欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1892-1897.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水分胁迫对水稻结实期一些生理性状的影响

王贺正;马均*;李旭毅;李艳;张荣萍;汪仁全   

  1. 四川农业大学水稻研究所,四川温江611130
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-12-12 网络出版日期:2006-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 马均

Effects of Water Stress on Some Physiological Characteristics in Rice during Grain Filling Stage

WANG He-Zheng,MA Jun*,LI Xu-Yi,LI Yan,ZHANG Rong-Ping,WANG Ren-Quan   

  1. Rice Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-08-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-12-12 Published online:2006-12-12
  • Contact: MA Jun

摘要:

选用抗旱性不同的3个杂交水稻品种,在干旱棚内分别在正常供水和水分胁迫条件下,研究了水稻结实期丙二醛(MDA)含量、光合速率、气孔导度、渗透调节物质及保护性酶活性等生理性状变化。结果表明,结实期随土壤水分胁迫加剧和时间延长细胞膜脂过氧化加剧,抗旱性弱的品种膜脂过氧化更为严重;剑叶光合速率、气孔导度和叶绿素含量迅速下降,抗旱性弱的品种比抗旱性强的品种降速快、幅度大。抽穗后0~14 d随胁迫时间的延长叶片内可溶性糖、氨基酸含量增加,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和过氧化物酶(POD)3种酶活性升高,抗旱性强的品种增加或升高的幅度大。抽穗14 d后叶片内可溶性糖、氨基酸含量下降,SOD、CAT和POD酶活性降低。试验表明,水稻叶片MDA含量、光合作用、渗透调节物质及保护性酶活性的变化幅度与品种的抗旱性密切相关。

关键词: 水稻, 水分胁迫, 结实期, 生理性状

Abstract:

Along with the increasing scarcity of global water resource, water shortage is crucial for restricting agricultural development in china. Rice is one of the main staple food crops in the world, and may suffer serious water stress during its growth period. Water stress during grain filling results in decreasing grain yield, and its physiological mechanism is unclear under continuance of the water stress. So study on the relationship between water stress and drought resistance in rice have become increasingly important proposals of rice scientific researches. The experiments were carried out in growth chamber to investigate the effects of water stress on MDA,photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, osmotic regulators and antioxidative enzyme activities in three hybrid rice cultivars (combinations) with different drought resistant abilities under both normal and drought conditions during grain filling stage. The results indicated that water stress aggravated the membrane lipid peroxidation in rice leaves, and it was more severe in weaker drought resistant cultivars than in better drought resistant cultivars. During the period of water stress, decreases of photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content in better drought resistant cultivars were obvious less than those in weaker drought resistant ones. Contents of soluble sugar and amino acid and activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD), catalase(CAT) and peroxidase(POD) in leaves increased obviously in 0–14 d after anthesis and subsequently decreased rapidly, and the increases were more in better drought resistant cultivars than in weaker drought resistant ones in 0–14 d after anthesis. These results suggest that water stress can induce physiological and biochemical changes in rice, and the changes indicate drought resistance of rice during grain filling stage. Changes of MDA content, photosynthesis, osmotic regulators and antioxidative enzyme activities are correlated significantly to drought resistance of rice varieties.

Key words: Rice, Water stress, Grain filling stage, Physiological characteristic

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!