欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (08): 1452-1459.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01452

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

散射光和直射光对高粱叶片光合功能的影响

王晓琳1,2,李志强3,姜闯道1,石雷1,邢全1,刘立安1   

  1. 1 中国科学院植物研究所,北京 100093;2 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;3 北京市农业职业技术学院,北京 102442
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-28 修回日期:2012-04-20 出版日期:2012-08-12 网络出版日期:2012-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 姜闯道, E-mail: jcdao@ibcas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:


    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30871455)和北京市自然科学基金项目(6122025)资助。

Effects of Diffuse and Direct Lights on Photosynthetic Function in Sorghum Leaf

WANG Xiao-Lin1,2,LI Zhi-Qiang3,JIANG Chuang-Dao1,SHI Lei1,XING Quan1,LIU Li-An1   

  1. 1 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; 2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3 Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, Beijing 102442, China
  • Received:2011-12-28 Revised:2012-04-20 Published:2012-08-12 Published online:2012-06-04
  • Contact: 姜闯道, E-mail: jcdao@ibcas.ac.cn

摘要: C4等面叶作物背腹侧结构相似并分别暴露在散射光和直射光下。为阐述散射光和直射光对其光合功能的驱动作用,以高粱为材料,研究了散射光和直射光对叶片背腹侧光合功能的影响。结果表明,高粱叶片背腹侧解剖结构相似,其光谱学特性差异很小, 与近轴侧相比,远轴侧的气孔密度、气孔下腔面积、维管束鞘细胞与叶肉细胞接触面积较大; 在相同直射光下近、远轴侧均具有较高的光合速率, 在近轴侧照光同时用PE膜封闭叶片受光侧气孔,观察到远轴侧在叶片自身透射光下能够维持较高的净光合速率;相反,近轴侧在自身透射光下光合速率很低; 自然光照条件下一天内直射光和散射光强度差异很大,大部分时间的散射光强度明显低于远轴侧光补偿点。由此认为,高粱远轴侧光合作用主要由自身透射光驱动,散射光作用很小,该特性是对光环境的适应。这对田间等面叶作物生产管理、生态系统生产力的研究和高光效育种有重要意义。

关键词: 直射光, 散射光, 结构, 光合

Abstract: The effects of direct and diffuse lights on the leaf-side-specific regulation of photosynthesis were studied in sorghum, a typical C4 plant. Leaf morphology and structure were carefully investigated by semithin cross section of sorghum leaves. Leaf absorption, transmittance and reflectance profiles were similar on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces across the light spectrum from 400 to 800 nm, whether light was illuminated via the adaxial or abaxial surface. The photosynthetic light-response curves showed that maximal whole photosynthetic rates were higher when the light entered the leaf via the adaxial surface than the abaxial surface. The changing trend of stomatal conductance was similar with photosynthetic light-response curves. However, the maximal photosynthetic rates were much lower when the light entered the leaf via the abaxial surface than adaxial surface when blocking the stomata of light-oriented side by PE membrane. Theintensity of direct and diffuse lights varied widely in a day, and that of diffuse light was significantly lower than light compensate point (Ic) of abaxial leaf surfaces in sorghum. Consequently, photosynthetic rate of abaxial leaf surface in sorghum should be mainly droved by self-transmitted light but not diffuse light. Differences in stomatal density, substomatic cavity, contacting areas between bundle sheath and mesophyll cells are related to this feature of abaxial leaf surfaces. is the findings of the present study are important for field management, investigation of ecosystem productivity and breeding for high photosynthetic efficiency.

Key words: Direct light, Diffuse light, Leaf structure, Photosynthesis

[1]Smith W K, Vogelmann T C, Delucia E H, Bell D T, Shepherd K A. Leaf form and photosynthesis: Do leaf structure and orientation interact to regulate inter light and carbon dioxide? Bioscience, 1997, 47: 785–793

[2]Moss D N. Optimum lighting of leaves. Crop Sci, 1964, 4: 131–135

[3]Vogelmann T C, Bornman J F, Yates D. Focusing of light by leaf epidermal cells. Physiol Plant, 1996, 98: 43–56

[4]Takahashi S, Inoue Y. Comparative photosynthetic properties of palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts of Camellia japonica L.: functional adjustment of the photosynthetic apparatus to light environment within a leaf. Plant Cell Physiol, 1984, 25: 555–563

[5]Brodersen C R, Vogelmann T C, Williams W E, Gorton H L. A new paradigm in leaf-level photosynthesis: direct and diffuse lights are not equal. Plant Cell Environ, 2008, 31: 159–164

[6]Mauseth D J. Botany: an Introduction to Plant Biology. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 1998

[7]Long S P, Farage P K, Bolhfir-Nordenkampf H R, Rohrhofer U. Separating the contribution of the upper and lower mesophyll to photosynthesis in Zea mays L. leaves. Planta, 1989, 177: 207–216

[8]Driscoll S P, Prins A, Olmos E, Kunert K J, Foyer C H. Specification of adaxial and abaxial stomata, epidermal structure and photosynthesis to CO2 enrichment in maize leaves. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 381–390

[9]Soares A S, Driscoll S P, Pellny T K, Olmos E, Arrabaca M C, Foyer C H. Variations in the dorso-ventral organization of leaf structure and kranz anatomy coordinate the control of photosynthesis and associated signaling at the whole leaf level in monocotyledonous species. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 1833–1844

[10]Li D-J(黎大爵), Liao F-S(廖馥荪). Sweet Sorghum and Utility (甜高粱及其应用). Beijing: Science Press, 1992. p 7 (in Chinese)

[11]Ge J-L(葛江丽), Shi L(石雷), Gu W-B(谷卫彬), Tang Y-D(唐宇丹), Zhang J-Z(张金政), Jiang C-D(姜闯道), Ren D-M(任大明). Photosynthetic characteristics and the regulation of photosystem Ⅱ function in salt-stressed sweet sorghum seedlings. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(8): 1272–1278 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wang X(王鑫), Li Z-Q(李志强), Gu W-B(谷卫彬), Shi L(石雷), Tang Y-D(唐宇丹), Gao H-Y(高辉远), Zhao S-J(赵世杰). Systemic regulation of anatomic structure and photosynthetic characteristics of developing leaves in sorghum seedlings under salt stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(11): 1941–1949 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Terashima I. Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynth Res, 1992, 31: 195–212

[14]Morison J I L , Lawson T. Does lateral gas diffusion in leaves matter? Plant Cell Environ, 2007, 30: 1072–1085

[15]Smith W K. C4 leaf curling-coupling incident light, stomatal and photosynthetic asymmetries. New Phytol, 2008, 177: 5–8

[16]Soares A S. Dorsoventral variations in dark chilling effects onphotosynthesis and stomatal function in Paspalum dilatatumleaves. J Exp Bot, 2010, 62: 687–699

[17]Li P M, Cheng L, Peng T, Gao H Y. CO2 assimilation and chlorophyll fluorescence in green versus red Berberis thunbergii leaves measured with different quality irradiation. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47: 11–18

[18]Gamon J A, Surfus J S. Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer. New Phytol, 1999, 143: 105–117

[19]Sims D A, Gamon J A. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens Environ, 2002, 81: 337–354

[20]Thain J F. Curvature correction factors in the measurement of cell surface areas in plant tissues. J Exp Bot, 1983, 34: 87–94

[21]Smith W K, Bell D T, Shepherd K A. Associations between leaf srtructure, orientation, and sunlight exposure in five western Australian communities. Am J Bot, 1998, 85: 56–62

[22]Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hiura T. Leaf anatomy as a constraint for photosynthetic acclimation: differential responses in leaf anatomy to increasing growth irradiance among three deciduous trees. Plant Cell Environ, 2005, 28: 916–927

[23]Delucia E H, Shenoi H D, Naidu S L, Day T A. Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations. Oecologia, 1991, 87: 51–57

[24]Soares A S, Driscoll S P, Olmos E, Harbinson J, Arrabaça M C, Foyer C H. Adaxial/abaxial specification in the regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal opening with respect to light orientation and growth with CO2 enrichment in the C4 species Paspalum dilatatum. New Phytol, 2007, 177: 186–199

[25]Ehleringer J R, Bjorkman O. Pubescence and Leaf spectral characteristics in a desert shrub, Encelia farinose. Oecologia (Berl.), 1978, 36: 151–162

[26]Wang Y, Noguchi K, Terashima L. Distinct light responses of the adaxial and abaxial stomata in intact leaves of Helianthus annuus L. Plant Cell Environ, 2008, 31: 1307–1316

[27]Sowiński P, Szczepanik J and Minchin E H. On the mechanism of C4 photosynthesis intermediate exchange between Kranz mesophyll and bundle sheath cells in grasses. J Exp Bot, 2008, 59: 1137–1147

[28]Gorton H L, Brodersen C R, Williams W E, Vogelmann T C. Measurement of the optical properties of leaves under diffuse light. Photochem Photobiol, 2010, 86(5): 1076–1083

[29]Delayney R H. Morphological and anatomical features of alfalfa leaves related to CO2 exchange. Crop Sci, 1974, 14: 444–447

[30]Sun T-X(孙同兴), Zhang X(张昕), Zhang C-S(张长胜), Lin J-X(林金星), Hu Y-X(胡玉喜). Effects of doubled CO2 on the leaf morphology and structure of alfalfa. J Laiyang Agric Coll (莱阳农学院学报), 1999, 16(1): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 陈国欢, 张锐, 李艳迪, 赵佳琪, 任湧涛, 张天赐, 郭华春, 李俊, 杨芳. 外源硒叶面喷施对浅紫色马铃薯块茎花青素合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1876-1890.
[2] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[3] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[4] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8] 李坤, 籍亚腾, 田银帅, 胡民航, 刘亮, 李菲, 李国强, 郝立华, 郑云普. CO2和NaCl对大豆气孔特征、光合性能及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1251-1267.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 赵翔, 李佳宜, 李爽, 韩文辉, 黄俊霞, 姚兴东, 张惠君, 王海英, 谢甫绨. 高温对不同大豆品种干物质积累和糖代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 857-865.
[11] 徐强, 谢奎忠, 胡新元, 岳云, 董博, 罗爱花. 连作对马铃薯根际土壤线虫群落结构与功能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 527-538.
[12] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[13] 高园, 李霞, 魏少博, 田小海, 周文彬. 植物光合午休研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2253-2265.
[14] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[15] 凤舞剑, 冼晓青, 张新钵, 曹丹, 强承魁. 基于转录组和AlphaFold对稻瘟菌经典效应蛋白和水稻受体的快速鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1480-1488.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!