欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 112-117.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

旱种方式对水稻产量与品质的影响

徐国伟;王朋; 唐成;王志琴;刘立军; 杨建昌   

  1. 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,扬州大学,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-12 网络出版日期:2006-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Effect of Dry-Cultivation Patterns on the Yield and Quality of Rice

XU Guo-Wei; WANG Peng; TANG Cheng; WANG Zhi-Qin; LIU Li-Jun; YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2005-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-01-12 Published online:2006-01-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

摘要:

以汕优63为材料,通过稻草覆盖旱种、地膜覆盖旱种和常规水种(对照)比较试验,研究了旱种水稻产量与品质的表现。结果表明,覆草旱种产量与水种稻产量无显著差异,但显著高于覆膜旱种稻的产量。覆草旱种稻米的碾磨品质、外观品质、蒸煮品质和营养品质与水种稻无显著差异,而覆膜旱种稻米的垩白度明显高于水种稻,胶稠度和碱解值则显著低于水种稻。水稻旱种后,淀粉谱的最高黏度和崩解值降低,消减值提高,覆膜旱种尤为明显。旱种稻的地上部干物质积累量减少,根干重增加,物质运转率和收获指数提高,灌浆中后期根系活力下降较快。表明覆草旱种的产量、稻米品质以及物质生产均优于覆膜旱种。对覆草旱种和覆膜旱种在产量和品质形成上的差异进行了讨论。

关键词: 水稻, 覆草旱种, 覆膜旱种, 产量, 米质

Abstract:

Rice dry-cultivation is a new technology in paddy rice production. An indica hybrid rice combination, Shanyou 63, was used to investigate the grain yield and quality of rice cultivated with different methods. Three treatments, dry-cultivation mulched with straw (DCMS, the field covered with rice straw before transplanting and not flooded), dry-cultivation mulched with film (DCMF, the field covered with plastic film before transplanting and not flooded), and moist-cultivation (MC, the field kept flooded, control), were established. Grain yield and its components, grain quality, starch profile characters, root dry weight and activity were determined. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the grain yield between DCMS and MC, but the grain yield of DCMS was significantly higher than that of DCMF. Under dry-cultivation, the panicles per square meter were significantly increased, but spikelets per panicle, grain setting percentage and 1 000-grain weight were decreased. More effective panicles by DCMS were produced than by DCMF, which attributed to higher grain yield for the former than the latter. The differences in the milling quality, appearance quality, and cooking and nutrient quality of rice were not significant between DCMS and MC, indicating that DCMS has no bad effect on the grain quality. Grains from DCMF had higher chalkiness, smaller gel consistency and alkali spreading value, when compared with those from MC. Peak viscosity and breakdown value were decreased and setback value of the starch profile of rice endosperm were increased by dry-cultivation, specially by DCMF, suggesting that the eating quality of the rice grown under DCMS is better than that under DCMF. Dry matter accumulation of shoot was reduced, but root dry weight, remobilization of assimilates from stems to grains and harvest index were increased by both DCMS and DCMF. Root activities under both DCMS and DCMF were higher than those under MC at heading and early grain filling stage, but decreased faster during the mid and late grain filling period. In comparison, DCMS exhibited a slower decrease in root activity and leaf senescence than DCMF. The results suggest that the grain yield and quality of rice under DCMS are better than those under DCMF, and all the dry-cultivation of rice do not produce low grain yield and poor rice quality. Reasons for the differences in the formation of grain yield and quality between DCMS and DCMF were discussed in the paper.

Key words: Rice, Dry-cultivation mulched with straw, Dry-cultivation mulched with film, Moist-cultivation, Grain yield, Rice quality

中图分类号: 

  • S511.1043
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[4] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[5] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[8] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[9] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[10] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[11] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[12] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[13] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[14] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[15] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!