欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (02): 180-189.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00180

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

青稞遗传多样性及其农艺性状与SSR标记的关联分析

孟亚雄1,2,孟祎林1,2,汪军成1,2,司二静1,2,张海娟1,2,任盼荣1,2,马小乐1,2,李葆春1,3, 杨轲1,2,王化俊1,2*   

  1. 1甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室 / 甘肃省作物遗传改良与种质创新重点实验室,甘肃兰州730070;2甘肃农业大学农学院,甘肃兰州 730070;
    3甘肃农业大学生命科学技术院,甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-03 修回日期:2015-11-20 出版日期:2016-02-12 网络出版日期:2015-12-07
  • 通讯作者: 王化俊, E-mail: whuajun@yahoo.com, Tel: 13809315256
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31460347),甘肃省财政厅科研业务费(035-041047)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-05)资助。

Genetic Diversity and Association Analysis of Agronomic Characteristics with SSR Markers in Hulless Barley

MENG Ya-Xiong1,2,MENG Yi-Lin1,2,WANG Jun-Cheng1,2,SI Er-Jing1,2,ZHANG Hai-Juan1,2,REN Pan-Rong1,2,MA Xiao-Le1,2,LI Bao-Chun1,3,YANG Ke1,2,WANG Hua-Jun1,2,*   

  1. 1 Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science / Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Improvement & Germplasm Enhancement, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 3College of Life Sciences and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2015-07-03 Revised:2015-11-20 Published:2016-02-12 Published online:2015-12-07
  • Contact: 王化俊, E-mail: whuajun@yahoo.com, Tel: 13809315256
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31460347), Gansu Provincial Department of Finance Research Operating Expenses (035-041047), and the Special Program of Modern Agro-industry Technology System (CARS-05).

摘要:

利用92个SSR标记对108份青稞亲本材料进行多态性扫描,分析其遗传多样性,旨在寻找与农艺性状相关联的分子标记,为青稞杂交组合的配制及分子标记辅助育种提供依据。挑选48个多态性标记进行群体遗传结构分析,在此基础上采用Tassel 2.1 GLM (general linear model)和MLM (mixed linear model)方法进行标记与农艺性状的关联分析。共检测出156个等位变异,每个位点2~6个等位变异。供试群体的Shannon指数为0.6727~1.1368,材料间遗传相似系数为0.2250~1.0000,平均0.7585。通过群体遗传结构分析将供试材料划分成4个亚群。以GLM分析,发现12个与株高、穗长、穗粒数和分蘖数相关联的标记,对表型变异的解释率分别为11.5%~17.6%、19.4%~45.4%、15.4%~22.1%和29.2%;以MLM分析,发现8个与株高、分蘖数和小穗数相关的标记,各标记对表型变异的解释率分别为31.7%~49.8%、28.1%~37.2%、22.7%~32.7%。关联标记分布在基因组全部6个连锁群上。

关键词: 青稞, SSR, 遗传多样性, 群体遗传结构, 关联分析

Abstract:

The objectives of this study were to find molecular markers associated with yield-related traits and guide parental combination in molecular marker-assisted breeding and hybrid breeding of hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum HK. f.). A natural hulless barley population composed of 108 parental varieties/lines was screened with 92 SSR markers, in which 48 markers were polymorphic. Population structure was analyzed based on the polymorphic SSR data and association between markers and five agronomic traits were performed in TASSEL GLM (general linear model) and MLM (mixed linear model) programs. A total of 156 alleles were detected in the 108 varieties/lines with 2–6 alleles per locus. The Shannon’s index of the population ranged from 0.6727 to 1.1368 and the genetic similarity between varieties ranged from 0.2250 to 1.0000, with the mean of 0.7585. Structure analysis revealed four genetic subpopulations for the entire materials tested. Based on GLM analysis, 12 SSR markers were found to be associated with plant height, spike length, grain number per spike and tiller number, with phenotypic contributions of 11.5%–17.6%, 19.4%–45.4%, 15.4%–22.1% and 29.2%, respectively. Based on MLM analysis, 8 SSR markers were associated with plant height, awn length, and spikelet compactness, with the phenotypic contributions of 31.71%–49.88%, 28.1%–37.2%, and 22.7%–32.7%, respectively. These associated markers were distributed on 6 chromosomes of the barley genome.

Key words: Hulless barley, SSR, Genetic diversity, Population structure, Association analysis

[1]孟凡磊, 强小林, 佘奎军, 唐亚伟, 胡银岗. 西藏主要农区青稞品种的遗传多样性分析. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1910–1914



Meng F L, Qiang X L, She K J, Tang Y W, Hu Y G. Genetic diversity analysis among hulless barley varieties from the major agricultural areas of Tibet. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1910–1914 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Tanksley S D, McCouch S R. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science, 1997, 277: 1063–1066



[3]Bhagwat A A, Cregan P B, Akkaya M S. Length polymorphisms of simple sequencerepeat DNA in soybean. Genetics, 1992, 132: 1131–1139



[4]Maroof M S, Biyashev R M, Yang G P, Zhang Q, Allard R W. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 5466–5470



[5]Wang Z, Weber J L, Zhong G, Tanksley S D. Survey of plant short tandem DNA repeats. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 88: 1–6



[6]赖勇, 王鹏喜, 范贵强, 司二静, 王晋, 杨轲, 王化俊. 大麦SSR标记遗传多样性及其与农艺性状关联分析. 中国农业科学, 2012, 46: 233–242



Lai Y, Wang P X, Fan G Q, Si E J, Wang J, Yang K, Wang H J. Genetic diversity and association analysis using SSR markers in barley. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 233–242 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Maccaferri M, Sanguineti M C, Noli E, Tuberosa R. Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection. Mol Breed, 2005, 15: 271–290



[8]Liu S B, Yang X P, Zhang D D, Bai G H, Chao S M, Bockus W. Genome-wide association analysis identified SNPs closely linked to a gene resistant to Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus. Theor Appl Genet, 2014, 127: 1039–1047



[9]Ducrocq S, Madur D, Veyrieras J B, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Kloiber-Maitz M, Presterl T, Ouzunova M, Manicacci D, Charcosset A. Key impact of Vgt1 on flowering time adaptation in maize: evidence from association mapping and ecogeographical information. Genetics, 2008, 178: 2433–2437



[10]Kumar B, Abdel-Ghani A H, Pace J, Reyes-Matamoros J, Hochholdinger F, Lübberstedt T. Association analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes with root traits in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Plant Sci, 2014, 224: 9–19



[11]Wen W W, Li D, Li X, Gao Y Q, Li W Q, Li H H, Liu J, Liu H J, Chen W, Luo J. Metabolome-based genome-wide association study of maize kernel leads to novel biochemical insights. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 34–38



[12]Eizenga G C, Agrama H A, Lee F N, Yan W, Jia Y. Identifying novel resistance genes in newly introduced blast resistant rice germplasm. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1870–1878



[13]Yonemaru J, Mizobuchi R, Kato H, Yamamoto T, Yamamoto E, Matasubara K, Hirabayashi H, Takeuchi Y, Tsunematsu H, Ishii T. Genomic regions involved in yield potential detected by genome-wide association analysis in Japanese high-yielding rice cultivars. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15: 346



[14]D'hoop B B, Keizer P L, Paulo M J, Visser R G, van Eeuwijk F A,van Eck H J. Identification of agronomically important QTL in tetraploid potato cultivars using a marker-trait association analysis. Theor Appl Genet, 2014, 127: 731–748



[15]Wu D Z, Qiu L L, Xu L, Ye L Z, Chen M X, Sun D F, Chen Z H, Zhang H T, Jin X L, Dai F, Zhang G P. Genetic variation of HvCBF genes and their association with salinity tolerance in Tibetan annual wild barley. PloS One, 2011, 6: e22938



[16]Brantestam A K, Bothmer R, Dayteg C, Rashal I, Tuvesson S, Weibull J. Genetic diversity changes and relationships in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm of Nordic and Baltic areas as shown by SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2007, 54: 749–758



[17]Sun D F, Ren W B, Sun G L, Peng J H. Molecular diversity and association mapping of quantitative traits in Tibetan wild and worldwide originated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 2011, 178: 31–43



[18]Kraakman A W, Martnez F, Mussiraliev B, Eeuwijk F A, Niks R E. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of morphological, resistance, and other agronomically relevant traits in modern spring barley cultivars. Mol Breed, 2006, 17: 41–58



[19]Ivandic V, Hackett C A, Nevo E, Keith R, Thomas W T B, Forster B P. Analysis of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in wild barley from the fertile crescent: associations with ecology, geography and flowering time. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 511–527



[20]Ivandic V, Thomas W T B, Nevo E, Zhang Z, Forster B P. Associations of simple sequence repeats with quantitative trait variation including biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in Hordeum spontaneum. Plant Breed, 2003, 122: 300–304



[21]Paterson A H, Brubaker C L, Wendel J F. A rapid method for extraction of cotton (Gossypium spp.) genomic DNA suitable for RFLP or PCR analysis. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1993, 11: 122–127



[22]Porebski S, Bailey L G, Baum B R. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1997, 15: 8–15



[23]Earl, D. A. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour, 2012, 4:359–361



[24]潘志芬, 邹弈星, 邓光兵, 翟旭光, 吴芳, 余懋群. 青藏高原栽培青稞SSR标记遗传多样性研究. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 46: 82–86



Pan Z F,Zou Y X,Deng G B,Zhai X G, Wu F, Yu M Q. Genetic diversity of SSR Markers in cultivated hulless barley from Qinghai-Tibet plateau in China. Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni, 2007, 46: 82–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]杨平, 刘仙俊, 刘新春, 李俊, 王希文, 何守朴, 冯宗云. 利用SRAP标记研究四川高原青稞育成品种的遗传多样性. 遗传, 2008, 30: 115–122 



Yang P, Liu X J, Liu X C, Li J, Wang X W, He S P, Feng Z Y. Genetic diversity analysis of the developed Qingke (hulless barley) varieties from the plateau regions of Sichuan Province in China revealed by SRAP markers. Hereditas (Beijing), 2008, 30: 115–122 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26] Harris B P, Stokesbury K E. The spatial structure of local surficial sediment characteristics on Georges Bank, USA. Continental Shelf Res, 2010, 30: 1840–1853



[27]Wang M L, Zhu C S, Barkley N A, Chen Z B, Erpelding J E, Murray S C, Tuinstra M R, Tesso T, Pederson G A, Yu J M. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of accessions in the US historic sweet sorghum collection. Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 120: 13–23



[28] Kline J B, Moore D J, Clevenger C V. Activation and association of the Tec tyrosine kinase with the human prolactin receptor: mapping of a Tec/Vav-receptor binding site. Mol Endocrinol, 2001, 15: 832–841



[29]武玉国, 吴承来, 秦保平, 王振林, 黄玮, 杨敏, 尹燕枰. 黄淮冬麦区175个小麦品种的遗传多样性及SSR标记与株高和产量相关性状的关联分析. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1018–1028



Wu Y G, Wu C L, Qin B P, Wang Z L, Huang W, Yang M, Yin Y P. Diversity of 175 wheat varieties from Yellow and Huai River Valleys facultative wheat zone and association of SSR markers with plant height and yield related traits. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1018–1028 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]Hansen M, Kraft T, Ganestam S, Sall T, Nilsson N O. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of the bolting gene in sea beet using AFLP markers. Genet Res, 2001, 77: 61–66



[31]Cockram J, White Jon, Leigh F J, Lea V J, Chiapparino E, Laurie D A, Mackay I J, Powell W, O'Sullivan D M. Association mapping of partitioning loci in barley. BMC Genet, 2008, 9: 16



[32]Marquez-Cedillo L A, Hayes P M, Kleinhofs A, Legge W G,Rossnagel B G, Sato K, Ullrich S E, Wesenberg D M. QTL analysis of agronomic traits in barley based on the doubled haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 625–637



[33]Teulat B, Borries C, This D. New QTLs identified for plant water status, water-soluble carbohydrate and osmotic adjustment in a barley population grown in a growth-chamber under two water regimes. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 161–170



[34]Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K. AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: II. Detection of favourable exotic alleles for agronomic traits introgressed from wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum). Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 1221–1231



[35] 司二静, 张宇, 汪军成, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 马小乐, 尚勋武, 王化俊. 大麦农艺性状与SSR标记的关联分析. 作物学报, 2015, 41: 1064–1072



Si E J, Zhang Y, Wang J C, Meng Y X, Li B C, Ma X L, Shang X W, Wang H J. Association analysis between SSR marker and agronomic traits in barley. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41: 1064–1072 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[36] Wang J, Yang J, McNeil D L, Zhou M. Identification and molecular mapping of a dwarfing gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and its correlation with other agronomic traits. Euphytica, 2010, 175: 331–342

[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[6] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[7] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[9] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[10] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[11] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[12] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[13] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[14] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[15] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!