欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (07): 1307-1317.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01307

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮肥和种植密度对带状种植小麦抗倒能力的影响及边际效应

樊高琼1,李金刚1,王秀芳1,郑亭1,郭翔2,陈溢1,吴中伟1,杨文钰1,*   

  1. 1农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室 / 四川农业大学农学院，四川成都611130；2四川省农业气象中心，四川成都610071
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-25 修回日期:2012-04-20 出版日期:2012-07-12 网络出版日期:2012-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由四川省小麦丰产科技工程项目(2006BAD02A05), 四川省育种攻关项目(2006YZGG-28)和教育厅青年基金项目(08ZB032)资助。

Lodging Resistance of Winter Wheat in Response to Nitrogen and Planting Density and Border Effect under Relay Intercropping Condition

FAN Gao-Qiong1,LI Jin-Gang1,WANG Xiu-Fang1,ZHEN Ting1,GUO Xiang2,CHEN Yi1,WU Zhong-Wei1,YANG Wen-Yu1,*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture / College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; 2 Agrometeorological Center of Sichuan Meteorological Bureau, Chengdu 610071, China
  • Received:2011-07-25 Revised:2012-04-20 Published:2012-07-12 Published online:2012-05-11
  • Contact: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net

PDF

1851

被引次数

25

摘要： 西南地区小麦以套作为主，因有效穗不足而使产量受到严重制约。本研究目的是提出该地区套作小麦高产栽培的适宜密度和氮肥施用量，提高小麦生育后期的抗倒伏能力，确保有效穗和最终产量。2009—2010和2010—2011连续两年度，选用主推品种川麦42，在纯氮120 kg hm-2和180 kg hm-2 2个施氮水平下，按60、120、180、240和300万株 hm-2密度进行带状种植，对小麦群体发展、茎秆形态特征和倒伏机械特性进行了行间差异分析。结果表明，边行、次边行和中间行均随种植密度的增加茎蘖数和有效穗增多，但单株干物重及其在穗中的分配比例下降，茎秆质量降低。群体发展和个体质量在拔节后表现出显著的边行优势，成穗率、有效穗、单茎干物重、节间粗度、茎壁厚度、节间充实度和机械强度均以边行最优；同时密度对边行优势有显著影响，在180万株 hm-2密度下，边行的有效穗基本达到饱和；密度继续增加时次边行和中间行的有效穗显著增加，并伴随株高和重心高度增加、单茎干物重降低、干物质分配在穗中的比例减小、节间充实度和茎秆机械强度急剧下降、倒伏时期提前、倒伏指数和倒伏程度增加。增加施氮量有提高中间行茎秆机械强度和降低倒伏指数、增强茎秆抗倒伏能力的趋势，但总体表现不显著。因此认为，120~180万株 hm-2种植密度有利于套作小麦个体和群体质量的协调，是南方丘陵旱地带状种植小麦抗倒高产的适宜种植密度。

关键词: 套作小麦, 密度, 氮肥, 倒伏, 边际效应

Abstract: Southwest is the third largest wheat producing area in China, where wheat/corn relay intercropping is the typical cultivation mode. In this area, wheat is harvested in a relatively low yield due to deficiency of effective spikes. The objective of this study was to modulate spike enhancement and lodging resistance of wheat in the relay intercropping system through optimizing plant density and nitrogen application rate. Using Chuanmai 42, the major wheat cultivar in local production, a two-year field experiment was carried out in Sichuan Province from November 2009 to May 2011 under two-factor split-plot design. The main-plot was for N application rate at 120 kg ha-1 and 180 kg ha-1, and the sub-plot was for plant density in five levels (0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, and 3.0 million plants per hectare). The border effects on wheat population quality, stem morphology, and stem mechanical strength were investigated at different growth stages. The quantities of tillers and effective spikes in edge, second, and central lines were all enhanced with the increase of planting density; however, the biomass and its distribution proportion in spike were reduced, resulting in declined stem quality. Under the same density, border advantage was significant after jointing stage, when the edge line showed higher levels than the second and central lines in spike rate, number of effective spikes, plant dry weight, outside diameter, wall thickness of culm, internode filling degree, and mechanical strength. Plant density influenced the border effect on number of effective spikes, with the maximum effective spikes in plant density of 1.8 million plants per hectare; even higher density stimulated significant increases of the spike number in the second and central lines in company with the increased plant height and height of gravity centre, the decreased plant weight and biomass distribution proportion in spike, and the dramatically declined internode filling degree and mechanical strength, which resulted in the occurrence of early lodging and high lodging degree and lodging area percentage. Nitrogen application had positive effects on lodging index and mechanical strength of the central line, but the general effects were not significant in the two nitrogen treatments. Suggestively, plant density of 1.2–1.8 million per hectare is optimal for relay intercropping wheat in the hill area of Southwest China based on its lodging resistance and border effect on plant growth and yield formation.

Key words: Relay intercropping wheat, Density, Nitrogen, Lodging, Border effect

[1]Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Ren W-J(任万军), Zheng T(郑亭), Yong T-W(雍太文), Wang X-C(王小春), Chen M-X(陈明祥), Bai W-J(白文进). Effects of different bandwidth on the yield and border effect of relaying wheat. J Sichuan Agric Univ (四川农业大学学报), 2009, 27(2): 133−136 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Tang Y-L(汤永禄), Li C-S(李朝苏), Yu X-F(余秀芳), Mo T-X(莫太相), Shu Z-G(舒泽刚). The sowing technique assembly and demonstration effect of strip-relay-intercropping wheat in dry land in Southwest region. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 2010, (4): 60–61 (in Chinese)

[3]Yong T-W(雍太文), Ren W-J(任万军), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Fan G-Q(樊高琼). Meaning and characteristic and cultivation technique of “wheat/maize/soybean” relay cropping system．Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 2006, (6): 78−81 (in Chinese)

[4]Li J-C(李金才), Yin J(尹钧), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍). Effects of planting density on characters of culm and culm lodging resistant index in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(5): 662−666 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Gou L(勾玲), Huang J-J(黄建军), Zhang B(张宾), Li T(李涛), Sun R(孙锐), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(10): 1688−1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Guo C-H(郭翠花), Gao Z-Q(高志强), Miao G-Y(苗果园). Relationship between lodging and mechanical characteristics of winter wheat stem under different yield levels. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2010, 26(3): 151−155 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Xiao S-H(肖世和), Zhang X-Y(张秀英), Yan C-S(闫长生), Zhang W-X(张文祥), Hai L(海林), Gou H-J(郭会君). Determination of resistance to lodging by stem strength in wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(1): 7−11 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Liang L(梁莉), Guo Y-M(郭玉明). Correlation study of biomechanical properties and morphological characteristics of crop stalks. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2008, 24(7): 1−6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Pu D-F(蒲定福), Zhou J-R(周俊儒), Li B-F(李邦发), Li Q(李全), Zhou Q(周强). Evaluation method of root lodging resistance in wheat. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2000, 9(1): 58−61 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Crook M J, Ennos A R. The effect of nitrogen and growth regulators on stem and root characteristics associated with lodging in two cultivars of winter wheat. J Exp Bot, 1995, 46: 931−938

[11]Yang S-M(杨世民), Xie L(谢力), Zheng S-L(郑顺林), Li J(李静), Yuan J-C(袁继超). Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(1): 93−103 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wang Y(王勇), Li C-H (李朝恒), Li A-F(李安飞), Li Q-Q(李晴祺). Study on culm quality in wheat cultivar. Tritical Crops (麦类作物), 1997, 17(3): 28–31 (in Chinese)

[13]Ma J(马均), Ma W-B(马文波), Tian Y-H(田彦华), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhou K-D(周开达), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). The culm lodging resistance of heavy panicle type of rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 143–148 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Dong Q(董琦), Wang A-P(王爱萍), Liang S-M(梁素明). Study on the arehitecturaI characteristics of wheat stalks. J Shanxi Agric Univ (山西农业大学学报), 2003, 23(3): 188−190 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Guo Y-H(郭玉华), Zhu S-G(朱四光), Zhang L-B(张龙步). Influence of different cultivation conditions on biochemistry components of rice culms. J Shenyang Agric Univ (沈阳农业大学学报), 2003, 34(2): 89–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Li Q-Q(李晴祺). Creation, Evaluation, and Utilization of Winter Wheat Gemplasm (冬小麦种质创新与评价利用). Jinan: Shandong Science and Technology Press, 1998. pp 203–219 (in Chinese)

[17]Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Li L-G(李永庚), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Border effect and standardization of cropping patterns of wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2003, 23(2): 68−71 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Chen Y-H(陈雨海), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Study on the edge effect in wheat. J Shandong Agri Univ (山东农业大学学报), 1999, 30(4): 431−435 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Zhao B Q(赵秉强), Yu S L(余松烈), Li F C(李凤超), Yu Z W(于振文). Studies on correlation of strip type, population and yield in wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(3): 278−284 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Zhao B Q(赵秉强), Yu S L(余松烈), Li F C(李凤超), Yu Z W(于振文). Study on the edge effect in winter wheat: II. The correlation of planting density and the edge effect in winter wheat. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 1997(5): 12−16 (in Chinese)

[21]Tripathi S C, Sayre K D, Kaul J N, Norden A J, Frey K J. Growth and morphology of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) culms and their association with lodging: effects of genotypes, N levels and ethephon. Field Crops Res, 2003, 84: 271−290

[22]Xu L(徐磊), Wang D-W(王大伟), Shi R-S(时荣盛), Sheng Z-F(盛中飞), Li A-F(李安飞). Relationship between lodging-resistance and the density of the bottom elongate stem in wheat. Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2009, 29(4): 673−679 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Li J-C(李金才), Wang Y-C(王雨成), Qu H-J(屈会娟), Shen X-S(沈学善). Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 1080−1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[4] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[5] 马海会, 张国平, 杨思存, 王红丽. 不同密度下氮肥运筹对半干旱区青贮玉米碳氮积累与转运特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1193-1207.
[6] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[7] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[8] 李晓龙, 严清彪, 李正鹏, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 韩梅, 柴强. 氮肥减施协同绿肥过腹还田可降低青海高原小麦农田温室气体排放[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 908-921.
[9] 许倍铭, 郝紫瑞, 冯健超, 马耕, 王丽芳, 谢迎新, 王晨阳, 马冬云. 氮磷减施对不同强筋小麦品种产量和品质及其土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 603-619.
[10] 石吕, 石晓旭, 韩笑, 单海勇, 刘旭杰, 张晋, 严旖旎, 李赢, 刘海翠, 魏亚凤, 杨美英, 薛亚光, 刘建, 张祖建. 氮肥减量与追施方式对小麦产量和氮肥利用效率及麦田N2O排放的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 202-220.
[11] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[12] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[13] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[14] 尤根基, 谢昊, 梁毓文, 李龙, 王玉茹, 蒋晨炀, 郭剑, 李广浩, 陆大雷. 氮肥减施措施对江淮春玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2152-2163.
[15] 闫喆林, 任强, 樊志龙, 殷文, 孙亚丽, 范虹, 何蔚, 胡发龙, 闫丽娟, 柴强. 氮肥后移优化绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米种间关系提高氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2190-2203.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2