欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (8): 2078-2090.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.31074

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

干旱条件下深施肥对春小麦旗叶生态化学计量特征及其光合碳同化的影响

梁进宇1,4(), 尹嘉德2,3,4, 侯慧芝2,3,4, 薛云贵1,4, 郭宏娟1,4, 王硕1,4, 赵绮志1,4, 张绪成1,2,3,4,*(), 谢军红1,*()   

  1. 1甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070
    2甘肃省农业科学院旱地农业研究所, 甘肃兰州 730070
    3甘肃省旱作区水资源高效利用重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
    4农业农村部西北旱地农业绿色低碳重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30 接受日期:2024-04-01 出版日期:2024-08-12 网络出版日期:2024-04-24
  • 通讯作者: * 张绪成, E-mail: gszhangxuch@163.com;谢军红, E-mail: xiejh@gsau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: liangjinyu1997@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1900700);甘肃省科技计划项目(22JR5RA763);甘肃省科技计划项目(23JRRA1340);甘肃省科技计划项目(20JR10RA464);农业农村部东北平原农业绿色低碳重点实验室2022年度开放基金资助。

Effects of deep fertilization on ecological stoichiometric characteristics and photosynthetic carbon assimilation of flag leaves of spring wheat under drought conditions

LIANG Jin-Yu1,4(), YIN Jia-De2,3,4, HOU Hui-Zhi2,3,4, XUE Yun-Gui1,4, GUO Hong-Juan1,4, WANG Shuo1,4, ZHAO Qi-Zhi1,4, ZHANG Xu-Cheng1,2,3,4,*(), XIE Jun-Hong1,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    2Institute of Dry Land Farming, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    3Key Laboratory of High Water Utilization on Dryland of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    4Key Laboratory of Green and Low Carbon Dryland Agriculture in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2023-11-30 Accepted:2024-04-01 Published:2024-08-12 Published online:2024-04-24
  • Contact: * E-mail: gszhangxuch@163.com;E-mail: xiejh@gsau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFD1900700);Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province(22JR5RA763);Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province(23JRRA1340);Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province(20JR10RA464);Open Fund for 2022 of the Northeast Plain Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs.

RichHTML

7

PDF

147

摘要：

深施肥能提高旱地作物的水肥利用效率, 是作物增产的重要技术途径之一, 但目前对其营养生理机制, 尤其是从旗叶生态化学计量特征的角度缺乏系统研究分析。本研究采用桶栽定量控制试验的方法, 在2021—2022年以‘陇春35号’为供试品种, 设置30 cm深施肥(D30)、15 cm浅施肥(D15)和不施肥(CK) 3个处理, 研究不同处理对春小麦挑旗至灌浆期春小麦旗叶碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)含量及生态化学计量特征(C/N、C/P、N/P)的影响, 揭示春小麦旗叶养分含量及生态化学计量特征对旗叶SPAD值、Pn、地上部干物质积累、地上部生长速率、产量形成的影响。结果表明, 灌浆期D30旗叶C/N值较D15和CK分别降低2.1%~6.4%、5.4%~10.2%; C/P值分别降低3.8%~5.2%、5.4%~6.0%; 2021年N/P值分布提高1.4%和4.1%, 2022年N/P值分别降低1.6%和0.2%。灌浆期D30旗叶SPAD值较D15和CK分别提高1.8%~6.5%、15.5%~18.2%; Pn分别提高21.6%~27.0%、28.5%~36.6%。扬花至灌浆期D30地上部生长速率较D15和CK分别提高22.1%~41.2%、68.4%~80.8%。成熟期D30地上部干物质积累量较D15和CK分别提高10.6%~11.1%; 产量分别提高15.7%~16.0%、46.5%~49.3%。D30氮肥贡献率较D15提高46.6%~52.4%; 氮肥偏生产力提高15.7%~16.0%; 氮肥农学效率提高69.6%~76.7%。相关性分析表明, 灌浆期春小麦旗叶C、N、P含量与旗叶SPAD值、Pn、地上部干物质积累呈正相关; 旗叶生态化学计量特征与旗叶SPAD值、Pn、干物质积累呈负相关。因此, 在干旱条件下30 cm深施肥通过提高春小麦挑旗至灌浆期旗叶C、N、P含量, 延缓扬花期后旗叶N、P含量的降低, 优化旗叶生态化学计量特征, 降低N、P对春小麦旗叶光合作用的限制, 提高春小麦旗叶Pn和地上部生长速率, 并且延缓旗叶衰老, 促进产量增加。

关键词: 春小麦, 干旱, 深施肥, 生态化学计量特征, 旗叶衰老

Abstract:

Deep fertilization can improve the water and fertilizer use efficiency of dryland crops, which is one of the important technical ways to increase crop yield, but there is a lack of systematic research on its nutritional physiological mechanism, especially from the perspective of ecological stoichiometric characteristics of flag leaves. In this study, three treatments, 30 cm deep fertilization (D30), 15 cm shallow fertilization (D15) and no fertilization (CK) were conducted in 2021 and 2022 with ‘Longchun 35’ as the test cultivar. The effects of different treatments on the contents of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and ecological stoichiometric characteristics (C/N, C/P, N/P) of spring wheat flag leaves from booting to filling stage were studied. The effects of nutrient content and ecological stoichiometric characteristics of flag leaves on SPAD value, Pn, shoot growth rate, dry matter accumulation, and yield formation of flag leaves in spring wheat were revealed. The results showed that the C/N value of D30 flag leaves at the grain filling stage was 2.1%?6.4% and 5.4%?10.2% lower than D15 and CK, respectively. The C/P values decreased by 3.8%?5.2% and 5.4%?6.0%, respectively. In 2021, the distribution of N/P values increased by 1.4% and 4.1%, and in 2022, the N/P values decreased by 1.6% and 0.2%, respectively. Compared with D15 and CK, the SPAD values of D30 flag leaves increased by 1.8%?6.5% and 15.5%?18.2%, respectively. Pn increased by 21.6%, 27.0%, 28.5%?36.6%, respectively. Compared with D15 and CK, the growth rate of D30 shoots increased by 22.1%?41.2% and 68.4%?80.8%, respectively. The dry matter accumulation of D30 at maturity stage increased by 10.6%?11.1% compared with D15 and CK, respectively. The output increased by 15.7%?15.9% and 46.5%?49.3%, respectively. The contribution rate of nitrogen fertilizer in D30 increased by 46.6%?52.4% compared with D15. The partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer increased by 15.7%?16.0%. The agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer increased by 69.6%?76.7%. Correlation analysis showed that the contents of C, N, and P in flag leaves of spring wheat at grain filling stage were positively correlated with SPAD value, Pn, and dry matter accumulation in flag leaves. The ecological stoichiometric characteristics of flag leaf were negatively correlated with SPAD value, Pn and dry matter accumulation of flag leaf. Therefore, 30 cm deep fertilization under drought conditions increased the contents of C, N and P in flag leaves from booting to filling stage, delayed the decrease of N and P contents in flag leaves after flowering, optimized the ecological stoichiometric characteristics of flag leaves, reduced the restriction of N and P on the photosynthesis of flag leaves of spring wheat, increased the growth rate of Pn and shoots of flag leaves of spring wheat, delayed the senescence of flag leaves, and promoted the increase of yield.

Key words: spring wheat, drought, deep fertilization, ecological stoichiometric characteristics, senescence of flag leaves

图1

2021-2022年日平均气温"

表1

试验施肥深度"

处理
Treatment		 施肥深度Fertilization depth
15 cm 30 cm
不施肥(CK) No fertilization 0 0
化肥全部浅施15 cm (D15) Deeply fertilization of fertilizer in 15 cm 100% 0
化肥全部深施30 cm (D30) Deeply fertilization of fertilizer in 30 cm 0 100%

图2

各处理春小麦旗叶C、N、P含量 BO: 挑旗期; HE: 抽穗期; FL: 扬花期; FI: 灌浆期。"

图3

各处理春小麦旗叶C/N值 缩写同图2。不同小写字母表示同一生育期不同处理差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图4

各处理春小麦旗叶C/P值 缩写同图2。不同小写字母表示同一生育期不同处理差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图5

各处理春小麦旗叶N/P值 缩写同图2。不同小写字母表示同一生育期不同处理差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图6

各处理春小麦旗叶SPAD值 缩写同图2。不同小写字母表示同一生育期不同处理差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图7

各处理春小麦旗叶Pn 缩写同图2。"

图8

各处理春小麦地上部生长速率 BO: 挑旗期; HE: 抽穗期; FL: 扬花期; FI: 灌浆期; HA: 成熟期。"

图9

各处理春小麦干物质积累量 缩写同图8。不同小写字母表示同一生育期不同处理差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表2

不同处理对春小麦产量及产量构成的影响"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 小穗数
Spikelet number		 穗粒数
Grain number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)		 较CK增产率
Yield increase rate compared to CK (%)
2021 CK 14.00±0.58 b 38.33±0.88 c 38.34±0.12 c 4681.53±120.57 c —
D15 14.33±0.33 ab 43.33±0.33 b 42.84±0.18 b 5912.95±69.61 b 26.3
D30 15.67±0.33 a 46.67±0.67 a 46.14±0.08 a 6857.75±90.70 a 46.5
2022 CK 12.33±0.33 c 35.67±0.88 c 40.74±0.78 c 4623.14±29.78 c —
D15 13.67±0.33 b 43.67±0.33 b 42.91±0.62 b 5966.03±53.08 b 29.0
D30 16.00±0.00 a 46.33±0.33 a 46.76±0.33 a 6900.21±59.11 a 49.3

图10

D15和D30氮肥利用率 NCR: 氮肥贡献率; PFPN: 氮肥偏生产力; NAE: 氮肥农学效率。"

图11

春小麦挑旗至灌浆期相关性分析 C: 旗叶碳含量; N: 旗叶氮含量; P: 旗叶磷含量; C/N: 旗叶碳氮比; C/P: 旗叶碳磷比; N/P: 旗叶氮磷比; SPAD: 旗叶SPAD值; Pn: 旗叶净光合速率; DM: 干物质积累量。* P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01。"

[19] 张永清, 苗果园. 冬小麦根系对施肥深度的生物学响应研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 14(4): 72-75.
Zhang Y Q, Miao G Y. Biological response of winter wheat root system to fertilization depth. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2006, 14(4): 72-75 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 姜超强, 王火焰, 卢殿君, 周健民, 王世济, 祖朝龙. 一次性根区穴施尿素提高夏玉米产量和养分吸收利用效率. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(12): 146-153.
Jiang C Q, Wang H Y, Lu D J, Zhou J M, Wang S J, Zu C L. Single fertilization of urea in root zone improving crop yield, nutrient uptake and use efficiency in summer maize. Trans CSAE, 2018, 34(12): 146-153 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 邬畏, 何兴东, 周启星. 生态系统氮磷比化学计量特征研究进展. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30: 296-302.
Wu W, He X D, Zhou Q X. Research progress on the stoichiometric characteristics of nitrogen phosphorus ratio in ecosystems. J Desert Res, 2010, 30: 296-302 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] Wingle A, Purdy S, MacLean J A, Pourtau N. The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 391-399.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri279 pmid: 16157653
[23] Zhang Z S, Song X L, Lu X G, Xue Z S. Ecological stoichiometry of carbon, Nitrogen, and phosphorus in estuarine wetland soils: Influences of vegetation coverage, plant communities, geomorphology, and seawalls. J Soils Sediments, 2013, 13: 1043-1051.
[24] Garcia N S, Bonachela J A, Martiny A C. Interactions between growth-dependent changes in cell size, nutrient supply and cellular elemental stoichiometry of marine Synechococcus. ISME J, 2016, 10: 2715-2724.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.50 pmid: 27058506
[25] 尹嘉德, 侯慧芝, 张绪成, 王红丽, 于显枫, 方彦杰, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 全膜覆土下施有机肥对春小麦旗叶碳氮比、光合特性和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31: 3749-3757.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.029
[1] 鲁英超, 李娜, 姜颖. 干旱胁迫对小麦形态与生理指标及产量影响的研究进展. 现代农业科技, 2023, (16): 10-13.
Lu Y C, Li N, Jiang Y. Research progress on the effects of drought stress on wheat morphology, physiological indicators, and yield. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2023, (16): 10-13 (in Chinese).
[2] Wang X, Deng Y, Gao L, Kong F, Shen G, Duan B, Wang Z, Dai M, Han Z. Series-temporal transcriptome profiling of cotton reveals the response mechanism of phosphatidylinositol signaling system in the early stage of drought stress. Genomics, 2022, 114: 110465.
[3] 段文学, 于振文, 石玉, 张永丽, 赵俊晔. 施氮深度对旱地小麦耗水特性和干物质积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 657-664.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00657
Duan W X, Yu Z W, Shi Y, Zhang Y L, Zhao J Y. Effects of nitrogen application depth on water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution in rainfed wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 657-664 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 杨云马, 孙彦铭, 贾良良, 贾树龙, 孟春香. 磷肥施用深度对夏玉米产量及根系分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51: 1518-1526.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.08.009
Yang Y M, Sun Y M, Jia L L, Jia S L, Meng C X. Effects of phosphorus fertilization depth on yield and root distribution of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2018, 51: 1518-1526 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.08.009
[5] 张永清, 李华, 苗果园. 施肥深度对春小麦根系分布及后期衰老的影响. 土壤, 2006, 38: 110-112.
Zhang Y Q, Li H, Miao G Y. Effect of fertilization depth on distribution and late senescence of root system of spring wheat. Soils, 2006, 38: 110-112 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 李永虎, 曹梦琳, 杜慧玲, 郭平毅, 张海颖, 郭美俊, 原向阳. 施肥位置及施肥量对杂交谷子干物质累积、转运和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52: 4177-4190.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.021
[25] Yin J D, Hou H Z, Zhang X C, Wang H L, Yu X F, Fang Y J, Ma Y F, Zhang G P, Lei K N. Effects of organic fertilizer application on flag leaf C/N ratio, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat with full plastic film mulching. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 3749-3757 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 张喜军, 魏廷邦, 樊志龙, 柴强. 绿洲灌区水氮减施密植玉米的光合源动态和产量表现. 核农学报, 2020, 34: 1302-1310.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.06.1302
Zhang X J, Wei Y B, Fan Z L, Chai Q. Dynamics of photosynthetic sources and yield performance of densely planted maize with reduced water and nitrogen application in oasis irrigation areas. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2020, 34: 1302-1310 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 谭彩霞, 封超年, 郭文善, 朱新开, 李春燕, 彭永欣. 不同品质类型小麦旗叶光合特性及其与产量的相关性研究. 扬州大学学报, 2019, 40(6): 30-34.
Tan C X, Feng C N, Guo W S, Zhu X K, Li C Y, Peng Y X. Photosynthetic physiological characteristics in flag leaf of different quality types of wheat and its correlation with yield. J Yangzhou Univ, 2019, 40(6): 30-34 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 孙旭生, 林琪, 李玲燕, 姜雯, 翟延举. 氮素对超高产小麦生育后期光合特性及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14: 840-844.
Sun X S, Lin Q, Li L Y, Jiang W, Zhai Y J. Effects of nitrogen supply on photosynthetic characteristics at later developing stages and yield in superhigh-yield winter wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2008, 14: 840-844 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 董剑, 赵万春, 陈其皎, 李哲清, 刘俊, 庞红喜, 高翔. 陕西关中地区不同冬小麦品种晚播高产的适宜播期和密度. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(3): 66-69.
Dong J, Zhao W C, Chen Q J, Li Z Q, Liu J, Pang H X, Gao X. Researches on suitable planting date and sowing rate for the late-sown high yield of different winter wheat cultivars in Guanzhong area of Shaanxi. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2010, 19(3): 66-69 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 孙雪芳, 丁在松, 侯海鹏, 葛均筑, 唐丽媛, 赵明. 不同春玉米品种花后光合物质生产特点及碳氮含量变化. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1284-1292.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01284
[6] Li Y H, Cao M L, Du H L, Guo P Y, Zhang H Y, Guo M J, Yuan X Y. Effect of fertilization location and amount on dry matter accumulation, translocation and yield of hybrid millet. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52: 4177-4190 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.021
[7] 侯慧芝, 张绪成, 尹嘉德, 方彦杰, 王红丽, 于显枫, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 旱地化肥分层和深施对春小麦水肥利用及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55: 3289-3302.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.17.003
Hou H Z, Zhang X C, Yin J D, Fang Y J, Wang H L, Yu X F, Ma Y F, Zhang G P, Lei K N. Effects of deep and layered application of reduced chemical nitrogen fertilizer on water, nutrient utilization and yield of spring wheat in rain-fed arid area. Sci Agric Sin, 2022, 55: 3289-3302 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.17.003
[8] 曲晓莲, 李耕, 仲锦维, 王升臣, 张雅芹. 尿素类型与施肥深度对冬小麦花后旗叶光合特性与产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(12): 88-95.
Qu X L, Li G, Zhong J W, Wang S C, Zhang Y Q. Effects of urea type and fertilization depth on photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves after anthesis and yield of winter wheat. Shandong Agric Sci, 2021, 53(12): 88-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学: 探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34: 2-6.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.002
He J S, Han X G. Ecological stoichiometry: searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems. Chin J Plant Ecol 2010, 34: 2-6 (in Chinese).
[10] Sardans J, Rivas-Ubach A, Peñuelas J. The elemental stoichiometry of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and its relationships with organismic lifestyle and ecosystem structure and function: a review and perspectives. Biogeochemi, 2012, 111: 1-39.
[11] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N : P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol, 1996, 33: 1441-1450.
[12] 戴明宏, 赵久然, 杨国航, 王荣焕, 陈国平. 不同生态区和不同品种玉米的源库关系及碳氮代谢. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 1585-1595.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.08.006
[30] Sun X F, Ding Z S, Hou H P, Ge J Z, Tang L Y, Zhao M. Post-anthesis photosynthetic assimilation and the changes of carbon and nitrogen in different varieties of spring maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1284-1292 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 羊留冬, 杨燕, 王根绪, 郭剑英, 杨阳. 短期增温对贡嘎山峨眉冷杉幼苗生长及其CNP化学计量学特征的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31: 3668-3676.
Yang L D, Yang Y, Wang G X, Guo J Y, Yang Y. Short-term effects of warming on growth and stoichiometrical characteristics of Abies fabiri (Mast.) Craib seedling in Gongga mountain. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 3668-3676 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] Ahmad I, Kamran M, Yang X, Meng X, Ali S, Ahmad S, Zhang X, Bilegjargal B, Ahmad B, Liu T. Effects of applying uniconazole alone or combined with manganese on the photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant defense system, and yield in wheat in semiarid regions. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 216: 400-414.
[33] 陈云, 李玉强, 王旭洋, 牛亚毅. 中国典型生态脆弱区生态化学计量学研究进展. 生态学报, 2021, 41: 4213-4225.
Chen Y, Li Y Q, Wang X Y, Niu Y Y. Advances in ecological stoichiometry in typically and ecologically vulnerable regions of China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41: 4213-4225 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 肖凯, 张荣铣. 氮素营养调控小麦旗叶衰老和光合功能衰退的生理机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 5: 371-378.
Xiao K, Zhang R X. The physiological mechanism of nitrogen nutrition regulating flag leaf senescence and photosynthetic function decline in wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 1998, 5: 371-378 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] 郭天财, 冯伟, 赵会杰, 薛国典, 王化岑, 王永华, 姚战军. 两种穗型冬小麦品种旗叶光合特性及氮素调控效应. 作物学报, 2004, 30: 115-121.
Guo T C, Feng W, Zhao H J, Xue G D, Wang H C, Wang Y H, Yao Z J. Photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves and nitrogen effects in two winter wheat cultivars with different spike type. Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30: 115-121 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Dai M H, Zhao J R, Yang G H, Wang R H, Chen G P. Source-sink relationship and carbon-nitrogen metabolism of maize in different ecological regions and varieties. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 1585-1595 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 付为国, 王凡坤, 赵云, 滕博群, 王雨轩. 土壤氮磷化学计量特征对小麦光合气体交换参数和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36: 1435-1442.
Fu W G, Wang F K, Zhao Y, Teng B Q, Wang Y X. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics on photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of wheat. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2016, 36: 1435-1442 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 马小龙, 王朝辉, 曹寒冰, 佘旭, 何红霞, 包明, 宋庆赟, 刘金山. 黄土高原旱地小麦产量差异与产量构成及氮磷钾吸收利用的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23: 1135-1145.
Ma X L, Wang Z H, Cao H B, She X, He H X, Bao M, Song Q Y, Liu J S. Yield variation of winter wheat and its relation to yield components, NPK uptake and utilization in drylands of the Loess Plateau. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2017, 23: 1135-1145 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 何杰, 李冰, 王昌全, 张敬昇, 向毫, 尹斌, 梁靖越. 不同控释氮肥比率对土壤无机氮、微生物及小麦生长的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37: 349-356.
He J, Li B, Wang C Q, Zhang J S, Xiang H, Yin B, Liang J Y. Effect of different controlled release nitrogen fertilizer rate on soil inorganic nitrogen, microorganism and wheat growth. J Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37: 349-356 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013. pp 72-75.
Bao S D. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013. pp 72-75.
[17] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45: 915-924.
[36] 米国华, 张福锁, 王震宇. 小麦超高产生理基础探讨: 小麦后期碳氮代谢互作与粒重形成. 中国农业大学学报, 1997, 2(5): 73-78.
Mi G H, Zhang F S, Wang Z Y. Discussion on the physiological basis of superhigh wheat yield: grain weight formation in relation to the post anthesis interaction between carbon and nitrogen. J China Agric Univ, 1997, 2(5): 73-78 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37] 杨世丽, 张凤路, 贾秀领, 马瑞昆, 姚艳荣. 水氮耦合对冬小麦叶片叶绿素含量和光合速率的影响. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(5): 161-164.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2008.05.035
Yang S L, Zhang F L, Jia X L, Ma R K, Yao Y R. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on chlorophyll content and photosythetic rate of winter wheat leaves. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2008, 23(5): 161-164 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] 杨铁钢, 戴廷波, 曹卫星. 不同施氮水平下GS抑制剂对小麦灌浆期碳氮代谢的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2007, 27: 671-676.
Yang T G, Dai T B, Cao W X. Effects of GS inhibitor glufosinate on carbon and nitrogen assimilation during wheat grain filling under different nitrogen supply. J Triticeae Crops, 2007, 27: 671-676 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45: 915-924 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 卜东升, 刘冬碧, 肖依波, 代勋, 毛波, 高红兵, 王玲, 吴茂前, 张继松. 江汉平原稻区16个水稻品种对氮肥的响应及其利用率差异. 土壤通报, 2021, 52: 1182-1192.
Bu D S, Liu D B, Xiao Y B, Dai X, Mao B, Gao H B, Wang L, Wu M Q, Zhang J S. Response of 16 rice varieties to nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen use efficiency in the Jianghan Plan Area. Chin J Soil Sci, 2021, 52: 1182-1192 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 徐一帆, 徐彩龙, 李瑞东, 吴宗声, 华建鑫, 杨琳, 宋雯雯, 吴存祥. 侧深施肥通过优化叶片功能与氮素积累来提高大豆产量[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2335-2346.
[2] 刘永惠, 沈一, 沈悦, 梁满, 沙琴, 张旭尧, 陈志德. 花生干旱诱导型启动子AhMYB44-11-Pro的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2157-2166.
[3] 李闻娟, 王利民, 齐燕妮, 赵玮, 谢亚萍, 党照, 赵丽蓉, 李雯, 徐晨梦, 王琰, 张建平. 亚麻LuWRI1a在旱盐胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1750-1761.
[4] 乔志新, 张杰道, 王雨, 郭启芳, 刘燕静, 陈蕊, 胡文浩, 孙爱清. 干旱胁迫下冬小麦不同品种萌发特性差异的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1568-1583.
[5] 张康, 聂志刚, 王钧, 李广. 温度升高下APSIM模型春小麦籽粒生长参数敏感性分析及优化[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 464-477.
[6] 王丽平, 王晓钰, 傅竞也, 王强. 玉米转录因子ZmMYB12提高植物抗旱性和低磷耐受性的功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 76-88.
[7] 陈力, 王靖, 邱晓, 孙海莲, 张文浩, 王天佐. 不同耐旱性紫花苜蓿干旱胁迫下生理响应和转录调控的差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2122-2132.
[8] 魏正欣, 刘昌燕, 陈宏伟, 李莉, 孙龙清, 韩雪松, 焦春海, 沙爱华. 基于干旱胁迫转录组信息的蚕豆ASPAT基因家族分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1871-1881.
[9] 张俊杰, 陈金平, 汤钰镂, 张锐, 曹红章, 王丽娟, 马梦金, 王浩, 王泳超, 郭家萌, KRISHNA SV Jagadish, 杨青华, 邵瑞鑫. 花期前后干旱胁迫对复水后夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1397-1409.
[10] 张晨晖, 章岩, 李国辉, 杨子君, 查莹莹, 周驰燕, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 郭保卫. 侧深施肥下水稻高产形成的根系形态及其生理变化特征[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1039-1051.
[11] 李兆伟, 莫祖意, 孙聪颖, 师宇, 尚平, 林伟伟, 范凯, 林文雄. OsNAC2d基因编辑水稻突变体的创建及其对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 365-376.
[12] 张艳艳, 关涵文, 刘淋茹, 贺利, 段剑钊, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 冯伟. 不同水分条件下施磷对冬小麦穗花发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2753-2765.
[13] 丁红, 张智猛, 徐扬, 张冠初, 郭庆, 秦斐斐, 戴良香. 氮素缓解花生干旱胁迫的生理和转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 225-238.
[14] 王海琪, 王荣荣, 蒋桂英, 尹豪杰, 晏世杰, 车子强. 施氮量对滴灌春小麦叶片光合生理性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 211-224.
[15] 陈松余, 丁一娟, 孙峻溟, 黄登文, 杨楠, 代雨涵, 万华方, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnCNGC基因家族鉴定及其在核盘菌侵染和PEG处理下的表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1357-1371.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[2] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[3] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[4] 王逸群. 根瘤菌对水稻的感染[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 32 -35 .
[5] 柯丽萍;郑滔;吴学龙;何海燕;陈锦清. 甘蓝型油菜SLG基因片段的克隆及序列分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 764 -769 .
[6] 崔秀辉. 化学杂交剂SQ-1诱导糜子雄性不育效果研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 106 -110 .
[7] 阿加拉铁;曾龙军;薛大伟;胡江;曾大力;高振宇;郭龙彪;李仕贵;钱前. 水稻灌浆期不同阶段叶绿素含量的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 61 -66 .
[8] 杨文雄;杨芳萍;梁丹;何中虎;尚勋武;夏先春. 中国小麦育成品种和农家种中慢锈基因Lr34/Yr18的分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(07): 1109 -1113 .
[9] 王英;吴存祥;张学明;王云鹏;韩天富. 不同光周期条件下大豆生育期主基因的效应[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(07): 1160 -1168 .
[10] 王国莉;郭振飞. 磷营养对水稻不同耐冷品种光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(08): 1385 -1389 .
京ICP备15008789号-2