欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (04): 540-547.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻根和籽粒细胞分裂素和脱落酸浓度与籽粒灌浆及蒸煮品质的关系

常二华;张文杰;唐成 ;刘立军;王志琴;杨建昌   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-15 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-04-12 网络出版日期:2006-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Concentrations of Cytokinin and Abscisic Acid in the Roots and Grains and Relationship with Grain Filling and Cooking Quality of Rice

CHANG Er-Hua; ZHANG Wen-Jie; TANG Cheng; LIU Li-Jun; WANG Zhi-Qin and YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu,China
  • Received:2005-08-15 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-04-12 Published online:2006-04-12

摘要:

以10个不同基因型水稻品种和杂交稻组合为材料,分析了结实期水稻根系和籽粒细胞分裂素和脱落酸(ABA)浓度的变化及其与籽粒灌浆速率和稻米蒸煮品质的关系。结果表明,灌浆早期(花后0~12 d)根和籽粒玉米素+玉米素核苷(Z+ZR)浓度以及灌浆中期(花后13~26 d)根和籽粒ABA浓度与籽粒起始生长势、平均灌浆速率、最大灌浆速率、糙米重呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.726* ~ 0.984**),与活跃灌浆期呈显著或极显著负相关(r=-0.749* ~ -0.834**)。灌浆中、后期(花后27~40 d)根和籽粒Z+ZR浓度与活跃灌浆期呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.689* ~ 0.932**),但灌浆后期Z+ZR浓度与灌浆速率呈极显著负相关(r=-0.826** ~ -0.927**)。灌浆中期和后期根和籽粒Z+ZR浓度与胶稠度及碱化值呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.722* ~ 0.896**),与直链淀粉含量呈显著或极显著负相关(r=-0.633* ~-0.778**)。灌浆中期根和籽粒ABA浓度与胶稠度及碱化值呈极显著负相关(r=-0.883** ~ -0.913**),与直链淀粉含量呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.803** ~ 0.871**)。不同灌浆期ZR或ABA处理对籽粒灌浆、稻米胶稠度和直链淀粉含量的影响,与内源激素同灌浆特征参数和稻米蒸煮品质指标的关系基本吻合。表明根和籽粒细胞分裂素和ABA对籽粒灌浆和稻米蒸煮品质起调控作用,其调控的正、负效应取决于灌浆的时期。

关键词: 水稻, 根系, 细胞分裂素, 脱落酸, 籽粒灌浆, 蒸煮品质

Abstract:

Cytokinin and abscisic acid (ABA) are two kinds of important plant hormones. Their roles in the grain filling and quality of rice, however, are not fully understood. The objective of this study was to determine changes in concentrations of zeatin (Z) + zeatin riboside (ZR) and ABA in both the roots and grains during grain filling, grain filling characteristics and the indexes for cooking quality using ten rice cultivars (including hybrids and lines) grown in nutrient solution. The results showed that the change in concentrations of Z+ZR and ABA in roots and grains exhibited a single peak curve during the grain filling period. The Z + ZR concentration in roots was very high at early grain filling stage and reached a peak at 3–9 d after anthesis (DAA), and that in grains at 9–12 DAA. ABA concentrations in roots and grains were rather low at early grain filling stage, then increased with grain filling, and reached a peak at 15–18 DAA in roots and at 15–21 DAA in grains. Concentrations of Z + ZR in roots and grains at early grain filling stage (0–12 DAA) and ABA at the mid stage (13–26 DAA) were significantly or very significantly correlated with the initial grain growth potential, mean grain filing rate, maximum grain filling rate and brown rice weight (r=0.726* ~ 0.984**), whereas significantly and negatively correlated with active grain filling period (r=-0.749* ~ -0.834**). Z+ZR concentrations at the mid or late grain filling stage (27–40 DAA) significantly or very significantly correlated with active grain filling period (r=0.689* ~ 0.932**) but those at the late stage negatively correlated with grain filling rate (r=-0.826** ~ -0.927**). The gel consistency and alkali spreading value of rice were significantly or very significantly correlated with Z+ZR concentrations in roots and grains at mid and late grain filling stages (r = 0.722* ~ 0.896**), whereas significantly and negatively correlated with ABA concentrations at mid grain filling stage (r=-0.883**~-0.913**). The correlations between amylose content and the concentrations of Z+ZR and ABA were reversed to the correlations of gel consistency with the two hormones. When roots were treated with 10-7 mol/L ZR or with 10-7 mol/L ABA at 0-6, 14–20 and 24–30 DAA, respectively, the effects of the exogenous hormones on grain filling and the cooking quality were consistent with the relationships of the two endogenous hormones with the grain filling parameters and indexes for cooking quality. The results suggest that cytokinin and ABA play important roles in the regulation of grain filling and quality of rice, and the direction of effects may dependent on grain filling stages.

Key words: Rice, Root, Cytokinin, Abscisic acid, Grain filling, Cooking quality

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[2] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[3] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[4] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[8] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[9] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[10] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[11] 詹戈锐, 余文, 李锋, 武明珠, 徐馨, 罗朝鹏, 巫升鑫, 杨军, 张智强, 王中. 烟草NtWRKY6基因响应ABA表达及其调控多酚合成的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 446-458.
[12] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[13] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[14] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[15] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!