欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 1958-1969.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.03026

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

旱地立式深旋耕方式下有机肥替代对饲用玉米耗水特性和产量的影响

方彦杰(), 张绪成*(), 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 王红丽, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁   

  1. 甘肃省农业科学院旱地农业研究所 / 甘肃省旱作区水资源高效利用重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-09 接受日期:2020-08-19 出版日期:2020-08-28 网络出版日期:2020-08-28
  • 通讯作者: 张绪成
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省重点研发计划项目(18YF1WA092);甘肃省农业科学院农业科技创新专项计划(2019GAAS10);国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD22B04)

Effects of substitution of organic fertilizer on water consumption and yields under vertical rotary subsoiling on arid area in forage maize

Yan-Jie FANG(), Xu-Cheng ZHANG*(), Xian-Feng YU, Hui-Zhi HOU, Hong-Li WANG, Yi-Fan MA, Guo-Ping ZHANG, Kang-Ning LEI   

  1. Institute of Dry-Land Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of High-Water Utilization on Dryland of Lanzhou, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2020-05-09 Accepted:2020-08-19 Published:2020-08-28 Published online:2020-08-28
  • Contact: Xu-Cheng ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Gansu Province(18YF1WA092);Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of GAAS(2019GAAS10);National Science and Technology Research Projects of China(2015BAD22B04)

摘要:

研究黄土高原半干旱区立式深旋耕方式下饲用玉米合理有效的施肥模式, 为提高产量和资源利用效率提供科学依据。2017—2019年在黄土高原半干旱区设单施化肥(all of fertilizer, F)、有机肥替代50%化肥(50% of fertilizer + 50% of organic fertilizer, FOF)、全部有机肥(all of organic fertilizer, OF) 3种施肥模式, 研究不同施肥模式对饲用玉米耗水特性、产量和水分利用效率的影响。结果表明, 农田0~300 cm各土层土壤贮水消耗与生育期耗水、降水量及降水分布密切相关。在干旱年份, FOF和OF较F增加了花期0~300 cm土层土壤贮水量11.9%和11.7%, 显著消耗了花前0~60 cm土层土壤贮水量, 0~300 cm土层土壤总耗水量FOF较OF和F增加1.4%和10.3%, 花前耗水量较F降低13.0%、较OF增加0.3%, 花后耗水量分别增加20.7%和23.9%。丰水年2018年FOF和OF较F提高花前耗水量13.5%和31.6%, 降低花后耗水量21.9%和36.1%, 2019年FOF较F和OF增加花前耗水量9.7%和11.9%, 较F降低花后耗水量8.1%, 且不同施肥模式对0~300 cm土层土壤贮水量消耗均有影响。0~300 cm土层土壤耗水量在干旱年份FOF高于F, 但无显著性差异, 在两丰水年均低于F。FOF较F和OF增加成熟期干物质量4.1%~10.4%、2.7%~11.5%, 增加籽粒产量3.8%~9.4%、10.1%~12.0%, 增加生物量5.6%~8.9%、3.1%~15.5%, 提高籽粒水分利用效率7.9%~11.1%、1.5%~14.6%。可见, 有机肥替代50%化肥模式能够优化土壤的水分特性, 增加土壤耗水有效性, 提高产量和WUE, 是黄土高原半干旱农业区饲用玉米增产增效的有效肥料管理模式。

关键词: 立式深旋耕, 有机肥替代, 产量, 水分利用效率, 饲用玉米

Abstract:

To elucidate soil water consumption characteristics and provide scientific basis for forage maize, a reasonable fertilization model under vertical rotatory subsoiling was studied on semi-arid lands of Loess Plateau. Three patterns including traditional fertilization (F), 50% replacement of chemical fertilizers using organic fertilizers (FOF), and complete organic fertilization (OF) were designed in 2017 and 2019 in order to investigate their effects on crop evapotranspiartion (ETc), grain yields, and water use efficiency (WUE). The results showed that there was a significant relationship among soil water storage (SWS), ETc, precipitation, and distribution in 0-300 cm layers. During the dry year, compared to F, FOF and OF increased SWS in 0-300 cm at anthesis stage by 11.9% and 11.7%, respectively, significantly consuming SWS in 0-60 cm layers. ETc in 0-300 cm treated with FOF was increased by 1.4% and 10.3%, compared to OF and F, whereas ETc before anthesis was decreased by 13.0% compared to F, but increased by 0.3% compared to OF, while ETc after anthesis was increased by 20.7% and 23.9%. During the wet year of 2018, compared to F, FOF and OF increased ETc before anthesis by 13.5% and 31.6%, while decreased it by 21.9% and 36.1%. During 2019, FOF increased ETc before anthesis by 9.7% and 11.9%, compared to F and OF, while it decreased ETc after anthesis by 8.1% compared to F. Furthermore, each fertilization pattern had significant effects on SWS at each layer across 0-300 soil profile. Regardless of different precipitation years, ETc from 0-300 cm layers of FOF was higher than that of F, but the difference was not significant, and was lower than that of F during the wet years of 2018 and 2019, and it had no significant differences to OF. Compared to F and OF, FOF increased dry matter weight at harvest by 4.1%-10.4% and 2.7%-11.5%, improved grain yields by 3.8%-9.4% and 10.1%-12.0%, increased population biomass yields by 5.6%-8.9% and 3.1%-15.5%, and consequently improved WUE based grain yields by 7.9%-11.1% and 1.5%-14.6%, respectively. In conclusion, 50% substitute of chemical fertilizers by organic ones could optimize soil water characteristics, increase crop effective water consumption, boosts yields and WUE, and it can be an efficient fertilizer management model for the high-yield and high-efficiency of forage maize productions in semi-arid areas of Loess Plateau.

Key words: vertically rotary sub-soiling, substitution of organic fertilizer, yield, water use efficiency, forage maize

图1

2017-2019年饲用玉米生育期降雨和气温变化"

图2

不同生育时期0~300 cm土壤贮水量 每个生育期数据上方的误差线代表LSD0.05; F: 单施化肥; FOF: 50%化肥+50%有机肥; OF: 全部有机肥。同一年度中, 同列的数据后不同字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图3

花前和花后0~300 cm各土层土壤剖面耗散量 处理同图2。每个生育期数据点上的的误差线代表LSD0.05。"

图4

花前和花后0~300 cm土层土壤耗水量 处理同图2。每个生育期数据上方的误差线代表LSD0.05。同一年度中, 同列的数据后不同字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表1

花前和花后的耗水模系数及耗水强度"

时期
Stage
处理
Treatment
2017 2018 2019
耗水模系数WCP
(%)
耗水强度
DWC
(d mm-1)
耗水模系数WCP
(%)
耗水强度
DWC
(d mm-1)
耗水模系数WCP
(%)
耗水强度DWC
(d mm-1)
花前Pre-flowering F 60.0 a 2.2 a 38.7 c 1.6 c 37.4 b 1.7 b
FOF 52.4 b 2.0 b 46.2 b 1.8 b 41.4 a 1.8 a
OF 57.6 a 2.0 b 53.1 a 2.1 a 37.3 b 1.6 b
花后Post-flowering F 40.0 b 1.5 b 61.3 a 3.7 a 62.7 a 3.7 a
FOF 47.6 a 1.8 a 53.8 b 3.0 b 58.6 b 3.4 b
OF 42.4 b 1.5 b 46.9 c 2.7 c 62.6 a 3.6 a

表2

饲用玉米阶段耗水量指标之间的相关性"

相关系数
Correlation
耗水量
ET
花前耗水量
Pre-ET
花后耗水量
Post-ET
花前耗水模系数
Pre-WCP
花后耗水模系数
Post-WCP
花前耗水强度
Pre-DWC
花后耗水强度
Post-DWC
耗水量ET 1.00 -0.49 0.96** -0.90** 0.90** 0.58 0.78**
花前耗水量Pre-ET 1.00 -0.72* 0.81** -0.81** -0.27 -0.55
花后耗水量Post-ET 1.00 -0.99** 0.99** 0.55 0.80**
花前耗水模系数Pre-WCP 1.00 -1.00** -0.47 -0.76*
花后耗水模系数Post-WCP 1.00 0.47 0.76*
花前耗水强度Pre-DWC 1.00 0.88**
花后耗水强度Post-DWC 1.00

表3

饲用玉米单株干物质量积累"

年份
Year
处理
Treatments
苗期
Seeding stage
拔节期
Jointing stage
大喇叭口期
Belling stage
花期
Flowering stage
乳熟期
Grain filling stage
成熟期
Maturity stage
2017 F 16.5 a 80.2 b 116.7 b 167.7 b 300.7 b 413.3 a
FOF 16.0 a 84.7 a 132.0 a 184.7 a 336.8 a 430.0 a
OF 15.2 a 82.5 ab 113.2 b 167.6 b 312.2 b 418.8 a
2018 F 29.1 a 83.4 b 108.4 b 186.7 b 315.6 b 496.7 b
FOF 27.8 a 92.6 a 125.5 a 202.9 a 332.9 a 526.1 a
OF 26.9 a 89.8 a 113.1 b 184.7 b 310.4 b 489.7 b
2019 F 29.2 a 87.2 b 107.7 b 169.7 b 374.8 b 513.5 b
FOF 30.1 a 97.9 a 122.8 a 186.6 a 428.0 a 566.7 a
O 29.1 a 93.0 b 106.2 b 174.4 b 387.8 b 508.1 b

表4

饲用玉米籽粒产量、生物量、耗水量及水分利用效率"

年份
Year
处理
Treatments
籽粒产量
Grain yield
(kg hm-2)
生物量
Biomass yield
(kg hm-2)
耗水量
Water consumption (mm)
籽粒水分利用效率
WUE of grain
(kg hm-2 mm-1)
生物量水分利用效率
WUE of biomass
(kg hm-2 mm-1)
2017 F 4505.8 b 78,637.5 b 341.0 a 13.2 b 230.6 c
FOF 4927.3 a 85,050.0 a 345.6 a 14.3 a 246.1 b
OF 4401.0 b 82,518.8 b 313.4 b 14.0 a 263.3 a
2018 F 10,632.6 a 150,076.6 b 412.0 a 25.8 b 364.3 b
FOF 11,038.2 a 158,537.9 a 384.9 b 28.7 a 411.9 a
OF 9893.1 b 148,295.3 b 395.4 b 25.0 b 375.0 b
2019 F 10,846.9 b 146,306.3 b 437.3 a 24.8 b 334.6 b
FOF 11,734.3 a 159,367.5 a 432.6 a 27.1 a 368.4 a
OF 10,654.0 b 138,037.5 c 427.1 a 24.9 b 323.2 b

表5

饲用玉米籽粒产量、生物量、耗水量及水分利用效率之间的相关性"

相关系数
Correlation
籽粒产量
Grain yield
生物量
Biomass yield
耗水量
Water consumption
籽粒水分利用效率
WUE of grain
生物量水分利用效率
WUE of biomass
籽粒产量Grain yield 1 0.99** 0.93** 0.99** 0.91**
生物量Biomass yield 1 0.87** 0.99** 0.96**
耗水量Water consumption 1 -0.85** -0.69**
籽粒WUE of grain 1 0.96
生物量WUE of biomass 1
[1] 黄高宝, 郭清毅, 张仁陟, 逄蕾, Li G D, Chan K Y, 于爱忠 . 保护性耕作条件下旱地农田麦-豆双处理轮作体系的水分动态及产量效应. 生态学报, 2006,26:1176-1185.
Huang G B, Guo Q Y, Zhang R Z, Pang L, Li G D, Chan K Y, Yu A Z . Effects of conservation tillage on soil moisture and crop yield in a phased rotation system with spring wheat and field pea in dryland. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006,26:1176-1185 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 梁尧, 蔡红光, 袁静超, 刘剑钊, 闫孝贡, 张洪喜, 任军 . 深松结合不同施肥方式对春玉米根系时空分布特征的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,47(6):1-10.
Liang Y, Cai H G, Yuan J C, Liu J Z, Yan X G, Zhang H X, Ren J . Effect of subsoiling combined with different soil amendment practices on temporal and spatial distribution of spring maize roots. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2019,47(6):1-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 倪印锋, 王明利 . 中国青贮玉米产业发展时空演变及动因. 草业科学, 2019,36:1915-1924.
Ni Y F, Wang M L . Spatiotemporal evolution of China’s silage corn industry and the factors driving its development. Pratac Sci, 2019,36:1915-1924 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 甘肃省统计局. 2019年甘肃发展年鉴: 农作物播种面积. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019 [2020-04-09]. http://tjj.gansu.gov.cn/tjnj/2019/zk/indexch.htm.
Gansu Province Bureau of Statistics. 2019: Crop Planting Area. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019 [2020-04-09]. http://tjj.gansu.gov.cn/tjnj/2019/zk/indexch.htm. (in Chinese).
[5] 廖佳丽 . 水肥管理对旱地马铃薯生长和水分利用效率及土壤肥力的影响. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西杨凌, 2009.
Liao J L . Effect of Water and Fertilizers Managing on Potato Growth and WUE and Soil Fertility in Dry Land. MS Thesis of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 2009 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 王晓娟, 贾志宽, 梁连友, 韩清芳, 杨保平, 丁瑞霞, 崔荣美, 卫婷 . 旱地施有机肥对土壤水分和玉米经济效益影响. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(6):144-149.
Wang X J, Jia Z K, Liang L Y, Han Q F, Yang B P, Ding R X, Cui R M, Wei T . Effects of organic fertilizer application on soil moisture and economic returns of maize in dryland farming. Trans CSAE, 2012,28(6):144-149 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 肖继兵, 孙占祥, 杨久廷, 张玉龙, 郑家明, 刘洋 . 半干旱区中耕深松对土壤水分和作物产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2011,42:709-714.
Xiao J B, Sun Z X, Yang J T, Zhang Y L, Zheng J M, Liu Y . Effect of subsoiling on soil water and crop yield in semi-arid area. Chin J Soil Sci, 2011,42:709-714 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] Ferro N D, Sartori L, Simonetti G, Berti A, Morari F . Soil macro and microstructure as affected by different tillage systems and their effects on maize root growth. Soil Tillage Res, 2014,140:55-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.02.003
[9] 刘恩科, 赵秉强, 胡昌浩, 刘秀英, 张夫道 . 长期不同施肥制度对玉米产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2004,37:711-716.
Liu E K, Zhao B Q, Hu C H, Liu X Y, Zhang F D . Effects of long-term fertilization systems on yield and quality of maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2004,37:711-716 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Qin A Z, Fang Y J, Ning D F, Liu Z D, Zhao B, Xiao J F, Duan A W, Yong B B . Incorporation of manure into ridge and furrow planting system boosts yields of maize by optimizing soil moisture and improving photosynthesis. Agronomy, 2019,9:865-884.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120865
[11] 陈刚, 王璞, 陶洪斌, 张中东 . 有机无机配施对旱地春玉米产量及土壤水分利用的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012,3(6):139-144.
Chen G, Wang P, Tao H B, Zhang Z D . Effects of combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers on the yield and water utilization of spring maize in dryland. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2012,30(6):139-144 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] Wang X B, Dai K, Zhang D C, Cai D X . Dryland maize yields and water use efficiency in response to tillage/crop stubble and nutrient management practices in China. Field Crops Res, 2011,120:47-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.010
[13] 樊廷录 . 提高黄土高原旱地抗逆减灾能力的肥定位试验研究. 水土保持研究, 2003,10(1):6-8.
Fan T L . Fixed fertilization experiment on stress tolerance and reducing disasters in dryland of loess plateau. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2003,10(1):6-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 韦本辉, 刘斌, 甘秀芹, 申章佑, 胡泊, 李艳英, 吴延勇, 陆柳英 . 粉垄栽培对水稻产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45:3946-3954.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.19.005
Wei B H, Liu B, Gan X Q, Shen Z Y, Hu P, Liu Y Y, Wu Y Y, Lu L Y . Effect of Fenlong cultivation on yield and quality of rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2012,45:3946-3954 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 韦本辉, 甘秀芹, 申章佑, 宁秀呈, 陆柳英, 韦广泼, 李艳英, 胡泊, 刘斌, 吴延勇 . 粉垄栽培甘蔗试验增产效果. 中国农业科学, 2011,44:4544-4550.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.024
Wei B H, Gan X Q, Shen Z Y, Ning X C, Lu L Y, Wei G P, Li Y Y, Hu B, Liu B, Wu Y Y . Yield increase of smash-ridging cultivation of sugarcane. Sci Agric Sin, 2011,44:4544-4550 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 方彦杰, 张绪成, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 王红丽, 马一凡 . 旱地饲草玉米立式深旋耕作技术规程. 甘肃农业科技, 2019, ( 2):71-73.
Fang Y J, Zhang X C, Yu X F, Hou H Z, Wang H L, Ma Y F . Technical specification for vertical deep rotation tillage of forage corn in dry land. Gansu Agric Sci Technol, 2019, ( 2):71-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Zhai L C, Xu P, Zhang Z B, Li S K, Xie R Z, Zhai L F, Wei B H . Effects of deep vertical rotary tillage on dry matter accumulation and grain yield of summer maize in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Soil Tillage Res, 2017,170:167-174.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.03.013
[18] 张绪成, 马一凡, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 王红丽, 方彦杰 . 立式深旋耕对西北半干旱区土壤水分性状及马铃薯产量的影响. 草业学报, 2018,27(12):156-165.
Zhang X C, Ma Y F, Yu X F, Hou H Z, Wang H L, Fang Y J . Effects of vertical rotary sub-soiling on soil water characteristics and potato tuber yield in a semi-arid area of northwest china. Acta Pratac Sin, 2018,27(12):156-165 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 张莉, 翟振, 逄博, 李玉义, 王婧, 逄焕成, 韦本辉, 王庆伟, 綦少伟 . 深旋松耕改善耕层结构促进马铃薯增产. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017, ( 4):17-23.
Zhang L, Zhai Z, Pang B, Li Y Y, Wang J, Pang H C, Wei B H, Wang Q W, Qin S W . Deep vertically rotary tillage improves soil structure and tuber yield of potato. Soil Fert Sci China, 2017, ( 4):17-23 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 李轶冰, 逄焕成, 杨雪, 李玉义, 李华, 任天志, 董国豪, 郭良海 . 粉垄耕作对黄淮海北部土壤水分及其利用效率的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33: 7478-7486.
Li Y B, Pang H C, Yang X, Li Y Y, Li H, Ren T Z, Dong G H, Guo L H . Effects of deep vertically rotary tillage on soil water and water use efficiency in northern China’s Huang-Huai-Hai region. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013,33:7478-7486 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 张绪成, 马一凡, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 王红丽, 方彦杰 . 西北半干旱区深旋松耕作对马铃薯水分利用和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018,29:3293-3301.
Zhang X C, Ma Y F, Yu X F, Hou H Z, Wang H L, Fang Y J . Effects of vertically rotary sub-soiling tillage on water utilization and yield of potato in semiarid area of northwest China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018,29:3293-3301 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 于显枫, 张绪成, 王红丽, 马一凡, 侯慧芝, 方彦杰 . 施肥对旱地全膜覆盖垄沟种植马铃薯耗水特征及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27:883-890.
Yu X F, Zhang X C, Wang H L, Ma Y F, Hou H Z, Fang Y J . Effects of fertilizer application on water consumption characteristics and yield of potato cultured under ridge furrow and whole filed plastic mulching in rainfed area. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016,27:883-890 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 崔红艳, 胡发龙, 许维成, 牛俊义, 方子森 . 施用有机肥对土壤水分、胡麻干物质生产和产量影响的研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014, ( 5):59-64.
Cui H Y, Hu F L, Xu W C, Niu J Y, Fang Z S . Effects of different organic manures on soil moisture, dry matter production and yield of oil flax. Soil Fert Sci China, 2014, ( 5):59-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 曹志平, 胡诚, 叶钟年 . 不同土壤培肥措施对华北高产农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响. 生态学报, 2006,26:1486-1493.
Cao Z P, Hu C, Ye Z N . Impact of soil fertility maintaining practice on microbial biomass carbon in high production agro-ecosystem in northern China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006,26:1486-1493 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 许晶晶, 郝明德, 赵云英 . 黄土高原旱地小麦氮磷钾与有机肥优化配施试验. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009,27(3):143-147.
Xu J J, Hao M D, Zhao Y Y . Analysis of the content of macro-elements in root system between maize genotypes with different tolerance to drought. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2009,27(3):143-147 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 王红丽, 张绪成, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 方彦杰, 马一凡 . 半干旱区氮肥运筹对全膜双垄沟播玉米水肥利用和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020,31:449-458.
Wang H L, Zhang X C, Yu X F, Hou H Z Fang Y J Ma Ma Y F . Effects of optimal nitrogen fertilizer management on water and fertilizer utilization efficiency and yield under double-ridge-furrow sowing with the whole plastic film mulching in maize in a semi-arid area. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020,31:449-458 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 郑凤霞, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌 . 长期有机无机肥配施对冬小麦籽粒产量及氨挥发损失的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23:567-577.
Zheng F X, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhang J W, Zhao B . Effects of combined application of manure and chemical fertilizers on ammonia volatilization loss and yield of winter wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2017,23:567-577 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 张建军, 樊廷录, 党翼, 赵刚, 王磊, 李尚中, 王淑英, 王勇 . 黄土旱塬耕作方式和施肥对冬小麦产量和水分利用特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:1016-1030.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.06.004
Zhang J J, Fan T L, Dang Y, Zhao G, Wang L, Li S Z, Wang S Y, Wang Y . Effects of long-term tillage and fertilization on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in loess dry land plateau. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:1016-1030 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 于昕阳, 翟丙年, 金忠宇, 李永刚, 王颖, 张昊青, 王朝辉 . 有机无机肥配施对旱地冬小麦产量、水肥利用效率及土壤肥力的影响. 水土保持学报, 2015,29:320-324.
Yu X Y, Zhai B N, Jin Z Y, Li Y G, Wang Y, Zhang H Q, Wang Z H . Effect of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on winter wheat yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency and soil fertility in dryland. J Soil Water Conserv, 2015,29:320-324 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!