nitrogen utilization efficiency. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26: 1239-1250 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 徐国伟, 陆大克, 刘聪杰, 王贺正, 陈明灿, 李友军. 干湿交替灌溉和施氮量对水稻内源激素及氮素利用的影响. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(7): 137-146.
Xu G W, Lu D K, Liu C J, Wang H Z, Chen M C, Li Y J. Effect of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and nitrogen coupling on endogenous hormones, nitrogen utilization. Trans CSAE, 2018, 34(7): 137-146 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Dehghan M, Balouchi H, Yadavi A, Zare E. Improve wheat (Triticum aestivum) performance by brassinolide application under different irrigation regimes. South Afr J Bot, 2020, 130: 259-267.
[16] Huang G M, Liu Y G, Guo Y L, Peng C X, Tan W M, Zhang M C, Li Z H, Zhou Y Y, Duan L S. A novel plant growth regulator improves the grain yield of high-density maize crops by reducing stalk lodging and promoting a compact plant type. Field Crops Res, 2021, 260: 107982.
[17] 赵黎明, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 沈雪峰, 黄安琪, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫. 耕作与植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量及光合特性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(15): 93-103.
Zhao L M, Zheng D F, Feng N J, Shen X F, Huang A Q, Wang Y X, Jiang W X. Effects of tillage and plant growth regulators on the yield and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality japonica rice. Trans CSAE, 2022, 38(15): 93-103 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 罗凯, 谢琛, 汪锦, 王甜, 何舜, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 外源喷施植物生长调节剂对套作大豆碳氮代谢和花荚脱落的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 752-760.
Luo K, Xie C, Wang J, Wang T, He S, Yong T W, Yang W Y. Effect of exogenous plant growth regulators on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and flower-pod abscission of relay strip intercropping soybean. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 752-760 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] Gong L S, Qu S J, Huang G M, Guo Y L, Zhang M C, Li Z H, Zhou Y Y, Duan L S. Improving maize grain yield by formulating plant growth regulator strategies in North China. J Integr Agric, 2021, 20: 622-632.
[20] 丁凯鑫, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 单莹, 王立春, 田国奎, 王海艳, 李凤云. 植物生长调节剂对赤豆鼓粒期光合特性及氮代谢的影响. 核农学报, 2022, 36: 2510-2518.
Ding K X, Feng N J, Zheng D F, Shan Y, Wang L C, Tian G K, Wang H Y, Li F Y. Effects of plant growth regulators on photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen metabolism of adzuki bean during seed filling stage. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2022, 36: 2510-2518 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 1005-1016.
Ke J, Chen T T, Wu Z, Zhu T Z, Sun J, He H B, You C C, Zhu D Q, Wu L Q. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 1005-1016 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 王娜, 杨思敏, 刘蓓蓓, 林瑞嫦, 杨璞, 高金锋, 高小丽. 植物生长调节剂对绿豆干物质积累动态与产量的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(3): 10-17.
Wang N, Yang S M, Liu B B, Lin R C, Yang P, Gao J F, Gao X L. Regulation of plant growth regulator on dry matter accumulation and yield of mung bean. J China Agric Univ, 2021, 26(3): 10-17 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Rasheed R, Yasmeen H, Hussain I, Iqbal M, Ashraf M A, Parveen A. Exogenously applied 5-aminolevulinic acid modulates growth, secondary metabolism and oxidative defense in sunflower under water deficit stress. Physiol Mol Biol Plants, 2020, 26: 489-499.
[24] 魏永霞, 曹晓强, 冀俊超, 张学文, 刘慧, 吴昱. 不同灌溉方式下旱直播水稻光合特性与干物质积累动态. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52: 358-368.
Wei Y X, Cao X Q, Ji J C, Zhang X W, Liu H, Wu Y. Effects of different irrigation methods on photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation dynamics of dry direct seeding rice. Trans CSAM, 2021, 52: 358-368 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Lahijani A D, Mosavi A, Moballeghi M. The influence of micronutrients foliar application on rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield and yield components. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2021, 27: 909-918.
[26] Qi M, Liu X D, Li Y B, Song H, Yin Z T, Zhang F, He Q J, Xu Z Z, Zhou G S. Photosynthetic resistance and resilience under drought, flooding and re-watering in maize plants. Photosynth Res, 2021, 148: 1-15.
[27] 张伟杨, 任维晨, 于吉祥, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 王志琴, 刘立军, 赵步洪, 杨建昌. 轻干湿交替灌溉促进水稻茎中碳同化物积累与转运的机制. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 42(6): 9-16.
Zhang W Y, Ren W C, Yu J X, Zhang H, Gu J F, Wang Z Q, Liu L J, Zhao B H, Yang J C. The mechanism underlying alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation enhancing carbon assimilates accumulation and remobilization of rice stems. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric Life Sci Edn), 2021, 42(6): 9-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 王泳超, 燕博文, 曹红章, 王山聪, 马梦金, 张俊杰, 郭家萌, 王浩, 邵瑞鑫, 杨青华. DA-6与CCC复配对密植下玉米叶片光合及抗早衰能力的影响. 华北农学报, 2022, 37(4): 90-102.
Wang Y C, Yan B W, Cao H Z, Wang S C, Ma M J, Zhang J J, Guo J M, Wang H, Shao R X, Yang Q H. Effects of the mixture of DA-6 and CCC on the photosynthesis and anti-premature senescence of maize leaves under dense planting. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2022, 37(4): 90-102 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 王英杰, 唐才宝, 潘素君, 朱丽菲, 汪莹, 李恩宇, 陈光辉. 外源6-BA和BR对不同灌溉方式下水稻光合特性及产量的影响. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20: 6930-6938.
Wang Y J, Tang C B, Pan S J, Zhu L F, Wang Y, Li E Y, Chen G H. Effects of 6-BA and BR on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice under different irrigation methods. Mol Plant Breed, 2022, 20: 6930-6938 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Basunia M A, Nonhebel H M. Hormonal regulation of cereal endosperm development with a focus on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Funct Plant Biol, 2019, 46: 493-506.
[31] Zhang X F, Tong J H, Bai A N, Liu C M, Xiao L T, Xue H W. Phytohormone dynamics in developing endosperm influence rice grain shape and quality. J Integr Plant Biol, 2020, 62: 1625-1637.
[32] Kato T, Sakurai N, Kuraishi S. The changes of endogenous ABA in developing grain of two rice cultivars with different grain size. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1993, 62: 456-461.
[33] 梁喜龙, 邱凯华, 何瑞, 金喜军, 李建英, 方淑梅. 植物籽粒建成的调控与细胞分裂素. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56: 635-642.
Liang X L, Qiu K H, He R, Jin X J, Li J Y, Fang S M. Regulation of plant seed formation and cytokinin. Plant Physiol J, 2020, 56: 635-642 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 滕颖, 章林平, 邵雅芳, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻穗部不同部位籽粒产量相关性状差异及其与内源激素的相关性. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36: 43-54.
Zheng X L, Zhou J Q, Teng Y, Zhang L P, Shao Y F, Hu P S, Wei X J. Difference in yield related traits of grains in various parts of panicle in japonica rice and its correlation with endogenous hormones. Chin J Rice Sci, 2022, 36: 43-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 李中海, 郭永峰, 任国栋, 张可伟, 缪颖, 郭红卫. 叶片衰老研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59: 1627-1656.
Li Z H, Guo Y F, Ren G D, Zhang K W, Miao Y, Guo H W. Research progress of leaf senescence. Plant Physiol J, 2023, 59: 1627-1656 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] Shi H T, Chen L, Ye T T, Liu X D, Ding K J, Chan Z L. Modulation of auxin content in Arabidopsis confers improved drought stress resistance. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2014, 82: 209-217.
[37] Luo K, Xie C, Wang J, Du Q, Cheng P, Wang T, Wu Y C, Yang W Y, Yong T W. Uniconazole, 6-benzyladenine, and diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate increase the yield of soybean by improving the photosynthetic efficiency and increasing grain filling in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. J Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 40: 1869-1880.
[38] 王鑫, 刘丹, 陈婧婷, 刘新宇, 张贺, 王玉波, 李彩凤. 外源BR对盐碱胁迫下甜菜内源激素含量及保护酶活性的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(7): 20-30.
Wang X, Liu D, Chen J T, Liu X Y, Zhang H, Wang Y B, Li C F. Effects of exogenous BR on endogenous hormone and protective enzyme activities in sugar beet under saline-alkali stress. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2021, 49(7): 20-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] 魏晓琼, 贾文飞, 李林宇, 裴彤, 王颖, 李金英, 吴林. 不同时期喷施6-BA对越橘叶片生理特性及内源激素质量分数的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2023, 51(3): 31-35.
Wei X Q, Jia W F, Li L Y, Pei T, Wang Y, Li J Y, Wu L. Effects of spraying 6-BA at different stages on physiological indices of leaves and endogenous hormones of blue-berry. J Northeast For Univ, 2023, 51(3): 31-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰, 顾春梅, 那永光, 解保胜. 灌溉方式对寒地水稻产量及籽粒灌浆的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48: 4493-4506.
Zhao L M, Li M, Zheng D F, Gu C M, Na Y G, Xie B S. Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and grain filling of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in cold region. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48: 4493-4506 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] Chu G, Chen T T, Chen S, Xu C M, Wang D Y, Zhang X F. Agronomic performance of drought-resistance rice cultivars grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation management in southeast China. Crop J, 2018, 6: 482-494.
[42] Zhu Y G, Chu J P, Dai X L, He M R. Delayed sowing increases grain number by enhancing spike competition capacity for assimilates in winter wheat. Eur J Agron, 2019, 104: 49-62.
[43] Masaki O, Jun H, Kenji N, Kentaro K, Daisuke S, Yumiko A S, Nobuya K, Motohiko K. Cross-locational experiments to reveal yield potential and yield-determining factors of the rice cultivar ‘Hokuriku 193’ and climatic factors to achieve high brown rice yield over 1.2 kg m-2 at Nagano in central inland of Japan. Plant Prod Sci, 2022, 25: 131-147.
[44] 王文玉, 郑桂萍, 万思宇, 陈立强, 赵海成, 赫臣, 康楷, 李红宇, 吕艳东. 15%调环酸钙对水稻产量与品质的影响. 大麦与谷类科学, 2019, 36(3): 11-17.
Wang W Y, Zheng G P, Wan S Y, Chen L Q, Zhao H C, He C, Kang K, Li H Y, Lyu Y D. Effects of 15% prohexadione calcium on rice yield and quality. Barley Cereal Sci, 2019, 36(3): 11-17 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[45] 赵宏伟, 李晓, 贾琰, 瞿炤珺, 张盛楠, 张妍, 王喆, 韩东. 水杨酸对孕穗期低温胁迫寒地粳稻颖花形成的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(6): 1-9.
Zhao H W, Li X, Jia Y, Qu S J, Zhang S N, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Han D. Effect of salicylic acid on floret formation of cold Japonica rice under low temperature stress at booting stage. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2019, 50(6): 1-9 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[46] 顾俊荣, 董明辉, 杨代凤, 陈培峰, 王文青, 乔中英. 一种新型水稻生长调节剂对超级稻籽粒结实与品质特性的影响. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(12) : 8-13.
Gu J R, Dong M H, Yang D F, Chen P F, Wang W Q, Qiao Z Y. Effects of a kind of new-type rice growth regulator on grain setting traits and quality of super rice. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2017, 29(12): 8-13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 张正康, 苏延红, 阮孙美, 张敏, 张攀, 张慧, 曾千春, 罗琼. 疣粒野生稻中OgXa13的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 334-346.
[2] 李春梅, 陈洁, 郎兴宣, 庄海民, 朱靖, 杜梓君, 冯浩天, 金涵, 朱国林, 刘凯. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DT1的图位克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 347-357.
[3] 胡雅杰, 郭靖豪, 丛舒敏, 蔡沁, 徐益, 孙亮, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 杨文飞, 张洪程. 灌浆前期低温弱光复合处理对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 405-417.
[4] 辛雨宁, 任昊, 王洪章, 梁明磊, 于涛, 刘鹏. 喷施6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)对授粉后高温胁迫下夏玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 418-431.
[5] 秦梦倩, 黄威, 陈敏, 宁宁, 何德志, 胡兵, 夏起昕, 蒋博, 程泰, 常海滨, 王晶, 赵杰, 汪波, 蒯婕, 徐正华, 周广生. 氮肥运筹对迟播油菜产量及抗倒性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 432-446.
[6] 王崇铭, 陆志峰, 闫金垚, 宋毅, 王昆昆, 方娅婷, 李小坤, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 磷肥用量对油稻轮作系统作物产量与磷素吸收量及其稳定性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 447-458.
[7] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
[8] 覃金华, 洪卫源, 冯向前, 李子秋, 周子榆, 王爱冬, 李瑞杰, 王丹英, 张运波, 陈松. 基于氮肥运筹下水稻产量与品质协同的农艺生理指标解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 485-502.
[9] 陈于婷, 丁晓雨, 许本波, 张学昆, 徐劲松, 殷艳. 气候变暖对冬油菜产量、品质及重要农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 516-525.
[10] 王鹏博, 张冬霞, 乔唱唱, 黄明, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对豫西旱地小麦土壤酶活性和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 534-547.
[11] 张军, 胡川, 周起晖, 任开明, 董誓言, 刘傲寒, 吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军. 减氮及有机肥替代对旱地冬小麦干物质积累、转运、分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[12] 王丽萍, 李盼, 赵连豪, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 何蔚, 柴强, 殷文. 西北绿洲灌区玉米叶片衰老特征对不同地膜覆盖利用方式的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 233-246.
[13] 王媛, 许佳茵, 董二伟, 王劲松, 刘秋霞, 黄晓磊, 焦晓燕. 有机肥替代化肥氮对谷子氮素累积、产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 149-160.
[14] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
[15] 李超, 付小琼. 基于GYT双标图综合评价黄河流域中熟杂交棉花区域试验品种[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 30-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2