欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 301-305.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

春小麦籽粒灌浆期沉淀值动态的定量研究

赵秀兰;李文雄   

  1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所东亚区域气候-环境重点实验室/全球变化东亚区域中心,北京100029
  • 收稿日期:2004-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵秀兰

Dynamic Changes in Grain Sedimentation Test Value of Spring Wheat during Grain Filling

ZHAO Xiu-Lan;LI Wen-Xiong   

  1. Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for East Asia, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences / START Regional Center for Temperate East Asia, Beijing 100029
  • Received:2004-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Xiu-Lan

摘要:

以3个不同品质类型春小麦品种为材料,在设定不 同肥力和气象条件等环境因子基础上,通过建立灌浆期籽粒沉淀值动态曲线拟合方程,定量揭示籽粒沉淀值的动态与规律。结果表明,灌浆期籽粒沉淀值随时间的变化符合一元三次多项式凸性曲线,即自开花始先增后降的单峰曲线。灌浆期籽粒沉淀值的动态,不同基因型具有不同特点。高蛋白强筋、高蛋白中筋和低蛋白弱筋品种曲线峰值分别出现在开花后28 d、23 d和30 d前后。各品种沉淀值积累速度的动态特点是成熟时沉淀值高蛋白强筋品种最高,高蛋白中筋品种次之,低蛋白弱筋品种最低的主要原因。

关键词: 春小麦, 籽粒沉淀值, 动态变化, 曲线拟合方程, 定量

Abstract:

Field experiments with three spring wheats genotypes were carried out in Harbin in 2002 to study quantitatively the dynamic change of grain sedimentation test value affected by environmental factors including fertility and meterological condition. The results showed that the dynamic change of grain sedimentation test value with varied days after anthesis was well fitted with the third-order curve convex in shape. For different genotypes, the characteristics of their dynamic changes were different. Moreover, the differences of grain sedimentation test value between genotypes were varied during the period of grain filling. The dates corresponding to the curve peak values of the high protein-rich gluten genotype, the high protein—medium gluten genotype and low protein-poor gluten genotype were the 28th, 23rd and 30th day after anthesis, respectively. The dynamic change shapes of the accumulation velocity curves for grain sedimentation test value in different genotypes were responsible for their sedimentation values at mature period, which were the highest in high protein-rich gluten genotype, the medium in high protein-medium gluten genotype, and the lowest in low protein-poor gluten genotype.

Key words: Spring wheat, Grain sedimentation test value, Dynamic change, Fitting curve equation, Quantitative

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 于永超, 刘明, 靳容, 赵鹏, 张强强, 王静, 朱晓亚, 唐忠厚. 甘薯高氮徒长的生理机制和转录组分析研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 813-824.
[2] 谢玮欣, 毛守发, 韦金贵, 侯思宇, 樊志龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 南运有, 柴强. 干旱灌区绿肥还田对减量灌水春小麦水分利用的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 514-526.
[3] 吕国锋, 范金平, 吴素兰, 张晓, 赵仁慧, 李曼, 王玲, 高德荣, 别同德, 刘健. 早熟小麦品种扬麦37主要目标性状的遗传构成分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1538-1547.
[4] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 侯慧芝, 薛云贵, 郭宏娟, 王硕, 赵绮志, 张绪成, 谢军红. 干旱条件下深施肥对春小麦旗叶生态化学计量特征及其光合碳同化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2078-2090.
[5] 张康, 聂志刚, 王钧, 李广. 温度升高下APSIM模型春小麦籽粒生长参数敏感性分析及优化[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 464-477.
[6] 毛守发, 韦金贵, 柴强, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 殷文, 王琦明. 绿洲灌区绿肥还田对减量灌水小麦产量的补偿机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2818-2830.
[7] 潘洁明, 田绍锐, 梁艳兰, 朱宇林, 周定港, 阙友雄, 凌辉, 黄宁. 甘蔗PIN-LIKES基因家族的鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 414-425.
[8] 王海琪, 王荣荣, 蒋桂英, 尹豪杰, 晏世杰, 车子强. 施氮量对滴灌春小麦叶片光合生理性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 211-224.
[9] 李增强, 丁鑫超, 卢海, 胡亚丽, 岳娇, 黄震, 莫良玉, 陈立, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 铅胁迫下红麻生理特性及DNA甲基化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1031-1042.
[10] 卢海, 李增强, 唐美琼, 罗登杰, 曹珊, 岳娇, 胡亚丽, 黄震, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 红麻DNA甲基化响应镉胁迫及甲基化差异基因的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2324-2334.
[11] 侯慧芝, 张绪成, 方彦杰, 于显枫, 王红丽, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 全膜微垄沟播对寒旱区春小麦苗期土壤水热环境及光合作用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1398-1407.
[12] 郑清雷,余陈静,姚坤存,黄宁,阙友雄,凌辉,许莉萍. 甘蔗Rieske Fe/S蛋白前体基因ScPetC的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 844-857.
[13] 马明生, 郭贤仕, 柳燕兰. 全生物降解地膜覆盖对旱地土壤水分状况及春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1933-1944.
[14] 高世武,傅志伟,陈云,林兆里,许莉萍,郭晋隆. 甘蔗热带种金属硫蛋白家族基因的克隆及响应重金属胁迫的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 166-178.
[15] 常建忠,董春林,张正,乔麟轶,杨睿,蒋丹,张彦琴,杨丽莉,吴佳洁,景蕊莲. 小麦抗逆相关基因TaSAP1的5′非翻译区内含子功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1311-1318.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!