氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.92010

Abstract

Abstract:

The experiment was conducted by using four high quality late rice varieties, including Taiyou 398, Huanghuazhan, Tianyouhuazhan, and Meixiangxinzhan under four nitrogen treatments of 0, 135, 180, and 255 kg hm ^-2 to select the optimum nitrogen application rate for the coordination of high quality and high yield. The appropriate increase of nitrogen application improved the yield of high quality rice, which reached maximum under the nitrogen treatment of 180 kg hm ^-2. When the nitrogen application was 180 kg hm ^-2, the indicators such as the brown rice rate, milled rice rate and head milled rice rate for all varieties reached maximum except for the head milled rice rate of Huanghuazhan. As more nitrogen was gradually applied, there were growing length-width ratio, protein content and gel consistency of double-season high-quality late rice while in contrast reduction in chalky grain percentage, chalkiness degree and amylose content, which also brought about a steady drop in peak viscosity, trough viscosity, breakdown, final viscosity while a rise in setback and pasting temperature. To sum up, the appropriate increase of nitrogen application can improve the processing quality, appearance quality, cooking and nutritional quality while deteriorate the RVA characteristics. The nitrogen application of 180 kg hm ^-2 facilitates a better coordination between quality and yield in high quality double-season late rice under mechanical transplanting.

Key words: mechanical transplanting, high quality late rice, nitrogen application, yield, rice quality

TANG Jian,TANG Chuang,GUO Bao-Wei,ZHANG Cheng-Xin,ZHANG Zhen-Zhen,WANG Ke,ZHANG Hong-Cheng,CHEN Heng,SUN Ming-Zhu. Effect of nitrogen application on yield and rice quality of mechanical transplanting high quality late rice[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 117-130.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Yield and composition of high quality late rice under different nitrogen application rates"

品种 Cultivar	处理Treatment	穗数 Panicle (×10⁴hm^-2)	每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	总颖花量 Total number of spikelets (×10⁴hm^-2)	结实率 Seed-setting rate (%)	千粒重 1000-kernel weight (g)	理论产量 Theoretical yield (kg hm^-2)	实际产量 Actual yield (kg hm^-2)
2017
美香新占 Meixiang- xinzhan	N0	295.50 Bb	127.39 Bc	37643.45 Cc	83.43 Aa	20.35 Aa	6391.11 Cc	6218.51 Cc
	N1	347.82 ABa	146.36 ABb	50907.50 Bb	77.79 ABb	20.05 Aab	7939.99 Bb	7497.38 Bb
	N2	354.63 Aa	157.26 Aa	55768.68 Aa	77.74 ABb	19.25 Ab	8345.75 Aa	8204.39 Aa
	N3	357.92 Aa	156.04 Aa	55849.66 Aa	77.15 Bb	19.17 Aab	8186.72 ABa	8096.84 ABa
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	304.88 Cc	117.36 Bb	35780.99 Cc	82.21 Aa	22.57 Aa	6639.09 Bc	6495.88 Bc
	N1	341.09 Bb	129.04 Aa	44014.31 Bb	79.28 ABab	22.41 Aa	7819.87 Ab	7342.58 ABb
	N2	367.41 ABa	131.02 Aa	48137.55 Aa	76.83 ABbc	22.35 Aa	8265.94 Aa	7928.13 Aa
	N3	377.66 Aa	129.25 Aa	48812.10 Aa	75.02 Bc	22.30 Aa	8166.00 Aa	7733.12 Aa
天优华占 Tianyouhua- zhan	N0	269.72 Cc	111.37 Cc	30039.25 Cc	90.81 Aa	23.57 Aa	6456.85 Bc	6203.33 Bc
	N1	285.15 BCb	133.18 Bb	37975.94 Bb	88.43 Aab	23.40 Aa	7858.22 ABb	7565.08 Ab
	N2	292.93 Bb	154.12 Aa	45146.24 Aa	86.38 ABb	23.30 Aa	9086.38 Aa	8608.62 Aa
	N3	315.88 Aa	150.32 Aa	47482.38 Aa	82.14 Bc	23.19 Aa	9005.57 Aa	8517.32 Aa
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	285.21 Bb	105.05 Cc	29961.58 Cc	92.04 Aa	22.11 Aa	6097.19 Bc	5941.71 Bc
	N1	334.41 ABa	112.96 Bb	37775.11 Bb	91.45 ABa	21.87 Aa	7555.06 Ab	6987.72 ABb
	N2	337.41 ABa	121.92 Aa	41137.03 Aa	91.09 ABa	21.75 Aa	8112.63 Aa	7948.39 Aa
	N3	354.47 Aa	119.68 Aa	42423.47 Aa	88.09 Bb	21.68 Aa	8027.25 Aa	7870.37 Aa
2018
美香新占 Meixiang- xinzhan	N0	304.77 Bc	103.30 Bb	31482.50 Bc	86.17 Aa	21.10 Aa	5724.27 Bb	5602.80 Bc
	N1	317.08 ABbc	144.50 Aa	45818.28 Ab	84.16 Aab	20.12 Aab	7750.88 Aa	7326.74 Ab
	N2	326.32 ABb	148.54 Aa	48470.61 Aab	83.79 Ab	19.80 Ab	8041.17 Aa	7757.72 Aa
	N3	354.02 Aa	142.97 Aa	50615.57 Aa	83.37 Ab	19.75 Ab	7912.05 Aa	7634.58 Aab
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	273.98 Bc	97.22 Bc	26637.24 Bc	87.29 Aa	24.25 Aa	5638.66 Cc	5910.65 Bc
	N1	338.63 Aa	113.77 Ab	38526.95 Ab	85.69 Aab	24.20 Aa	7989.63 Bb	7449.88 Ab
	N2	347.87 Aab	121.08 Aa	42120.79 Aa	85.14 Ab	23.90 Aa	8571.00 Aa	8127.14 Aa
	N3	354.02 Ab	117.75 Aab	41686.22 Aab	84.74 Ab	23.85 Aa	8425.41 ABa	7942.43 Aa
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	283.77 Ac	97.00 Cc	27525.47 Cc	85.43 Aa	24.80 Aa	5831.91 Cc	5610.65 Bc
	N1	306.42 Ab	131.32 Bb	40239.12 Bb	83.09 ABab	24.60 Aa	8225.20 Bb	7816.15 Ab
	N2	324.58 Aa	145.83 Aa	47334.81 Aa	80.51 ABbc	24.45 Aa	9280.08 Aa	8831.26 Aa
	N3	335.54 Aa	141.50 ABa	47478.53 Aa	79.36 Bc	24.40 Aa	9156.49 Aa	8646.55 Aa
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	286.53 Ac	96.65 Bb	27693.35 Cc	90.65 Aa	22.80 Aa	5723.56 Bc	5699.08 Cc
	N1	318.18 Ab	119.71 Aa	38089.35 Bb	89.22 Aab	22.75 Aa	7731.50 Ab	7345.75 Bb
	N2	338.32 Aa	123.34 Aa	41728.23 Aa	88.49 Aab	22.65 Aa	8363.81 Aa	8180.86 Aa
	N3	341.40 Aa	120.93 Aa	41284.46 Aa	87.92 Ab	22.60 Aa	8203.12 Aa	7996.15 ABa

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

References 40

[1]	Yu Q G, Ye J, Yang S N, Fu J R, Ma J W, Sun W C, Jiang L N, Wang Q, Wang J M . Effects of nitrogen application level on rice nutrient uptake and ammonia volatilization. Rice Sci, 2013,20:139-147. doi: 10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60117-1
[2]	Xiang L K, Ping Z, Zhong Q S, Jin S B . Physicochemical properties of starches from diverse rice cultivars varying in apparently amylose content and gelatinisation temperature combinations. Food Chem, 2015,172:433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.085 pmid: 25442575
[3]	程方民, 刘正辉, 张嵩午 . 稻米品质形成的气候生态条件评价及我国地域分布规律. 生态学报, 2002,22:636-642.
	Cheng F M, Liu Z H, Zhang S W . The evaluation of climatic-ecology condition for the rice quality formation and its distribution laws in China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002,22:636-642 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	Hayashi S, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J, Kotchasatit A, Jongdee B . Genotypic differences in grain yield of transplanted and direct-seeded rainfed lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in northeastern Thailand. Field Crops Res, 2007,102:9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.01.001
[5]	Lanning S B, Siebenmorgen T J, Counce P A, Ambardekar A A, Mauromoustakos A . Extreme nighttime air temperatures in 2010 impact rice chalkiness and milling quality. Field Crops Res, 2011,124:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.012
[6]	Jun F G, Jing C, Lu C, Zhi Q W, Hao Z, Jian C Y . Grain quality changes and responses to nitrogen fertilizer ofjaponica rice cultivars released in the Yangtze river basin from the 1950s to 2000s. Crop J, 2015,3:285-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.007
[7]	Nowotna A, Gambuś H, Kratsch G . Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the physicochemical properties of starch isolated from German triticale varieties. Starch-Stärke, 2007,59:397-399. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-379X
[8]	Peng S B, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Yang J C, Zou Y B, Zhong X H, Wang G G, Zhang F S . Strategies for overcoming low agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in china. Field Crops Res, 2006,96:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.004
[9]	王秀斌, 徐新朋, 孙刚, 孙静文, 梁国庆, 刘光荣, 周卫 . 氮肥用量对双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19:1279-1286. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0601
	Wang X B, Xu X M, Sun G, Sun J W, Liang G Q, Liu G R, Zhou W . Effects of nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double cropping rice. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2013,19:1279-1286 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0601
[10]	郭保卫, 胡雅杰, 钱海军, 曹伟伟, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕 . 秸秆还田下适宜施氮量提高机插稻南粳9108产量和群体质量. 中国水稻科学, 2015,29:511-518. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.05.008
	Guo B W, Hu Y J, Qian H J, Cao W W, Xing Z P, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y . Optimal nitrogen rate improves grain yield and population quality of mechanical transplanted rice Nanjing 9108 under straw manuring. Chin J Rice Sci, 2015,29:511-518 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.05.008
[11]	徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 何萍, 徐芳森, 余喜初 . 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21:763-772. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0324
	Xu X M, Zhou W, Liang G Q, Sun J W, Wang X B, He P, Xu F S, Yu X C . Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2015,21:763-772 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0324
[12]	李敏, 张洪程, 李国业, 马群, 杨雄, 魏海燕 . 生育类型与施氮水平对粳稻淀粉RVA谱特性的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38:293-300. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00293
	Li M, Zhang H C, Li G Y, Ma Q, Yang X, Wei H Y . Effects of growth-period type and nitrogen application level on the RVA profile characteristics for japonica rice genotypes. Acta Agron Sin, 2012,38:293-300 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00293
[13]	马群, 张洪程, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 霍中洋, 许轲, 殷春渊, 杭杰, 张胜飞, 张庆 . 生育类型与施氮水平对粳稻加工品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35:1282-1289. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01282
	Ma Q, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Yin C Y, Hang J, Zhang S F, Zhang Q . Effects of nitrogen application rate and growth-development type on milling quality in japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:1282-1289 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01282
[14]	朱大伟 . 三种关键栽培措施对软米粳稻产量与品质的影响. 扬州大学博士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2018.
	Zhu D W . Effects of Three Key Cultivation Measures on Yield and Quality of Soft Rice Japonica Rice. PhD Dissertation of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]	金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 赵久明, 金学泳 . 氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001,7:31-35. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0105
	Jin Z X, Qiu T Q, Sun Y L, Zhao J M, Jin X Y . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chalkness ratio and cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2001,7:31-35 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0105
[16]	金军, 徐大勇, 蔡一霞, 胡署云, 葛敏, 朱庆森 . 施氮量对水稻主要米质性状及RVA谱特征参数的影响. 作物学报, 2004,30:154-158.
	Jin J, Xu D Y, Cai Y X, Hu S Y, Ge M, Zhu Q S . Effect of N-fertilizer on main quality characters of rice and RVA profile parameters. Acta Agron Sin, 2004,30:154-158 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17]	郭保卫, 朱大伟, 朱聪聪, 许轲, 周兴涛, 张洪程, 陈厚存, 张军, 陈京都, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 曹利强, 李明银 . 有序摆抛栽对粳型超级稻稻米品质的影响. 作物学报, 2015,41:487-498. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00487
	Guo B W, Zhu D W, Zhu C C, Xu K, Zhou X T, Zhang H C, Chen H C, Zhang J, Chen J D, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Cao L Q, Li M Y . Effect of ordered transplanting and optimized broadcasting on japonica super rice quality. Acta Agron Sin, 2015,41:487-498 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00487
[18]	Zhou W, Lyu T F, Zhang P P . Regular nitrogen application increases nitrogen utilization efficiency and grain yield inindica hybrid rice. Agron J, 2016,108:1951-1961. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.03.0137
[19]	魏海燕, 王亚江, 孟天瑶, 葛梦婕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲 . 机插超级粳稻产量、品质及氮肥利用率对氮肥的响应. 应用生态学报, 2014,25:488-496.
	Wei H Y, Wang Y J, Meng T Y, Ge M J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K . Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014,25:488-496 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20]	成臣, 曾勇军, 王祺, 谭雪明, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华 . 施氮量对晚粳稻甬优1538产量、品质及氮素吸收利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018,32:222-228.
	Cheng C, Zeng Y J, Wang Q, Tan X M, Shang Q H, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H . Effects of nitrogen application rates on japonica rice yield, quality, and nitrogen uptake and utilization during the late-rice cropping seasons in southern China. J Soil & Water Conserv, 2018,32:222-228 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	张建军, 贾哲, 涂强, 张党省, 张效瑕 . 不同施氮量对汉中稻区晚熟稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 西北农业学报, 2014,23(8):60-65.
	Zhang J J, Jia Z, Tu Q, Zhang D S, Zhang X J . Effects of different rates of nitrogen application on the yield and quality of late-maturing rice in Hanzhong. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2014,23(8):60-65 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22]	韩宝吉, 曾祥明, 卓光毅, 徐芳森, 姚忠清, 肖习明, 石磊 . 施用措施对湖北中稻产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44:842-850.
	Han B J, Zeng X M, Zhuo G Y, Xu F S, Yao Z Q, Xiao X M, Shi L . Effects of fertilization measures of nitrogen (N) on grain yield, grain quality and N-use efficiency of midseason rice in Hubei province. Sci Agric Sin, 2011,44:842-850 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23]	王春雨, 余华清, 何艳, 郭长春, 张绍文, 杨志远, 马均 . 播栽方式与施氮量对杂交籼稻氮肥利用特征及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017,25:1792-1801.
	Wang C Y, Yu H Q, He Y, Guo C C, Zhang S W, Yang Z Y, Ma J . Characteristics of nitrogen accumulation and utilization in indica hybrid rice under different planting methods and nitrogen rates. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017,25:1792-1801 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24]	伍丹丹, 谢小兵, 陈佳娜, 邹应斌 . 种植方式对水稻生长发育和产量的影响. 作物研究, 2014,28(1):92-96.
	Wu D D, Xie X B, Chen J N, Zou Y B . Effects of planting methods on rice growth and yield. Crop Res, 2014,28(1):92-96 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25]	汪和廷, 董慧, 齐龙昌, 李学松, 王腾, 宋贺, 陈松, 董召荣, 章秀福 . 种植方式及施氮量对水稻灌浆初期氮代谢关键酶活性和产量性状的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23:1210-1214.
	Wang H Y, Dong H, Qi L C, Li X S, Wang T, Song H, Chen S, Dong Z R, Zhang X F . Effects of cultivation method and nitrogen application rate on key enzyme activities of nitrogen metabolism at early milky stage and grain yield of rice. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2015,23:1210-1214 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26]	Falade K O, Semon M, Fadairo O S, Oladunjoye A O, Orou K K . Functional and physico-chemical properties of flours and starches of African rice cultivars. Food Hydrocolloids, 2014,39:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.11.002
[27]	Wu F F, Chen H Y, Na Y, Wang J P, Duan X, Jin Z Y, Xu X M . Effect of germination time on physicochemical properties of brown rice flour and starch from different rice cultivars. J Cereal Sci, 2013,58:263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.06.008
[28]	万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 林忠成, 戴其根, 许轲, 张军 . 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33:175-182.
	Wan J J, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Lin Z C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Zhang J . Effects of nitrogen application regimes on yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency of super japonica hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:175-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	殷春渊, 王书玉, 刘贺梅, 孙建权, 胡秀明, 薛应征, 王和乐, 范永胜 . 不同密度和施氮量对稻米品质特性的影响. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(9):15-18.
	Yin C Y, Wang S Y, Liu H M, Sun J Q, Hu X M, Xue Y Z, Wang H L, Fan Y S . Effects of different planting density and amount of nitrogen fertilizer on rice quality characteristics. J Henan Agric Sci, 2015,44(9):15-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30]	龚金龙, 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 王艳, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋 . 灌浆结实期温度对水稻产量和品质形成的影响. 生态学杂志, 2013,32:482-491.
	Gong J L, Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Long H Y, Chang Y, Wang Y, Xing Z P, Huo Z Y . Effects of air temperature during rice grain filling period on the formation of rice grain yield and its quality. Chin J Ecol, 2013,32:482-491 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31]	张洪程, 王秀芹, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲 . 施氮量对杂交稻两优培九产量、品质及吸氮特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003,36:800-806.
	Zhang H C, Wang X Q, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K . Effects of N-application rate on yield, quality and characters of nitrogen uptake of hybrid rice variety Liangyoupeijiu. Sci Agric Sin, 2003,36:800-806 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32]	从夕汉, 施伏芝, 阮新民, 罗玉祥, 马廷臣, 罗志祥 . 氮肥水平对不同基因型水稻氮素利用率、产量和品质的影响. 生态学报, 2017,28:1219-1226.
	Cong X H, Shi F Z, Ruan X M, Luo Y X, Ma Z C, Luo Z X . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield and quality of different rice varieties. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017,28:1219-1226 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33]	高辉, 马群, 李国业, 杨雄, 李雪侨, 殷春渊, 李敏, 张庆, 张洪程, 戴其根, 魏海燕 . 氮肥水平对不同生育类型粳稻稻米蒸煮食味品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010,43:4543-4552.
	Gao H, Ma Q, Li G Y, Yang X, Li X Q, Yin C Y, Li M, Zhang Q, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y . Effect of nitrogen application rate on cooking and eating qualities of different growth-development types of japonica rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2010,43:4543-4552 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34]	张自常, 李鸿伟, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 杨建昌 . 施氮量和灌溉方式的交互作用对水稻产量和品质影响. 作物学报, 2013,39:84-92. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00084
	Zhang Z C, Li H W, Cao Z Q, Wang Z Q, Yang J C . Effect of interaction between nitrogen rate and irrigation regime on grain yield and quality of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:84-92 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00084
[35]	成臣, 曾勇军, 吕伟生, 谭雪明, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华 . 南方稻区优质晚粳稻产量和品质调优的播期效应. 核农学报, 2018,32:2019-2030.
	Cheng C, Zeng Y J, Lyu W S, Tan X M, Shang Q Y, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H . Effect of sowing date on rice yield and quality of high-quality japonica rice during the late-rice cropping seasons in southern china. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2018,32:2019-2030 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	叶全宝, 张洪程, 李华, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 夏科, 戴其根, 许轲 . 施氮水平和栽插密度对粳稻淀粉RVA谱特性的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31:124-130.
	Ye Q B, Zhang H C, Li H, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Xia K, Dai Q G, Xu K . Effects of amount of nitrogen applied and planting density on RVA profile characteristic of japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:124-130 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37]	闫影, 张丽霞, 万常照, 曹黎明, 吴书俊 . 稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值及理化指标与食味值的相关性. 植物生理学报, 2016,52:1884-1890.
	Yan Y, Zhang L X, Wan C Z, Cao L M, Wu S J . Correlation analysis between taste value and RVA profile characteristics as well as physical/chemical indicator in rice. Plant Physiol J, 2016,52:1884-1890 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38]	李国生, 张耗, 王志琴, 刘立军, 杨建昌 . 氮素水平对水稻产量与品质的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2007,28(4):66-70.
	Li G S, Zhang H, Wang Z Q, Liu L J, Yang J C . Effects of nitrogen levels on grain yield and quality of rice. J Yangzhou Univ(Agric & Life Sci Edn), 2007,28(4):66-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39]	胡雅杰, 钱海军, 吴培, 朱明, 邢志鹏, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 许轲, 张洪程 . 秸秆还田条件下氮磷钾用量对软米粳稻产量和品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24:817-824.
	Hu Y J, Qian H J, Wu P, Zhu M, Xing Z P, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Xu K, Zhang H C . Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer rates on yield and grain quality of soft japonica rice under straw returning condition. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2018,24:817-824 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40]	Zhu D W, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Xu K, Dai Q G, Wei C X, Wei H Y, Gao H, Hu Y J, Cui P Y, Huo Z Y . Effect of nitrogen management on the structure and physicochemical properties of rice starch. J Agric Food Chem, 2016,64:8019-8025. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03173 pmid: 27715058

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	2017			2018
品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	糙米率 BR	精米率 MR	整精米率 HMR	糙米率 BR	精米率 MR	整精米率 HMR
美香新占 Meixiangxinzhan	N0	78.41 Aa	68.67 Ab	58.94 Ab	77.01 Ab	70.71 Ab	53.58 Bb
	N1	78.67 Aa	69.48 Ab	59.72 Aab	80.98 Aa	73.60 Aa	55.28 ABb
	N2	79.30 Aa	70.74 Aa	62.25 Aa	81.20 Aa	73.88 Aa	58.02 Aa
	N3	78.82 Aa	70.21 Aab	59.51 Aab	81.10 Aa	69.96 Ab	54.87 ABb
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	79.70 Ab	66.56 Ab	53.58 Abc	78.29 Ab	63.58 Ab	50.99 Ab
	N1	80.63 Aab	69.17 Aab	55.16 Aab	79.68 Aab	67.91 Aab	53.97 Aab
	N2	81.98 Aa	70.12 Aa	57.07 Aa	81.74 Aa	70.23 Aa	57.75 Aa
	N3	81.00 Aab	69.90 Aab	52.33 Ac	81.81 Aa	69.68 Aa	52.19 Aab
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	80.10 Ab	70.70 Aa	63.10 Bc	77.93 Ac	68.99 Ab	60.85 Bc
	N1	80.14 Ab	71.22 Aa	65.89 ABb	81.08 Aab	70.25 Aab	64.05 ABb
	N2	82.71 Aa	71.61 Aa	68.72 Aa	82.31 Aa	72.98 Aa	67.78 Aa
	N3	81.51 Aab	71.29 Aa	61.67 Bc	79.72 Abc	71.89 Aa	59.54 Bc
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	81.12 Aa	69.46 Ab	45.15 Bc	79.77 Aa	68.36 Ab	45.56 Cc
	N1	81.24 Aa	70.00 Aab	48.99 ABbc	80.56 Aa	68.97 Ab	48.14 BCb
	N2	82.51 Aa	70.63 Aa	53.11 Aab	80.68 Aa	70.13 Aa	52.32 ABa
	N3	82.01 Aa	69.21 Ab	54.13 Aa	79.44 Aa	68.87 Ab	54.67 Aa

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	2017				2018
品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	粒长 KL (mm)	长宽比 L/W	垩白粒率 CR (%)	垩白度 CD (%)	粒长 KL (mm)	长宽比 L/W	垩白粒率 CR (%)	垩白度 CD (%)
美香新占 Meixiang xinzhan	N0	6.07 Aa	3.12 Aa	13.90 Aa	2.95 Aa	6.05 Aa	3.18 Aa	18.00 Aa	5.17 Aa
	N1	6.12 Aa	3.16 Aa	12.94 ABa	2.63 Aa	6.30 Aa	3.33 Aa	15.04 Bb	3.64 Bb
	N2	6.15 Aa	3.17 Aa	10.98 BCb	2.45 ABb	6.35 Aa	3.35 Aa	13.12 Cc	3.17 Bc
	N3	6.28 Aa	3.23 Aa	9.90 Cb	2.30 Bb	6.42 Aa	3.36 Aa	11.89 Cd	2.59 Cd
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	5.91 Aa	3.00 Aa	18.94 Aa	3.91 Aa	6.23 Aa	3.33 Ab	18.62 Aa	5.59 Aa
	N1	5.99 Aa	3.02 Aa	17.18 Aab	2.91 Bb	6.59 Aa	3.57 Aab	17.41 Aa	4.70 Bb
	N2	6.06 Aa	3.05 Aa	13.90 Bc	2.65 Bb	6.62 Aa	3.59 Aab	15.68 Ab	3.76 Cc
	N3	6.13 Aa	3.09 Aa	10.29 Cd	2.15 Bb	6.69 Aa	3.65 Aa	11.57 Ac	2.55 Dd
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	6.15 Aa	3.27 Ab	21.05 Aa	6.14 Aa	5.73 Bb	3.02 Aa	23.76 Aa	11.58 Aa
	N1	6.19 Aa	3.31 Aab	18.73 ABb	5.41 ABab	5.93 Bb	3.16 Aa	19.77 Bb	9.21 Bb
	N2	6.23 Aa	3.38 Aab	17.25 ABbc	4.95 Bb	6.56 Aa	3.19 Aa	15.75 Cc	6.56 Cc
	N3	6.33 Aa	3.45 Aa	16.21 Bc	4.20 Bb	6.75 Aa	3.24 Aa	15.23 Cc	6.54 Cc
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	6.17 Aa	3.02 Ab	18.35 Aa	7.47 Aa	6.04 Aa	3.04 Aa	18.06 Aa	5.88 Aa
	N1	6.22 Aa	3.06 Aab	17.71 Aa	6.70 ABa	6.05 Aa	3.11 Aa	14.61 Bb	4.43 Bb
	N2	6.29 Aa	3.18 Aab	14.24 Ab	5.41 Bb	6.20 Aa	3.20 Aa	10.36 Cc	2.85 Cc
	N3	6.37 Aa	3.28 Aa	7.43 Bc	4.97 Bb	6.21 Aa	3.21 Aa	9.96 Cc	2.72 Cc

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	2017			2018
品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	直链淀粉含量 AC (%)	胶稠度 GC (mm)	蛋白质含量 PC (%)	直链淀粉含量 AC (%)	胶稠度 GC (mm)	蛋白质含量 PC (%)
美香新占	N0	19.34 Aa	62.0 Bc	6.10 Bc	17.95 Aa	63.2 Cc	6.5 Bc
Meixiang xinzhan	N1	18.05 ABb	68.5 ABb	7.90 Ab	17.32 Aab	69.5 Bb	7.8 Ab
	N2	17.52 Bbc	76.5 Aa	7.95 Ab	16.19 ABbc	75.9 Aa	8.5 Aa
	N3	16.90 Bc	77.5 Aa	8.80 Aa	15.94 Bc	78.3 Aa	8.9 Aa
泰优398	N0	16.46 Aa	64.5 Bc	6.35 Dd	15.53 Aa	65.9 Ac	6.6 Cd
Taiyou 398	N1	15.74 Aab	68.0 ABbc	8.05 Cc	13.88 Bb	68.6 Abc	8.2 Bc
	N2	15.26 Ab	69.5 ABab	8.70 Bb	13.57 Bbc	70.9 Aab	9.3 ABb
	N3	15.23 Ab	73.0 Aa	9.70 Aa	12.85 Bc	73.5 Aa	10.1 Aa
天优华占	N0	23.78 Aa	65.8 Ab	7.10 Ab	22.51 Aa	68.8 Ab	6.7 Bc
Tianyouhuazhan	N1	22.51 ABa	66.5 Ab	7.25 Aab	18.93 Bb	71.5 Ab	7.5 ABb
	N2	19.53 BCb	75.8 Aa	7.35 Aab	18.26 Bbc	78.3 Aa	8.3 Aa
	N3	19.01 Cb	76.0 Aa	7.70 Aa	17.68 Bc	79.2 Aa	8.8 Aa
黄华占	N0	17.92 Aa	49.5 Bc	6.35 Cc	16.11 Aa	53.6 Cc	7.4 Cc
Huanghuazhan	N1	15.26 Bb	56.0 ABb	8.00 Bb	14.02 Bb	60.5 Bb	8.1 BCb
	N2	13.71 Bc	58.0 Ab	8.40 ABb	12.36 Bbc	62.6 ABb	8.7 ABb
	N3	13.41 Bbc	62.0 Aa	9.20 Aa	11.47 Bc	66.1 Aa	9.6 Aa

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	峰值黏度 Peak viscosity (cP)	热浆黏度 Trough viscosity (cP)	崩解值 Breakdown (cP)	最终黏度 Final viscosity (cP)	消减值 Setback (cP)	糊化温度 Pasting temperature (℃)
美香新占	N0	3073.0 Aa	1777.5 Aa	1295.5 Aa	3002.5 Aa	-70.5 Dd	75.13 Bb
Meixiang xinzhan	N1	2860.0 ABb	1691.5 ABab	1168.5 ABb	2865.0 ABb	5.0 Cc	75.70 ABb
	N2	2727.0 Bbc	1676.5 ABb	1050.5 Bc	2749.0 BCc	22.0 Bb	76.65 ABb
	N3	2644.5 Bc	1608.5 Bb	1036.0 Bc	2694.0 Cc	49.5 Aa	78.23 Aa
泰优398	N0	3322.0 Aa	2036.0 Aa	1286.0 Aa	3134.5 Aa	-187.5 Dd	75.15 Ab
Taiyou 398	N1	3025.0 ABb	1958.0 ABa	1067.0 Bb	2946.5 ABb	-78.5 Cc	75.48 Ab
	N2	2794.0 ABbc	1792.5 BCb	1001.5 BCc	2833.5 Bbc	39.5 Bb	76.35 Aab
	N3	2641.0 Bc	1657.0 Cc	984.0 Cc	2745.0 Bc	104.0 Aa	77.33 Aa
天优华占	N0	2941.5 Aa	1839.0 Aa	1102.5 Aa	3093.5 Aa	152.0 Cd	76.75 Ab
Tianyouhuazhan	N1	2862.0 ABa	1838.0 Aa	1024.0 ABb	3022.5 Aab	160.5 Cc	77.13 Ab
	N2	2722.5 ABb	1782.0 Ab	940.5 Bc	2920.5 Ab	198.0 Bb	78.58 Aa
	N3	2668.0 Bb	1728.50 Ab	939.5 Bc	2896.5 Ab	228.5 Aa	78.78 Aa
黄华占	N0	3075.5 Aa	1835.0 Aa	1240.5 Aa	2923.5 Aa	-152.0 Dd	72.50 Bb
Huanghuazhan	N1	2895.5 ABb	1759.5 Aab	1136.0 ABb	2805.0 ABb	-90.5 Cc	73.65 ABb
	N2	2785.0 Bbc	1696.0 Ab	1089.0 Bbc	2747.5 Bb	-37.5 Bb	74.15 ABab
	N3	2698.0 Bc	1638.0 Ab	1060.0 Bc	2740.5 Bb	42.5 Aa	75.63 Aa

变异来源 Source of variation	年份 Y	品种 C	氮肥用量 N	年份×品种 Y×C	年份×氮肥用量 Y×N	品种×氮肥用量 C×N	年份×品种× 氮肥用量 Y×C×N
自由度 df	1	3	3	3	3	9	9
穗数Panicle	5.901^*	77.14^**	207.66^**	24.78^**	4.36^*	3.82^**	4.02^**
每穗粒数Spikelets per panicle	152.87^**	296.40^**	408.01^**	21.06^**	17.81^**	19.28^**	1.62
总颖花量Total number of spikelets	210.24^**	321.75^**	1093.84^**	68.89^**	8.42^**	11.22^**	1.54
结实率Filled-grain percentage	9.93^**	57.27^**	18.05^**	33.18^**	1.54	0.92	0.35
千粒重1000-kernel weight	61.28^**	201.49^**	7.07^**	4.97^**	0.07	1.41	0.31
产量Yield	4.37^*	32.19^**	713.21^**	9.56^**	14.47^**	7.51^**	0.95
F_0.05	4.16	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.19	2.19
F_0.01	7.53	4.48	4.48	4.48	4.48	3.04	3.04

Effect of nitrogen application on yield and rice quality of mechanical transplanting high quality late rice

RichHTML360

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 40

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

变异来源 Source of variation	年份 Y	品种 C	氮肥用量 N	年份×品种 Y×C	年份×氮肥用量 Y×N	品种×氮肥用量 C×N	年份×品种× 氮肥用量 Y×C×N
自由度 df	1	3	3	3	3	9	9
糙米率 BR	1.85	4.09^*	10.73^**	5.12^**	1.77	0.58	0.83
精米率 MR	0.46	7.96^**	11.52^**	4.17^*	0.58	2.24^*	1.14
整精米率 HMR	41.85^**	409.36^**	65.81^**	11.92^**	0.76	15.25^**	0.54
长宽比 L/W	33.99^**	11.76^**	18.89^**	61.26^**	1.90	0.39	0.53
垩白粒率 CR	2011.08^**	2241.82^**	1185.19^**	3517.08^**	30.86^**	37.38^**	26.37^**
垩白度 CD	616.49^**	7547.28^**	2116.79^**	8743.70^**	154.42^**	52.60^**	99.76^**
直链淀粉含量 AC	385.15^**	1162.91^**	326.03^**	8.88^**	5.38^**	20.13^**	6.28^**
蛋白质含量 PC	57.15^**	439.02^**	277.98^**	8.77^**	0.32	9.84^**	0.37
胶稠度 GC	69.15^**	62.814^**	515.17^**	3.46^*	5.72^**	16.93^**	5.73^**
峰值黏度 PKV	10.43^**	18.63^**	113.98^**	11.16^**	2.13	6.07^**	0.50
热浆黏度 THV	46.93^**	93.56^**	33.68^**	38.51^**	17.88^**	14.35^**	1.86
崩解值 BKD	486.79^**	85.67^**	516.85^**	83.93^**	15.58^**	5.28^**	8.78^**
最终黏度 FLV	19.92^**	78.08^**	18.96^**	28.89^**	8.84^**	3.79^**	0.88
消减值 STB	769.98^**	30348.16^**	16690.88^**	7333.67^**	1416.93^**	409.35^**	359.09^**
糊化温度 PAT	58.79^**	89.87^**	3.75^*	52.58^**	0.53	0.10	0.14
F_0.05	4.16	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.91	2.19	2.19
F_0.01	7.53	4.48	4.48	4.48	4.48	3.04	3.04

指标 Index	糙米率 BR	精米率 MR	整精米率 HMR	垩白粒率 CR	垩白度 CD	直链淀含量 AC	胶稠度 GC	蛋白质含量 PC	峰值黏度PKV	热浆黏度THV	崩解值BKD	最终黏度 FLV	消减值STB
精米率 MR	0.485	—
整精米率 HMR	0.178	0.576^*	—
垩白粒率 CR	-0.258	-0.174	0.180	—
垩白度 CD	-0.134	-0.048	0.228	0.819^**	—
直链淀粉含量AC	-0.360	0.259	0.626^**	0.691^**	0.694^**	—
蛋白质含量PC	0.238	0.462	0.720^**	-0.248	-0.320	0.216	—
胶稠度 GC	0.614^*	0.287	-0.050	-0.783^**	-0.620^*	-0.630^**	0.387	—
峰值黏度PKV	-0.511^*	-0.588^*	-0.168	0.763^**	0.432	0.309	-0.404	-0.836^**	—
热浆黏度THV	-0.281	-0.316	0.360	0.691^**	0.344	0.464	0.201	-0.600^*	0.785^**	—
崩解值BKD	-0.544^*	-0.604^*	-0.574^*	0.566^*	0.395	0.093	-0.812^**	-0.741^**	0.808^**	0.274	—
最终黏度FLV	-0.384	-0.019	0.636^**	0.649^**	0.448	0.773^**	0.382	-0.635^**	0.568^*	0.869^**	0.078	—
消减值STB	0.200	0.651^**	0.823^**	-0.225	-0.047	0.416	0.841^**	0.321	-0.575^*	-0.030	-0.843^**	0.347	—
糊化温度PAT	-0.257	0.467	0.651^**	-0.138	-0.259	0.487	0.768^**	-0.025	-0.226	0.163	-0.496	0.502^*	0.755^**

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	日平均温度 Daily mean temperature (℃)	日最高温度 Daily maximum temperature (℃)	日最低温度 Daily minimum temperature (℃)	日平均温差 Daily mean temperature difference (℃)	日平均光照时数 Daily mean illumination hours (h)
2017
美香新占 Meixiangxinzhan	N0	20.34	23.97	16.81	7.16	7.14
	N1	20.41	23.18	16.24	6.94	6.87
	N2	19.52	22.98	16.11	6.87	6.54
	N3	19.14	22.78	15.98	6.80	6.17
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	23.87	25.49	19.68	5.81	6.87
	N1	23.24	25.12	19.37	5.75	6.69
	N2	22.17	24.41	19.25	5.16	6.26
	N3	19.98	24.19	19.07	5.12	5.76
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	22.56	25.17	18.23	6.94	6.58
	N1	21.49	24.98	18.25	6.73	6.12
	N2	21.05	24.52	17.92	6.60	5.56
	N3	19.88	23.91	17.24	6.67	5.24
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	22.59	25.74	17.86	7.88	6.97
	N1	22.11	25.24	17.53	7.71	6.68
	N2	21.47	24.56	16.97	7.59	6.25
	N3	20.41	23.87	16.54	7.33	6.16
2018
美香新占 Meixiangxinzhan	N0	21.02	25.06	17.03	8.03	7.05
	N1	20.56	24.33	16.54	7.79	6.98
	N2	19.61	23.57	15.69	7.88	6.57
	N3	19.41	23.12	15.40	7.72	6.21
泰优398 Taiyou 398	N0	24.90	26.57	21.28	5.29	6.66
	N1	23.45	25.98	20.95	5.03	6.25
	N2	22.35	24.56	20.41	4.15	5.78
	N3	22.04	24.22	19.88	4.34	5.52
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan	N0	22.76	26.32	19.23	7.09	6.15
	N1	22.46	26.12	18.84	7.28	5.57
	N2	21.15	25.74	18.35	7.39	5.68
	N3	20.94	25.16	18.02	7.14	5.21
黄华占 Huanghuazhan	N0	22.75	26.63	18.91	7.72	6.72
	N1	22.13	25.93	18.46	7.47	6.34
	N2	21.58	25.12	18.17	6.95	5.97
	N3	20.97	24.95	17.76	7.19	6.04

指标 Index	日平均温度 Daily mean temperature (°C)	日最高温度 Daily maximum temperature (°C)	日最低温度 Daily minimum temperature (°C)	日平均温差 Daily mean temperature difference (°C)	日平均光照时数 Daily mean illumination hours (h)
糙米率 BR	-0.328	-0.451	-0.120	-0.207	-0.473
精米率 MR	-0.712^**	-0.470	-0.593*	0.406	-0.116
整精米率 HMR	-0.246	-0.075	-0.119	0.097	-0.505^*
粒长 KL	-0.202	-0.458	0.095	-0.498^*	-0.449
长宽比 L/W	0.031	-0.493	0.277	-0.768^**	-0.202
垩白率 CR	0.554^*	0.668^**	0.397	0.016	0.178
垩白度 CD	0.398	0.664^**	0.280	0.167	-0.159
直链淀粉含量 AC	-0.056	0.229	-0.200	0.451	0.099
蛋白质含量 PC	-0.457	-0.541^*	-0.259	-0.095	-0.540^*
胶稠度 GC	-0.400	-0.596^*	-0.096	-0.357	-0.588^*
峰值黏度 PKV	0.737^**	0.685^**	0.486	-0.089	0.614^*
热浆黏度THV	0.869^**	0.793^**	0.749^**	-0.350	0.169
崩解值 BKD	0.353	0.343	0.055	0.206	0.861^**
最终黏度 FLV	0.680^**	0.758^**	0.506^*	-0.057	0.187
消减值 STB	-0.401	-0.236	-0.212	0.077	-0.747^**
糊化温度 PAT	-0.394	-0.422	-0.202	-0.075	-0.609^*

[1]	WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2]	WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3]	YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4]	YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5]	CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6]	LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7]	SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8]	PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[9]	YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10]	KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11]	LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[12]	WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13]	DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14]	CHEN Yun, LI Si-Yu, ZHU An, LIU Kun, ZHANG Ya-Jun, ZHANG Hao, GU Jun-Fei, ZHANG Wei-Yang, LIU Li-Jun, YANG Jian-Chang. Effects of seeding rates and panicle nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and quality in good taste rice cultivars under direct sowing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15]	YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.