欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 309-316.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00309

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦、玉米粒重动态共性特征及其最佳模型的筛选与应用

付雪丽;赵明*;周宝元;崔国美;丁在松   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-13 修回日期:2008-10-26 出版日期:2009-02-12 网络出版日期:2008-12-11
  • 通讯作者: 赵明
  • 基金资助:

     本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118605),国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2006BAD02A13)资助。

Optimal Model for Dynamic Characteristics of Grain Weight Commonly Used in Wheat and Maize

FU Xue-Li,ZHAO Ming*,ZHOU Bao-Yuan,CUI Guo-Mei,DING Zai-Song   

  1. Crop Science Institutes,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2008-08-13 Revised:2008-10-26 Published:2009-02-12 Published online:2008-12-11
  • Contact: ZHAO Ming

摘要:

为了定量描述小麦、玉米两作物粒重变化共性特征,选用3个冬小麦和4个夏玉米不同熟期型品种进行不同密度的田间试验,对其粒重(GW)动态进行测定,并对GW灌浆天数进行归一化处理得到的3个主要模型进行比较,结果表明,Logistic曲线方程y= a/(1+be–cx) 具有广泛适应性和生物学意义,具体方程式为y=1.0624/(1+52.8653e6.7609x)r=0.9916 (P<0.01)。不同作物、品种、密度处理的方程参数a值基本为1;参数b在密度间变异很小,品种间变幅较大,为45.3379~66.9306c值在品种和密度间变异均很小,在小麦和玉米间的变幅分别为6.2122~6.80257.0199~7.7325用本试验及河南焦作高产冬小麦和山东泰安高产夏玉米不同品种的GW试验资料对模型分别进行验证表明,冬小麦和夏玉米的归一化GW动态共性模型的模拟准确度(k表示),分别为0.98701.00570.99821.0131,精确度(R2表示)分别为0.98540.99180.97720.9926。说明归一化方法建立的小麦、玉米GW动态共性模型能够准确地反映两作物GW动态共性变化特点。利用该模型,仅根据品种的灌浆期和最大GW,以及参数b值的品种特点,便可还原整个灌浆期的GW动态。计算不同地点、年份及不同品种、密度处理的冬小麦、夏玉米灌浆前、中、后期的GW模拟值与测量值均比较接近,误差小于0.2797

关键词: 小麦, 玉米, 粒重动态, 共性特征, 模型筛选

Abstract:

Grain weight (GW) is one of important components of yield in cereal crops. Currently, there are several models on GW of cereal crops, such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and rice (Oryza sativa L.). However, these models are mostly applicable on a single crop.To establish a common model of GW for at least two crops with wider application under different conditions, three cultivars of winter wheat and four cultivars of summer maize were used in field experiments in four environments in 2006–2008. Each cultivar had three treatments of density. A common GW model, y= a / (1+be-cx), was developed with normalized GWand grain filling duration for the two crops. The parameters of a, b, and c were 1.0624, 52.8653, and 6.7609 (r=0.9916, P<0.01) on the basis of the experimental data, respectively. In different crops, cultivars, and densities, the GW dynamic model kept a relative stable a value, which was around 1; however, the b and c values varied in different conditions. The b value changed slightly with density, and shift from 45.3379 to 66.9306 in different cultivars; whereas, the c value had small differences among different cultivars and densities, and varied from 6.2122 to 6.8025 in winter wheat and from 7.0199 to 7.7325 in maize. The accuracy and precision of the normalized model were tested with theGWdata of winter wheat from Jiaozuo, Henan province and summer maize from Tianan, Shandong province as well as data in this study. The normalized dynamic model could make a good estimation of GW dynamics with the accuracies of 0.9870, 1.0057, and 0.9982, 1.0131, and the precision (R2) of 0.9854, 0.9918 and 0.9772, 0.9926 for winter wheat and summer maize respectively. Compared with other GWmodels established by other researches, normalized GW dynamic model could eliminate the variance of the model parameters caused by location, year, cultivar, and density. Normalized GWdynamic model can predict the increase of GW reliably and easily, if the GWmax and grain filling duration are acquired, and the characteristics of parameter b are ascertained. This model is applicable to calculate the GW of winter wheat and summer maize at early, middle, and late stages of growth under different conditions (region, years, cultivar, and density), and the error is less than 0.2797 between the measured GW and the simulated GW.

Key words: Wheat, Maize, Grain weight dynamic, Common characters, Model selection

[1]Shi X-W(时晓伟), Wang S-F(王淑芬), Wang J-Z(王继忠), Wang H(王辉), Jia Y-G(贾永国). Analysis on grain grouting characters in early maturing and high yield wheat cultivars. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 2005, 20(6): 4–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Zhang Y-J(张亚洁), Xu D-M(许德美), Sun B(孙斌), Diao G-H(刁广华), Lin Q-S(林强森), Yang J-C(杨建昌). Effects of cultivation methods on grain-filling and chalky grains of upland and paddy rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 39(2): 257–264 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Zheng H-J(郑洪建), Dong S-T(董树亭), Wang K-J(王空军), Hu C-H(胡昌浩), Guo Y-Q(郭玉秋), Zhang J-W(张吉旺). Studies on effect of ecological factors on maize kernel growth and corre-sponding regulative measures. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2001, 9(1): 69–73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Liu K-L(刘克礼), Gao J-L(高聚林), Zhang Y-P(张永平), Song R-H(宋瑞华), Yu J-G(于金刚), Xue F-C(薛凤成). Characters of grain formation and filling of spring wheat under dry framing. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2003, 23(4): 71–74(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Li S-C(李绍长), Bai P(白萍), Lü X(吕新), Liu S-Y(刘淑云), Dong S-T(董树亭). Ecological and sowing date effects on maize grain filling. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(5): 775–778 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Wang J-Y(王嘉宇), Fan S-X(范淑秀), Xu Z-J(徐正进), Chen W-F(陈温福). Filling properties of grains on different positions in a panicle of rice with different panicle types. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(8): 1366–1371 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Jones D B, Peterson M L, Geng S. Association between grain filling rate and duration and yield components in rice. Crop Sci, 1979, 19: 641–644
[8]Ren Z-L(任正隆), Li Y-Q(李尧权). Variety differences of filling rate and relative growth rate of wheat grain and dry matter accumulation after anthesis in wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1981, 14(6): 12–20 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Zhang X-L(张晓龙). Study on the grain filling of wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1982, 8(2): 87–93 (in Chinese with Eng-lish abstract)
[10]Lin W-X(林文雄), Wu Z-Q(吴志强), Liang Y-Y(梁义元). Im-pact of climatic condition on the grain filling properties of hybrid rice. Chin J Agrometeorol (中国农业气象), 1992, 13(2): 4–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Xiao S-Z(肖淑招), Zhang G-Z(张桂宗), Meng X-Y(孟宪钺). Study on simulation model of grain filling rate in winter wheat. Chi J Agrometeorol (农业气象), 1986, 7(4): 9–13 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Liu Z-Y(刘章勇), Mei N(梅楠), Yu M-J(郁明谏). Study on simulation model of process of grain weight growth in winter wheat. Hubei Agric Sci (湖北农业科学), 1997, (3): 14–18 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Zhang L-D(张录达), Jiang Z-H(蒋钟怀). Study on the nonlinear model on the relationship between the corn grain filling and the cumulated temperature. J China Agric Univ (中国农业大学学 报), 1998, 3(1): 45–49 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Cao X-Z(曹显祖), Luo Y-Q(骆亦其). Growth analysis on the process of grain filling in rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1988, 14(3): 182–193(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q, Wang W. Hormoneal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 315–323
[16]Gong Y-H(龚月桦), Liu Y-Z(刘迎洲), Gao J-F(高俊凤). Growth analysis on the process of grain filling in hybrid wheat 901 and its parents. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(9): 1288–1292 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Xue X(薛香), Wu Y-E(吴玉娥), Chen R-J(陈荣江), Han Z-J(韩占江), Gao Q-L(郜庆炉). Comparison of different mathematical equations for simulating the grain filling process of wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2006, 26(6): 169–171 (in Chi-nese with English abstract)
[18]Zhang B(张宾), Zhao M(赵明), Dong Z-Q(董志强), Li J-G(李建国), Chen C-Y(陈传永), Sun R(孙锐). Establishment and test of LAI dynamic simulation model for high yield population. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(4): 612–619 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Ma C(马冲), Zou R-F(邹仁峰), Su B(苏波), Zhang J(张健), Chen J-L(陈举林). Studies on grain filling characteristics of hy-brid corn with different growth durations. Crop Res (作物研究), 2000, 4(6): 17–19 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Zhang X-D(张旭东), Cai H-J(蔡焕杰), Fu Y-J(付玉娟), Wang J(王健). Study on leaf area index of summer maize in loess areas. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2006, 24(2): 25–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Hu J(胡健), Yang L-X(杨连新), Zhou J(周娟), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Zhu J-G(朱建国). Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on grain filling dynamics of rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(11): 2443–2451 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[2] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[3] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[4] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[5] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[6] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[7] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[8] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[9] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[10] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[11] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[15] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!