Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (05): 730-740.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00730

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer Types and Their Application Regime on Yield in Rice with Different Types of Panicle

WEI Hai-Yan,LI Hong-Liang,CHENG Jin-Qiu,ZHANG Hong-Cheng*,DAI Qi-Gen,HUO Zhong-Yang,XU Ke,GUO Bao-Wei,HU Ya-Jie,CUI Pei-Yuan   

  1. Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture /Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology / Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2016-11-10 Revised:2017-01-21 Online:2017-05-12 Published:2017-02-17
  • Contact: Zhang Hongcheng, E-mail: hczhang@yzu.edu.cn E-mail:wei_haiyan@163.com
  • Supported by:

    This work was financed by the National Key Research and Development Programs (2016YFD0300503), the Key Research and Development Programs of Jiangsu Province (BE2016344), the Agricultural Technology Independent Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province (CX[12]1003-9), the China Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303102), and the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Yangzhou University(2016CXJ056).

Abstract:

Rice cultivars of Yongyou 2640 with big panicle and Nanjing 9108 with more panicles were adopted in this study. Three types of slow/controlled release fertilizer (polymer-coated urea, sulfur-coated urea, and urea formaldehyde) and two fertilization methods (both slow/controlled release fertilizer and conventional urea as basal fertilizer, slow/controlled release fertilizer as basal fertilizer with conventional urea as tillering fertilizer) were applied in field with conventional urea split fertilization as control (CK). The application of slow/controlled release fertilizer could not increase the yield of Yongyou 2640 that has big panicles and a large amount of spikelets. Compared with CK, most nitrogen of slow/controlled release fertilizers were released at early and middle stage of rice resulting in rapid decrease of LAI, fewer nitrogen accumulation and LAD, insufficient dry matter production and poor grain filling at middle and late stage. For Nanjing 9108, compared with CK, the yield in treatment with urea formaldehyde as basal fertilizer and conventional urea as tillering fertilizer was increased by 5.2% to 5.9%. And rice yield in treatment with polymer-coated urea as basal fertilizer and conventional urea as tillering fertilizer or treatment with both urea formaldehyde and conventional urea as basal fertilizer was similar to that of CK, while the fertilizer application frequency was decreased by 2 to 3 times. Rice yields in treatments with slow/controlled release fertilizer as basal fertilizer and conventional urea as tillering fertilizer were higher than those in treatments with both slow/controlled release fertilizer and conventional urea as basal fertilizer. Compared with the application of both slow/controlled release fertilizer and conventional urea as basal fertilizer, the application of slow/controlled release fertilizer as basal fertilizer and conventional urea as tillering fertilizer could increase the number of rice tillers effectively with a large number of panicles and a higher percentage of productive tillers. Meanwhile, the leaf area index and leaf area duration in treatment with both slow/controlled release fertilizer and conventional urea as basal fertilizer were large, which could enhance the accumulation of dry matter and nitrogen in rice. Rice yield by using different types of slow/controlled release fertilizer showed a tendency of urea formaldehyde > polymer-coated urea > sulfur-coated urea. In Nanjing 9108, the reason of high yield by using urea formaldehyde was that, nitrogen of urea formaldehyde could be steadily released at the late stage also, therefore, the application of urea formaldehyde as basal fertilizer and conventional urea as tillering fertilizer could not only promote tillering but also maintain a high level of productive tiller and leaf area index after peak seedling stage. And the highest leaf area duration, dry matter accumulation after elongating and the final nitrogen use efficiency were beneficial to obtain high yield. In conclusion, for rice cultivars with different types of panicle and various characteristics of yield, the application of optimal type of slow/controlled release fertilizer as basal fertilizer and conventional urea as tillering fertilizer can achieve labor saving and yield increasing simultaneously in rice production.

Key words: Type of slow/controlled release fertilizer, Application regime of fertilizer, Rice with different types of panicle, Yield

[1] 凌启鸿. 水稻精确定量栽培理论与技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007. pp 92–99 Ling Q H. Theory and Technology of Precise and Quantitative Cultivation in Rice. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. pp 92–99 [2] 樊小林, 廖宗文. 控释肥料与平衡施肥和提高肥料利用率. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4: 219–223 Fan X L, Liao Z W. Increasing fertilizer use efficiency by means of controlled release fertilizer (CRF) production according to theory and techniques of balanced fertilization. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 1998, 4: 219–223 (in Chinese with English abstract) [3] 陈剑秋. 几种新型缓控释肥工艺及养分释放特征研究. 山东农业大学博士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2012 Chen J Q. Study on Technology and Nutrient Release Characteristics of New Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizers. PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract) [4] 杜建军, 廖宗文, 王新爱, 毛小云, 崔英德. 高吸水性树脂包膜尿素的结构特征及养分控/缓释性能. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40: 1447–1455 Du J J, Liao Z W, Wang X AI, Mao X Y, Cui Y D. Structure and nutrient controlled/slow release characteristics of super absorbent polymer coated urea. Sci Agric Sin, 40: 1447–1455 (in Chinese with English abstract) [5] 黄旭, 唐拴虎, 徐培智, 黄巧义, 卢钰升, 蒋瑞萍, 李苹, 付弘婷. 不同种类缓/控释肥料对水稻产量及养分利用率的影响. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(8): 95–96 Huang X, Tang S H, Xu P Z, Huang Q Y, Lu Y S, Jiang R P, Li P, Fu H T. Effect of different kinds of slow/controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and nutrient utilization. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2010, 37(8): 95–96 (in Chinese) [6] 王晓巍, 蒯佳林, 刘晓静, 叶芳, 张进霞. 4种缓控释氮肥在不同环境条件下的养分释放特性的研究. 草地学报, 2013, 21: 332–337 Wang X W, Kuai J L, Liu X J, Ye F, Zhang J X. Nutrient release characteristics of four slow and controlled release nitrogen fertilizer in different environmental conditions. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2013, 21: 332–337 (in Chinese with English abstract) [7] 徐明岗, 孙小凤, 邹长明, 秦道珠, 八木一行, 宝川靖和. 稻田控释氮肥的施用效果与合理施用技术. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11: 487–493 Xu M G, Sun X F, Zou C M, Qin D Z, Yagi K, Hosen Y. Effects and rational application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in paddy field of southern China. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2005, 11: 487–493 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8] Ji X H, Zheng S X, Lu Y H, Liao Y L. Study of dynamics of floodwater nitrogen and regulation of its runoff loss in paddy field-based two-cropping rice with urea and controlled release nitrogen fertilizer application. Agric Sci China, 2007, 6: 189–199 [9] 聂军, 肖剑, 戴平安, 郑圣先. 控释氮肥对水稻氮代谢关键酶活性及糙米蛋白质含量的影响. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2003, 29: 318–321 Nie J, Xiao J, Dai P AN, Zheng S X. Effect of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on key enzymes activities of nitrogen metabolism and protein contents in brown rice. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci), 2003, 29: 318–321 (in Chinese with English abstract) [10] Yang Y C, Zhang M, LI YC, Fan X H, Geng Y Q. Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency, activities of leaf enzymes, and rice yield. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2012, 76: 2307–2317 [11] Tang S H, Yang S H, Chen J S, Xu P Z, Zhang F B, Ai S Y, Huang X. Studies on the mechanism of single basal application of controlled-release fertilizers for increasing yield of rice (Oryza saiiva L.). Agric Sci China, 2007, 6: 586–596 [12] 李玥, 李应洪, 赵建红, 孙永健, 徐徽, 严奉君, 谢华英, 马均. 缓控释氮肥对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41: 673–684 Li Y, Li Y H, Zhao J H, Sun Y J, Xu W, Yan F J, Xie H Y, Ma J. Effects of slow-and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield of machine-transplanted rice. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci), 2015, 41: 673–684 (in Chinese with English abstract) [13] Ji Y, Liu G, Ma J, Zhang G, Xu H, Yagi K. Effect of controlled-release fertilizer on mitigation of N2O emission from paddy field in South China: a multi-year field observation. Plant Soil, 2013, 371: 473–486 [14] Wang B, Li Y E, Wan Y F, Qin X B, Gao Q Z, Liu S, Li J L. Modifying nitrogen fertilizer practices can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from a Chinese double rice cropping system. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2016, 215: 100–109 [15] Yang J, Gang L, Jing M, Zhang G B, Hua X. Effects of urea and controlled release urea fertilizers on methane emission from paddy fields: a multi-year field study. Pedosphere, 2014, 24: 662–673 [16] 邢晓鸣, 李小春, 丁艳锋, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 唐设, 丁承强, 李刚华, 魏广彬. 缓控释肥组配对机插常规粳稻群体物质生产和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48: 4892–4902 Xing X M, Li, X C, Ding Y F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Tang S, Ding C Q, Li G H, Wei G B. Effects of types of controlled released nitrogen and fertilization modes on yield and dry mass production. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48: 4892–4902 (in Chinese with English abstract) [17] 许仙菊, 马洪波, 宁运旺, 汪吉东, 张永春. 缓释氮肥运筹对稻麦轮作周年作物产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22: 307–316 Xu X J, Ma H B, Ning Y W, Wang J D, Zhang Y C. Effects of slow-released nitrogen fertilizers with different application patterns on crop yields and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in rice-wheat rotation system. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2016, 22: 307–316 (in Chinese with English abstract) [18] Grant C A, Wu R, Selles F, Harker K N, Clayton G W, Bittman S, Zebarth B J, Lupwayi N Z. Crop yield and nitrogen concentration with controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared to non-coated urea applied at seeding. Field Crops Res, 2012, 127: 170–180 [19] 樊小林, 刘芳, 廖照源, 郑祥洲, 喻建刚. 我国控释肥料研究的现状和展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15: 463–473 Fan X L, Liu F, Liao Z Y, Zheng X Z, Yu J G. The status and outlook for the study of controlled-release fertilizers in China. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2009, 15: 463–473 (in Chinese with English abstract) [20] 高志博, 王晓宇. 缓释肥料脲甲醛的研究进展, 高师理科学刊, 2016, 36(4): 38–41 Gao Z B, Wang X Y. The research progress on the slow release fertilizers of urea formaldehyde. J Sci Teach Coll Univ, 2016, 36(4): 38–41 (in Chinese with English abstract) [21] 彭玉, 马均, 蒋明金, 严奉君, 孙永健, 杨志远. 缓/控释肥对杂交水稻根系形态、生理特性和产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 1048–1057 Peng Y, Ma J, Jiang M J, Yang F J, Sun Y J, Yang Z Y. Effects of slow/controlled release fertilizers on root morphological and physiological characteristics of rice. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2013, 19: 1048–1057 (in Chinese with English abstract) [22] 胡春花, 罗革彬, 曾建华, 潘孝忠. 不同类型缓释氮肥对水稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(15): 174–177 Hu C H, Luo G B, Ceng J H, Pan X Z. Influence of different types of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(15): 74–177 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23] 李敏, 郭熙盛, 叶舒娅, 刘枫, 袁嫚嫚, 黄义德. 硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对水稻产量, 光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 808–815 Li M, Guo X S, Ye S Y, Liu F, Yuan M M, Huang Y D. Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2013, 19: 808–815 (in Chinese with English abstract) [24] 彭玉, 孙永健, 蒋明金, 徐徽, 秦俭, 杨志远, 马均. 不同水分条件下缓/控释氮肥对水稻干物质量和氮素吸收、运转及分配的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 859–870 Peng Y, Sun Y J, Jiang M J, Xu, H, Qin J, Yang Z Y, Ma J. Effects of water management and slow/controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on biomass and nitrogen accumulation, translocation, and distribution in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 859?870 (in Chinese with English abstract) [25] 符建荣. 控释氮肥对水稻的增产效应及提高肥料利用率的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7: 145–152 Fu J R. Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and N recovery. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2001, 7: 145–152 (in Chinese with English abstract) [26] 田吉林, 诸海焘, 廖宗文, 杜建军. 包膜尿素的养分释放特征及其肥效. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(6): 128–132 Tian J L, Zhu H T, Liao Z W, Du J J. Nutrient release characteristic of coated urea and its efficiency on rice. J Soil Water Conserv, 2006, 20(6): 128–132 (in Chinese with English abstract) [27] Geng J B, Sun Y B, Zhang M, Li C L, Yang Y C, Liu Z G, Li S L. Long-term effects of controlled release urea application on crop yields and soil fertility under rice-oilseed rape rotation system. Field Crops Res, 2015, 184: 65–73 [28] 张小翠, 戴其根, 胡星星, 朱德建, 丁秀文, 马克强, 张洪程, 朱聪聪. 不同质地土壤下缓释尿素与常规尿素配施对水稻产量及其生长发育的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1494–503 Zhang X C, Dai Q G, Hu X X, Zhu D J, Ding X W, Ma K Q, Zhang H C, Zhu C C. Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on rice output and growth in soils of different textures. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1494?1503 (in Chinese with English abstract) [29] 王永军, 孙其专, 杨今胜, 王空军, 董树亭, 袁翠平, 王立春. 不同地力水平下控释尿素对玉米物质生产及光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 2233?2240 Wang Y J, Sun Q Z, Yang J S, Wang K J, Dong S T, Yuan C P, Wang L C. Effects of controlled-release urea on yield and photosynthesis characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) under different soil fertility conditions. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 2233?2240 (in Chinese with English abstract) [30] Tao Y Y, Qu H, Li Q J, Gu X H, Zhang Y N, Liu M J, Guo L, Liu J, Wei J J, Wei G J, Shen K R, Dittert K, Lin S. Potential to improve N uptake and grain yield in water saving Ground Cover Rice Production System. Field Crops Res, 2014, 168: 101–108 [31] Ye Y S, Liang X Q, Chen Y X, Liu J, Gu J T, Guo R, Li L. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice. Effects on dry matter accumulation, yield, water and nitrogen use. Field Crops Res, 2013, 144: 212–224 [32] 姜元华, 张洪程, 韦还和, 赵可, 许俊伟, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 亚种间杂交稻不同冠层叶形组合产量差异及其形成机理. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 2313–2325 Jiang Y H, Zhang H C, Wei H H, Zhao K, Xu J J, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Difference of yield and its formation mechanism of indica-japanica inter-subspecific hybrid rice with different canopy leaf types. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 2313–2325 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] CHEN Yun, LI Si-Yu, ZHU An, LIU Kun, ZHANG Ya-Jun, ZHANG Hao, GU Jun-Fei, ZHANG Wei-Yang, LIU Li-Jun, YANG Jian-Chang. Effects of seeding rates and panicle nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and quality in good taste rice cultivars under direct sowing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] DING Hong, XU Yang, ZHANG Guan-Chu, QIN Fei-Fei, DAI Liang-Xiang, ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Effects of drought at different growth stages and nitrogen application on nitrogen absorption and utilization in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!