欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 126-132.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00126

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

木薯物质累积特征及其施肥效应研究

黄巧义,唐拴虎*,陈建生,张发宝,解开治,黄旭,蒋瑞萍,李苹   

  1. 广东省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所 / 农业部南方植物营养与肥料重点实验室 / 广东省养分资源循环利用与耕地保育重点实验室,广东广州510640
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-18 修回日期:2012-10-09 出版日期:2013-01-12 网络出版日期:2012-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 唐拴虎, E-mail: tfstshu@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2008BADA4B10)和广东省科技计划项目(2009B020311002)资助。

Characteristics of Dry Matter Accumulation and Effect of Fertilizer Application in Cassava

HUANG Qiao-Yi,TANG Shuan-Hu,CHEN Jian-Sheng,ZHANG Fa-Bao,XIE Kai-Zhi,HUANG Xu,JIANG Rui-Ping,LI Ping   

  1. Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2012-04-18 Revised:2012-10-09 Published:2013-01-12 Published online:2012-11-14
  • Contact: 唐拴虎, E-mail: tfstshu@yahoo.com.cn

摘要:

以传统品种华南205及新育品种华南5号为材料,通过田间试验,研究了木薯生物量与产量累积规律,探讨了品种改良及施肥措施对木薯物质形成规律的影响。结果表明,不同品种生物量累积动态相似,生长前期生物量累积缓慢,且以地上部分为主,到8月中下旬块根快速生长,物质累积速率迅速提高,累积重心由地上部逐渐转移到地下部; 不同品种间物质累积速率及分配比例有所差异,分枝早且多、茎叶生长旺盛的大株型品种(华南5号)物质累积速率大于小株型品种(华南205),但地上部分生物量比例相对较高,降低了收获指数。氮素是木薯物质形成累积的主要养分限制因子,其次是钾素,磷素影响最小。氮、磷、钾配合施用(1.0∶0.4∶1.0)可显著提高木薯物质累积速率及产量,不同木薯品种物质累积对施肥依赖程度不同,可能与品种的营养需求量、根系发达程度有关。

关键词: 木薯品种, 生物量, 产量, 施肥

Abstract:

The field trials were conducted at two sites nearby the Tropical of Cancer to investigate the influence of variety and fertilization on dry matter formation and accumulation of cassava. Two varieties of newly developed SC5 and conventional SC205 were used with five fertilization treatments including NP (1.0:0.4:0), NK (1:0:1), PK (0:0.4:1.0), NPK (1.0:0.4:1.0) and CK (no fertilizer application). Results indicated that the dry matter accumulation patterns were similar for both varieties. From transplanting to early August, dry matter accumulation mainly allocated in above-ground parts. When tubes started rapidly growing from mid August, the allocation of dry matter accumulation was shifted from above-ground to underground parts, and there was a difference between two varieties in accumulating velocity and distributing proportion of biomass. SC5 had larger crown with many earlier developing branches and leaves compared with SC205, resulting in more biomass accumulation in above-ground parts, thus reducing harvesting index. For fertilizer application, N was the most significant factor to increase dry matter, following K and P. Combining application of NPK (1.0:0.4:1.0) significantly enhanced accumulating velocity of dry matter and tube yields of cassava. There were some difference between two varieties in dry matter accumulation depended on NPK fertilizer application, and probably related to their nutrient demands and root developing level.

Key words: Cassava, Mass cumulating, Yield, Fertilization

[1]Howeler R H. Cassava mineral nutrition and fertilization. In: Hillocks R J, Thresh J M, Belloti A C, eds. Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2002. pp 115–147



[2]El-Sharkawy M A. Cassava Biology and Physiology. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 56: 481–501



[3]Zhang C, Han W J, Jing X D, Pu G Q, Wang C T. Life cycle economic analysis of fuel ethanol derived from cassava in southwest China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2003, 7: 353–366



[4]Adeniyi O D, Kovo A S, Abdulkareem A S, Chukwudozie C. Ethanol fuel production from cassava as a substitute for gasoline. J Dispers Sci Technol, 2007, 28: 501–504



[5]Leng R B, Wang C T, Zhang C, Dai D, Pu G D. Life cycle inventory and energy analysis of cassava-based fuel ethanol in China. J Cleaner Prod, 2008, 16: 374–384



[6]Olaleye A O, Akinyemi S O S, Tijani-Eniola H, Akinyemi J O, Fapojuwo O E, Oladoja M A, Onsanaya A S. Influence of potassium fertilizer on yield of plantain intercropped with cassava on an oxic paleustalf in southwestern Nigeria. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2006, 37: 925–938



[7]El-Sharkawy M A, Cadavid L F. Response of cassava to prolonged water stress imposed at different stages of growth. Exp Agric, 2002, 38: 333–350



[8]Alves A A C. Cassava botany and physiology. In: Hillocks R J, Thresh J M, Bellotti A C, eds. Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization. New York: CABI Publishing, 2002. pp 67–89



[9]Byju G, Anand M H. Differential response of short-and long-duration cassava cultivars to applied mineral nitrogen. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2009, 172: 572–576



[10]Nassar N M A, Ortiz R. Cassava improvement: challenges and impacts. J Agric Sci, 2007, 145: 163–171



[11]Kawano K, Cock J H. Breeding Cassava for underprivileged: institutional, socio-economic and biological factors for success. J Crop Improv, 2005, 14: 197–219



[12]Ceballos H, Iglesias C A, Perez J C, Dixon A G O. Cassava breeding: opportunities and challenges. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 56: 503–516



[13]Nakviroj C, Paisancharoen K, Boonseng O, Wongwiwatchai C, Roongruang S. Cassava long-term fertility experiments in Thailand. In: Howeler R H ed. Cassava Research and Develepment in Asia: Exploring New Opportunities for an Ancient Crop. Proc 7th Regional Workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand, 2002. pp 212–223



[14]Hy G H, Dang N T, Bien P V, Dung T T, Cach N T, Phien T. Cassava Agronomy Research in Vietnam. In: Howeler R H, ed. Cassava Research and Development in Asia: Exploring New Opportunities for an Ancient Crop. Proc.7th Regional Workshop, held in Bangkok, Thailand, 2002. pp 204–211



[15]Chen G-X(陈冠喜), Li K-M(李开绵), Ye J-Q(叶剑秋), Xu R-L(许瑞丽). Growth and yield traits of 6 cassava varieties. Chin J Trop Agric (热带农业科学), 2009, 29(6): 26–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Ye J-Q (叶剑秋). Chinese cassava breeding progress. Chin J Tropl Agric (热带农业科学), 2009, (11): 115–119 (in Chinese)



[17]Lin X(林雄), Li K-M(李开绵), Huang J(黄洁), Xu R-L(许瑞丽), Zhang W-T(张伟特). A breeding report of new cassava variety SC5. Chin J Trop Agric (热带农业科学), 2001, (5): 15–19 (in Chinese)



[18]Cruz J L, Mosquim P R, Pelacanil C R, Araujo W L, Damatta F M. Carbon partitioning and assimilation as affected by nitrogen deficiency in cassava. Photosynthetica, 2003, 41: 201–207



[19]Cruz J L, Mosquim P R, Pelacanil C R, Araujo W L, Damatta F M. Photosynthesis impairment in cassava leaves in response to nitrogen deficiency. Plant Soil, 2003, 257: 417–423



[20]Susan John K, Venugopal V K, Sarawathi P. Critical level of phosphorus and potassium in the cassava growing soils(typical kandiustults) of Kerala. Root Crop, 2004, 30: 37–40



[21]Nguyen H, Schoenau J J, Nguyen D, Van R K, Boehm M. Effect of long- term nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on cassava yield and plant nutrient composition in north vietnam. J Plant Nutr, 2002, 25: 425–442



[22]Adekayode F O, Adeola O F. The response of cassava to potassium fertilizer treatments. J Food Agric Environ, 2009, 7: 279–282
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!