欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 2154-2161.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.02154

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大麦遗传多样性及连锁不平衡分析

赖勇1,2,**,孟亚雄1,2,**,王晋1,2,范贵强1,2,司二静1,2,王鹏喜1,2,李葆春1,3,马小乐2,杨轲1,2,尚勋武2,王化俊1,2,*   

  1. 1甘肃省作物遗传改良与种质创新重点实验室 / 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室，甘肃兰州730070；2甘肃农业大学农学院，甘肃兰州 730070；
    3甘肃农业大学生命科学技术学院，甘肃兰州730070
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-08 修回日期:2013-07-26 出版日期:2013-12-12 网络出版日期:2013-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 王化俊，E-mail: whuajun@yahoo.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31171558)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-05)项目资助。

Genetic Diversity and Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis in Barley

LAI Yong1,2,**,MENG Ya-Xiong1,2,**,WANG Jin1,2,FAN Gui-Qiang1,2,SI Er-Jing1,2,WANG Peng-Xi1,2,LI Bao-Chun3,MA Xiao-Le2,YANG Ke1,2,SHANG Xu-Wu2,WANG Hua-Jun1,2,*   

  1. 1 Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Improvement & Germplasm Enhancement / Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2 College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 3 College of Life Sciences and Technology of Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2013-05-08 Revised:2013-07-26 Published:2013-12-12 Published online:2013-09-29
  • Contact: 王化俊，E-mail: whuajun@yahoo.com

RichHTML

PDF

1829

被引次数

6

摘要：

为了合理评价引进种质资源，为大麦基因发掘及育种组合配置提供依据，选用分布于全基因组的64个SSR标记，对221份大麦材料进行了基因型分析。共检测到192个等位变异，变幅为2~7个；基因频率变异范围为0.0090~0.9729，平均0.3333；全部位点的基因多样性变化范围在0.0528~0.7807，平均0.4813；多态性信息含量(PIC)变异范围在0.0514~0.7464，平均0.4113。供试材料间遗传相似系数变幅为0.4844~0.9792，平均0.7023。221份材料被划分成两大群7个亚群，国内地方品种与1份北京品种为一大群，国内育种品种与所有国外引进品种为另一群。遗传结构分析与聚类结果基本一致，两大类群间的遗传距离为0.3358，且第二大群多样性比第一大群丰富。2016个SSR位点成对组合中，不论共线性组合还是非共线性组合，都存在一定程度的连锁不平衡(LD)。D′统计概率(P<0.01)支持的LD成对位点830个，占全部位点组合的41.2%，D′平均值为0.4，整体LD水平较高。栽培品种的LD水平高于地方品种，且现代遗传改良的目标性状集中于2H、4H、6H和7H染色体。

关键词: 大麦, SSR, 遗传多样性, 连锁不平衡, 关联分析

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to provide a suitable evaluation for introduced germplasm resources and useful information for associate analysis and parental combinations in barley (Hordeum valgare L.). A total of 192 alleles were detected by 64 SSR markers on chromosomes 1H to 7H in 221 barley accessions with 2–7 alleles per locus. The allelic frequency ranged from 0.0090 to 0.9729, with the mean of 0.3333. The gene diversity was from 0.0528 to 0.7807, averagely 0.4813. The polymorphism information content (PIC) value ranged from 0.0514 to 0.7464 with the mean of 0.4113. The genetic similarity of the 221 accessions ranged from 0.4844 to 0.9792 with the mean of 0.7023. All accessions were clustered into two major groups and seven subgroups. Most landraces or developed varieties fell into the same major group. Genetic structure analysis revealed two subpopulations of these accessions, with consistence to the clustering analysis. Genetic distance between the two subpopulations was 0.3358, and the second subpopulation had richer diversity than the first one. There was linkage disequilibrium (LD) among linked loci and unlinked loci pairs, and 830 out of 2016 loci pairs (41.2%) had significant LD (P < 0.01) with D′ average value of 0.4. The LD level of developed variety was higher than that of landraces. Target traits of developed varieties were mainly distributed on chromosomes 2H, 4H, 6H, and 7H.

Key words: Barley, SSR, Genetic diversity, Linkage disequilibrium, Association analysis

[1]Tanksley S D, McCouch S R. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science, 1997, 277: 1063–1064



[2]Bhagwat A A, Cregan P B, Akkaya M S. Length polymorphisms of simple sequence repeat DNA in soybean. Genetics, 1992, 132: 1131–1139



[3]Saghai-Maroof M A, Biyashev R M, Yang G P, Zhang Q, Allard R W. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 5466–5470



[4]Weber J L. Informativeness of human (dC-dA)n.(dG-dT)n polymorphism. Genomics, 1990, 7: 524–530



[5]Wang Z, Weber J L, Zhong G, Tanksley S D. Survey of plant short tandem DNA repeats. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 88: 1–6



[6]Matus I A, Hayes P M. Genetic diversity in three groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence repeats. Genome, 2002, 45: 1095–1106



[7]Brantestam A K, Bothmer R, Dayteg C, Rashal I, Tuvesson S, Weibull J. Genetic diversity changes and relationships in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm of Nordic and Baltic areas as shown by SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2007, 54: 749–758



[8]Sun D F, Ren W B, Sun G L, Peng J H. Molecular diversity and association mapping of quantitative traits in Tibetan wild and worldwide originated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 2011, 178: 31–43



[9]Teulat B, Borries C, This D. New QTLs identified for plant water status, water-soluble carbohydrate and osmotic adjustrnent in a barley population grown in a growth-chamber under two water regimes. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 161–170



[10]Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K. AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: II. Detection of favourable exotic alleles for agronomic traits introgressed from wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum). Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 1221–1231



[11]Shahinnia F, Druka A, Franckowiak J, Morgante M, Waugh R, Stein N. High resolution mapping of dense spike-ar (dsp.ar) to the genetic centromere of barley chromosome 7H. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 124: 373–384



[12]Flint-Garcia S A, Thornsberry J M, Buckler I V. Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol, 2003, 54: 357–374



[13]Zondervan K T, Cardon L R. The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat Rev Genet, 2004, 5: 89–100



[14]Gupta P K, Rustgi S, Kulwal P L. Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: Present status and future prospects. Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 57: 461–485



[15]Maccaferri M, Sanguineti M C, Enrico N, Roberto T. Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection. Mol Breed, 2005, 15: 271–289



[16]Flint-Garcia S A, Thuillet A C, Yu J M, Pressoir G, Romero S M, Sharon E, Mitchell S E, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Goodman M M, Buckler IV E S. Maize association population: a high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J, 2005, 44: 1054–1064



[17]Huang X H, Wei X H, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li C Y, Zhu C R, Lu T T, Zhang Z W, Li M, Fan D L, Guo Y L, Wang A H, Wang L, Deng L W, Li W J, Lu Y Q, Weng Q J, Liu K Y, Huang T, Zhou T Y, Jing Y F, Li W, Lin Z, Buckler E S, Qian Q, Zhang Q F, Li J Y, Han B. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet, 2010, 42: 961–967



[18]Kraakman A T W, Martnez F, Mussiraliev B, Eeuwijk F A, Niks R E. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of morphological, resistance, and other agronomically relevant traits in modern spring barley cultivars. Mol Breed, 2006, 17: 41–58



[19]Katherine S C, Joanne R, Peter L, Wayne P. Extreme population-dependent linkage disequilibrium detected in an inbreeding plant species, Hordeum vulgare. Genetics, 2006, 172: 557–567



[20]Paterson A H, Brubaker C L, Wendel J F. A rapid method for extraction of cotton (Gossypium spp.) genomic DNA suitable for RFLP or PCR analysis. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1993, 11: 122–127



[21]Maccaferri M, Sanguineti M C, Noli E, Tuberosa R. Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection. Mol Breed, 2005, 15: 271–290



[22]Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol, 2005, 14: 2611–2620



[23]Guo H, Wei Y M, Chen F, Zheng Y L. Genetic diversity of Hordeum bogdanii wilensky native to Xinjiang, China, based on STS_PCR markers. Acta Bot Sin, 2002, 44: 1327–1332



[24]Shi Y-T(施永泰), Bian H-W(边红武), Han N(韩凝), Pan J-W(潘建伟), Tong W-X(童微星), Zhu M-Y(朱睦元.). Genetic variation analysis by RAPD of some barley cultivars in China. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2004, 30(3): 258–265 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]Zhang C-H(张赤红), Zhang J(张京). Genetic diversity assessment of barley germplasm resources using SSR markers. J Triticeae Crops(麦类作物学报), 2008, 28(2): 214–219 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Liu Z-M(刘志敏), Jin N(金能), Lü C(吕超), Huang Z-L(黄祖六), Xu R-G(许如根). Genetic diversity analysis of barley varieties by SSR. J Triticeae Crops(麦类作物学报), 2011, 31(5): 839–846 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[27]Maroof M A S, Biyashev R M, Yang G P, Zhang Q, Allard R W. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley, species diversity, chromosomal locations and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 5466–5470



[28]Struss D, Plieske J. The use of microsatellite markers for detection of genetic diversity in barley populations. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 97: 308–315



[29]Hansen M, Kraft T, Ganestam S, Sall T, Nilsson N O. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of the bolting gene in sea beet using AFLP markers. Genet Res, 2001, 77: 61–66



[30]Thornsberry J M, Goodman M M, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D, Buckler IV E S. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genet, 2001, 28: 286–289



[31]Stracke S, Perovic D, Stein N, Thiel T, Graner A. Linkage disequilibrium in barley. In: 11th Molecular Markers Symposium of the GPZ, 2003. http://meetings.ipk-gater-sleben.de/moma2003/index.php.



[32]Kraakman A T W, Niks R E, Van den Berg P M M M, Stam P, Van Eeuwijk F A. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of yield and yield stability in modern spring barley cultivars. Genetics, 2004, 168: 435–446
[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[8] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[9] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[10] 李赢, 石晓旭, 刘海翠, 石吕, 薛亚光, 魏亚凤. 裸大麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量近红外预测模型的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 735-745.
[11] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 牛丽, 王勇胜, 王长杰, 张宏, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 杨轲, 马小乐, 姚立蓉, 司二静, 王化俊, 汪军成. 大麦NAC基因家族鉴定分析及HvNAC38的耐盐功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 688-707.
[14] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[15] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2