欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (08): 1279-1286.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01279

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

苗期不同滴灌方式对东北春玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响

徐杰1,2,李从锋1,孟庆锋1,葛均筑3,王璞2,赵明1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农业部作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室，北京 100081；2中国农业大学农业与生物技术学院，北京 100193；3华中农业大学植物科技学院，湖北武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-19 修回日期:2015-04-02 出版日期:2015-08-12 网络出版日期:2015-05-04
  • 通讯作者: 赵明, E-mail: zhaomingcau@163.net, Tel: 010-82108752
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD07B04, 2011BAD16B14)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(NYCYTX-02)资助。

Effects of Different Drip-Irrigation Modes at the Seeding Stage on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Spring Maize in Northeast China

XU Jie1,2,LI Cong-Feng1,MENG Qing-Feng1,GE Jun-Zhu3,WANG Pu2,ZHAO Ming1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 3 College of Plant Science & Technology of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2015-01-19 Revised:2015-04-02 Published:2015-08-12 Published online:2015-05-04
  • Contact: 赵明, E-mail: zhaomingcau@163.net, Tel: 010-82108752

RichHTML

PDF

1382

被引次数

13

摘要：

春旱是东北玉米产量增长的主要障碍因素之一，滴灌可有效缓解其对玉米生产的不利影响，不同滴灌方式的效果具有差异性。本文以常规雨养玉米为对照(CK)，研究了传统滴灌(采用内嵌迷宫式滴灌管)和新型滴灌(采用自流插入式滴灌管) 2种方式与不同埋管深度(0 cm、5 cm和10 cm)对玉米生长发育、产量和水分利用效率的影响。与对照相比，滴灌显著增产，增幅达9.5%~20.1%。传统滴灌不同埋管深度处理间产量差异不显著，而新型滴灌埋深5 cm产量显著高于地表滴灌，增幅为4.4%。同一埋深不同滴灌方式之间，新型滴灌埋深5 cm比传统滴灌增产8.8%，其他埋深差异不显著。与对照相比，滴灌处理出苗率提高11.3%，收获期穗数增加13.3%。新型滴灌埋深5 cm产量高于其他处理的原因是生殖生长期叶面积指数下降慢，显著提高收获期干物质重。与对照相比，滴灌处理水分利用效率提高8.1%~10.9%，其中新型滴灌埋深5 cm处理水分利用效率最高。因此，埋深5 cm新型滴灌是有效提高玉米产量和水分利用效率的灌溉方式。

关键词: 春旱, 滴灌埋深, 产量, 水分利用效率

Abstract:

The seasonal drought especially in spring is one of the major obstacle factors for yield improvement in maize production in Northeast China. Drip irrigation could effectively alleviate drought while different drip irrigation strategies have different impacts. Using rainfed maize as a control (CK), we compared the effects of traditional drip irrigation (using the Embedded labyrinth drip irrigation tube, TDI) and new drip irrigation (using the New drip irrigation tube, NDI) together with three depths of tube (0 cm, 5 cm and 10 cm) on maize growth, yield and water use. Compared with CK, irrigation treatments significantly increased grain yield by 9.5%–20.1%. For TDI, no significant yield difference was observed among three tube depths. For NDI, grain yield in treatment with 5 cm tube depth was 4.4% higher than that with 0 cm tube depth. At the same tube depth between TDI and NDI, no significant yield difference was observed with an exception of NDI with 5 cm tube depth, which increased yield by 8.8%. Compared with CK, yield increase with irrigation mainly resulted from the improvement of emergence rate, which was increased by 12%. The ear number per ha was improved by 13%. The higher yield in NDI with 5 cm tube depth was because of the delayed leaf senescence and higher total dry matter accumulation. Compared with CK, irrigation improved water use efficiency by 8.1%–10.9%, with the highest in NDI with 5 cm tube depth. Therefore, Using NDI with 5 cm tube depth could be an effective strategy to increase both yield and water use efficiency of spring maize in Northeast China.

Key words: Spring drought, Drip irrigation, Dripline depth, Yield, Water use efficiency

[1]Chen C, Lei C, Deng A, Qian C, Hoogmoed W, Zhang W. Will higher minimum temperatures increase corn production in Northeast China? An analysis of historical data over 1965–2008. Agric For Meteorol, 2011, 151: 1580–1588



[2]马树庆, 王琪, 于海, 徐丽萍, 张铁林. 春旱对春玉米产量的影响试验研究. 自然灾害学报, 2012, 21: 207–212



Ma S Q, Wang Q, Yu H, Xu L P, Zhang T L. Field experiment study into influence of spring drought on maize yield. J Nat Disasters, 2012, 21: 207–212 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]王琪, 马树庆, 徐丽萍, 于海, 张铁林. 东北地区春旱对春玉米幼苗长势的影响指标和模式. 自然灾害学报, 2011, 20: 141–147



Wang Q, Ma S Q, Xu L P, Yu H, Zhang T L. Indices and modes of spring drought influence on maize seedling growth in Northeast China. J Nat Disasters, 2011, 20: 141–147 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]贺伟, 布仁仓, 熊在平, 胡远满. 1961–2005年东北地区气温和降水变化趋势. 生态学报, 2013, 33: 519–531



He W, Bu R C, Xiong Z P, Hu Y M. Characteristics of temperature and precipitation in northeastern China from 1961 to 2005. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33: 519–531 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Meng K, Zhang X, Sui Y, Zhao J. Analysis of water characteristics of black soil over long-term experimental researches in Northeast China. Bulg J Plant Physiol, 2004, 30(3/4): 111–120



[6]宋振伟, 郭金瑞, 邓艾兴, 寇太记, 任军, 张卫建. 耕作方式对东北春玉米农田土壤水热特征的影响. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(16): 108–114



Song Z W, Guo J R, Deng A X, Kou T J, Ren J, Zhang W J. Effects of surface tillage regimes on soil moisture and temperature of spring corn farmland in Northeast China. Trans CSAE, 2012, 28(16): 108–114 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]刘云发. 我国大田作物滴灌现状及发展前景. 节水灌溉, 1998, 4(4): 26–31



Liu Y F. Field crop irrigation status and development prospect in China. Water Saving Irrig, 1998, 4(4): 26–31 (in Chinese)



[8]Wanjura D F, Upchurch D R, Mahan J R, Burke J J. Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation. Agric Water Manag, 2002, 55(3): 217–237



[9]张晓伟, 黄占斌. 滴灌条件下玉米的产量和WUE效应研究. 水土保持研究, 1999, 6(1): 72–75



Zhang X W, Huang Z B. Study on yield and WUE of corn under drip irrigation. Res Soil Water Conserv, 1999, 6(1): 72–75 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Camp C R, Sadler E J, Busscher W J. A comparison of uniformity measures for drip irrigation systems. Trans ASAE, 1997, 40(4): 1013–1020



[11]Camp C R, Sadler E J, Busscher W J. Subsurface drip irrigation: a review. Trans ASAE, 1998, 41: 1353–1367



[12]Phene C J, Davis K R, Hutmacher R B, Mccormick R L. Advantages of subsurface irrigation for processing tomatoes. Acta Hortic, 1987, 200: 101–114 



[13]Douh B, Boujelben A. Effects of surface and subsurface drip irrigation on agronomic parameters of maize (Zea mays L.) under Tunisian climatic condition. J Nat Prod Plant Resour, 2011, 1(3): 8–14



[14]Patel N, Rajput T B S. Effect of drip tape placement depth and irrigation level on yield of potato. Agric Water Manag, 2007, 88(1–3): 209–223



[15]Schwankl L J, Grattan S R, Miyao E M. Drip Irrigation Burial Depth and Seed Planting Depth Effects on Tomato Germination. Proc. Third International Irrigation Symp. Oct. 28- Nov.I Phoenix Arizona. ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, 1990. pp 682–687



[16]李久生, 杜珍华, 栗岩峰, 李蓓. 壤土特性空间变异对地下滴灌水氮分布及夏玉米生长的影响. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 1717–1726



Li J S, Du Z H, Li Y F, Li B. Water and nitrogen distribution and summer maize growth in subsurface drip irrigation system as affected by spatial variations of soil properties. Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41: 1717–1726 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Ravina I, Paz E, Sofer Z, Marcu A, Shisha A, Sagi G. Control of emitter clogging in drip irrigation with reclaimed wastewater. Irrig Sci, 1992, 13(3): 129–139



[18]胡笑涛, 康绍忠, 王晓燕, 李志军. 地下滴灌灌水器的筛选试验研究. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2004, 35: 483–485



Hu X T, Kang S Z, Wang X Y, Li Z J. Experiment on choosing emitter of subsurface drip irrigation. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2004, 35: 483–485 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]赵明. 自流插入式滴灌装置. 中国专利: ZL200720190042.1.2007-11-7, 2007



Zhao M. Gravity Flow Insertion Drip Irrigation System. Chinese patent: ZL200720190042.1.2007-11-7, 2007 (in Chinese)



[20]Allen R G, Pereira L S, Rase D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration—Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements—FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. RomeItaly: FAO- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998



[21]Yu X S, Liao Y C, Olaposi I O. Effect of salinity water irrigation on maize growth in northwest region. J Chem Pharm Res, 2014, 6: 300–305



[22]Liu X B, Jin J, Wang G H, Herbert S J. Soybean yield physiology and development of high-yielding practices in Northeast China. Field Crops Res, 2008, 105: 157–171



[23]宋振伟, 郭金瑞, 任军, 闫孝贡, 郑成岩, 邓艾兴, 张卫建. 耕作方式对东北雨养区玉米光合与叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24: 1900–1906



Song Z W, Guo J R, Ren J, Yan X G, Deng A X, Zhang W J. Effects of tillage patterns on photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of maize in rainfed area of Northeast China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24: 1900–1906 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]徐翠莲, 王冀川, 高山, 徐雅丽. 土壤水分调控对滴灌春小麦产量及分利用的影响. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(3): 127–132



Xu C L, Wang J C, Gao S, Xu L N. Impacts of soil water controlling on grain yield and water use efficiency of spring wheat under drip irrigation. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2013, 28(3): 127–132 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]任杰, 温新明, 王振华，安俊波. 地下滴灌毛管适宜埋深及间距研究进展. 水资源与水工程学报, 2007, 18(6): 48–51



Ren J, Wen X M, Wang Z H, An J B. Research progress on appropriate depth and interval of lateral pipes in subsurface drip irriagation. J Water Resour Water Eng, 2007, 18(6): 48–51 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26] Lamm F R, Trooien T P. Dripline depth effects on corn production when crop establishment is nonlimiting. Appl Eng Agric, 2005, 21(5): 835



[27]山东农学院. 作物栽培学(上册). 北京: 农业出版社, 1985. p 229



Shandong Agriculture College. Crop Cultivation Science (first volume). Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1985. p 229 (in Chinese)



[28]何华, 康绍忠, 曹红霞. 灌溉施肥部位对玉米同化物分配和水分利用的影响. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23: 1458–1461



He H, Kang S Z, Cao H X. Effect of fertigation depth on dry matter partition and water use efficiency of corn. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2003, 23: 1458–1461 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2