欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 920-930.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00920

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

密植条件下玉米品种混播对夏玉米光合性能及产量的影响

胡旦旦,张吉旺,刘鹏,赵斌,董树亭()   

  1. 作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院, 山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-08 接受日期:2018-03-26 出版日期:2018-06-12 网络出版日期:2018-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 董树亭
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31071358);本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30871476);国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD07B06-2);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-02-20);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(HY20121203100);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(HY1203096);山东省财政支持农业重大应用技术创新课题资助(2014)

Effects of Mixed-cropping with Different Varieties on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Summer Maize under Close Planting Condition

Dan-Dan HU,Ji-Wang ZHANG,Peng LIU,Bin ZHAO,Shu-Ting DONG()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-11-08 Accepted:2018-03-26 Published:2018-06-12 Published online:2018-04-08
  • Contact: Shu-Ting DONG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31071358);This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(30871476);the National “12th Five-Year” Science and Technology Support Plan(2013BAD07B06-2);the China Agriculture Research System(CARS-02-20);the Special Fund for Agro-scien- tific Research in the Public Interest(HY20121203100);the Special Fund for Agro-scien- tific Research in the Public Interest(HY1203096);and the Funds for Financial Support to Agriculture in Shandong Province(2014)

摘要:

探究密植条件下玉米品种混播对夏玉米光合性能及产量的影响。在82 500株 hm -2种植密度下, 选用郑单958 (ZD958)和登海605 (DH605), 在大田条件下设置M(两种子相同数量混合后随机混播)、1行郑单958和1行登海605混播(1:1)、2行郑单958和2行登海605混播(2:2)、单播郑单958 (SZD958)和单播登海605 (SDH605) 5个水平, 研究密植条件下玉米品种混播对黄淮海夏玉米产量、群体干物质积累量、净光合速率、叶片衰老酶活性、冠层透光率等的影响。两年结果表明, ZD958和DH605混播可显著改善玉米生育后期群体透光率, 使叶面积指数、叶绿素含量和穂位叶净光合速率较单播显著增加, 干物质积累量显著增加。混播处理较单播增加生育后期超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)活性和可溶性蛋白含量, 与此同时, 丙二醛(MDA)含量降低。混播显著增加玉米群体产量, 究其原因是穗粒数和千粒重的有效增加。M、1:1、2:2处理的两年平均产量较SZD958和SDH605分别增加11.47%、8.70%、8.48%和9.30%、6.42%、6.20%, 其中M、1:1、2:2处理间没有显著差异。混播处理通过优化冠层结构, 改善群体通风透光条件, 延缓叶片衰老, 减缓花后叶面积指数和叶绿素含量降低, 保持较高的净光合速率, 致使群体干物质积累量增加, 产量提高。可见, 合理品种搭配的混播栽培可显著提高密植夏玉米产量, 是提高黄淮海区夏玉米产量的可选途径之一。

关键词: 夏玉米, 密植, 混播, 光合性能, 产量

Abstract:

During the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons in Shandong, a province in the North China Plain, using Zhengdan 958 and Denghai 605 for five treatments, including M (random sowing after mixing in the same proportion), 1:1 (raw ratio of ZD958 to DH605 is 1:1), 2:2 (raw ratio of ZD958 to DH605 is 2:2), and two monoculture treatments (SDH605 and SDH605). This experiment was conducted to explore the effects of mixed-cropping on grain yield, amount of dry matter of groups, net photosynthetic rate, anti-oxidative metabolism, canopy structure of summer maize under a density of 82 500 plants ha -1. The two-year results showed that mixed-cropping significantly improved canopy light transmittance, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate and dry matter accumulation. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) activities and soluble protein content increased significantly, but the content of MDA decreased under mixed-cropping. The grain yield of summer maize increased significantly under mixed-cropping, due to the increase in grains per spike and 1000-kernel weight. Compared with SZD958 and SDH605, the two-year average grain yields of M, 1:1, 2:2 increased by 11.47%, 8.70%, 8.48% and 9.30%, 6.42%, 6.20%, respectively. There were no significant difference among M, 1:1 and 2:2 treatments. Mixed-cropping formed high-efficiency canopy structure, created better aeration and transmittance conditions, delayed leaf senescence, slowed down the decrease of leaf area index and chlorophyll content after anthesis, maintained higher net photosynthetic rate and increased dry matter accumulation, eventually resulted in the higher grain yield of summer maize. It is concluded that mixed-cropping with reasonable varieties can significantly increase the yield of close planting summer maize, which is one of the optional cultivation patterns to increase maize yield in the Yellow-Huaihe-Haihe Rivers Plain.

Key words: summer maize, high plant density, mixed-cropping, photosynthetic characteristics, grain yield

表1

郑单958和登海605的品种特性"

品种
Variety
生育时期
Growth stage (d)
株高
Plant height (cm)
株型
Plant type
郑单958 Zhengdan 958 110 260 紧凑, 上部叶片宽而大Compact, with wide and large upper leaves
登海605 Denghai 605 107 250 紧凑, 上部叶片窄而尖Compact, with narrow and sharpe upper leaves

表2

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米产量及其构成的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
穗数
Ear number (ears hm-2)
穗粒数
Grains per ear
千粒重
1000-kernel weight (g)
产量
Yield (kg hm-2)
2016 SZD958 78281.1 a 475.8 cd 356.1 b 10115.1 c
SDH605 78455.6 a 470.3 d 351.0 b 10420.7 bc
M 79850.6 a 513.9 a 371.8 a 11522.3 a
1:1ZD958 79037.5 a 505.2 a 354.9 b 11159.6 a
1:1DH605 80033.3 a 483.3 bc 366.4 a
2:2ZD958 79842.3 a 489.3 b 366.3 a 11049.5 ab
2:2DH605 78693.8 a 484.4 bc 372.4 a
2017 SZD958 78953.3 a 462.5 c 343.5 e 10850.2 b
SDH605 79314.2 a 464.8 c 363.0 c 11064.8 b
M 79279.2 a 484.8 a 372.3 b 11928.5 a
1:1ZD958 79359.2 a 486.2 a 353.0 d 11798.3 a
1:1DH605 79350.0 a 473.3 b 384.5 a
2:2ZD958 78852.5 a 490.0 a 357.9 cd 11826.6 a
2:2DH605 78887.5 a 473.1 b 380.1 ab

表3

不同玉米品种混播在不同生育时期群体干物质积累"

年份
Year
生育时期
Growth
stage
处理
Treatment
干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (kg hm-2)
茎秆
Stalk
叶片
Leaf
雄穗
Tassel
苞叶
Husk
穗轴
Cob
籽粒
Grain
雌穗
Ear
植株
Plant
2016 VT SZD958 4692.6 ab 2693.4 bc 370.2 abc 924.3 bc 518.9 c 9199.4 c
SDH605 4605.7 b 2583.4 c 373.2 ab 860.2 c 452.7 d 8875.1 d
M 4958.5 a 2896.0 a 317.1 bc 1026.9 b 608.9 a 9807.3 a
1:1ZD958 4823.8 ab 2792.6 ab 279.7 c 860.5 c 481.0 d 9237.5 c
1:1DH605 4791.3 ab 2784.9 ab 414.7 a 865.4 c 521.7 c 9378.1 bc
2:2ZD958 4911.2 a 2700.5 bc 382.3 ab 1199.6 a 527.5 c 9720.9 ab
2:2DH605 4840.8 ab 2785.2 ab 329.2 abc 990.6 bc 560.5 b 9506.2 abc
R6 SZD958 4149.8 b 2425.5 c 236.5 b 825.5 ab 1672.0 ab 13684.0 b 23020.3 c
SDH605 4224.0 ab 2579.5 bc 184.3 cd 891.0 ab 1556.5 bc 13593.3 b 23028.5 c
M 4237.8 ab 2841.0 a 209.0 c 814.0 abc 1452.0 cd 14176.3 a 23765.5 a
1:1ZD958 4372.5 a 2601.5 bc 189.8 cd 706.8 d 1383.3 d 14014.0 a 23267.8 bc
1:1DH605 4273.5 ab 2884.8 a 178.8 d 761.8 cd 1793.0 a 14041.5 a 23850.8 a
2:2ZD958 4317.5 ab 2656.5 b 275.0 a 836.0 abc 1553.8 bc 14024.0 a 23580.3 ab
2:2DH605 4265.3 ab 2511.5 b 242.0 b 805.8 bc 1490.5 cd 14179.0 a 23694.0 a
年份
Year
生育时期
Growth
stage
处理
Treatment
干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (kg hm-2)
茎秆
Stalk
叶片
Leaf
雄穗
Tassel
苞叶
Husk
穗轴
Cob
籽粒
Grain
雌穗
Ear
植株
Plant
2017 VT SZD958 4712.4 cd 2677.7 b 308.0 c 779.9 bc 138.9 d 8616.9 c
SDH605 4681.3 d 2681.3 b 188.9 d 867.9 ab 204.3 c 8706.2 c
M 5335.3 a 2907.0 a 283.3 c 931.7 a 221.9 bc 9679.2 a
1:1ZD958 5272.0 ab 2853.7 ab 440.0 a 746.9 c 227.2 bc 9506.8 ab
1:1DH605 5253.1 ab 2930.1 a 292.1 c 839.0 abc 131.5 d 9445.7 ab
2:2ZD958 5006.4 bc 2949.4a 298.7 c 852.0 ab 262.1 ab 9368.4 b
2:2DH605 5285.8 ab 2917.2 a 360.0 b 864.1 ab 295.6 a 9667.6 a
R6 SZD958 4206.7 b 2708.8 de 254.4 a 597.3 bc 1540.0 a 13016.3 c 22323.4 c
SDH605 4192.7 b 2526.7 e 121.6 c 544.5 c 1497.1 ab 13210.5 c 22093.0 c
M 4274.6 a 2847.6 abc 127.6 c 567.1 bc 1347.0 b 14466.4 a 23851.6 a
1:1ZD958 4426.1 ab 2930.7 a 193.3 b 617.9 abc 1314.2 b 14326.1 ab 23808.4 ab
1:1DH605 4502.0 a 2571.5 cd 148.8 c 517.0 c 1572.5 a 14034.1 ab 23345.9 b
2:2ZD958 4496.0 ab 2912.3 ab 277.2 a 727.1 a 1477.9 ab 13938.1 b 23607.1 ab
2:2DH605 4424.8 ab 2771.7 bc 134.5 c 665.8 ab 1465.5 ab 13902.9 b 23365.1 b

图1

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米叶面积指数的影响 S: 单播; M: 按同等比例混合后随机播种; 1:1处理: 1行郑单958, 1行登海605; 2:2处理: 2行郑单958, 2行登海605。V6: 拔节期; V12: 大喇叭口期; VT: 开花期; VT+10: 花后10 d; VT+30: 花后30 d; VT+50: 花后50 d。"

图2

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米冠层透光率的影响 ZD958: 郑单958; DH605: 登海605; 缩写同图1。"

图3

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米叶片叶绿素含量的影响 缩写同图1。"

图4

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米叶片净光合速率的影响 缩写同图1。"

表4

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米叶片SOD、POD活性的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
SOD (U g-1 FW min-1) POD (U g-1 FW min-1)
VT VT+10 VT+30 VT+50 VT VT+10 VT+30 VT+50
2016 SZD958 576.3 b 607.3 b 350.4 c 242.9 c 198.6 ab 220.1 a 197.0 c 142.9 d
SDH605 580.1 ab 602.6 ab 356.7 b 255.6 b 200.2 ab 221.2 a 199.6 bc 144.5 d
M 578.4 ab 607.4 a 362.3 a 265.8 a 201.0 ab 224.5 a 206.8 a 152.3 ab
1:1 ZD958 577.1 b 606.7 a 362.4 a 256.7 b 199.6 ab 220.6 a 203.5 ab 150.4 bc
1:1 DH605 584.0 a 596.0 b 357.0 b 265.9 a 198.1 b 224.1 a 203.2 ab 149.9 c
2:2 ZD958 581.7 ab 602.2 ab 358.0 ab 255.9 b 200.3 ab 223.3 a 199.1 bc 145.2 d
2:2 DH605 583.4 a 605.9 a 360.6 ab 254.6 b 201.7 a 221.7 a 203.0 ab 152.8 a
2017 SZD958 593.0 a 614.0 ab 359.1 c 256.2 c 202.0 a 234.5 ab 198.6 c 148.5 c
SDH605 589.4 a 610.6 ab 366.6 bc 262.3 c 204.8 a 232.8 b 205.0 bc 154.2 bc
M 588.4 a 616.1 a 380.9 a 279.1 ab 205.0 a 238.5 ab 213.5 a 165.6 a
1:1 ZD958 583.8 a 614.3 ab 374.7 ab 273.4 b 203.9 a 242.3 ab 210.5 ab 163.7 ab
1:1 DH605 592.3 a 609.3 b 380.9 a 281.6 a 200.8 a 244.1 a 213.6 a 164.2 a
2:2 ZD958 591.7 a 608.9 b 381.4 a 280.2 ab 203.6 a 239.9 ab 212.4 a 161.9 ab
2:2 DH605 590.1 a 612.6 ab 377.3 a 283.0 a 205.1 a 238.6 ab 213.6 a 164.8 a

表5

不同玉米品种混播对夏玉米叶片MDA含量和可溶性蛋白含量的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
MDA (μmol mg-1 FW) 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg g-1 FW)
VT VT+10 VT+30 VT+50 VT VT+10 VT+30 VT+50
2016 SZD958 15.5 ab 19.0 bc 24.9 a 37.3 b 26.0 a 30.3 bc 37.6 b 25.4 d
SDH605 15.2 bc 18.5 c 24.7 ab 38.4 a 26.2 a 30.8 b 37.7 b 25.7 cd
M 15.0 bc 20.0 a 23.1 d 33.8 e 25.5 b 32.4 a 39.0 a 26.7 a
1:1 ZD958 14.9 c 19.5 ab 24.0 c 35.2 d 25.5 bc 30.8 b 38.4 ab 26.0 bc
1:1 DH605 15.0 bc 19.0 bc 24.3 bc 36.4 c 25.6 b 29.6 c 38.9 a 26.4 ab
2:2 ZD958 15.9 a 19.5 ab 23.8 c 34.4 de 25.3 cd 29.5 c 38.4 ab 26.6 a
2:2 DH605 15.4 abc 19.1 bc 24.1 b 37.4 b 25.2 d 30.7 b 38.9 a 26.5 ab
2017 SZD958 15.2 a 18.9 ab 24.4 ab 37.0 a 25.4 a 29.7 b 34.9 c 24.4 c
SDH605 14.9 a 18.7 ab 24.6 a 37.3 a 24.6 b 30.1 ab 35.2 bc 24.9 bc
M 14.5 a 18.1 b 22.7 c 33.8 c 25.2 ab 31.1 a 36.3 a 26.0 a
1:1 ZD958 14.2 a 18.1 b 23.0 c 34.0 c 25.0 ab 29.7 ab 36.0 ab 25.4 ab
1:1 DH605 14.8 a 18.3 ab 23.4 bc 35.4 b 24.6 ab 29.3 b 36.5 a 25.8 a
2:2 ZD958 14.6 a 19.1 a 22.9 c 34.7 bc 25.1 ab 29.5 b 36.1 a 25.7 a
2:2 DH605 14.7 a 18.5 ab 23.3 bc 35.5 b 25.4 ab 29.8 ab 36.4 a 25.2 a
[1] 李坤, 袁文胜, 张文毅, 张礼纲, 祁兵 . 玉米施肥技术与施肥机械的研究现状及趋势. 农机化研究, 2017,39(1):264-268
Li K, Yuan W S, Zhang W Y, Zhang L G, Qi B . Research status and development trend of corn fertilizing technology and fertilizing machine. J Agric, 2017,39(1):264-268 (in Chinese)
[2] Sango L, Gracietti M A, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P . Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different area to change in plant density. Field Crops Res, 2002,79:39-51
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00124-7
[3] Tokatlidis I S, Koutroubas S D . A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Res, 2004,88:103-114
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.013
[4] 马利, 徐景梅, 贾德涛 . 玉米高密度育种探讨. 现代农业科技, 2008, ( 2):154-155
Ma L, Xu J M, Jia D T . Discussion on high density breeding of maize. Agric Sci Technol, 2008, ( 2):154-155 (in Chinese)
[5] 明博, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 李璐璐, 王克如 . 2005-2016年中国玉米种植密度变化分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:1960-1972
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.002
Ming B, Xie R Z, Hou P, Li L L, Wang K R . Changes of maize planting density in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:1960-1972 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.002
[6] 张世煌 . 中美两国玉米育种思路和技术水平的比较. 北京农业, 2007, ( 14):13-16
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6966.2007.14.006
Zhang S H . Comparison of maize breeding ideas and technical level between China and America. Beijing Agric, 2007, ( 14):13-16 (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6966.2007.14.006
[7] Borras L, Westgate M E, Astin J P, Echarte L . Coupling time to silking with plant growth rate in maize. Field Crops Res, 2007,102:73-85
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.02.003
[8] 刘战东, 肖俊夫, 南纪琴, 冯跃华 . 倒伏对夏玉米叶面积、产量及其构成因素的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(18):107-110
Liu Z D, Xiao J F, Nan J Q, Feng Y H . Effect of different levels lodging on leaf area index, yield and its components of summer maize. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010,26(18):107-110 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 卫丽, 熊友才, 马超, 张慧琴, 邵阳, 李朴芳, 程正国, 王同朝 . 不同群体结构夏玉米灌浆期光合特征和产量变化. 生态学报, 2011,31:2524-2531
Wei L, Xiong Y C, Ma C, Zhang H Q, Shao Y, Li P F, Cheng Z G, Wang T Z . Photosynthetic characterization and yield of summer corn ( Zea mays L.) during grain filling stage under different planting pattern and population densities. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011,31:2524-2531 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Daellenbach G C, Kerridge P C, Wolfe M S, Frossard E, Finckh M R . Plant productivity in cassava-based mixed cropping systems in Colombian hillside farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2005,105:595-614
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.08.009
[11] Zhu Y, Chen H, Fan J, Wang Y Y, Chen J B, Fan J X, Yang S S, Hu L P . Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000,406:718-722
doi: 10.1038/35021046
[12] 樊哲翾 . 在不同密度条件下单混种作物的生长代谢研究. 兰州大学硕士学位论文, 甘肃兰州, 2013
Fan Z X . Metabolic and Ontogenetic Growth of Monoculture and Mixture Crops under the Condition of Different Density. MS Thesis of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 2013 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 朱敏 . 玉米不同品种间作、混作栽培理论与技术研究. 沈阳农业大学硕士学位论文, 辽宁沈阳, 2008
Zhu M . Research on Different Maize Varieties Inter-planting and Mixed Cultivation Theory and Technology. MS Thesis of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 2008 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 李潮海, 苏新宏, 孙敦立 . 不同基因型玉米间作复合群体生态生理效应. 生态学报, 2002,22:2096-2103
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.12.012
Li C H, Su X H, Sun D L . Ecophysiological characterization of different maize ( Zea mays L.) genotypes under mono- or inter-cropping conditions. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002,22:2096-2103 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.12.012
[15] 刘天学, 李潮海, 付景, 闫成辉 . 不同基因型玉米间作的群体质量. 生态学报, 2009,29:6302-6309
Liu T X, Li C H, Fu J, Yan C H . Population quality of different maize genotypes intercropped. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009,29:6302-6309 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 于桂霞 . 玉米高矮秆间作试验研究初报. 耕作与栽培, 1999, ( 2):8-10
Yu G X . Preliminary report on intercropping experiment of maize. Till & Cult, 1999, ( 2):8-10 (in Chinese)
[17] 崔俊明, 宋长江, 卢道文, 杨海燕, 郭素英, 裴振群, 刘智萍, 芦连勇, 孙海, 牛永锋, 郑丽敏 . 不同类型玉米杂交种高矮立体间作种植技术研究. 杂粮作物, 2005,25(4):253-257
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0896.2005.04.014
Cui J M, Song C J, Lu D W, Yang H Y, Guo S Y, Pei Z Q, Liu Z P, Lu L Y, Sun H, Niu Y F, Zheng L M . Study on planting techniques of different types of maize hybrids with different height. Rain Fed Crops, 2005,25:253-257 (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0896.2005.04.014
[18] Arnon D I . Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol, 1949,24:1-15
doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 pmid: 16654194
[19] Yang H S, Dobermann A, Lindquist J L, Walters D T, Arkebaur T J . Hybrid-maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crops Res, 2004,87:131-154
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.10.003
[20] Smith J S C, Duvick D N, Smith O S, Cooper M, Feng L Z . Changes in pedigree backgrounds of pioneer brand maize hybrids widely grown from 1930 to 1999. Crop Sci, 2004,44:1935-1946
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.1935
[21] 郭江, 肖凯, 郭新宇, 张凤路, 赵春江 . 玉米冠层结构、光分布和光合作用研究综述. 玉米科学, 2005,13(2):55-59
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2005.02.019
Guo J, Xiao K, Guo X Y, Zhang F L, Zhao C J . Review on maize canopy structure, light distributing and canopy photosynthesis. J Maize Sci, 2005,13(2):55-59 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2005.02.019
[22] Westgate M E, Forcella F, Reicosky D C, Somsen J . Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US corn belt: Radiation-use efficiency and grain yield. Field Crops Res, 1997,49:249-258
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01055-6
[23] 魏珊珊, 王祥宇, 董树亭 . 株行距配置对高产夏玉米冠层结构及籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2014,25:441-450
Wei S S, Wang X Y, Dong S T . Effects of row spacing on canopy structure and grain-filling characteristics of high-yield summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014,25:441-450 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 沈秀瑛, 戴俊英, 郑波 . 玉米群体冠层特征与光截获量及产量关系的研究. 作物学报, 1993,19:246-252
Shen X Y, Dai J Y, Zheng B . Studies on relationship among character of canopy light interception and yield in maize populations ( Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin, 1993,19:246-252 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Ma B L, Dwyer L M . Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. Plant Soil, 1998,199:283-291
doi: 10.1023/A:1004397219723
[26] Borrell A K, Hammer G L, Henzell R G . Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Sci, 2000,40:1037-1048
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4041037x
[27] 段俊, 梁承邺, 黄毓文 . 杂交水稻开花结实期间叶片衰老. 植物生理学报, 1997,23:139-144
Duan J, Liang C Y, Huang Y W . Studies on leaf senescence of hybrid rice at flowering and grain formation stage. J Plant Physiol, 1997,23:139-144 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 刘天学, 李潮海, 马新明, 赵霞, 刘士英 . 不同基因型玉米间作对叶片衰老、籽粒产量和品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008,32:914-921
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021
Liu T X, Li C H, Ma X M, Zhao X, Liu S Y . Effects of maize intercropping with different genotypes on leaf senescence and grain yield and quality. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008,32:914-921 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021
[29] 梅沛沛 . 不同基因型玉米间作复合群体稳产增产效应及其机制研究. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2007
Mei P P . Effect of Different Genotype Maize Intercropping on Yield and Its Mechanism. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2007 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 吕丽华, 王璞, 鲁来清 . 不同冠层结构下夏玉米产量形成的源库关系. 玉米科学, 2008,16(4):66-71
Lyu L H, Wang P, Lu L Q . The relationship of source-sink for yield form in summer maize under different canopy structure. J Maize Sci, 2008,16(4):66-71 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 赵亚丽, 康杰, 刘天学, 李潮海 . 不同基因型玉米间混作优势带型配置. 生态学报, 2013,33:3855-3864
Zhao Y L, Kang J, Liu T X, Li C H . Optimum stripe arrangement for inter-cropping and mixed-cropping of different maize genotypes. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013,33:3855-3864 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] Saidou A, Janssen B H , Temminghoff E J M. Effects of soil properties, mulch and NPK fertilizer on maize yields and nutrient budgets on ferralitic soils in southern Benin. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2003,100:265-273
doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00184-1
[33] 王建斌, 石岩 . 两个玉米品种不同混种方式对玉米植株性状和产量影响的研究. 耕作与栽培, 2015, ( 3):27-28
Wang J B, Shi Y . Effects of two maize mixing planting pattern on plant traits and yield. Tillage and Cultivation, 2015, ( 3):27-28 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 史振声, 朱敏, 李凤海, 王志斌 . 玉米不同品种间作的增产效果研究. 玉米科学, 2008,16(2):107-109
Shi Z S, Zhu M, Li F H, Wang Z B . Research on yield-increasing of different kinds of maize. J Maize Sci, 2008,16(2):107-109 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!