欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (8): 2025-2038.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32061

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

滴灌条件下施氮量对不同氮效率水稻品种物质积累及养分吸收的影响

宋志文1(), 赵蕾1, 毕俊国2, 唐清芸1, 王国栋3,*(), 李玉祥1,*()   

  1. 1石河子大学农学院 / 新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室, 新疆石河子 832000
    2上海市农业生物基因中心, 上海 201106
    3新疆农垦科学院 / 农业农村部西北绿洲节水农业重点实验室 / 水肥资源高效利用兵团重点实验室, 新疆石河子 832000
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-21 接受日期:2024-04-01 出版日期:2024-08-12 网络出版日期:2024-04-24
  • 通讯作者: * 李玉祥, E-mail: yxli@shzu.edu.cn;王国栋, E-mail: 664812734@qq.com
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 17318598568@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32360527);国家自然科学基金项目(31460541);第三师图木舒克市科技计划项目(KJ2023CG03);石河子大学青年创新拔尖人才项目(CXBJ202003);石河子大学自主支持科研项目(ZZZC2022008)

Effects of nitrogen fertilization levels on matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in rice cultivar with different nitrogen efficiency under drip irrigation

SONG Zhi-Wen1(), ZHAO Lei1, BI Jun-Guo2, TANG Qing-Yun1, WANG Guo-Dong3,*(), LI Yu-Xiang1,*()   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University / Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
    2Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center, Shanghai 201106, China
    3Key Laboratory of Water-saving Agriculture in Northwest Oasis / Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Water and Fertilizer Resources, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2023-12-21 Accepted:2024-04-01 Published:2024-08-12 Published online:2024-04-24
  • Contact: * E-mail: yxli@shzu.edu.cn;E-mail: 664812734@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32360527);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31460541);Science and Technology Plan Project of Tumushuke City, the Third Division(KJ2023CG03);Young Innovative Top Talents Project of Shihezi University(CXBJ202003);Independent Support Scientific Research Project of Shihezi University(ZZZC2022008)

RichHTML

46

PDF

438

摘要：

研究滴灌条件下施氮量对不同氮效率品种关键生育时期干物质积累和氮素吸收转运及产量的影响, 为干旱半干旱区滴灌水稻高产高效生产提供技术参考。试验于2021—2022年开展, 以氮高效品种(T-43)和氮低效品种(LX-3)为供试材料, 采用裂区设计; 设置4个施氮水平, 分别为N0 (0 kg hm-2)、N1 (150 kg hm-2)、N2 (300 kg hm-2)和N3 (450 kg hm-2)。分析滴灌水稻在抽穗期和成熟期干物质积累、氮素吸收利用及产量对施氮量的响应差异。结果表明: (1) 施用氮肥可以增加滴灌水稻干物质积累量(1.99%~26.02%)和氮素积累量(25.67%~97.69%), 提高水稻产量(23.75%~66.75%); 但过量施氮(450 kg hm-2)会减小对干物质积累的促进作用, 导致结实率和穗粒数下降, 使氮素主要集中在秸秆中, 最终降低水稻对氮素的利用效率。(2) 在同一施氮条件下, T-43的有效穗数、结实率、抽穗期叶片和穗部干物质及氮素积累量均高于LX-3 (分别为1.65%~5.19%、0.42%~8.47%、7.61%~19.68%、19.81%~40.73%、19.81%~30.23%和20.14%~49.65%), 最终产量高于LX-3 (4.23%~28.47%)。(3) 氮素利用效率对施氮量的响应存在品种间差异(P<0.05)。与LX-3相比, T-43有更高的氮肥农学利用效率、氮素回收率和氮肥偏生产力(分别高1.05%~25.23%、5.86%~20.05%和10.09%~18.01%)。综上所述, 在滴灌栽培条件下, 选用氮高效品种(T-43), 配施300 kg hm-2氮肥表现出更佳的氮素吸收转运能力和更高的产量, 能更好地利用养分资源, 是本试验最佳的品种和施氮量组合方式。

关键词: 滴灌水稻, 氮效率品种, 干物质积累, 氮素积累, 氮素利用

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to explore the effects of nitrogen application levels on dry matter accumulation, nitrogen absorption and transport, and yield of rice varieties with different nitrogen efficiency during key growth stages under drip irrigation conditions, which can provide the technical reference for high-yield and efficient rice production under drip irrigation in arid and semi-arid areas. The experiment was conducted from 2021 to 2022, using high nitrogen efficient cultivar (T-43) and low nitrogen efficient cultivar (LX-3) as the test materials. The split zone design was conducted with four nitrogen application levels, namely N0 (0 kg hm-2), N1 (150 kg hm-2), N2 (300 kg hm-2), and N3 (450 kg hm-2). The differences in dry matter accumulation, nitrogen absorption and utilization, and yield response to nitrogen application in drip irrigated rice at heading and maturity stages were analyzed. The results showed as follows: (1) Applying nitrogen fertilizer can increase the dry matter accumulation (1.99%-26.02%) and nitrogen accumulation (25.67%-97.69%) of rice under drip irrigation, and increase rice yield (23.75%-66.75%). However, the excessive nitrogen application (450 kg hm-2) reduced the promoting effect on dry matter accumulation, leading to a decrease in seed setting rate and grain number per spike, mainly concentrating nitrogen in straw, ultimately reducing the nitrogen utilization efficiency of rice. (2) Under the same nitrogen application conditions, the effective number of panicles, seed setting rate, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in leaves and panicles of T-43 were higher than LX-3 by 1.65%-5.19%, 0.42%-8.47%, 7.61%-19.68%, 19.81%-40.73%, 19.81%-30.23%, and 20.14%-49.65%, respectively, and the final yield was higher than LX-3 by 4.23%-28.47%. (3) The response of nitrogen utilization efficiency varies among varieties at P < 0.05. Compared with LX-3, T-43 had higher N Agronomic efficiency, N recovery efficiency, and N partial factor productivity higher by 1.05%-25.23%, 5.86%-20.05%, and 10.09%-18.01%, respectively. In conclusion, under drip irrigation cultivation, the selection of high nitrogen efficient cultivar (T-43) and the application of 300 kg hm-2 nitrogen showed better nitrogen uptake and transport capacity and higher yield, and could better utilize nutrient resources, which was the best combination of variety and nitrogen application rate in this experiment.

Key words: drip irrigation of rice, cultivar with high nitrogen efficiency, dry matter accumulation, nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen utilization

图1

2021-2022年最高气温、最低气温和降雨量"

表1

全生育期施肥量及分配比例"

指标
Index		 处理
Treatment		 播种期
Seeding stage		 播种-穗始期
Seeding-panicle
initiation stage		 穗始-抽穗期
Panicle initiation -heading stage		 抽穗-成熟前15 d
Heading-15 d
before maturity		 成熟前15 d-收获期
15 d before
maturation-harvest		 总量
Total
施氮量
Nitrogen application levels (kg hm-2)		 N0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N1 0 66.3 41.8 41.8 0 150
N2 0 140.8 79.6 79.6 0 300
N3 0 198.8 125.6 125.6 0 450
施肥次数Fertilization times 0 3 2 2 0 7

表2

滴灌施氮量对水稻产量及构成因子的影响"

年份
Year		 品种
Cultivar		 施氮量
Nitrogen		 有效穗数
Effective panicle
(×104 hm-2)		 穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 结实率
Filled grain rate (%)		 产量
Yield
(t hm-2)
2021 氮高效品种T-43 N0 371.74±30.2 4 b 72.00±0.82 c 22.51±0.83 a 80.08±5.61 b 4.81±0.39 c
N1 396.84±10.10 b 85.33±1.89 b 22.43±0.21 a 82.45±2.31 ab 6.34±0.09 b
N2 417.53±10.08 a 99.67±1.25 a 22.83±1.06 a 88.29±4.64 a 8.37±0.36 a
N3 409.54±16.96 a 95.33±1.25 a 22.90±0.82 a 87.09±3.63 ab 7.88±0.34 ab
氮低效品种LX-3 N0 360.91±12.34 c 72.33±2.87 c 23.50±0.10 a 74.53±4.68 b 4.59±0.58 c
N1 382.73±4.55 b 79.33±2.05 b 23.83±0.33 a 78.58±1.93 ab 5.68±0.22 b
N2 406.75±26.67 a 92.00±0.82 a 24.80±1.43 a 81.91±3.60 a 7.60±0.83 a
N3 402.88±14.32 a 84.67±2.49 b 25.06±0.91 a 80.29±1.33 a 7.56±0.91 a
2022 氮高效品种T-43 N0 365.27±11.20 c 84.00±1.00 b 22.41±0.44 a 78.15±3.26 a 5.37±0.26 c
N1 387.90±13.71 b 95.33±1.70 a 22.61±0.08 a 81.84±1.52 a 6.84±0.24 b
N2 427.33±13.13 a 104.00±3.56 a 22.85±0.34 a 83.08±3.56 a 8.43±0.46 a
N3 419.49±15.29 a 99.00±5.35 a 22.70±0.35 a 82.58±2.55 a 8.12±0.28 a
氮低效品种LX-3 N0 351.37±23.97 c 65.00±3.56 c 23.61±0.29 b 77.44±1.47 a 4.18±0.49 c
N1 380.14±15.27 b 74.00±1.41 bc 23.93±0.26 ab 81.50±1.98 a 5.48±0.26 b
N2 407.78±16.86 a 89.00±7.48 a 24.81±0.60 a 81.80±2.44 a 7.32±0.16 a
N3 398.79±8.78 ab 80.67±6.65 ab 24.34±0.32 ab 79.53±3.20 a 6.97±0.20 a
F值F-value
年份Year (Y) 0.080 1.179 0.962 0.175 0.014
品种Cultivar (C) 7.445* 105.336** 14.131** 72.629** 44.159**
施氮量Nitrogen (N) 24.398** 67.165** 8.203** 4.711** 135.965**
Y×C 0.261 27.240** 5.352* 0.074 7.802**
Y×N 0.466 0.276 1.178 0.508 0.372
C×N 0.036 0.966 0.406 1.285 0.340
Y×C×N 0.209 1.542 0.044 0.172 0.284

图2

滴灌施氮量对水稻干物质积累的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。图中方柱上方不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。*和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平差异显著, ns表示无显著差异。"

图3

滴灌施氮量对水稻干物质分配的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。"

图4

滴灌施氮量对水稻氮素积累量的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。图中方柱上方不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。*和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平差异显著, ns表示无显著差异。"

图5

滴灌施氮量对水稻氮素积累量分配的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。"

图6

滴灌施氮量对水稻氮素转运量的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。图中方柱上方不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。*和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平差异显著, ns表示无显著差异。"

图7

滴灌施氮量对水稻氮素转运率的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。图中方柱上方不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。*和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平差异显著, ns表示无显著差异。"

图8

滴灌施氮量对水稻氮素利用特征的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。图中方柱上方不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。NAE、NPE、NRG、NRE、NPFP、NGPE分别表示氮肥农学利用效率、氮肥生理利用率、百千克籽粒需氮量、氮素回收率、氮肥偏生产力、氮素稻谷生产效率。*和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平差异显著, ns表示无显著差异。"

图9

滴灌施氮量对水稻产量、植株干物质和氮素积累量归一化值的影响 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。"

图10

产量、植株干物质和氮素积累量及氮素利用效率间的主成分分析 处理同表2。T-43: 氮高效品种; LX-3: 氮低效品种。Yield: 产量; HS: PDW、MS: PDW、HS: PNA、MS: PNA分别表示抽穗期干物质积累量、成熟期干物质积累量、抽穗期氮素积累量和成熟期氮素积累量; NAE、NPE、NRG、NRE、NPFP、NGPE分别表示氮肥农学利用效率、氮肥生理利用率、百千克籽粒需氮量、氮素回收率、氮肥偏生产力、氮素稻谷生产效率。"

表3

产量、干物质与氮素积累量及氮素利用效率间的相关系数"

品种
Cultivar		 指标
Index		 产量
Yield		 百千克籽粒需氮量
NRG		 氮素稻谷
生产效率
NGPE		 氮素
回收率
NRE		 氮肥偏
生产力
NPFP		 氮肥农学
利用效率
NAE		 氮肥生理
利用率
NPE
氮高效
品种T-43		 百千克籽粒需氮量 NRG 0.390
氮素稻谷生产效 NGPE -0.431* -0.991**
氮素回收率 NRE 0.548** 0.701** -0.702**
氮肥偏生产力 NPFP 0.445* 0.566** -0.580** 0.943**
氮肥农学利用效率 NAE 0.725** 0.511* -0.549** 0.837** 0.860**
氮肥生理利用率 NPE 0.853** 0.481* -0.527** 0.645** 0.671** 0.916**
氮高效
品种T-43		 抽穗期干物质积累量HS: PDW 0.880** 0.428* -0.446* 0.451* 0.341 0.594** 0.771**
成熟期干物质积累量MS: PDW 0.709** 0.621** -0.648** 0.759** 0.638** 0.729** 0.655**
抽穗期氮素积累量HS: PNA 0.893** 0.555** -0.579** 0.453* 0.345 0.594** 0.808**
成熟期氮素积累量MS: PNA 0.935** 0.687** -0.713** 0.682** 0.544** 0.747** 0.845**
氮低效
品种LX-3		 百千克籽粒需氮量 NRG -0.111
氮素稻谷生产效 NGPE 0.077 -0.993**
氮素回收率 NRE 0.473* 0.502* -0.510*
氮肥偏生产力 NPFP 0.403 0.375 -0.393 0.959**
氮肥农学利用效率 NAE 0.709** 0.055 -0.101 0.676** 0.743**
氮肥生理利用率 NPE 0.824** -0.011 -0.044 0.543** 0.586** 0.952**
抽穗期干物质积累量HS: PDW 0.800** 0.076 -0.094 0.237 0.109 0.320 0.499*
成熟期干物质积累量MS: PDW 0.716** 0.489* -0.491* 0.694** 0.547** 0.603** 0.639**
抽穗期氮素积累量HS: PNA 0.808** 0.370 -0.398 0.579** 0.455* 0.598** 0.713**
成熟期氮素积累量MS: PNA 0.866** 0.392 -0.414* 0.668** 0.531** 0.662** 0.745**
[1] 李亚贞, 韩天富, 曲潇琳, 马常宝, 都江雪, 柳开楼, 黄晶, 刘淑军, 刘立生, 申哲, 张会民. 我国水稻的肥料贡献率时空变化及影响因素. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56: 674-685.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.007
Li Y Z, Han T F, Qu X L, Ma C B, Du J X, Liu K L, Huang J, Liu S J, Liu L S, Shen Z, Zhang H M. Spatio-temporal variations of fertilizer contribution rate for rice in China and its influencing factors. Sci Agric Sin, 2023, 56: 674-685 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.007
[2] 江立庚, 曹卫星, 甘秀芹, 韦善清, 徐建云, 董登峰, 陈念平, 陆福勇, 秦华东. 不同施氮水平对南方早稻氮素吸收利用及其产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37: 490-496.
Jiang L G, Cao W X, Gan X Q, Wei S Q, Xu J Y, Dong D F, Chen N P, Lu F Y, Qin H D. Nitrogen uptake and utilization under different nitrogen management and influence on grain yield and quality in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2004, 37: 490-496 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 闫湘, 金继运, 梁鸣早. 我国主要粮食作物化肥增产效应与肥料利用效率. 土壤, 2017, 49: 1067-1077.
Yan X, Jin J Y, Liang M Z. Fertilizer use efficiencies and yield-increasing rates of grain crops in China. Soils, 2017, 49: 1067-1077 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 李敏, 张洪程, 李国业, 魏海燕, 殷春渊, 马群, 杨雄. 水稻氮效率基因型差异及其机理研究进展. 核农学报, 2011, 25: 1057-1063.
Li M, Zhang H C, Li G Y, Wei H Y, Yin C Y, Ma Q, Yang X. Genotypic difference of nitrogen use efficiency in rice its morphological and physiological mechanisms. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2011, 25: 1057-1063 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11869/hnxb.2011.05.1057
[5] Broadbent F E, De Datta S K, Laureles E V. Measurement of nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice genotypes. Agron J, 1987, 79: 786-791.
[6] 魏海燕, 张洪程, 杭杰, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 张胜飞, 马群, 张庆, 张军. 不同氮素利用效率基因型水稻氮素积累与转移的特性. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 119-125.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00119
Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Hang J, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Zhang S F, Ma Q, Zhang Q, Zhang J. Characteristics of N accumulation and translocation in rice genotypes with different N use efficiencies. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 119-125 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 李玥, 严奉君, 蒋明金, 马均. 水氮管理模式对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1639-1649.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01639
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Li Y, Yan F J, Jiang M J, Ma J. Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1639-1649 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] Wang J F, Fawibe O O, Fawibe K O, Isoda A. Water productivity, sink production and varietal differences in panicle structure of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drip irrigation with plastic-film mulch. Field Crops Res, 2023, 291: 108790.
[9] Ringler C, Zhu T. Water resources and food security. Agron J, 2015, 107: 1533-1538.
[10] Zhang J, Hou J W, Zhang H Y, Meng C R, Zhang X J, Wei C Z. Low soil temperature inhibits yield of rice under drip irrigation. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2019, 19: 228-236.
[11] 余锋, 李思宇, 邱园园, 卓鑫鑫, 黄健, 汪浩, 朱安, 刘昆, 刘立军. 稻田甲烷排放的微生物学机理及节水栽培对甲烷排放的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36: 1-12.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.201202
Yu F, Li S Y, Qiu Y Y, Zhuo X X, Huang J, Wang H, Zhu A, Liu K, Liu L J. Microbiological mechanism of methane emission in paddy field and influence of water-saving cultivation on methane emission. Chin J Rice Sci, 2022, 36: 1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.201202
[12] Zhang J X, Liu X W, Wu Q, Qiu Y Z, Chi D C, Xia G M, Arthur E. Mulched drip irrigation and maize straw biochar increase peanut yield by regulating soil nitrogen, photosynthesis and root in arid regions. Agric Water Manag, 2023, 289: 108565.
[13] 唐文雪, 马忠明, 罗双龙, 段誉. 河西绿洲灌区膜下滴灌水稻氮素平衡及氮肥投入阈值研究. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40: 763-771.
Tang W X, Ma Z M, Luo S L, Duan Y. Research on nitrogen equilibrium and nitrogen fertilizer input threshold in rice soil with drip irrigation in the Hexi Oasis irrigation area. J Agric Resour Environ, 2023, 40: 763-771 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Samoy-Pascual K, Lampayan R M, Remocal A T, Orge R F, Tokida T, Mizoguchi M. Optimizing the lateral dripline spacing of drip-irrigated aerobic rice to increase water productivity and profitability under the water-limited condition. Field Crops Res, 2022, 287: 108669.
[15] He H B, Ma F Y, Yang R, Chen L, Jia B, Cui J, Fan H, Wang X, Li L. Rice performance and water use efficiency under plastic mulching with drip irrigation. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e83103.
[16] Zheng J, Zhou M H, Zhu B, Fan J L, Lin H Y, Ren B, Zhang F C. Drip fertigation sustains crop productivity while mitigating reactive nitrogen losses in Chinese agricultural systems: evidence from a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 886: 163804.
[17] Zhao L, Tang Q Y, Song Z W, Yin Y G, Wang G D, Li Y X. Increasing the yield of drip-irrigated rice by improving photosynthetic performance and enhancing nitrogen metabolism through optimizing water and nitrogen management. Front Plant Sci, 2023, 14: 1075625.
[18] Tang Q Y, Ma Y D, Zhao L, Song Z W, Yin Y G, Wang G D, Li Y X. Effects of water and nitrogen management on root morphology, nitrogen metabolism enzymes, and yield of rice under drip irrigation. Agronomy, 2023, 13: 1118.
[19] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 44-49.
Bao S D. Agricultural Chemistry Analysis in Soil, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 44-49 (in Chinese).
[20] 王吕, 吴玉红, 秦宇航, 淡亚彬, 陈浩, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿. 紫云英稻秸秆协同还田与氮肥减量配施对水稻干物质积累、氮素转运及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 756-770.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32013
Wang L, Wu Y H, Qin Y H, Dan Y B, Chen H, Hao X S, Tian X H. Effects of rice straw mulching combined with green manure retention and nitrogen reduction applications on dry matter quality accumulation, nitrogen transport and grain yield of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2024, 50: 756-770 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32013
[21] 黄恒, 姜恒鑫, 刘光明, 袁嘉琦, 汪源, 赵灿, 王维领, 霍中洋, 许轲, 戴其根, 张洪程, 李德剑, 刘国林. 侧深施氮对水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 2232-2249.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02086
Huang H, Jiang H X, Liu G M, Yuan J Q, Wang Y, Zhao C, Wang W L, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Dai Q G, Zhang H C, Li D J, Liu G L. Effects of side deep placement of nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 2232-2249 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02086
[22] 陈天祥, 杨顺瑛, 苏彦华. 基于高氮投入和基因型差异的水稻氮素营养特征. 土壤, 2023, 55: 954-963.
Chen T X, Yang S Y, Su Y H. Characteristics of nitrogen nutrition in rice based on high nitrogen input and genotype differences. Soils, 2023, 55: 954-963 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 李立江, 蒋明金, 何星雷, 姬广梅, 张佳凤, 罗丹秋, 江学海, 田晋钰, 黎勇, 李敏. 施氮量对优质稻G优325氮肥利用率和产量的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 42: 515-522.
Li L J, Jiang M J, He X L, Ji G M, Zhang J F, Luo D Q, Jiang X H, Tian J Y, Li Y, Li M. Effect of nitrogen application rate on nitrogen efficiency and grain yield of high-quality indica rice variety Gyou 325. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 42: 515-522.
[24] 杨建昌, 杜永, 吴长付, 刘立军, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 超高产粳型水稻生长发育特性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39: 1336-1345.
Yang J C, Du Y, Wu C F, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S. Growth and development characteristics of super-high-yielding mid- season japonica rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39: 1336-1345 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 薛亚光, 王康君, 颜晓元, 尹斌, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 不同栽培模式对杂交粳稻常优3号产量及养分吸收利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 4781-4792.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.23.003
Xue Y G, Wang K J, Yan X Y, Yin B, Liu L J, Yang J C. Effects of different cultivation patterns on grain yield and nutrient absorption and utilization efficiency of japonica hybrid rice Changyou 3. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 4781-4792 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.23.003
[26] 张洪程, 王夫玉. 中国水稻群体研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15: 52-57.
Zhang H C, Wang F Y. Recent progress on research of rice population in China. Chin J Rice Sci, 2001, 15: 52-57 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 王振洋, 王冀川, 郭子扬, 袁杰, 张凯雨, 王奉斌, 康德锐. 施氮量与栽插密度对南疆水稻氮素利用率及产量的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(5):72-81.
Wang Z Y, Wang J C, Guo Z Y, Yuan J, Zhang K Y, Wang F B, Kang D R. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on nitrogen use efficiency and yield of rice in Southern Xinjiang. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2023, 42(5): 72-81 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 周群, 袁锐, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 不同施氮量下籼/粳杂交稻甬优2640产量和氮素吸收利用的特点. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 2285-2299.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12070
Zhou Q, Yuan R, Zhu K Y, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Characteristics of grain yield and nitrogen absorption and utilization of indica/japonica hybrid rice Yongyou 2640 under different nitrogen application rates. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 2285-2299 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 王艳, 米国华, 陈范骏, 张福锁. 玉米自交系氮效率基因型差异的比较研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 2002, 8: 361-365.
Wang Y, Mi G H, Chen F J, Zhang F S. Genotypic difference in nitrogen efficiency of five maize inbred lines as affected by nitrate levels. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2002, 8: 361-365 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 39-50.
Yin C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F. Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43: 39-50 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 从夕汉, 施伏芝, 阮新民, 罗玉祥, 王元垒, 许有尊, 罗志祥. 施氮量对不同品种水稻氮素利用及碳氮代谢关键酶的影响. 河南农业大学学报, 2019, 53: 325-330.
Cong X H, Shi F Z, Ruan X M, Luo Y X, Wang Y L, Xu Y Z, Luo Z X. Effects of nitrogen application rate on nitrogen use efficiency and key enzymes for carbon and nitrogen metabolism in different rice varieties. J Henan Agric Univ, 2019, 53: 325-330 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 张亚丽, 樊剑波, 段英华, 王东升, 叶利庭, 沈其荣. 不同基因型水稻氮利用效率的差异及评价. 土壤学报, 2008, 45: 267-273.
Zhang Y L, Fan J B, Duan Y H, Wang D S, Ye L T, Shen Q R. Variation of nitrogen use efficiency of rice different in genotype and Its evaluation. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45: 267-273 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 韩志丽, 许桂玲, 冯跃华, 王晓珂, 卢苇, 李杰, 高钰琪, 任红军, 由晓璇. 不同地力条件下施氮量对杂交籼稻干物质积累、氮肥利用率和产量的影响. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2):34-39.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.02.007
Han Z L, Xu G L, Feng Y H, Wang X K, Lu W, Li J, Gao Y Q, Ren H J, You X X. Effects of nitrogen application rate on dry matter accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency and yield of hybrid indica rice under different soil fertility condition. J Chin Rice, 2023, 29(2): 34-39 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 陈天祥, 杨顺瑛, 王书伟, 苏彦华. 水稻氮素利用效率的基因型差异与调控途径. 土壤, 2022, 54: 873-881.
Chen T X, Yang S Y, Wang S W, Su Y H. Genotypic differences and regulatory strategies of nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Soils, 2022, 54: 873-881 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 吕腾飞, 谌洁, 马鹏, 代邹, 杨志远, 徐徽, 郑传刚, 马均. 氮肥缓速配施对机插杂交稻氮素利用特征的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 1410-1423.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.008
Lyu T F, Shen J, Ma P, Dai Z, Yang Z Y, Xu H, Zheng C G, Ma J. Effects of combined application of slow release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on the nitrogen utilization characteristics in machine transplanted hybrid rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 1410-1423 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[2] 赵翔, 李佳宜, 李爽, 韩文辉, 黄俊霞, 姚兴东, 张惠君, 王海英, 谢甫绨. 高温对不同大豆品种干物质积累和糖代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 857-865.
[3] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 高产高油高油酸花生品种的生长发育及干物质生产特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 191-201.
[4] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[5] 杨婷婷, 陈娟, ABDUL Rehman, 李婧, 闫素辉, 汪建来, 李文阳. 花后弱光对软质小麦干物质积累转运、籽粒产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2204-2219.
[6] 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 孙亚丽, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 闫丽娟, 柴强. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2190-2203.
[7] 霍建喆, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 尹波, 刘亚龙, 张冬玲, 姜科强, 庞小能, 王凤. 有机肥替代化肥对绿洲灌区甜玉米产量、品质及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1887-1900.
[8] 李雪婷, 任昊, 王洪章, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘莹, 姚海燕, 刘鹏. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型玉米品种叶片光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1091-1101.
[9] 杨翠华, 李诗豪, 易徐徐, 郑飞雄, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 聚-γ-谷氨酸对水稻产量、品质和养分吸收的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 785-796.
[10] 梁淼, 李盼, 赵连豪, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 何蔚, 柴强, 殷文. 土壤调理剂与缓释氮肥对小麦干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 470-484.
[11] 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[12] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
[13] 王晶卿, 陈惠哲, 兰天明, 李慧, 唐承翰, 马昕伶, 张玉屏, 王亚梁. 不同播期下氮素穗肥对大穗型籼粳杂交稻甬优538颖花退化的调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2759-2774.
[14] 张军, 胡川, 周起晖, 任开明, 董誓言, 刘傲寒, 吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军. 减氮及有机肥替代对旱地冬小麦干物质积累、转运、分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[15] 辛明华, 秘雅迪, 王国平, 李小飞, 李亚兵, 董合林, 韩迎春, 冯璐. 行距配置和种植密度对棉花干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 221-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2