欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (09): 1411-1418.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽宁水稻穗型分类及其与产量和品质的关系

徐正进1;陈温福1;韩勇2;邵国军2;张文忠1;马殿荣1   

  1. 1 沈阳农业大学水稻研究所/农业部作物生理生态与遗传育种重点开放实验室/辽宁省北方粳稻育种重点实验室,辽宁沈阳110161;2 辽宁省水稻研究所,辽宁沈阳110101
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-09-12 网络出版日期:2007-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 徐正进

Classification of Panicle Type and Its Relationship with Grain Yield and Quality of Rice in Liaoning Province

XU Zheng-Jin1,CHEN Wen-Fu1,HAN Yong2,SHAO Guo-Jun2,ZHANG Wen-Zhong1,MA Dian-Rong1   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Northern Japonica Rice Breeding of Liaoning /Rice Institute of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning; 2 Rice Institute of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2007-01-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-09-12 Published online:2007-09-12
  • Contact: XU Zheng-Jin

摘要:

以辽宁省近年来育成的40个水稻品种为试材,研究了穗部性状的品种间差异、穗型分类方法及其与穗部性状、产量和品质的关系。结果表明,调查的13项穗部性状的品种间差异均达到极显著水平;以单穗重、着粒密度、穗直立程度和穗型指数为指标,分别将试材划分为重、中、轻,密、中、稀,直、半、弯,上、中、下4类各3种穗型;总体看重穗型有与密穗型相对应的趋势,共同特点是穗数少而一次枝梗数和每穗粒数多,着粒密度大,二次枝梗粒数及其占每穗粒数的比率(二次粒率)高,结实性特别是二次枝梗结实性差,因而产量潜力较高但是品质较差;直立穗型与重穗型和密穗型的对应关系不如前两者之间明显,在穗数、一次枝梗数、每穗粒数、着粒密度等方面与重穗型和密穗型相似,但是二次粒率低,结实率高,加工品质、外观品质和食味品质都优于重穗型和密穗型;上部优势型在结实性和品质性状上有明显优势,但是产量较低。因此,直立穗型与上部优势型相结合将有利于北方粳稻产量和品质的协调统一。

关键词: 水稻, 穗部性状, 穗型, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

Panicle is one of the important objective for improving the plant type of rice. Studying on the panicle traits were lagged behind compared with studying on the culm and leaf. Recent years, studying on the effect of panicle traits on seed setting ability and yield increased, but little of reports could be found in integrative comparing with the classification in different panicle type and studying on the relationship of panicle type with yield and quality. In this paper, 40 rice cultivars bred during recent years in Liaoning were used to study panicle character differences, panicle type classification and their relationships with grain yield and quality for providing the theoritic basis to improve panicle type. The results showed that 13 panicle traits varied significantly among cultivars. The tested cultivars were classified into heavy panicle type (HPT), middle panicle type (MPT), and thin panicle type (TPT) according to panicle weight; dense panicle type (DPT), semi-dense panicle type (SDPT) and loose panicle type (LPT) according to grains density; erect panicle type (EPT), semi-erect panicle type (SEPT), and curved panicle type (CPT) according to panicle-neck curvature (PNC); superior-on-the-up-part type (SUT), superior-on-the-middle-part type (SMT), and superior-on-the-low-part type (SLT) according to panicle trait index (PTI), respectively. The panicle characters of HPT were similar to those of DPT, with fewer panicles per plant, more grains per panicle, higher grain density, higher ratio of secondary branch grains/total grains, lower seed-setting rate, which resulted in the higher yield and inferior grain quality. Relation of EPT with HPT or DPT was not as significant as that of HPT with DPT. The panicle number, primary branches, grains per panicle, grain density of EPT were similar to those of HPT or DPT. EPT had lower ratio of secondary branch grains to total grains per panicle, but higher seed setting rate, which resulted in that the processing qualities, appearance qualities and eating qualities of erect panicle rice cultivars were superior to those of heavy panicle type and compact panicle type rice cultivars. SUT cultivars had higher seed setting rate and better quality characters, but lower grain yield. Therefore, it may be advantageous for harmonizing yield and quality by combining EPT with SUT.

Key words: Rice, Character of panicle, Panicle type, Yield, Quality

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[6] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[7] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[8] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[14] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[15] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!