欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 358-369.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44091

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

嗜线虫沙雷氏菌Serratia nematodiphila TG10增强油菜耐盐碱能力

苏晴芳1,2(), 孙小钊1,2, 林杨1, 付艳苹1, 程家森1, 谢甲涛1,2, 姜道宏1,2, 陈桃1,2,*()   

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科学技术学院 / 农业微生物资源发掘与利用全国重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070
    2湖北洪山实验室, 湖北武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-07 接受日期:2024-09-18 出版日期:2025-02-12 网络出版日期:2024-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈桃, E-mail: taochen@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: suqingfang@webmail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研专项资金项目(X2662024ZKPY004);中央高校基本科研专项资金项目(2662023PY006);财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-12)

Serratia nematodiphila TG10 enhanced salt-alkali tolerance in rapeseed

SU Qing-Fang1,2(), SUN Xiao-Zhao1,2, LIN Yang1, FU Yan-Ping1, CHENG Jia-Sen1, XIE Jia-Tao1,2, JIANG Dao-Hong1,2, CHEN Tao1,2,*()   

  1. 1College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University / National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
    2Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2024-06-07 Accepted:2024-09-18 Published:2025-02-12 Published online:2024-10-10
  • Contact: E-mail: taochen@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Research Funds for the Central Universities(X2662024ZKPY004);Research Funds for the Central Universities(2662023PY006);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-12)

RichHTML

25

PDF

263

摘要：

油菜具有较强的耐盐碱能力, 本研究从天津盐碱土中分离得到一株嗜线虫沙雷氏菌Serratia nematodiphila TG10, 它不仅能够在8% NaCl和pH 10.15的R2A培养基上生长, 还能定殖在油菜根系和根内。在盐胁迫条件下, TG10菌株处理后可以促进拟南芥和油菜生长。含盐1.2%基质土和哈尔滨盐碱土盆栽试验中, TG10处理后可以促进油菜鲜重和干重的增加, Na+含量显著下降, K+与Na+的含量比值增加; 同样在天津盐碱土和吉林盐碱土盆栽试验中, TG10处理后均可显著增加油菜鲜重、叶绿素和脯氨酸的含量。吉林盐碱土盆栽油菜的转录组数据表明, TG10菌株处理后细胞色素P450代谢通路、硫代葡萄糖硫苷生物通路等显著富集, 一些抗逆相关的基因显著上调表达。另外, TG10菌株能抑制油菜病原菌的生长, 诱导油菜抗菌核病和灰霉病。本研究结果表明, 嗜线虫沙雷氏菌S. nematodiphila TG10能增强油菜在不同类型盐碱土中的耐盐能力, 为盐碱地的生物修复提供微生物菌种资源和理论支撑。

关键词: 盐碱土, 油菜, 嗜线虫沙雷氏菌, 耐盐碱机制, 诱导抗性

Abstract:

Rapeseed exhibits strong resistance to salt-alkali stress. In this study, a strain of Serratia nematodiphila TG10 was isolated from saline-alkali soil in Tianjin. This strain can not only grow on a 6% NaCl R2A medium plate with a pH of 10.15 but can also colonize the roots and rhizosphere of rapeseed. Under salt stress, the TG10 strain promoted the growth of both Arabidopsis and rapeseed. In pot experiments using a 1.2% salt-containing matrix soil and saline-alkali soil from Harbin, TG10 treatment enhanced the fresh and dry weights of rapeseed, reduced Na? content, and increased the K?/Na? ratio. In experiments with saline-alkali soils from Tianjin and Jilin, TG10 treatment significantly increased the fresh weight, chlorophyll content, and proline levels in rapeseed. Transcriptome analysis of rapeseed grown in Jilin saline-alkali soil revealed that the cytochrome P450 metabolic pathway and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway were significantly enriched following TG10 treatment, with significant upregulation of several stress-related genes. Additionally, the TG10 strain inhibited the growth of pathogenic bacteria in rapeseed and induced resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. These findings suggest that S. nematodiphila TG10 can enhance the salt tolerance of rapeseed in various types of saline-alkali soils, providing a valuable resource and theoretical foundation for the biorefining of microorganisms in saline-alkali environments.

Key words: saline-alkali soil, rapeseed, Serratia nematodiphila, saline-alkali resistance mechanism, induced resistance

表1

3种不同类型盐碱土理化性质"

盐碱土来源
Saline-alkali soil source		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 电导率
Electrical
conductivity
(mS cm-1)		 有效磷
Available
phosphorus
(mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Available
potassium
(mg kg-1)		 钠离子
Sodium ion
(mg kg-1)		 pH
天津 Tianjin 13.73±0.42 13.58±0.27 53.73±1.04 332.23±22.33 1389.09±45.72 8.97±0.08
吉林 Jilin 19.13±5.58 6.92±0.43 7.88±1.26 230.02±31.83 2294.10±17.92 10.05±0.04
黑龙江哈尔滨
Harbin, Heilongjiang		 9.35±1.10 0.61±0.19 16.37±1.15 229.00±6.08 941.82±243.85 10.09±0.07

图1

嗜线虫沙雷氏菌TG10的鉴定及油菜根系定殖能力测试 A: 菌株TG10在不同NaCl含量以及pH的R2A培养基生长3 d的菌落形态; B: 根据菌株TG10的16S全长, 使用MEGA 7.0软件中的Neighbor-Joining构建系统发育树; C, D: TG10处理油菜, 无菌培养14 d后, 根系和根内分离的TG10的表型(C)和菌落数目统计(D)。每一株油菜的所有根系为一个样本, 3个生物学重复。图中误差线为平均值±标准差, 数据均使用t-test进行检验分析, *表示P < 0.05。"

图2

菌株TG10增强拟南芥和油菜在无菌/半无菌条件下的耐盐能力 A~C: 在100 mmol L-1 NaCl胁迫下, 拟南芥种子与菌株共培养14 d后的表型(A)、鲜重(B)和根长(C)统计, n = 37~64; D~F: TG10增强油菜在水培条件下的耐盐能力, 菌液处理的油菜幼苗在含75 mmol L-1 NaCl的霍格兰营养液中水培7 d的表型(D)、鲜重(E)和根长(F)的统计, n = 15~26。图中误差线为平均值±标准差, 标尺为1 cm。数据均采用t检验分析, *表示P < 0.05, **表示P < 0.01, ***表示P < 0.001, ****表示P < 0.0001。"

图3

菌株TG10处理减低油菜的Na+含量 A~F: 在1.2% NaCl基质土壤中, 油菜接种菌液28 d后的表型(A)、鲜重(B)、干重(C)、地上部分Na+含量(D)、地上部分K+含量(E)和K+/Na+含量的比值(F), A中标尺为2 cm, B中n = 12~14, C中n = 7, D、E和F中n = 3。G~L: 在哈尔滨盐碱土中, 用细菌处理28 d后的油菜表型(G)、鲜重(H)、干重(I)和地上部分Na+含量(J)、地上部分K+含量(K)和K+/Na+含量的比值(L), G中标尺为2 cm, H中n = 13~15, I中n = 9~10, J、K和L中n = 3。图中误差线为平均值±标准差, 数据均采用t检验分析, *表示P < 0.05, **表示P < 0.01, ***表示P < 0.001, ****表示P < 0.0001。"

图4

菌株TG10显著提高油菜在盐碱土中叶绿素和脯氨酸的含量 A~D: 天津盐碱土盆栽试验, 菌液处理28 d后的油菜植株表型(A)、地上部分鲜重(B)、叶绿素含量(C)和脯氨酸含量(D)的测定, A中标尺为4 cm, B中n = 15, C中n = 3, D中n = 3~5。E~H: 吉林盐碱土盆栽试验, 菌液处理28 d后的油菜表型(E)、鲜重(F)、叶绿素含量(G)和脯氨酸含量(H)的测定, E中标尺为2 cm, F中n = 28, G中n = 5, H中n = 3~4。图中误差线为平均值±标准差, 数据均采用t检验分析, *表示P < 0.05, **表示P < 0.01, ***表示P < 0.001, ****表示P< 0.0001。"

图5

盐胁迫下菌株TG10诱导基因差异表达 A: 将处理组TG10与对照组CK进行基因相对表达量的比较, 随后将获得的DEGs进行火山图的绘制, 蓝色表示下调基因(log2 (FC) < -1, P < 0.05), 橘色表示上调基因(log2 (FC) > 1, P < 0.05), 灰色表示非显著变化基因。B: 将TG10 vs CK的上调DEGs进行GO富集, 选取不重复的丰度前20的条目绘制气泡图, 图中主要展示基因参与的生物学过程(Biological process, BP)。C: 将TG10 vs CK的上调DEGs进行KEGG富集, 选取P < 0.05的通路绘制气泡图。D: 选取KEGG中与抗逆相关通路的35个基因进行热图的绘制。"

图6

菌株TG10诱导油菜抵御核盘菌和灰霉菌的侵染 菌株TG10划线于核盘菌(A)和灰霉菌(B)的四周, 两者在PDA平板上生长2~4 d的表型及统计的真菌直径, 标尺为1 cm, n = 3; 菌液处理的油菜子叶上接种核盘菌(C)和灰霉菌(D)的菌丝块36 h后的表型及统计的病斑大小, 标尺为0.5 cm, n = 6。图中误差线为平均值±标准差, 数据均采用t-test检验分析, *表示P < 0.05, **表示P < 0.01。"

[1] Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2008, 59: 651-681.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 pmid: 18444910
[2] 王雷, 郭岩, 杨淑华. 非生物胁迫与环境适应性育种的现状及对策. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2021, 51: 1424-1434.
Wang L, Guo Y, Yang S H. Designed breeding for adaptation of crops to environmental abiotic stresses. Sci Sin Vitae, 2021, 51: 1424-1434 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Cao Y B, Song H F, Zhang L Y. New insight into plant saline- alkali tolerance mechanisms and application to breeding. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23: 16048.
[4] van Zelm E, Zhang Y X, Testerink C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2020, 71: 403-433.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100005 pmid: 32167791
[5] Ludwiczak A, Osiak M, Cárdenas-Pérez S, Lubińska-Mielińska S, Piernik A. Osmotic stress or ionic composition: which affects the early growth of crop species more. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 435.
[6] Yang Y Q, Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol, 2018, 217: 523-539.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14920 pmid: 29205383
[7] 汪波, 文静, 张凤华, 李立军, 来永才, 任长忠, 鲁剑巍, 沈金雄, 郭亮, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 耐盐碱油菜品种选育及修复利用盐碱地研究进展. 科技导报, 2021, 39(23): 59-64.
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.23.009
Wang B, Wen J, Zhang F H, Li L J, Lai Y C, Ren C Z, Lu J W, Shen J X, Guo L, Zhou G S, Fu T D. Research progress in breeding of saline-alkaline tolerant rapeseed and restoring the salinate land. Sci Technol Rev, 2021, 39(23): 59-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.23.009
[8] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 1451-1462.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14051
Wang W N, Ge J Z, Yang H C, Yin F T, Huang T L, Kuai J, Wang J, Wang B, Zhou G S, Fu T D. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 1451-1462 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] Coban O, De Deyn G B, van der Ploeg M. Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands. Science, 2022, 375: abe0725.
[10] Kim M J, Radhakrishnan R, Kang S M, You Y H, Jeong E J, Kim J G, Lee I J. Plant growth promoting effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H-2-5 on crop plants and influence on physiological changes in soybean under soil salinity. Physiol Mol Biol Plants, 2017, 23: 571-580.
[11] Hasanuzzaman M, Raihan M R H, Nowroz F, Fujita M. Insight into the mechanism of salt-induced oxidative stress tolerance in soybean by the application of Bacillus subtilis: coordinated actions of osmoregulation, ion homeostasis, antioxidant defense, and methylglyoxal detoxification. Antioxidants (Basel), 2022, 11: 1856.
[12] Miller A, Knowles A, Nielsen B, Hill J. Halophile inoculation significantly improves growth of Alfalfa under saline conditions. FASEB J, 2020, 34: 1.
[13] Anam G B, Reddy M S, Ahn Y H. Characterization of Trichoderma asperellum RM-28 for its sodic/saline-alkali tolerance and plant growth promoting activities to alleviate toxicity of red mud. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 662: 462-469.
[14] 王启尧, 赵庚星, 赵永昶, 杨婧文, 张术伟, 李涛, 李建伟, 潘登, 涂强. 滨海盐渍棉田施用微生物菌肥的降盐效果及棉花长势响应. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(增刊1): 267-274.
Wang Q Y, Zhao G X, Zhao Y C, Yang J W, Zhang S W, Li T, Li J W, Pan D, Tu Q. Effects of microbial fertilizer on salt reduction and cotton growth response in coastal salted cotton field. Acta Agric Boreali Sin, 2021, 36(S1): 267-274 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 王启尧, 赵庚星, 李涛, 李建伟, 潘登, 涂强. 滨海盐渍麦田施用微生物菌肥的降盐效果及冬小麦长势响应. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(24): 60-66.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0609
Wang Q Y, Zhao G X, Li T, Li J W, Pan D, Tu Q. Microbial fertilizers application in coastal saline wheat field: the salt-reducing effect and the growth response of winter wheat. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 37(24): 60-66 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0609
[16] 舒展, 张晓素, 陈娟, 陈根云, 许大全. 叶绿素含量测定的简化. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46: 399-402.
Shu Z, Zhang X S, Chen J, Chen G Y, Xu D Q. The simplification of chlorophyll content measurement. Plant Physiol Commun, 2010, 46: 399-402 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 职明星, 李秀菊. 脯氨酸测定方法的改进. 植物生理学通讯, 2005, 41: 355-357.
Zhi M X, Li X J. Improvement on the method for measuring proline content. Plant Physiol Commun, 2005, 41: 355-357 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 姬亚丽. Trizol试剂法提取金鱼藻总RNA的技术方法改进. 高原科学研究, 2019, 3(2): 51-58.
Ji Y L. A modification on the Trizol method for extracting the total RNA of Ceratophyllum demersum L. Plateau Sci Res, 2019, 3(2): 51-58 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] Hanin M, Ebel C, Ngom M, Laplaze L, Masmoudi K. New insights on plant salt tolerance mechanisms and their potential use for breeding. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 1787.
pmid: 27965692
[20] Wu Y, Jin X, Liao W B, Hu L L, Dawuda M M, Zhao X J, Tang Z Q, Gong T Y, Yu J H. 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) alleviated salinity stress in cucumber seedlings by enhancing chlorophyll synthesis pathway. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 635.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00635 pmid: 29868088
[21] 钟华, 董洁, 董宽虎. 盐胁迫对扁蓿豆幼苗脯氨酸积累及其代谢关键酶活性的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(4): 189-194.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2017464
Zhong H, Dong J, Dong K H. Effect of salt stress on proline accumulation and the activities of the key enzymes involved in proline metabolism in Medicago ruthenica seedlings. Acat Pratac Sin, 2018, 27(4): 189-194 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] de Oliveira F K, Santos L O, Buffon J G. Mechanism of action, sources, and application of peroxidases. Food Res Int, 2021, 143: 110266.
[23] Shim J S, Jeong H I, Bang S W, Jung S E, Kim G, Kim Y S, Redillas M C F R, Oh S J, Seo J S, Kim J K. Drought-induced branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase enhances drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol, 2023, 191: 1435-1447.
[24] Sun K T, Fang H, Chen Y, Zhuang Z M, Chen Q, Shan T Y, Khan M K R, Zhang J, Wang B H. Genome-wide analysis of the cytochrome P450 gene family involved in salt tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 685054.
[25] 黄建斌, 周文杰, 房磊, 孙明明, 李鑫, 李晶晶, 李晓婷, 唐艳艳, 姜德锋, 朱虹, 隋炯明, 乔利仙. ACC氧化酶基因AhACOs对花生耐盐性的影响. 生物工程学报, 2023, 39: 603-613.
Huang J B, Zhou W J, Fang L, Sun M M, Li X, Li J J, Li X T, Tang Y Y, Jiang D F, Zhu H, Sui J M, Qiao L X. Effect of ACC oxidase gene AhACOs on salt tolerance of peanut. Chin J Biotechnol, 2023, 39: 603-613 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] Niu M X, Feng C H, Liu M Y, Liu X, Liu S J, Liu C, Yin W L, Xia X L. Genome-wide identification of poplar GSTU gene family and its PtrGSTU23 and PtrGSTU40 to improve salt tolerance in poplar. Ind Crops Prod, 2024, 209: 117945.
[27] Horváth E, Bela K, Papdi C, Gallé Á, Szabados L, Tari I, Csiszár J. The role of Arabidopsis glutathione transferase F9 gene under oxidative stress in seedlings. Acta Biol Hung, 2015, 66: 406-418.
doi: 10.1556/018.66.2015.4.5 pmid: 26616373
[28] Rosa-Téllez S, Anoman A D, Alcántara-Enguídanos A, Garza- Aguirre R A, Alseekh S, Ros R. PGDH family genes differentially affect Arabidopsis tolerance to salt stress. Plant Sci, 2020, 290: 110284.
[29] Anjum N A, Gill R, Kaushik M, Hasanuzzaman M, Pereira E, Ahmad I, Tuteja N, Gill S S. ATP-sulfurylase, sulfur-compounds, and plant stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci, 2015, 6: 210.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00210 pmid: 25904923
[30] Dong N Q, Sun Y W, Guo T, Shi C L, Zhang Y M, Kan Y, Xiang Y H, Zhang H, Yang Y B, Li Y C, Zhao H Y, Yu H X, Lu Z Q, Wang Y, Ye W W, Shan J X, Lin H X. UDP-glucosyltransferase regulates grain size and abiotic stress tolerance associated with metabolic flux redirection in rice. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 2629.
[31] Tiwari R, Garg K, Senthil-Kumar M, Bisht N C. XLG2 and CORI3 function additively to regulate plant defense against the necrotrophic pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant J, 2024, 117: 616-631.
[32] Gondil V S, Asif M, Bhalla T C. Optimization of physicochemical parameters influencing the production of prodigiosin fro. Serratia nematodiphila RL2 and exploring its antibacterial activity. 3 Biotech 2017, 7: 338.
[33] Patil C D, Patil S V, Salunke B K, Salunkhe R B. Insecticidal potency of bacterial species Bacillus thuringiensis SV2 and Serratia nematodiphila SV6 against larvae of mosquito species Aedes aegypti. Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Parasitol Res, 2012, 110: 1841-1847.
[34] Sutthisa W. Comparison of the antagonistic potential of the entomopathogenic bacterium Serratia nematodiphila GCSR38 with other effective microorganisms for the control of rice bacterial leaf blight. J Pure Appl Microbiol, 2022, 16: 557-566.
[35] Dastager S G, Deepa C K, Pandey A. Potential plant growth- promoting activity of Serratia nematodiphila NII-0928 on black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2011, 27: 259-265.
[36] Kang S M, Khan A L, Waqas M, You Y H, Hamayun M, Joo G J, Shahzad R, Choi K S, Lee I J. Gibberellin-producing Serratia nematodiphila PEJ1011 ameliorates low temperature stress in Capsicum annuum L. Eur J Soil Biol, 2015, 68: 85-93.
[37] 梁洪榜, 赵丽, 周云鹏, 刘畅, 和婧, 匡乃昆, 李云开. 盐碱地应用根际促生菌对土壤改良、作物产量与品质的影响: 基于Meta分析. 土壤, 2022, 54: 1257-1264.
Liang H B, Zhao L, Zhou Y P, Liu C, He J, Kuang N K, Li Y K. Effects of rhizosphere growth-promoting bacteria on soil improvement, crop yield and quality in saline-alkali land: a meta- analysis. Soils, 2022, 54: 1257-1264 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] Han Y J, Liu S X, Chen F L, Deng X L, Miao Z, Wu Z S, Ye B C. Characteristics of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria SCPG-7 and its effect on the growth of Capsicum annuum L. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2021, 28: 11323-11332.
[39] Lotfi N, Soleimani A, Çakmakçı R, Vahdati K, Mohammadi P. Characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Persian walnut associated with drought stress tolerance. Sci Rep, 2022, 12: 12725.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16852-6 pmid: 35882927
[40] 陈小娟, 刘铠鸣, 宣明刚, 邵佳慧, 张瑞福. 增强作物耐盐胁迫能力的根际促生菌筛选、鉴定及田间应用效果. 南京农业大学学报, 2020, 43: 452-459.
Chen X J, Liu K M, Xuan M G, Shao J H, Zhang R F. Screening and identification of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to enhance salt stress tolerance of crops and their effects in field experiment. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2020, 43: 452-459 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] Mishra P, Sharma P. Superoxide Dismutases (SODs) and their role in regulating abiotic stress induced oxidative stress in plants. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 15: 53-88.
[42] Fu H Q, Yang Y Q. How plants tolerate salt stress. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 2023, 45: 5914-5934.
doi: 10.3390/cimb45070374 pmid: 37504290
[43] Gong Y, Chen L J, Pan S Y, Li X W, Xu M J, Zhang C M, Xing K, Qin S. Antifungal potential evaluation and alleviation of salt stress in tomato seedlings by a halotolerant plant growth- promoting actinomycete Streptomyces sp. KLBMP5084. Rhizosphere, 2020, 16: 100262.
[44] Mehrabi S S, Sabokdast M, Bihamta M R, Dedičová B. The coupling effects of PGPR inoculation and foliar spraying of strigolactone in mitigating the negative effect of salt stress in wheat plants: insights from phytochemical, growth, and yield attributes. Agriculture, 2024, 14: 732.
[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[7] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[8] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[9] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[10] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[11] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[12] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[13] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[14] 李炳霖, 叶晓磊, 肖红, 肖国滨, 吕伟生, 刘君权, 任涛, 陆志峰, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥用量对油菜产量和镁吸收量及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1850-1860.
[15] 李世鹏, 陈才武, 张晶, 吕恬, 傅廷栋, 易斌. 基于改进U-Net++模型的油菜pol TCMS温敏两系育性等级鉴定及温度育性关系的量化研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1423-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2