欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (07): 1235-1248.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01235

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同种植方式水稻高产栽培条件下的光合物质生产特征研究

李杰,张洪程*,常勇,龚金龙,郭振华,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕,高辉   

  1. 扬州大学农业部长江流域稻作技术创新中心 / 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-04 修回日期:2011-04-13 出版日期:2011-07-12 网络出版日期:2011-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 张洪程, E-mail: hczhang@yzu.edu.cn; Tel: 0514-87979220
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十一五”科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAD02A03), 超级稻配套栽培技术开发与技术集成(农业部专项)和江苏省科技支撑计划重大项目(BE2008355, BE2009425)资助。

Characteristics of Photosynthesis and Matter Production of Rice with Different Planting Methods under High-Yielding Cultivation Condition

LI Jie,ZHANG Hong-Cheng*,CHANG Yong,GONG Jin-Long,GUO Zhen-Hua,DAI Qi-Gen,HUO Zhong-Yang,XU Ke,WEI Hai-Yan,GAO Hui   

  1. Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Rive Valley, Ministry of Agriculture / Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2011-01-04 Revised:2011-04-13 Published:2011-07-12 Published online:2011-05-11
  • Contact: 张洪程, E-mail: hczhang@yzu.edu.cn; Tel: 0514-87979220

摘要: 为探明不同种植方式水稻在长江下游稻-麦两熟制条件下的干物质及光合生产特征,以早熟晚粳、迟熟中粳和中熟中粳3种类型水稻品种(含常规粳稻和杂交粳稻两种)为材料,对旱育中苗壮秧精量手栽、小苗机插、直播3种种植方式水稻的干物质积累、分配、运转及叶面积、光合势、群体生长率、净同化率等方面进行了系统的比较研究。结果表明,(1)不同种植方式水稻产量与总干物质积累量和抽穗至成熟期干物质积累量呈极显著正相关,与拔节至抽穗期的干物质积累量(在确保抽穗期干物质积累量适宜的前提下)也呈极显著正相关,与播种至拔节期干物质积累量和收获指数相关不显著;(2)群体干物重拔节前无明显差异,拔节后均是手栽稻最高,机插稻次之,直播稻最小,并随生育进程差异越来越大,而单茎干物重整个生育期都是手栽稻最大,直播稻最小;(3)阶段干物质积累上,播种至拔节期差异较小,拔节至抽穗期和抽穗至成熟期都是手栽稻极显著高于机插稻,机插稻极显著高于直播稻,占总干物重的比例播种至拔节期手栽、机插、直播依次增大,拔节至抽穗期大体相当,抽穗至成熟期依次降低;(4)干物质分配上,成熟期穗和茎干物重占总干物重的比例手栽、机插、直播依次降低,而叶和鞘的比例依次增大,但叶的比例在孕穗、抽穗、蜡熟3个时期手栽、机插、直播依次降低;(5)物质输出和转化上,叶、茎物质输出率和转化率手栽、机插、直播依次降低,且蜡熟期后茎都有物质回运现象,手栽回运的最多,直播最少;鞘物质输出率相当,转化率手栽和机插低于直播;(6)光合生产上,拔节前不同种植方式水稻叶面积指数相当,光合势手栽、机插、直播依次降低,群体生长率和净同化率依次增大;拔节至抽穗期,光合势也是依次降低,群体生长率和净同化率差异较小;抽穗期有效叶面积率不同种植方式水稻间没有明显差异,而高效叶面积率手栽极显著高于机插,机插又极显著高于直播;抽穗以后,叶面积指数、光合势、群体生长率和净同化率均是手栽最大,直播最小。说明不同种植方式水稻干物质和光合生产有各自特征,与机插稻和直播稻相比,手栽稻前期物质积累量适宜,中后期物质积累量显著高,干物质总量大而且分配合理,运输转化效率高,抽穗后光合生产能力强。

关键词: 水稻, 种植方式, 高产栽培, 干物质生产特征, 光合生产特征

Abstract: To explore the characteristics of dry matter production and photosynthesis of rice under different planting methods in the rice-wheat cropping system in the lower Yangtze River, with early-maturing late japonica rice, late–maturing medium japonica rice and medium-maturing medium japonica rice (including japonica conventional rice and japonica hybrid rice) as materials, we compared the dry matter accumulation, distribution, translocation and leaf area, photosynthetic potential (PP), crop growth rate(CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) of rice by using precisionartificial transplanting with middle and strong seedlings grown in dry nursery (ATR), mechanical transplanting with small seedlings (MTR) and direct seeding (DSR). Results showed that: (1) Rice yield by using different planting methods was significantly positively correlated with totaldry matter accumulation at maturity, dry matter accumulationfrom headingto maturity, and dry matter accumulation from jointing to heading under the premise of ensuring the dry matter accumulation appropriate at heading, but not with dry matter accumulation from sowing to jointing and the harvest index. (2) For dry matter weight of population, there was no significant difference among the three planting methods before jointing, after jointing ATR was the highest, followed by MTR, DSR was the lowest, and the difference was increasing with the growing process. However, the dry matter weight per stem of ATR was the highest, while that of DSR was the lowest in the whole growth period. (3) For dry matter accumulation at different stages, there was no significant difference among the three planting methods from sowing to jointing, but ATR was significantly higher than MTR, MTR was significantly higher than DSR at the stages from jointingto headingand from heading tomaturity. The ratio to total dry matter weight increased in turn for ATR, MTR, DSR from sowing to jointing, there was no many difference among them from jointing to heading, and reduced in turn for them from heading to maturity. (4) For dry matter distribution, the dry matter weight ratio of panicle and stem to total plant at maturity reduced in turn for ATR, MTR, DSR, and that of leaf and sheath increased in turn for them. However,the ratio ofleaf at booting, heading and waxy ripe stages reduced in turn for them. (5) For dry matter export and transformation, the export rate and transformation rate of leaf and stem reduced in turn for ATR, MTR, DSR, and the matter was transportedback in stem after waxy stage, the amount of matter transportedback for ATR was most, while that for DSR was least. The export rate in sheath was no many difference in generally, but the transformation rate for ATR and MTR was lower than that for DSR. (6) For photosynthetic production, before jointing, the leaf area index was generally no many difference for three planting methods, the PPreduced in turn for ATR, MTR, DSR, and the CGR and NAR increased in turn. From jointing to heading, the PP also reduced in turn for ATR, MTR, DSR, but there was no significant difference for CGR and NAR. The leaf area rate of productive tillers at heading had no significant difference among different planting methods, but the leaf area rate from flag leaf to 3rd leaf of ATR was significantly higher than that of MTR, and MTR was significantly higher than that of DSR. After heading, the leaf area index, PP, CGR and NAR of ATR were the highest, while those of DSR were the lowest. The results suggested that dry matter and photosyntheticproduction of rice with different planting methods have their own characteristics. Compared to MTR and DSR, ATR has the advantages that the dry matter accumulation is appropriate in the early stage and significantly higher in the middle and late stage, so the total dry matter accumulation is significantly higher and its distribution is reasonable, the export and transformation rate is high, and the photosynthetic production capacity is great after heading.

Key words: Rice, Planting method, High-yielding cultivation, Characteristics of dry matter production, Characteristics of photosynthetic production

[1]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿). Quality of Crop Population (作物群体质量). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2000. pp 44–107 (in Chinese)
[2]Ma J(马均), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Ma W-B(马文波), Tian Y-H(田彦华), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhou K-D(周开达). Studies on the photosynthetic characteristics and accumulation and transformation of assimilation product in heavy panicle type of rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(4): 375–381 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Qi C-H(戚昌瀚), He H-H(贺浩华), Shi Q-H(石庆华), Zeng X-J(曾宪江). Studies on the relationship between the characteristics of the dry matter production and yield potential in the large-panicle type rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1986, 12(2): 121–127 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Guo Y-C(郭玉春), Lin W-X(林文雄), Liang Y-Y(梁义元), Yu G-J(余高镜), Chen H-F(陈鸿飞). Physioecological studies on dry matter production and yield formation in new plant type (NPT) rice: I. Dry matter production and grain-filling characteristics in NPT rice. J Fujian Agric Univ (福建农业大学学报), 2001, 30(1): 16–21 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Lang Y-Z(郎有忠). Photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and its translocation in intersubspecific hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1997, 23(1): 82–88 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Wu W-G(吴文革), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Qian Y-F(钱银飞), Chen Y(陈烨), Xu J(徐军), Wu G-C(吴桂成), Zhai C-Q(翟超群), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Dai Q-G(戴其根). Analysis on dry matter production characteristics of middle-season indica super hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(3): 287–293 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Wei H-Y(魏海燕), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲), Hang J(杭杰), Ma Q(马群), Zhang S-F(张胜飞), Zhang Q(张庆), Liu Y-Y(刘艳阳). Characteristics of matter production and accumulation in rice genotypes with different N use efficiency. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(11): 1802–1809 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Ying J F, Peng S B, He Q R, Yang H, Yang C D, Visperas R M, Cassman K G. Comparison of high-yield rice in tropical and subtropical environments I. Determinants of grain and dry matter yields. Field Crops Res, 1998, 57: 71–84
[9]Fan S-X(范淑秀), Chen W-F(陈温福), Wang J-Y(王嘉宇). Studies on production characters of dry matter in high-yield rice. Liaoning Agric Sci (辽宁农业科学), 2005, (3): 6–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Yan Z-D(颜振德). Studies on the production and distribution of dry matter in high-yielding populations of hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1981, 7(1): 11–18 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Yang H-J(杨惠杰), Li Y-Z(李义珍), Yang R-C(杨仁崔), Jiang Z-W(姜照伟), Zheng J-S(郑景生). Dry matter production characteristics of super high yielding rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2001, 15(4): 265–270 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Takai T, Matsuura S, Nishio T, Ohsumi A, Shiraiwa T, Horie T. Rice yield potential is closely related to crop growth rate during late reproductive period. Field Crops Res, 2006, 96: 328–335
[13]Wu G-C(吴桂成), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲), Gao H(高辉), Wei H-Y(魏海燕), Sha A-Q(沙安勤), Xu Z-J(徐宗进), Qian Z-H(钱宗华), Sun J-Y(孙菊英). Characteristics of dry matter production and accumulation and super-high yield of Japonica super rice in south China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(11): 1921–1930 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Du X-L(都兴林), Jin R-Z(金润洲), Fang X-Q(方秀芹), Wang J-Y(王景余). A trial on the relationships between accumulation, distribution of dry matter and grain yield of rice under different yield level. Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1998, (1): 17–22 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿). Discussion on problem of rice simplified cultivation. China Rice (中国稻米), 1997, (5): 3–9 (in Chinese)
[16]Ma D-R(马殿荣), Chen W-F(陈温福), Su Y-S(苏英山), Li L-X(李磊鑫), Gao F(高峰). Comparison of dry matter accumulation between rice nursing seedlings scattering and other planting patterns. Liaoning Agric Sci (辽宁农业科学), 2004, (5): 6–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]San-oh Y, Mano Y, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T. Comparison of dry matter production and associated characteristics between direct-sown and transplanted rice plants in a submerged paddy field and relationships to planting patterns. Field Crops Res, 2004, 87: 43–58
[18]Chen W-F(陈温福), Xu Z-J(徐正进), Zhang L-B(张龙步). Physiological Basis of Rice Breeding for Super Yield (水稻超高产育种生理基础). Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House, 1995. pp 69–94 (in Chinese)
[19]Wang G-Z(王国忠), Peng B(彭斌), Lu Z-R(陆峥嵘), Wang Y-L(王余龙). Study on production characteristics and high-yield control techniques of direct seeding rice. Acta Agric Shanghai (上海农业学报), 2002, 18(2): 32–37 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Su Z-F(苏祖芳), Li Y-F(李永丰), Guo H-W(郭宏文), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Li G-S(李国生). Discussion on the relationship between the culm-sheath weight per shoot and yield in rice and its cultural approaches of high yield. J Jiangsu Agric Coll (江苏农学院学报), 1993, 14(1): 1–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Su Z-F(苏祖芳), Zhang H-Q(张海泉). Relationship between earbearing tiller percentage and population quality and its influential factors in rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1995, 21(4): 463–469 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]Liu J(刘军), Yu T-Q(余铁桥). Analysis of the formation of super-high yield of big panicle rice and its dry matter production. J Hunan Agric Univ (湖南农业大学学报), 1998, 24(1): 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]Zhao Q-Z(赵全志), Huang P-S(黄丕生), Ling Q-H(凌启鸿). Relations between canopy apparent photosynthesis and store matter in stem and sheath between and yield and nitrogen regulations in rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2001, 34(3): 304–310 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]Zhuang B-H(庄宝华), Lin F(林菲), Hong Z-F(洪植蕃). Physiological regulations on fertility of two-line intersubspecies rice hybrids. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 1994, 8(2): 111–114 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Ma L-J(马莲菊), Gao F(高峰), Du H-M(杜慧明), Cui X-F(崔鑫福). Characteristic biomass production between two rice varieties with different panicle type during grain filling stage. J Shandong Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn) (山东农业大学学报?自然科学版), 2004, 35(1): 11–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]Zhang H-C(张洪程), Wu G-C(吴桂成), Li D-J(李德剑), Xiao Y-C(肖跃成), Gong J-L(龚金龙), Li J(李杰), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲), Gao H(高辉), Wei H-Y(魏海燕), Sha A-Q(沙安勤), Zhou Y-Y(周有炎), Wang B-J(王宝金), Wu A-G(吴爱国). Population characteristics and formation mechanism for super-high-yielding hybrid japonica rice (13.5 t ha−1). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(9): 1547–1558 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]Hong Z-F(洪植蕃), Lin F(林菲), Zhuang B-H(庄宝华), Zhu C-Z(朱朝枝), Yang J-D(杨居钿). Studies on agro-physio-ecological characteristics of two-line rice hybrids: II. Characteristics of dry matter production and partitioning. J Fujian Agric Coll (福建农学院学报), 1992, 21(2): 129–136 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]Yang J-C(杨建昌), Du Y(杜永), Wu C-F(吴长付), Liu L-J(刘立军), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Growth and development characteristics of super-high-yielding mid-season Japonica rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2006, 39(7): 1336–1345 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!