欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (01): 102-116.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.92009

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同叶龄蘖、穗氮肥组合对粳稻产量及氮素利用的影响

王艳,易军,高继平(),张丽娜,杨继芬,赵艳泽,辛威,甄晓溪,张文忠()   

  1. 沈阳农业大学水稻研究所/教育部省部共建北方粳稻遗传育种重点实验室/农业农村部东北水稻生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 辽宁沈阳 110161
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-01 接受日期:2019-08-09 出版日期:2020-01-12 网络出版日期:2019-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 高继平,张文忠
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 2422437380@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0300306);国家自然科学基金项目(31501250);辽宁省百千万人才工程项目(2015-39)和沈阳市科技计划项目资助(17-231-37)

Effects of precision leaf age fertilization on yield and nitrogen utilization of
japonica rice

WANG Yan,YI Jun,GAO Ji-Ping(),ZHANG Li-Na,YANG Ji-Fen,ZHAO Yan-Ze,XIN Wei,ZHEN Xiao-Xi,ZHANG Wen-Zhong()   

  1. Rice Research Institute, Shenyang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Northern Japonica Rice Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Education and Liaoning Province/Key Laboratory of Northeast Rice Biology, Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2019-03-01 Accepted:2019-08-09 Published:2020-01-12 Published online:2019-09-10
  • Contact: Ji-Ping GAO,Wen-Zhong ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was financed by the National Key Research and Development Program(2018YFD0300306);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31501250);Liaoning Bai-Qian-Wan Talents Program (2015-39), and the Project of Shenyang Science and Technology(17-231-37)

RichHTML

8

PDF

761

摘要：

以主茎叶片数不同的粳稻品种吉粳88 (14片)、沈农265 (15片)和沈农1401 (16片)为试材, 采用大田筒栽方式, 在总施氮量225 kg hm -2及轻简施肥(基肥、蘖肥、穗肥)模式基础上, 设置基蘖肥∶穗肥6∶4和8∶2两种施肥比例, 并分设不同源、库叶龄期施氮组合即不同叶龄蘖、穗肥精确施氮组合。分析了不同源库期氮肥运筹模式对水稻农艺性状、产量及氮素利用特性的影响。结果表明: (1)在有效穗数、分化颖花数、产量和氮素利用率方面, 吉粳88、沈农265、沈农1401不同氮肥运筹下最佳蘖、穗肥叶龄组合均为6∶4显著高于8∶2。(2)不同氮肥运筹下, 吉粳88在8叶(叶龄指数57.1%)、沈农265在9叶(叶龄指数60.0%)、沈农1401在10叶(叶龄指数62.5%)时, 即叶龄指数在60%左右时, 施用蘖肥效果最佳, 最终穗数最多, 对保蘖起主要作用; 吉粳88在11叶(叶龄指数78.6%)、沈农265在12叶(叶龄指数80.0%)、沈农1401在13叶(叶龄指数81.3%)时, 即叶龄指数在80%左右时, 施用穗肥效果最佳, 最终穗粒数最多, 对促花起主要作用。(3)吉粳88-6∶4 (8, 11), 沈农265-6∶4 (9, 12), 沈农1401-6∶4 (10, 13) 3组处理, 在产量、氮素积累量、氮素吸收利用率、农学利用率及偏生产力等方面, 显著高于同品种不同叶龄蘖、穗氮肥组合中的其他处理。因此, 适当延迟蘖肥施用叶龄期(叶龄指数60%左右)、提前穗肥施用叶龄期(叶龄指数80%左右)同时增加穗肥施用比例, 既可以显著提高氮素积累量、氮素吸收利用率、农学利用率及偏生产力, 又能显著促进成穗率的提高和颖花数的分化, 达到保蘖促花的双重作用, 实现优源、扩库、充实的目标, 从而获得高产。

关键词: 粳稻, 保蘖氮肥, 促花氮肥, 产量, 氮素利用效率

Abstract:

The japonica rice cultivar Jigeng 88 (14 leaves), Shennong 265 (15 leaves) and Shennong 1401 (16 leaves) with different main leaf ages were used to analyze the effects of different source-sink nitrogen fertilizer application models on agronomic traits, yield and nitrogen utilization characteristics of rice grown in the field-tube condition. Two kinds of fertilizer proportions (base fertilizer: panicle fertilizer was 6:4 and 8:2) were set under 225 kg hm -2 of nitrogen application based on the light and simple fertilization model (basal fertilizer, tillering fertilizer, panicle fertilizer). The tillering fertilizer was applied at the stage of source construction, and panicle fertilizer was applied at stage of sink formation. The precise nitrogen application combined different nitrogen fertilizer modes for tillering and panicle fertilizers with different leaf ages. Number of differentiated spikelets, effective panicles, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency, were significantly higher by using the 6:4 fertilizer proportions than by using 8:2 under all nitrogen fertilizer application models in these cultivars. Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, the 8 leaves of Jigeng 88 (leaf age index was 57.1%), 9 leaves of Shennong 265 (leaf age index was 60.0%), and 10 leaves of Shennong 1401 (leaf age index was 62.55%) were the best stage to apply tillering fertilizer. It means that the leaf age index about 60% is better to protect the more panicle formation. The 11 leaves of Jigeng 88 (leaf age index was 78.6%), 12 leaves of Shennong 265 (leaf age index was 80.0%), 13 leaves of Shennong 1401 (leaf age index was 81.3%) were the best stage to apply panicle fertilizer. It means that leaf age index about 80% is better to promote spikelet differentiation. The yield, nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen uptake and utilization, agronomic efficiency, and partial productivity were significantly higher in 6:4 (8, 11) of Jigeng 88, 6:4 (9, 12) of Shennong 265, 6:4 (10, 13) of Shennong 1401 than in other treatments. Therefore, the delayed leaf age of tillering nitrogen fertilizer application (leaf age index was about 60%), ahead of applied the panicle fertilizer (leaf age index was about 80%), and increasing the ratio of nitrogen fertilizer application not only significantly increase nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen absorption and utilization, nitrogen agronomic utilization rate and partial productivity but also promote number of differentiated spikelets and the percentage of effective panicle number, achieving the dual role of protecting and promoting spikelets, and high yields.

Key words: japonica rice, tillering protecting nitrogen fertilizer, flower promoting nitrogen fertilizer, yield, nitrogen use efficiency

表1

水稻生育期间温度、降雨量、相对湿度和日照时数"

月份
Month		 平均温度 Average temperature (°C) 降雨量
Rainfall
(mm)		 平均湿度
Average relative humidity (%)		 总日照时数
Total sunshine
hours (h)
最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum
2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017
5月May 10.5 11.0 24.2 25.9 175.7 37.1 51.7 49.5 257.5 292.8
6月June 16.1 15.8 27.7 29.3 170.3 64.9 66.2 56.7 204.0 268.4
7月July 20.4 21.2 30.0 31.7 363.7 109.8 77.2 71.8 188.4 206.5
8月August 19.7 18.8 29.6 29.3 68.6 128.1 75.8 80.7 224.7 170.4
9月September 13.7 11.4 24.7 25.3 40.5 57.6 77.7 72.9 233.7 207.5

表2

基蘖肥与穗肥施用分配(施氮总量225 kg hm-2) "

基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 基肥
Basal
fertilizer		 蘖肥
Tillering
fertilizer		 基肥+蘖肥
Basal fertilizer and
tillering fertilizer		 穗肥
Panicle
fertilizer
8:2 108 72 180 45
6:4 81 54 135 90

表3

不同品种蘖肥与穗肥叶龄组合"

吉粳88 Jigeng 88 沈农265 Shennong 265 沈农1401 Shennong 1401
叶龄
(叶龄指数)
Leaf ages
(leaf age index)		 11叶
11 leaves
(78.6%)		 13叶
13 leaves
(92.9%)		 叶龄
(叶龄指数)
Leaf ages
(leaf age index)		 12叶
12 leaves
(80.0%)		 14叶
14 leaves
(93.3%)		 叶龄
(叶龄指数)
Leaf ages
(leaf age index)		 13叶
13 leaves
(81.3%)		 15叶
15 leaves
(93.6%)
6 (42.9%) (6, 11) # (6, 13) 7 (46.7%) (7, 12) (7, 14) 8 (50.0%) (8, 13) (8, 15)
7 (50.0%) (7, 11) (7, 13) 8 (53.3%) (8, 12) (8, 14) 9 (56.3%) (9, 13) (9, 15)
8 (57.1%) (8, 11) (8, 13) 9 (60.0%) (9, 12) (9, 14) 10 (62.5%) (10, 13) (10, 15)

图1

不同氮肥运筹下各处理每5 d叶龄进程 图中横坐标始于5, 表示叶龄为5叶时移栽, 每条柱中各小段表示每5 d的叶龄进程。"

图2

不同氮肥运筹下各处理茎蘖成穗率(2016-2017) 图中所标注的字母为成穗率的显著性。不同字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著。"

图3

氮肥运筹对不同品种粳稻颖花量的影响(2016-2017) 图中所标注的字母为分化颖花数的显著性, 即实际颖花数、空瘪颖花数与退化颖花数之和。不同字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著。"

表4

2016年不同氮肥运筹对各处理产量及其构成的影响"

品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒有效穗数
No. of panicles
per pot		 每穗粒数
No. of grains
per panicle		 结实率
Filled-grain
percentage (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 每筒实
测产量
Yield per pot (g)
吉粳88
Jigeng 88		 8:2 (6, 11)# 21.6±2.4 ab 139.8±5.9 c 89.2±4.0 abcd 21.3±0.4 bc 56.8±0.8 b
(6, 13) 18.2±0.5 b 137.3±4.7 c 86.9±3.5 cd 20.4±0.2 cd 52.8±0.4 b
(7, 11) 23.6±2.6 ab 139.0±10.8 c 88.5±5.1 abcd 21.1±1.2 bc 60.0±2.8 b
(7, 13) 24.0±2.1 ab 120.0±1.0 d 87.1±0.0 bcd 21.0±0.6 bc 52.8±3.4 b
(8, 11) 26.2±3.6 a 146.6±14.4 abc 90.5±0.3 abcd 19.3±2.0 d 67.2±5.4 ab
(8, 13) 23.2±0.8 b 134.8±4.9 c 92.1±0.2 ab 21.1±1.1 bc 60.8±4.0 b
6:4 (6, 11) 22.0±2.0 ab 159.3±7.4 a 86.1±2.3 d 21.0±0.4 bc 62.4±0.4 ab
(6, 13) 18.2±0.5 b 146.7±2.1 abc 91.5±1.1 abc 20.8±0.1 bc 54.4±0.4 b
(7, 11) 24.6±1.2 ab 143.4±10.5 bc 91.5±3.3 d 21.1±1.3 bc 64.8±4.0 b
(7, 13) 19.8±1.2 ab 134.0±7.9 c 92.1±1.4 abcd 21.9±0.2 b 52.8±2.8 b
(8, 11) 25.2±1.2 a 155.4±11.7 ab 93.1±2.2 a 20.9±0.6 bc 76.0±1.6 a
(8, 13) 25.0±1.5 a 136.4±11.3 c 91.1±2.5 abc 20.5±0.5 bcd 63.2±1.2 ab
N0 (0, 0) 10.2±0.5 c 114.0±3.5 d 89.5±2.9 abcd 23.7±0.9 a 24.8±2.4 c
沈农265
Shennong 265		 8:2 (7, 12) 18.0±0.8 c 155.8±8.3 ab 86.0±1.1 def 24.1±0.4 abc 57.6±1.2 ef
(7, 14) 18.8±0.4 c 147.0±2.2 bcd 83.5±1.4 f 24.0±0.2 abc 55.2±0.4 f
(8, 12) 21.2±1.0 abc 134.0±4.5 e 90.8±1.0 ab 23.7±0.1 bcd 60.8±1.6 def
(8, 14) 21.6±0.8 abc 136.8±7.8 de 87.8±2.3 cde 23.0±0.6 ef 59.2±2.4 ef
(9, 12) 23.6±1.4 ab 149.3±9.4 bc 88.8±1.6 bcd 22.8±0.4 f 71.2±1.2 b
(9, 14) 19.2±0.7 c 149.3±7.3 bc 91.4±0.4 a 23.5±0.4 de 61.6±1.2 def
6:4 (7, 12) 22.0±2.0 abc 142.5±8.2 cde 86.8±1.0 cde 22.8±0.4 f 61.6±3.2 de
(7, 14) 18.0±0.8 c 162.0±7.8 a 84.1±1.8 f 24.2±0.1 ab 59.2±1.6 ef
(8, 12) 23.6±2.0 ab 155.3±10.2 ab 85.2±3.4 ef 22.0±0.3 g 68.0±2.4 bc
(8, 14) 19.6±1.4 c 152.5±9.9 abc 88.8±0.5 bcd 24.2±0.2 ab 64.0±2.4 cde
(9, 12) 24.4±1.4 a 149.3±4.5 bc 91.3±2.5 ab 23.2±0.8 def 76.8±1.2 a
(9, 14) 20.4±1.2 bc 150.8±7.5 abc 89.7±3.0 abc 24.3±0.1 a 66.4±2.4 bcd
N0 (0, 0) 10.4±0.7 d 115.0±4.2 f 95.4±0.7 a 24.2±0.2 ab 27.2±1.2 g
沈农1401
Shennong 1401		 8:2 (8, 13) 18.0±0.8 abcd 142.3±18.2 abc 70.3±9.0 abcd 26.0±1.0 ab 66.4±4.4 bcd
(8, 15) 15.6±1.4 de 144.5±4.0 abc 76.8±1.3 a 26.5±0.7 a 59.2±3.6 de
(9, 13) 17.6±1.1 bcde 133.3±8.4 cd 66.3±8.7 abcd 25.2±0.5 abc 59.2±2.8 de
(9, 15) 17.2±0.4 bcde 119.8±9.3 d 62.4±10.9 bcd 26.7±0.8 a 55.2±2.4 e
(10, 13) 18.4±0.5 abc 152.3±12.6 ab 64.1±6.3 abcd 24.7±0.8 bc 68.8±3.6 abc
(10, 15) 16.0±0.7 cde 138.5±15.9 bc 70.6±10.3 abc 26.2±1.1 ab 57.6±3.2 de
品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒有效穗数
No. of panicles
per pot		 每穗粒数
No. of grains
per panicle		 结实率
Filled-grain
percentage (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 每筒实
测产量
Yield per pot (g)
沈农1401
Shennong 1401		 6:4 (8, 13) 18.8±1.0 ab 151.5±5.4 ab 61.2±3.9 cd 25.4±0.3 abc 72.0±2.4 ab
(8, 15) 17.2±0.4 bcde 138.5±1.7 bc 63.6±4.0 abcd 26.1±0.9 ab 62.4±0.8 cde
(9, 13) 18.4±0.5 abc 131.3±4.3 cd 56.7±5.8 d 26.6±0.6 a 64.0±1.2 bcd
(9, 15) 16.0±0.7 cde 144.8±4.5 abc 75.3±5.3 ab 26.0±0.6 ab 60.0±2.0 de
(10, 13) 20.4±1.0 a 155.3±8.1 a 71.3±6.7 abc 24.1±1.9 c 76.0±1.6 a
(10, 15) 15.2±0.5 e 149.3±11.2 ab 66.5±7.6 abcd 26.2±1.3 ab 59.2±1.6 de
N0 (0, 0) 8.0±0.7 f 103.0±4.5 e 64.9±9.3 abcd 25.5±0.8 abc 20.8±1.2 f

表5

2017年不同氮肥运筹对各处理产量及其构成的影响"

品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒有效穗数
No. of panicles
per pot		 每穗粒数
No. of grains
per panicle		 结实率
Filled-grain
percentage (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 每筒实测产量
Yield per
pot (g)
吉粳88
Jigeng 88		 8:2 (6, 11)# 19.2±1.6 c 146.7±5.7 bc 97.4±1.2 a 24.2±1.3 ab 66.4±5.2 abc
(6, 13) 19.4±0.6 c 137.0±5.2 d 96.5±2.8 a 22.8±1.3 bc 58.4±2.4 bc
(7, 11) 21.4±0.4 bc 159.0±19.3 bc 96.0±1.2 a 22.5±0.7 bc 72.8±3.2 abc
(7, 13) 19.2±1.3 c 153.3±22.2 bc 94.2±4.1 a 22.4±0.5 bc 60.8±3.2 abc
(8, 11) 22.4±0.7 ab 170.7±7.4 ab 96.5±0.9 a 22.6±0.9 bc 84.0±5.6 a
(8, 13) 21.8±0.8 b 166.0±28.4 ab 94.4±2.7 a 21.6±0.6 c 74.4±3.8 abc
6:4 (6, 11) 20.8±0.8 bc 141.7±3.1 bc 98.4±0.7 a 23.1±0.4 bc 67.2±3.6 abc
(6, 13) 17.4±0.6 c 137.3±7.5 cd 94.9±4.1 a 26.5±2.4 a 59.2±1.2 abc
(7, 11) 19.2±1.6 c 146.7±5.7 bc 97.4±1.2 a 24.2±1.3 ab 66.4±5.2 abc
(7, 13) 19.2±1.3 c 164.0±9.2 ab 95.4±2.8 a 23.4±0.6 abc 70.4±4.8 abc
(8, 11) 24.0±1.1 ab 175.7±39.7 ab 95.9±1.5 a 21.5±0.3 c 84.8±6.4 a
(8, 13) 21.8±0.8 b 161.3±15.4 bc 96.8±1.1 a 21.6±0.6 c 72.8±1.2 abc
N0 (0, 0) 8.6±0.4 d 137.3±17.3 cd 98.6±1.6 a 23.3±0.2 abc 26.4±1.2 d
沈农265
Shennong 265		 8:2 (7, 12) 19.2±2.1 abcd 152.5±33.4 ab 95.2±0.8 ab 25.1±1.1 ab 72.8±8.0 bc
(7, 14) 17.6±0.7 bcd 147.2±23.0 bc 94.1±1.3 b 24.8±0.8 abc 60.8±3.6 d
(8, 12) 21.8±1.1 abc 140.8±10.7 bc 97.4±0.9 a 24.7±0.5 abc 74.4±5.6 bc
(8, 14) 17.0±1.7 cd 147.7±6.7 bc 95.2±1.2 ab 25.6±0.7 a 61.6±3.4 d
(9, 12) 23.4±1.7 a 146.6±10.9 bc 93.3±2.3 b 24.3±0.6 bc 79.2±4.6 ab
(9, 14) 23.0±2.1 ab 133.2±7.5 cd 94.1±2.4 b 23.7±0.9 c 68.0±3.4 cd
6:4 (7, 12) 21.8±1.1 abc 156.5±23.8 ab 93.7±1.3 b 23.7±1.0 c 76.8±4.2 b
(7, 14) 19.8±1.1 abcd 151.0±21.5 ab 94.6±1.3 b 24.9±0.5 abc 71.2±4.2 cd
品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒有效穗数
No. of panicles
per pot		 每穗粒数
No. of grains
per panicle		 结实率
Filled-grain
percentage (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 每筒实测产量
Yield per
pot (g)
沈农265
Shennong 265		 (8, 12) 20.2±0.9 abcd 160.7±3.8 a 94.8±2.4 b 24.9±1.1 abc 76.8±3.6 b
(8, 14) 23.0±0.4 ab 146.8±24.3 bc 93.9±3.0 b 22.4±1.0 d 71.2±4.0 cd
(9, 12) 23.4±2.2 a 163.7±11.7 a 93.0±1.9 b 22.5±1.4 d 81.6±5.8 a
(9, 14) 19.8±2.3 abcd 149.7±14.0 bc 94.8±1.9 b 24.3±0.7 bc 68.8±5.4 cd
N0 (0, 0) 12.6±1.7 d 117.5±11.9 d 93.9±2.1 b 24.5±0.7 abc 34.4±2.8 e
沈农1401
Shennong 1401		 8:2 (8, 13) 17.0±0.1 bcd 155.5±12.1 ab 65.5±1.7 ab 25.0±1.0 bc 56.0±2.4 bc
(8, 15) 13.4±0.5 d 148.6±10.1 abc 66.9±2.6 ab 25.6±1.0 ab 48.0±4.0 de
(9, 13) 15.0±0.6 cd 157.5±11.7 ab 74.6±4.9 ab 27.0±0.9 a 61.6±4.2 b
(9, 15) 14.4±0.4 cd 124.2±11.8 bc 65.0±3.3 ab 26.8±1.6 a 41.6±3.6 e
(10, 13) 20.8±0.8 ab 156.5±9.5 ab 80.5±5.6 a 24.3±0.8 bc 73.6±4.4 a
(10, 15) 17.0±0.4 bcd 133.5±10.1 bc 73.2±6.3 ab 26.5±1.0 ab 57.6±7.2 bc
6:4 (8, 13) 18.2±0.5 abc 163.8±12.0 ab 61.9±4.3 b 25.0±0.5 bc 60.8±4.0 b
(8, 15) 17.0±0.1 bcd 154.7±14.2 abc 69.1±4.3 ab 25.6±0.9 bc 53.6±4.4 c
(9, 13) 19.8±0.4 ab 156.3±9.2 ab 67.2±3.1 ab 24.0±1.4 bc 50.4±2.6 cd
(9, 15) 16.6±0.1 bcd 150.8±12.2 abc 66.5±4.5 ab 26.0±1.0 ab 43.2±3.2 e
(10, 13) 22.4±0.8 a 164.3±10.6 ab 68.6±1.7 ab 24.4±0.9 bc 75.2±4.1 a
(10, 15) 17.6±0.8 bcd 152.7±14.6 abc 62.9±4.9 b 25.5±1.4 bc 55.2±3.6 bc
N0 (0, 0) 9.0±0.5 e 118.8±13.4 c 70.3±8.8 ab 27.2±1.4 a 23.2±1.8 f

表6

2016年不同氮肥运筹下各处理氮素利用率"

品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒氮积累总量
N total uptake
(g pot-1)		 吸收利用率
Recovery
efficiency (%)		 农学利用率
Agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1N)		 偏生产力
Partial factor
productivity
(kg kg-1N)
吉粳88
Jigeng 88		 8:2 (6, 11)# 1.22±0.05 cde 32.8±2.3 cde 20.1±0.5 b 31.5±0.8 bcd
(6, 13) 1.15±0.12 de 28.8±7.1 de 17.6±0.3 b 29.4±0.6 bcd
(7, 11) 1.28±0.11 bcd 36.6±7.6 bcd 22.1±1.8 b 33.4±3.3 abcd
(7, 13) 1.21±0.02 cde 32.4±1.3 cde 17.6±2.1 b 26.9±1.9 cd
品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒氮积累总量
N total uptake
(g pot-1)		 吸收利用率
Recovery
efficiency (%)		 农学利用率
Agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1N)		 偏生产力
Partial factor
productivity
(kg kg-1N)
吉粳88
Jigeng 88		 (8, 11) 1.37±0.10 ab 42.6±7.3 ab 26.7±3.4 ab 37.2±11.9 ab
(8, 13) 12.30±0.01 cd 33.7±0.8 cde 22.6±2.5 b 34.0±4.6 abc
6:4 (6, 11) 1.27±0.04 bcd 36.2±3.8 bcd 23.6±0.3 ab 34.8±0.3 abc
(6, 13) 1.10±0.01 e 25.5±1.1 e 18.6±0.3 b 30.1±0.4 bcd
(7, 11) 1.42±0.14 ab 45.5±9.9 ab 25.2±2.5 b 35.8±4.3 abc
(7, 13) 1.31±0.08 abc 38.7±5.6 abc 17.6±1.8 b 28.8±2.8 bcd
(8, 11) 1.43±0.02 a 45.8±1.5 a 32.2±1.0 a 42.2±1.9 a
(8, 13) 1.16±0.06 de 29.2±4.6 de 24.1±0.8 ab 35.1±1.3 abc
N0 (0, 0) 0.70±0.02 f — — —
沈农265
Shennong 265		 8:2 (7, 12) 1.15±0.00 d 28.1±0.9 d 19.1±0.8 ef 36.6±2.8 d
(7, 14) 1.07±0.01 e 23.2±1.6 e 17.6±0.3 f 34.8±1.9 c
(8, 12) 1.16±0.01 d 28.9±2.3 d 21.1±1.0 def 39.4±5.9 c
(8, 14) 1.13±0.03 d 27.3±0.5 d 20.1±1.5 ef 38.3±3.7 c
(9, 12) 1.36±0.01 b 41.4±1.3 ab 27.7±0.8 b 43.5±3.1 bc
(9, 14) 1.05±0.02 e 21.9±1.4 e 21.6±0.8 def 39.2±5.2 bc
6:4 (7, 12) 1.22±0.02 c 32.9±2.1 c 21.6±2.0 de 39.8±6.7 bc
(7, 14) 1.06±0.02 e 22.7±0.5 e 20.1±1.0 ef 35.1±1.5 bc
(8, 12) 1.35±0.02 b 40.7±3.9 b 25.7±1.5 bc 40.8±1.9 bc
(8, 14) 1.16±0.01 d 28.9±1.6 d 23.1±1.5 cde 39.0±2.8 bc
(9, 12) 1.42±0.03 a 45.3±3.7 a 31.2±0.8 a 46.5±4.2 abc
(9, 14) 1.17±0.06 d 29.5±2.8 d 24.6±1.5 bcd 38.9±4.8 ab
N0 (0, 0) 0.70±0.02 f — — —
沈农1401
Shennong 1401		 8:2 (8, 13) 1.31±0.09 bcde 36.4±6.2 bcde 28.7±2.8 bcd 36.8±4.9 bcd
(8, 15) 1.17±0.04 ef 27.5±3.3 e 24.1±2.3 de 33.0±4.1 de
(9, 13) 1.43±0.07 ab 43.9±5.1 b 24.1±1.8 de 32.7±3.1 de
(9, 15) 1.21±0.06 ef 29.7±4.2 de 21.6±1.5 e 30.5±2.6 e
(10, 13) 1.42±0.07 ab 43.2±4.9 b 30.2±2.3 abc 38.4±4.1 abc
(10, 15) 1.24±0.07 cdef 31.9±5.2 cde 23.1±2.0 de 32.2±3.4 de
6:4 (8, 13) 1.39±0.16 abc 41.2±10.6 bc 32.2±1.5 ab 41.2±1.0 ab
(8, 15) 1.23±0.02 def 31.1±2.3 cde 26.2±0.5 cde 34.5±1.1 cde
(9, 13) 1.44±0.12 ab 44.3±8.4 ab 27.2±0.8 bcd 35.2±1.2 cde
(9, 15) 1.16±0.05 f 26.6±3.6 e 24.6±1.3 de 33.3±2.2 de
(10, 13) 1.47±0.11 a 46.2±7.2 a 34.7±1.0 a 43.2±1.4 a
(10, 15) 1.36±0.06 abcd 39.4±4.6 bcd 24.1±1.0 de 32.9±1.8 de
N0 (0, 0) 0.73±0.04 g — — —

表7

2017年不同氮肥运筹下各处理氮素利用率"

品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒氮积累总量
N total uptake
(g pot-1)		 吸收利用率
Recovery efficiency
(%)		 农学利用率
Agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1 N)		 偏生产力
Partial factor
productivity
(kg kg-1 N)
吉粳88
Jigeng 88		 8:2 (6, 11)# 1.10±0.07 de 21.8±0.7 bcd 25.2±3.3 abc 36.2±2.1 b
(6, 13) 1.02±0.06 e 16.8±0.8 d 20.1±1.5 bc 36.0±2.4 b
(7, 11) 1.28±0.03 bc 30.4±6.2 abc 29.2±2.0 abc 37.3±2.6 b
(7, 13) 1.10±0.06 de 19.0±13.7 cd 21.6±2.0 abc 36.2±1.2 b
(8, 11) 1.29±0.04 bc 30.7±6.6 abc 36.2±3.5 a 41.4±2.3 ab
(8, 13) 1.26±0.05 c 28.9±7.4 abcd 30.2±2.4 abc 36.3±1.7 b
6:4 (6, 11) 1.32±0.05 bc 35.3±0.8 a 25.7±2.3 abc 36.4±2.9 b
(6, 13) 1.03±0.04 e 17.0±1.5 d 20.6±0.8 abc 37.4±2.3 b
(7, 11) 1.33±0.03 abc 33.3±5.5 ab 25.2±3.3 abc 43.5±2.2 ab
(7, 13) 1.15±0.07 d 22.1±13.5 bcd 27.7±3.0 abc 40.5±3.7 ab
(8, 11) 1.42±0.03 a 38.7±1.8 a 36.7±4.0 a 47.2±1.4 a
(8, 13) 1.37±0.05 ab 35.5±4.9 a 29.2±0.8 abc 42.3±2.6 ab
N0 (0, 0) 0.76±0.06 f — — —
沈农265
Shennong 265		 8:2 (7, 12) 1.21±0.05 d 28.3±2.7 d 24.1±5.0 bc 39.5±15.2 de
(7, 14) 1.18±0.05 d 26.9±1.3 d 16.6±2.3 d 33.1±6.5 e
(8, 12) 1.46±0.04 ab 44.1±2.3 ab 25.2±3.5 bc 41.4±4.3 cde
(8, 14) 1.30±0.04 c 34.4±2.7 c 17.1±2.1 d 34.9±6.7 de
(9, 12) 1.47±0.01 ab 45.0±1.6 ab 28.2±2.9 ab 47.8±5.5 ab
(9, 14) 1.42±0.04 b 41.5±1.2 b 21.1±2.1 cd 38.4±7.3 de
6:4 (7, 12) 1.43±0.03 ab 42.3±3.5 ab 26.7±2.6 b 42.5±5.2 bcd
(7, 14) 1.22±0.01 d 29.0±1.6 d 23.1±2.6 cd 38.4±7.5 de
(8, 12) 1.47±0.05 ab 44.7±4.1 ab 26.7±2.3 b 33.3±19.0 de
(8, 14) 1.41±0.04 b 41.0±3.0 b 23.1±2.5 cd 39.0±5.4 de
(9, 12) 1.49±0.04 a 46.3±2.9 a 29.7±3.6 a 43.8±11.5 bc
(9, 14) 1.48±0.00 ab 45.3±2.2 ab 21.6±3.4 cd 38.2±9.9 de
N0 (0, 0) 0.76±0.04 e — — —
沈农1401
Shennong 1401		 8:2 (8, 13) 1.15±0.14 efg 25.2±8.9 efg 20.6±1.5 bc 27.9±5.8 abcd
(8, 15) 1.00±0.08 g 15.6±5.0 h 15.6±2.5 de 25.8±2.0 cd
(9, 13) 1.16±0.09 ef 25.6±5.5 ef 24.1±2.6 b 41.7±18.1 ab
(9, 15) 1.02±0.10 fg 16.5±6.4 g 11.6±2.3 e 30.8±3.9 abcd
(10, 13) 1.49±0.04 ab 46.3±2.4 ab 31.7±2.8 a 40.9±5.8 ab
(10, 15) 1.20±0.09 de 28.3±5.8 de 21.6±4.5 bc 37.5±11.2 abc
6:4
 (8, 13) 1.39±0.08 abc 40.3±4.9 abc 23.6±2.5 b 34.4±13.0 abc
(8, 15) 1.30±0.13 cde 34.4±8.2 cde 19.1±2.8 c 27.5±0.6 bcd
(9, 13) 1.51±0.06 a 47.6±3.6 a 17.1±1.6 cd 41.0±9.8 a
(9, 15) 1.28±0.06 cde 33.1±3.8 cde 12.6±2.0 e 32.0±8.1 abcd
品种
Cultivar		 基蘖肥:穗肥
B:P		 处理时期
Treatment		 每筒氮积累总量
N total uptake
(g pot-1)		 吸收利用率
Recovery efficiency
(%)		 农学利用率
Agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1 N)		 偏生产力
Partial factor
productivity
(kg kg-1 N)
沈农1401
Shennong 1401		 (10, 13) 1.53±0.03 a 48.8±1.6 a 32.7±2.6 a 41.9±8.4 a
(10, 15) 1.35±0.12 bcd 37.5±7.3 bcd 20.1±2.3 bc 28.2±4.6 abcd
N0 (0, 0) 0.77±0.02 h — — —
[1] 孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金, 李应洪, 严奉君, 徐徽, 王海月, 马均 . 施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:4745-4756.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.24.007
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Jiang M J, Li Y H, Yan F J, Xu H, Wang H Y, Ma J . Effects of fertilizer levels on nitrogen utilization characterristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:4745-4756 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.24.007
[2] Zhong X H, Peng S B, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Yang J C, Zou Y B, Zhang X H, Wang G H, Zhang F S . Strategies for overcoming low agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in China. Field Crops Res, 2006,96:37-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.004
[3] 范立慧, 徐珊珊, 侯朋福, 薛利红, 李刚华, 丁艳锋, 杨林章 . 不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:1872-1884.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.10.004
Fan L H, Xu S S, Hou P F, Xue L H, Li G H, Ding Y F, Yang L Z . Effect of different ratios of basal to tiller nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen utilization under different soil fertility. Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:1872-1884 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.10.004
[4] Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Yang J C, Wang G H, Zou Y B, Zhang F S, Zhu Q S, Buresh R, Witt C . Challenge and opportunity in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. J Integr Agric, 2002,1:776-785.
[5] 罗文姬, 江立庚, 覃丽玲, 梁天锋, 罗必敬 . 氮肥基追比对机插稻产量和氮肥利用效率的影响. 作物杂志, 2016,32(5):119-123.
Luo W J, Jiang L G, Qin L L, Liang T F, Luo B J . Nitrogen fertilization ratio on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of mechanical transplanting rice. Crops, 2006,32(5):119-123 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 白志刚, 张均华, 黄洁, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 朱春权, 钟楚, 金千瑜 . 氮肥运筹对水稻氮代谢及稻田土壤氮素迁移转化的影响. 生态学杂志, 2018,37:3440-3448.
Bai Z G, Zhang J H, Huang J, Zhu L F, Cao X C, Zhu C Q, Zhong C, Jin Q Y . Effects of nitrogen regime on nitrogen metabolism of rice and nitrogen transformation and translocation in paddy soils. Chin J Ecol, 2018,37:3440-3448 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 龚振恺, 戴其根, 许轲 . 穗肥运筹对不同秧龄机插超级稻宁粳1号产量及群体质量的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38:1460-1470.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01460
Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Gong Z K, Dai Q G, Xu K . Effect of panicle nitrogen fertilizer management on yield and population quality in mechanical transplanted super rice Ningjing 1 with different seedling ages. Acta Agron Sin, 2012,38:1460-1470 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01460
[8] 丁艳锋, 刘胜环, 王绍华, 王强盛, 黄丕生, 凌启鸿 . 氮素基、蘖肥用量对水稻氮素吸收与利用的影响. 作物学报, 2004,30(8):739-744.
Ding Y F, Liu S H, Wang S H, Wang Q S, Huang P S, Ling Q H . Effects of amount of basic and tillering nitrogen applied on absorption and utilization of nitrogen in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2004,30:739-744 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 王维金, 徐竹生, 鲍隆清 . 重施穗肥对杂交水稻的产量和氮素营养的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 1993,12(3):209-214.
Wang W J, Xu Z S, Bao L Q . Effects of heavy spike fertilizer on yield and nitrogen in middle-season hybrid rice. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 1993,12(3):209-214 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 薛亚光, 陈婷婷, 杨成, 王志琴, 刘立军, 杨建昌 . 中粳稻不同栽培模式对产量及其生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 2010,36:466-476.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00466
Xue Y G, Chen T T, Cheng Y, Wang Z Q, Liu L J, Yang J C . Effects of different cultivation patterns on the yield and physiological characteristics in mid-season japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2010,36:466-476 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00466
[11] 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 戴其根, 丁艳锋, 凌励, 苏祖芳, 徐茂, 阙金华, 王绍华 . 水稻精确定量施氮研究. 中国农业科学, 2005,38:2457-2467.
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Ding Y F, Ling L, Su Z F, Xu M, Que J H, Wang S H . Study on precise and quantitative N application in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2005,38:2457-2467 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 张洪程, 吴桂成, 戴其根, 霍忠洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 吕修涛, 万靓军, 黄银忠 . 水稻氮肥精确后移及其机制. 作物学报, 2011,37:1837-1851.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01837
Zhang H C, Wu G C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Lyu X T, Wan L J, Huang Y Z . Precise postponing nitrogen application and its mechanism in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:1837-1851 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01837
[13] 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 苏祖芳, 凌励 . 稻作新理论: 水稻叶龄模式. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994.
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Su Z F, Ling L. . New Theory of Rice Cultivation: the Leaf-age-model of Rice. Beijing: Science Press, 1994 (in Chinese).
[14] 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 丁艳锋, 戴其根, 凌励, 王绍华, 徐茂 . 水稻高产精确定量栽培. 北方水稻, 2007,37(2):1-9.
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Ding Y F, Dai Q G, Ling L, Wang S H, Xu M . Precise and quantitative cultivation for high yield in rice. North Rice, 2007,37(2):1-9 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 张洪程, 吴桂成, 吴文革, 戴其根, 霍忠洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 黄幸福, 龚金龙 . 水稻“精苗稳前、控蘖优中、大穗强后”超高产定量化栽培模式. 中国农业科学, 2010,43:2645-2660.
Zhang H C, Wu G C, Wu W G, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Huang X F, Gong J L . The SOI model of quantitative cultivation of super-high yielding rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2010,43:2645-2660 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 林忠成, 戴其根, 许轲, 张军 . 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33:175-182.
Wang L J, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Lin Z C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Zhang J . Effects of nitrogen application regimes on yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency of super japonica hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:175-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 柳新伟, 孟亚利, 周治国, 曹卫星 . 水稻颖花分化与退化的动态特征. 作物学报, 2005,31:451-455.
Liu X W, Meng Y L, Zhou Z G, Cao W X . Dynamic characteristics of floret differentiation and degeneration in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:451-455 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] Kim H Y, Lieffering M, Miura S, Kobayashi K, Okada M . Growth and nitrogen uptake of CO2-enriched rice under field conditions. New Phytol, 2001,150:223-229.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00111.x
[19] 杨洪建, 杨连新, 刘红江, 董桂春, 颜士敏, 朱建国, 王余龙 . FACE对武香粳14根系活性影响的研究. 作物学报, 2006,32(1):118-124.
Yang H J, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Liu H J, Dong G C, Yan S M, Zhu J G, Wang Y L . Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment on spikelet differentiation and degeneration of japonica rice(Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Wuxiangjing 14. Acta Agron Sin, 2006,32:118-124 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 杨弘远 . 水稻生殖生物学. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2005.
Yang H Y. . Rice Reproductive Biological. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2005 (in Chinese).
[21] 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 桂玉清, 吴文革, 吴桂成, 端木银熙, 孙菊英, 赵品恒, 徐军, 李杰, 王艳, 龚金龙, 姚义, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 李德剑, 肖跃成, 王宝金, 吴爱国, 钱宗华, 淤永杰, 李华 . 水稻超高产栽培研究与探讨. 中国稻米, 2012,18(1):1-14.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2012.01.001
Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Gui Y Q, Wu W G, Wu G C, Duan-Mu Y X, Sun J Y, Zhao P H, Xu J, Li J, Wang Y, Gong J L, Yao Y, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Li D J, Xiao Y C, Wang B J, Wu A G, Qian Z H, Yu Y J, Li H . Research and discussion on super high yielding cultivation of rice. Chin Rice, 2012,18(1):1-14 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2012.01.001
[22] 胡群, 夏敏, 张洪程, 曹利强, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 陈厚存, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 林昌明, 韩宝富 . 氮肥运筹对钵苗机插优质食味水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42:1666-1676.
Hu Q, Xia M, Zhang H C, Cao L Q, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Chen H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Lin C M, Han B F . Effect of nitrogen application regime on yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization of mechanical pot-seedling transplanting rice with good taste quality. Acta Agron Sin, 2016,42:1666-1676 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 严田蓉, 李旭毅, 李娜, 蒋明金, 杨志远, 何艳, 王春雨, 王海月, 马均 . 氮肥运筹与栽植方式对杂交籼稻籽粒灌浆及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017,25:1485-1494.
Yan T R, Li X Y, Li N, Jiang M J, Yang Z Y, He Y, Wang C Y, Wang H Y, Ma J . Effect of nitrogen management and cultivation method on grain-filling characteristics and grain yield of indica hybrid rice. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017,25:1485-1494 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 李贵勇, 何清兰, 朱建宇, 王秋英, 叶进华, 夏琼梅, 龙瑞平, 朱海平, 邓安凤, 杨从党 . 不同叶龄期穗肥对籼稻产量及氮肥利用效率的影响. 中国稻米, 2017,23(4):147-150.
Li G Y, He Q L, Zhu J Y, Wang Q Y, Ye J H, Xia Q M, Long R P, Zhu H P, Deng A F, Yang C D . Effects of panicle fertilizers of different leaf ages on japonica rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Chin Rice, 2017,23(4):147-150 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Fan M S, Lu S H, Jiang R F, Liu X J, Zhang F S . Triangular transplanting pattern and split nitrogen fertilizer application increase rice yield and nitrogen fertilizer recovery. Agron J, 2009,101:1421-1425.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0009
[26] 丁艳锋, 赵长华, 王强盛 . 穗肥施用时期对水稻氮素利用及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2003,26(4):5-8.
Ding Y F, Zhao C H, Wang Q S . Effect of application stage of panicle fertilizer on rice grain yield and the utilization of nitrogen. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2003,26(4):5-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 霍中洋 . 长江中游地区双季早稻超高产形成特征及精确定量栽培关键技术研究. 扬州大学博士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2010.
Huo Z Y . Study on Super-high Yield Formational Characteristics of Early Rice in the Double-cropping System in the Model Researches of the Yangtze River and Its Key Techniques of Precise and Quantitation Cultivation. PhD Dissertation of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Williams J F, Mutters R G, Greer C A, Horwath W R. Rice Nutrient Management in California. Richmond, California: Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California Press, 2010.
[29] Wang H Y, Hu R F, Chen X X, Zhong X H, Zheng Z T, Huang N R, Xue C L . Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use results in increased rice yields and improved environmental protection. Int J Agric Sustain, 2017,15:681-692.
doi: 10.1080/14735903.2017.1398627
[30] 黄大山, 陈忠平, 程飞虎, 周培建, 林志南, 吴放斌 . 不同时期施用分蘖肥对水稻产量及其结构的影响. 江西农业学报, 2014,26(5):29-32.
Huang D S, Chen Z P, Cheng F H, Zhou P J, Lin Z N, Wu F B . Effects of applying tillering fertilizer at different times on yield and yield components of rice. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2014,26(5):29-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 史鸿儒, 张文忠, 解文孝, 杨庆, 张振宇, 韩亚东, 徐正进, 陈温福 . 不同氮肥施用模式下北方粳型超级稻物质生产特性分析. 作物学报, 2008,34:1985-1993.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01985
Shi H R, Zhang W Z, Xie W X, Yang Q, Zhang Z Y, Han Q D, Xu Z J, Chen W F . Analysis of matter production characteristics under different nitrogen application patterns of japonica super rice in North China. Acta Agron Sin, 2008,34:1985-1993 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01985
[32] 杨海生, 张洪程, 杨连群, 张士永, 戴其根, 霍中洋 . 依叶龄运筹氮肥对优质水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2002,7(3):19-26.
Yang H S, Zhang H C, Yang L Q, Zhang S Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y . Effects of nitrogen operations according to leaf-age on yield and quality in good-quality rice. J Chin Agric Univ, 2002,7(3):19-26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 林忠成, 李土明, 吴福观, 张洪程, 戴其根, 叶世超, 郭宏文 . 基蘖肥与穗肥氮比例对双季稻产量和碳氮比的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17:269-275.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0058
Lin Z C, Li T M, Wu F G, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Ye S C, Guo H W . Effects of nitrogen application on yield and C/N of double-cropping rice. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2011,17:269-275 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0058
[34] 许轲, 张军, 张洪程, 花劲, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 高辉, 周培建, 程飞虎, 黄大山, 陈忠平, 陈国梁 . 双季晚粳稻氮肥精确运筹研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20:1063-1075.
Xu K, Zhang J, Zhang H C, Hua J, Guo B W, Huo Z Y, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Gao H, Zhou P J, Cheng F H, Huang D S, Chen Z P, Chen G L . Nitrogen managements of late japonica rice in double-cropping rice area. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2014,20:1063-1075 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] Wang G H, Dobermann A, Witt C, Sun Q Z, Fu R X . Performance of site-specific nutrient management for irrigated rice in Southeast China. Agron J, 2001,93:869-878.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2001.934869x
[36] 刘立军, 徐伟, 桑大志, 刘翠莲, 周家麟, 杨建昌 . 实地氮肥管理提高水稻氮肥利用效率. 作物学报, 2006,32:987-994.
Liu L J, Xu W, Sang D Z, Liu C L, Zhou J L, Yang J C . Site-specific nitrogen management increases fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2006,32:987-994 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2