欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 1489-1498.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01489

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

活性炭促进玉米幼胚离体培养幼苗生长与发育的转录组分析

王金萍1,2,孙果忠2,*,王海波2,*   

  1. 1河北农业大学农学院, 河北保定 071001；2河北省农林科学院遗传生理研究所/河北省植物转基因中心, 河北石家庄 050051
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-21 修回日期:2017-04-20 出版日期:2017-10-12 网络出版日期:2017-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 孙果忠, E-mail: 13933023804@163.com; 王海波, E-mail: nkywanghb@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由河北省财政专项(2009055001, F15R25)资助。

Transcriptome Analysis of Promotive Effects of Active Carbon on Growth and Development of Maize Seedlings from in vitro Cultured Immature Embryos

WANG Jin-Ping1,2,SUN Guo-Zhong2,*,WANG Hai-Bo2,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China; 2 Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences / Plant Genetic Engineering Center of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
  • Received:2017-03-21 Revised:2017-04-20 Published:2017-10-12 Published online:2017-05-08
  • Contact: Sun Guozhong, E-mail: 13933023804@163.com;Wang Haibo, E-mail: nkywanghb@163.com
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the Financial Fund Program of Hebei Province (2009055001, F15R25).

RichHTML

PDF

1076

被引次数

1

摘要：

以玉米自交系昌7-2为试材, 比较了14 d龄幼胚在MS和MSA(MS加活性炭)培养基上离体培养9 d的幼苗生长情况, 并利用转录组测序技术分析了2种培养基上的玉米幼苗地上部和地下部的基因表达差异。结果表明, 活性炭可以显著促进玉米幼苗的生长与发育。活性炭主要影响地下部基因表达。加入活性炭后, 幼苗地上部表达上调的基因有1612个, 下调的基因有530个；幼苗地下部表达上调的基因有69个, 下调的基因有78个。GO功能显著性分析表明, 地下部差异表达基因(DEGs)主要涉及DNA包装、DNA包装复合体和水解酶活性, 地上部DEGs主要涉及脂类代谢、胞外区和过氧化物酶活性。KEGG富集分析表明, 地下部DEGs主要涉及能量、碳水化合物、脂类和氨基酸代谢, 以及细胞周期和植物激素转导途径；地上部DEGs主要涉及泛醌和其他萜-醌类物质合成途径。活性炭促进细胞周期途径中的关键基因(CYC、CDH1、MCM3、PCNA2和BUBR1)、生长素信号传导基因(Aux/IAA)以及细胞色素基因(CYP450)显著上调表达。利用实时荧光定量PCR (qRT-PCR)验证了10个DEGs的表达模式与转录组测序结果一致, 证实了转录组数据与分析的可靠性。

关键词: 玉米, 幼胚, 活性炭, 转录组

Abstract:

Immature embryos from the maize inbred line Chang 7-2 were collected at 14 days after pollination, and cultured on MS or MSA medium (MS medium plus active carbon) for nine days at 24°C. Active carbon significantly accelerated the growth and development of maize seedlings from cultured immature embryos. Using RNA-seq technique, the genes involved in the growth promotive effects of active carbon were analyzed. The presence of active carbon in the medium affected the gene expression in seedlings. Number of up- and down-regulated genes was 1612 and 530 in roots, as well as 69 and 78 in shoots, respectively, indicating that active carbon mainly affects gene expression in roots. GO enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in roots were mainly involved in DNA packaging, DNA packaging complex and hydrolase activity; the DEGs in shoots were mainly involved in lipid metabolic process, extracellular region and peroxidase activity. The KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs in roots were significantly associated with energy metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, cell cycle and plant hormone signal transduction. The DEGs in shoots were significantly associated with biosynthesis of ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone compounds. Several key genes involved in the cell cycle pathway (i.e., CYC, CDH1, MCM3, PCNA2, and BUB1), signal transduction of auxin (Aux/IAA) and cytochrome function (CYP450 oxidase) were significantly up-regulated by active carbon. Ten DEGs were confirmed by Real-time quantitative PCR assay, suggesting that our data and analysis of transcriptome sequencing are reliable.

Key words: Maize, Immature embryo, Active carbon, Transcriptome

[1]王海波, 王彦霞, 赵和. 如何加快作物遗传改良的速度. 河北农业科学, 2003, (7): 50–56 Wang H B, WangY X, Zhao H. How to accelerate the process of plant genetic modification. J Hebei Agric Sci, 2003, 7: 50–56 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]Forster B P, Till B J, Ghanim A M A, Huynh H O A, Burstmayr H, Caligari P D S. Accelerated plant breeding. CAB Rev, 2014, 9: 1–16 [3]Yao Y, Zhang P, Wang H B, Lu Z Y, Liu C J, Liu H, Yan G J. How to advance up to seven generations of canola (Brassica napus L.) per annum for the production of pure line populations. Euphytica, 2016, 209: 113–119 [4]Liu H, Zwer P, Wang H B, Liu C J, Lu Z Y, Wang Y X, Yan G J. A fast generation cycling system for oat and triticale breeding. Plant Breed, 2016, 135: 574–579 [5]Bewley J D. Seed germination and dormancy. Plant cell, 1997, 9: 1055–1066 [6]Bove J, Jullien M, Grappin P. Functional genomics in the study of seed germination. Genome Biol, 2002, 3: 1002.1–1002.5 [7]Galland M, Huguet R, Arc E, Cueff G, Job D, Rajjou L. Dynamic proteomics emphasizes the importance of selective mRNA translation and protein turnover during Arabidopsis seed germination. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2014, 13: 252–268 [8]Rajjou L, Gallardo K, Debeaujon I, Vandekerckhove J, Job C, Job D. The effect of α-amanitin on the Arabidopsis seed proteome highlights the distinct roles of stored and neosynthesized mRNAs during germination. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 1598–1613 [9]Abraham Z, Fernández R I, Martinez M, Diaz I, Carbonero P, Vicente-Carbajosa J. A developmental switch of gene expression in the barley seed mediated by HvVP1 (Viviparous1) and HvGAMYB interactions. Plant Physiol, 2016, 170: 2146–2158 [10]Miransari M, Smith D L. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environ Exp Bot, 2014, 99: 110–121 [11]Umezawa T, Nakashima K, Miyakawa T, Kuromori T, Tanokura M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular basis of the core regulatory network in ABA responses: sensing, signaling and transport. Plant Cell Physiol, 2010, 51: 1821–1839 [12]Weitbrecht K, Müller K, Leubner-Metzger G. First off the mark: early seed germination. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 3289–3309 [13]Sun T. Gibberellin-GID1-DELLA: a pivotal regulatory module for plant growth and development. Plant Physiol, 2010, 154: 567–570 [14]Pan M J, van Staden J. The use of charcoal in in vitro culture: a review. Plant Growth Regul, 1998, 26: 155–163 [15]Thomas T D. The role of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture. Biotechnol Adv, 2008, 26: 618–631 [16]Mittal P, Devi R, Gosal S S. Effect of genotypes and activated charcoal on high frequency in vitro plant regeneration in sugarcane. Ind J Biotechnol, 2016, 15: 261–265 [17]Fridborg G, Pedersén M, Landstr?m LE, Eriksson T. The effect of activated charcoal on tissue cultures: adsorption of metabolites inhibiting morphogenesis. Physiol Plant, 1978, 43: 104–106 [18]Manchanda P, Gosal S S. Effect of activated charcoal, carbon sources and gelling agents on direct somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in sugarcane via leaf roll segments. Sugar Tech, 2012, 14: 168–173 [19]Nguyen T V, Thu T T, Claeys M, Angenon G. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) using an improved in vitro regeneration system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2007, 91: 155–164 [20]Ebert A, Taylor F, Blake J. Changes of 6-benzylaminopurine and 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid concentrations in plant tissue culture media in the presence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 1993, 33: 157–162 [21]Ebert A, Taylor H F. Assessment of the changes of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid concentrations in plant tissue culture media in the presence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 1990, 20: 165–172 [22]Halhouli K A, Darwish N A, Al-Dhoon N M. Effects of pH and inorganic salts on the adsorption of phenol from aqueous systems on activated decolorizing charcoal. Separat Sci Technol, 1995, 30: 3313–3324 [23]Nissen S J, Sutter E G. Stability of IAA and IBA in nutrient medium to several tissue culture procedures. Hortscience, 1990, 25: 800–802 [24]Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10: 57–63 [25]Trapnell C, Hendrickson D G, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn J, Pachter L. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31: 46–53 [26]Costa V, Angelini C, De F I, Ciccodicola A. Uncovering the complexity of transcriptomes with RNA-Seq. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2010, 2010: 853916 [27]Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant, 1962, 15: 473–497 [28]Aken B L, Ayling S, Barrell D, Clarke L, Curwen V, Fairley S, Fernandez Banet J, Billis K, García Girón C, Hourlier T, Howe K, H?h?ri A, Kokocinski F, Martin F J, Murphy D N, Nag R, Ruffier M, Schuster M, Tang Y A, Vogel J H, White S, Zadissa A, Flicek P, Searle S M. The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database (Oxford), 2016, 2016: baw093 [29]Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg S L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25: 1105–1111 [30]Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley D R, Pimentel H, Salzberg S, Rinn J, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protocols, 2012, 7: 562–578 [31]Anders S, Pyl P T, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31: 166–169 [32]Love M I, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol, 2014, 15: 550 [33]Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang X. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26: 136–138 [34]Ashburner M, Ball C A, Blake J A, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry J M, Davis A P, Dolinski K, Dwight S S, Eppig J T, Harris M A, Hill D P, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese J C, Richardson J E, Ringwald M, Rubin G M, Sherlock G. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet, 2000, 25: 25–29 [35]Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucl Acids Res, 2000, 28: 27–30 [36]Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucl Acids Res, 2014, 42 (database issue): D199–D205 [37]Jenuwein T, Allis C D. Translating the histone code. Science, 2001, 293: 1074–1080 [38]Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell, 2007, 128: 693–705 [39]Baumann K. Genome stability: Cyclin’on mRNA. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2016, 17: 676–677 [40]Maga G, Hübscher U. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J Cell Sci, 2003, 116: 3051–3060 [41]Georgescu R, Langston L, O'Donnell M. A proposal: Evolution of PCNA’s role as a marker of newly replicated DNA. DNA Repair, 2015, 29: 4–15 [42]Strzalka W, Ziemienowicz A. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a key factor in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation. Ann Bot, 2011, 107: 1127–1140 [43]Labib K, Tercero J A, Diffley J F X. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science, 2000, 288: 1643–1647 [44]Wei L, Zhao X. A new MCM modification cycle regulates DNA replication initiation. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2016, 23: 209–216 [45]Helariutta Y, Fukaki H, Wysocka-Diller J, Nakajima K, Jung J, Sena G, Hauser M, Benfey P N. The SHORT-ROOT gene controls radial patterning of the Arabidopsis root through radial signaling. Cell, 2000, 101: 555–567 [46]Grimplet J, Agudelo-Romero P, Teixeira R T, Teixeira R T, Martinez-Zapater J M, Fortes A M. Structural and functional analysis of the GRAS gene family in grapevine indicates a role of GRAS proteins in the control of development and stress responses. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 353 [47]Woodward A W, Bartel B. Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann Bot, 2005, 95: 707–735 [48]Zhao Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2010, 61: 49–64 [49]Abel S, Theologis A. Early genes and auxin action. Plant Physiol, 1996, 111: 9–17 [50]Rivas-San Vicente M, Plasencia J. Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 3321–3338 [51]Janda M, Ruelland E. Magical mystery tour: Salicylic acid signalling. Environ Exp Bot, 2015, 114: 117–128 [52]Johnson C, Boden E and Arias J. Salicylic acid and NPR1 induce the recruitment of trans-activating TGA factors to a defense gene promoter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2003, 15: 1846–1858 [53]Bernhardt R. Cytochromes P450 as versatile biocatalysts. J Biotechnol, 2006, 124: 128–145
[1] 王亚, 赵宜婷, 王宙, 杨俊芳, 张宏斌, 曹越. 转录组-代谢组联合分析蓖麻蜡质合成相关基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1774-1787.
[2] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[5] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[6] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[10] 蔡兆琴, 何观咏, 何文, 阮丽霞, 梁振华, 李永珍, 李恒锐, 陈会鲜. 木薯分枝发育过程的动态转录组分析与关键基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1430-1441.
[11] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[12] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[13] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2