Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 2080-2087.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14134

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Suitable soil moisture promotes sugar supply and tuberization in sweet potato at root branching stage

XIE Li-Ming1(), JIANG Zhong-Yu1, LIU Hong-Juan1, HAN Jun-Jie2, LIU Ben-Kui1, WANG Xiao-Lu1, SHI Chun-Yu1,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University / State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China
    2Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai 265500, Shandong, China
  • Received:2021-07-29 Accepted:2022-01-05 Online:2022-08-12 Published:2022-02-08
  • Contact: SHI Chun-Yu E-mail:1215948128@qq.com;scyu@sdau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Potato Innovation Program for Chief Expert of Shandong Province(SDAIT-16-01);Key Laboratory of Tropical Horticultural Crop Quality Regulation of Hainan Province(HNZDSYS(YY)-08)

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to explore the effect of soil moisture on the formation of storage roots in sweet potato and its relationship with the number and uniformity of storage roots. In this experiment, the sweet potato variety Yanshu 25 was used as the experimental material. We performed five soil relative water content levels with 50%±5% (W50), 60%±5% (W60), 70%±5% (W70), 80%±5% (W80), and 90%±5% (W90) at root branching stage. The effects of soil moisture on the content of carbohydrate and the activity of metabolic enzymes in the potential storage roots, as well as the number, uniformity and yield of storage roots at the harvest time were studied by a two-year field experiment. The results showed that the content of sucrose, glucose, and fructose and the activity of sucrose invertase in the potential storage roots of sweet potato in W70 treatment were significantly higher than those of other treatments during 10-35 days after planting. The activity of sucrose synthase and the content of starch in the potential storage roots of sweet potato in W70 treatment were significantly lower than those of other treatments at 10-25 days after planting, while the trend was opposite during 30-35 days after planting. Compared with other treatments, the number of storage roots per plant and the yield of storage root in W70 treatment increased by 14%-120% and 22%-122%, respectively. The variable coefficient of the single storage root weight decreased by 9%-34%. The soil relative water content of 70% at root branching stage of sweet potato was beneficial to the formation of storage roots, which increased the number of storage roots per plant, weight of the single storage root and yield of storage roots, and improved the commercial quality of storage roots at harvest time.

Key words: sweet potato, soil moisture at root branching stage, the supply of hexose, the number of storage roots per plant, storage roots uniformity

Table 1

Physical and chemical properties of soil in test field"

年份
Year
0-20 cm土层 0-20 cm soil layer 0-40 cm土层 0-40 cm soil layer
有机质
Organic matter
(%)
碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen
(mg kg-1)
速效磷
Available phosphorus
(mg kg-1)
速效钾
Available potassium
(mg kg-1)
容重
Bulk density
(g cm-3)
田间持水量
Field capacity
(%)
2019 1.07 81.23 25.87 80.57 1.25 24.14
2020 1.04 82.09 26.83 79.44 1.27 25.11

Table 2

Storage root yield of sweet potato and its components"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
单株结薯数
Storage root (lump plant-1)
单薯重
Fresh weight (g lump-1)
块根产量
Storage root yield (t hm-2)
2019 W50 1.78 e 255.82 c 22.76 e
W60 2.25 d 270.86 bc 30.46 d
W70 3.26 a 309.66 a 50.55 a
W80 2.86 b 289.79 ab 41.50 b
W90 2.51 c 280.33 bc 35.21 c
2020 W50 2.00 c 177.39 b 21.95 c
W60 3.00 bc 201.42 ab 30.59 bc
W70 4.40 a 219.95 a 48.76 a
W80 3.60 ab 207.12 a 38.68 b
W90 3.00 bc 177.78 b 27.83 c

Table 3

Coefficient variation of sweet potato storage root length, diameter and fresh weight at harvest time"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
块根长度Storage root length 块根直径Storage root diameter 单薯重Weight
长度
Length (cm)
变异系数
CV (%)
直径
Diameter (mm)
变异系数
CV (%)
鲜重
Fresh weight (g lump-1)
变异系数
CV (%)
2019 W50 21.21 b 22.17 49.53 c 29.73 255.82 c 102.52
W60 23.30 ab 18.52 52.16 c 25.13 270.86 bc 77.04
W70 25.67 a 6.26 78.41 a 7.71 309.66 a 68.10
W80 24.67 a 7.78 74.45 ab 14.64 289.79 ab 74.52
W90 23.50 ab 14.73 69.24 b 16.21 280.33 bc 75.47
2020 W50 11.70 c 37.83 43.32 a 40.78 177.39 b 53.89
W60 14.66 b 20.71 47.17 a 39.07 201.42 ab 51.20
W70 17.84 a 9.41 49.55 a 20.30 219.95 a 36.42
W80 17.35 a 12.17 50.56 a 33.68 207.12 a 43.98
W90 14.03 b 18.38 54.35 a 40.17 177.78 b 51.24

Fig. 1

Effects of soil moisture on the content of sucrose in potential storage roots of sweet potato in 2019 The bars superscripted by different letters indicate significant difference among different treatments in the same period at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2."

Fig. 2

Effects of soil moisture on the content of glucose in potential storage roots of sweet potato in 2019 Bars superscripted by different letters indicate significant difference among different treatments in the same period at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2."

Fig. 3

Effects of soil moisture on the content of fructose in potential storage roots of sweet potato in 2019 Bars superscripted by different letters indicate significant difference among different treatments in the same period at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2. "

Fig. 4

Effects of soil moisture on the content of starch in potential storage roots of sweet potato in 2019 Bars superscripted by different letters indicate significant difference among different treatments in the same period at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2."

Fig. 5

Effects of soil moisture on the activity of sucrose invertase (InV) in potential storage roots of sweet potato in 2019 Bars superscripted by different letters indicate significant difference among different treatments in the same period at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2."

Fig. 6

Effects of soil moisture on the activity of sucrose synthase (SS) in potential storage roots of sweet potato in 2019 Bars superscripted by different letters indicate significant difference among different treatments in the same period at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2."

[1] 姜仲禹, 唐丽雪, 柳洪鹃, 史春余. 不同施钾量条件下甘薯块根形成的内源激素变化及其与块根数量的关系. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1750-1759.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.04097
Jiang Z Y, Tang L X, Liu H J, Shi C Y. Changes of endogenous hormones on storage root formation and its relationship with storage root number under different potassium supplication rates of sweet potato. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1750-1759. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 闫会, 张允刚, 刘亚菊, 王欣, 后猛, 唐维, 马代夫, 李强. 生育期对徐紫薯8号品质及结薯性的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2019, 35(1): 9-14.
Yan H, Zhang Y G, Liu Y J, Wang X, Hou M, Tang W, Ma D F, Li Q. Effects of growth stage on quality and tuber traits of new sweet potato cultivar Xuzishu 8. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2019, 35(1): 9-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 于振文. 作物栽培学各论北方本(第2版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013. pp 162-168.
Yu Z W. On Crop Cultivation in North China, 2nd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013. pp 162-168. (in Chinese)
[4] Chowdhury S R, Varma S P. Dry matter production and partitioning in sweet potato in response to different levels of irrigation. Indian J Plant Physiol, 1997, 2: 29-31.
[5] 肖利贞. 土壤干旱对甘薯生育及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 1995, (2): 106-110.
Xiao L Z. Effects of soil drought on growth and yield of sweet potato. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 1995, (2): 106-110. (in Chinese)
[6] 张海燕, 段文学, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 史春余, 张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯内源激素的影响及其与块根产量的关系. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 126-136.
Zhang H Y, Duan W X, Xie B T, Dong S X, Wang B Q, Shi C Y, Zhang L M. Effects of drought stress at different growth stages on endogenous hormones and its relationship with storage root yield in sweet potato. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 126-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00126
[7] 张海燕, 解备涛, 汪宝卿, 董顺旭, 段文学, 张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯生长和抗氧化能力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 1126-1139.
Zhang H Y, Xie B T, Wang B Q, Dong S X, Duan W X, Zhang L M. Effects of drought treatments at different growth stages on growth and the activity of antioxidant enzymes in sweet potato. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 1126-1139. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Villordon A Q, La Bonte D R, Firon N, Kfir Y, Pressman E, Schwartz A. Characterization of adventitious root development in sweet potato. Hortscience, 2009, 44: 651-655.
doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.651
[9] 张庆会, 徐步东. 试论甘薯块根的生长机理. 生物学通报, 2002, 37(8): 22-23.
Zhang Q H, Xu B D. Growth mechanism of sweet potato tuber root. Bull Biol, 2002, 37(8): 22-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.2307/1536396
[10] Villordon A, LaBonte D, Solis J. Characterization of lateral root development at the onset of storage root initiation in ‘beauregard' sweet potato adventitious roots. Hortic Sci, 2012, 47: 961-968.
[11] Ravi V, Indira P. Crop physiology of sweet potato. Hortic Rev, 1999, 23: 277-339.
[12] Ravi V, Naskar S, Makeshkumar T, Babu B, Prakash Krishnan B S. Molecular physiology of storage root formation and development in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). J Root Crops, 2009, 35: 1-27.
[13] 刘国琴, 张曼夫, 生物化学(第2版). 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011. pp 210-230.
Liu G Q, Zhang M F. Biochemistry, 2nd edn. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2011. pp 210-230. (in Chinese)
[14] 李长志, 李欢, 刘庆, 史衍玺. 不同生长时期干旱胁迫甘薯根系生长及荧光生理的特性比较. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22: 511-517.
Li C Z, Li H, Liu Q, Shi Y X. Comparison of root development and fluorescent physiological characteristics of sweet potato exposure to drought stress in different growth stages. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2016, 22: 511-517. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 张海燕, 解备涛, 段文学, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 史春余. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯光合效率和耗水特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29: 1943-1950.
pmid: 29974705
Zhang H Y, Xie B T, Duan W X, Dong S X, Wang B Q, Zhang L M, Shi C Y. Effects of drought stress at different growth stages on photosynthetic efficiency and water consumption characteristics in sweet potato. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018, 29: 1943-1950. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201806.024 pmid: 29974705
[16] 吴海云, 郭琪琳, 王金强, 李欢, 刘庆. 不同水分供应对甘薯叶片光合与荧光特性的影响及其光响应模型比较. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27: 908-918.
Wu H Y, Guo Q L, Wang J Q, Li H, Liu Q. Effects of water supply on photosynthesis and fluorescence characteristics of sweet potato leaves and comparison of light response models. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2019, 27: 908-918. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 王东. 黄淮流域冬小麦按需补灌方法及其应用. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(6): 223-231.
Wang D. A method of supplemental irrigation on-demand for winter wheat and its application in Huang-Huai Plain. J Soil Water Conserv, 2017, 31(6): 223-231. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 毛善巧, 杨锋, 黄永春. 高效液相色谱法测定车厘子中果糖、葡萄糖及蔗糖含量. 中国酿造, 2016, 35(9): 168-171.
Mao S C, Yang F, Huang Y C. Determination of fructose, glucose and sucrose contents in cherry by HPLC. China Brew, 2016, 35(9): 168-171. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 卞科, 刘孝沾. 甘薯中可溶性糖的HPLC法测定及其在加工中的变化研究. 河南工业大学学报, 2012, 33(1): 1-4.
Bian K, Liu X Z. Determination of soluble sugars in sweet potato by HPLC and its changes during processing. J Henan Technol (Nat Sci Edn), 2012, 33(1): 1-4 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 汤章城. 现代植物生理学实验指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999. p 126.
Tang Z C. A Guide to Modern Plant Physiology Experiments. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. p 126. (in Chinese)
[21] 刘卫群, 陈良存, 甄焕菊, 石永春. 烟叶成熟过程中碳氮代谢关键酶对追施氮肥的响应. 华北农学报, 2005, 20(3): 74-78.
Liu W Q, Chen L C, Zhen H J, Shi Y C. Effect of nitrogen topdressing on the key enzymes of carbon and nitrogen metabolism during the process of tobacco leaf maturation. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2005, 20(3): 74-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 柳洪鹃, 姚海兰, 史春余, 张立明. 施钾时期对甘薯济徐23块根淀粉积累与品质的影响及酶学生理机制. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 43-52.
Liu H J, Yao H L, Shi C Y, Zhang L M. Effect of potassium application time on starch accumulation and related enzyme activities of sweet potato variety Jixu 23. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 43-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 张海燕, 汪宝卿, 冯向阳, 李广亮, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 段文学, 张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯生长和渗透调节能力的影响. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1760-1770.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.04079
Zhang H Y, Wang B Q, Feng X Y, Li G L, Xie B T, Dong S X, Duan W X, Zhang L M. Effects of drought treatments at different growth stages on growth and the activity of osmotic adjustment in sweet potato. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1760-1770. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 刘倩, 侯松, 刘庆, 李欢, 史衍玺. 移栽时期对食用型甘薯品种烟薯25号产量和品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 136-141.
Liu Q, Hou S, Liu Q, Li H, Shi Y X. Effect of transplanting period on yield and quality of edible sweet potato variety Yanshu 25. Crops, 2017, (5): 136-141. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 陈俊伟, 秦巧平, 谢鸣, 蒋桂华, 徐红霞, 程建徽, 吴江, 孙崇波. 草莓果实蔗糖和已糖的代谢特性及其与糖积累的关系. 果树学报, 2007, 24(1): 49-54.
Chen J W, Qin Q P, Xie M, Jiang G H, Xu H X, Cheng J H, Wu J, Sun C B. Characteristics of sucrose and hexose metabolism in to sugar accumulation in developing strawberry fruit. J Fruit Sci, 2007, 24(1): 49-54. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 郭小路. 薄荷幼叶蔗糖酶的分离纯化及部分性质与功能基团研究和固定化初探. 西南大学硕士学位论文,重庆, 2008.
Guo X L. Purification, Some Properties and Modification of Groups and Immobilization of the Sucrase from Mentha haplocalyx Briq Leaves. MS Thesis of Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] Ruan Y L. Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2014, 65: 33-67.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251
[28] Li X Q, Zhang D P. Gene expression activity and pathway selection for sucrose metabolism in developing storage root of sweet potato. Plant Cell Physiol, 2003, 44: 630.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg080
[29] Sturm A, Tang G Q. The sucrose-cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development, growth and carbon partitioning. Trends Plant Sci, 1999, 4: 401.
pmid: 10498964
[30] 王翠娟, 史春余, 刘娜, 刘双荣, 余新地. 结薯数差异显著的甘薯品种生长前期根系特性及根叶糖组分比较. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 131-140.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00131
Wang C J, Shi C Y, Liu N, Liu S R, Yu X D. Comparison of root characteristics and sugar components in root and leaf at early growth phase of sweet potato varieties with significant different in valid storage root number. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42: 131-140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00131
[31] Du F R, Liu H J, Yin X B, Zhao Q X, Shi C Y. Potassium- mediated regulation of sucrose metabolism and storage root formation in sweet potato. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2021, 67: 703-713.
doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1751824
[32] Toshihiko E. Satoshi Y. Effects of application of sucrose and cytokine in to roots on the formation of tuberous roots in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Plant Root, 2008, 2: 7-13.
doi: 10.3117/plantroot.2.7
[33] Si C C, Shi C Y, Liu H J, Zhan X D, Liu Y C. Effects of nitrogen forms on carbohydrate metabolism and storage-root formation of sweet potato. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2018, 181: 419-428.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.201700297
[1] SONG Tian-Xiao, LIU Yi, RAO Li-Ping, Soviguidi Deka Reine Judesse, ZHU Guo-Peng, YANG Xin-Sun. Identification and expression analysis of cell wall invertase IbCWIN gene family members in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(7): 1297-1308.
[2] WANG Cui-Juan, CHAI Sha-Sha, SHI Chun-Yu, ZHU Hong, TAN Zhong-Peng, JI Jie, REN Guo-Bo. Anatomy characteristics and IbEXP1 gene expression of tuberization under ammonia nitrogen treatment in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(2): 305-319.
[3] Yong-Chen LIU,Cheng-Cheng SI,Hong-Juan LIU,Bin-Bin ZHANG,Chun-Yu SHI. Reason exploration for soil aeration promoting photosynthate transportation between sink and source in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(3): 462-471.
[4] ZHANG Huan, YANG Nai-Ke, SHANG Li-Li, GAO Xiao-Ru, LIU Qing-Chang, ZHAI Hong, GAO Shao-Pei, HE Shao-Zhen. Cloning and functional analysis of a drought tolerance-related gene IbNAC72 in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1649-1658.
[5] JIANG Zhong-Yu, TANG Li-Xue, LIU Hong-Juan, SHI Chun-Yu. Changes of endogenous hormones on storage root formation and its relationship with storage root number under different potassium application rates of sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1750-1759.
[6] ZHANG Hai-Yan, WANG Bao-Qing, FENG Xiang-Yang, LI Guang-Liang, XIE Bei-Tao, DONG Shun-Xu, DUAN Wen-Xue, ZHANG Li-Ming. Effects of drought treatments at different growth stages on growth and the activity of osmotic adjustment in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1760-1770.
[7] Wen-Qing SHI,Bin-Bin ZHANG,Hong-Juan LIU,Qing-Xin ZHAO,Chun-Yu SHI,Xin-Jian WANG,Cheng-Cheng SI. Response mechanism of sweet potato storage root formation and bulking to soil compaction and its relationship with yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(5): 755-763.
[8] Wen-Xue DUAN,Hai-Yan ZHANG,Bei-Tao XIE,Bao-Qing WANG,Li-Ming ZHANG. Identification of Salt Tolerance and Screening for Its Indicators in Sweet Potato Varieties during Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1237-1247.
[9] Jian-Gang AN,Fu JING,Yi DING,Yi XIAO,Hao-Hao SHANG,Hong-Li LI,Xiao-Lu YANG,Dao-Bin TANG,Ji-Chun WANG. Effects of Split Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1858-1866.
[10] Song HOU, Xia TIAN, Qing LIU. Effects of Foliage Spray of Se on Absorption Characteristics of Se and Quality of Purple Sweet Potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(03): 423-430.
[11] WANG Cui-Juan,SHI Chun-Yu,LIU Na,LIU Shuang-Rong,YU Xin-Di. Comparison of Root Characteristics and Sugar Components in Root and Leaf at Early Growth Phase of Sweet Potato Varieties with Significant Difference in Valid Storage Root Number [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(01): 131-140.
[12] WANG Cui-Juan,SHI Chun-Yu,WANG Zhen-Zhen,CHAI Sha-Sha,LIU Hong-Juan,SHI Yan-Xi. Effects of Plastic Film Mulching Cultivation on Young Roots Growth Development, Tuber Formation and Tuber Yield of Sweet Potato [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(09): 1677-1685.
[13] WANG Xiao-Chun,YANG Wen-Yu,DENG Xiao-Yan,ZHANG Qun,YONG Tai-Wen,LIU Wei-Guo,YANG Feng,MAO Shu-Ming. Differences of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization and Nitrogen Regulation Effects in Maize between Maize/Soybean and Maize/Sweet Potato Relay Intercropping Systems [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(03): 519-530.
[14] DENG Xiao-Yan,WANG Xiao-Chun,YANG Wen-Yu,SONG Chun,WEN Xi-Chen,ZHANG Qun,MAO Shu-Ming. Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization of Maize and Interspecies Interactions in Maize/Soybean and Maize/Sweet Potato Relay Intercropping Systems [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(10): 1891-1898.
[15] LI Ai-Xian, LIU Qiang-Chang, WANG Qiang-Mei, ZHANG Li-Ming, ZAI Hong, LIU Shu-Zhen. Establishment of Molecular Linkage Maps Using SRAP Markers in Sweet potato [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(08): 1286-1295.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yan Mei;Yang Guangsheng;Fu Tingdong;Yan Hongyan. Studies on the Ecotypical Male Sterile-fertile Line of Brassica napus L.Ⅲ. Sensitivity to Temperature of 8-8112AB and Its Inheritance[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[2] Wang Yongsheng;Wang Jing;Duan Jingya;Wang Jinfa;Liu Liangshi. Isolation and Genetic Research of a Dwarf Tiilering Mutant Rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[3] Hu Yuqi;Liao Xiaohai. A STUDY ON THE COEFFICIENT OF LEAVES SHAPE OF MAIZE[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 1986, (01): 71 -72 .
[4] LIANG Tai-Bo;YIN Yan-Ping;CAI Rui-Guo;YAN Su-Hui;LI Wen-Yang;GENG Qing-Hui;WANG Ping;WANG Zhen-Lin. Starch Accumulation and Related Enzyme Activities in Superior and Inferior Grains of Large Spike Wheat[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 150 -156 .
[5] WANG Cheng-Zhang;HAN Jin-Feng;SHI Ying-Hua;LI Zhen-Tian;LI De-Feng. Production Performance in Alfalfa with Different Classes of Fall Dormancy[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 133 -141 .
[6] TIAN Zhi-Jian;Yi Rong;CHEN Jian-Rong;GUO Qing-Quan;ZHANG Xue-Wen;. Cloning and Expression of Cellulose Synthase Gene in Ramie [Boehme- ria nivea (Linn.) Gaud.][J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 76 -83 .
[7] ZHAO Xiu-Qin;ZHU Ling-Hua;XU Jian-Long;LI Zhi-Kang. QTL Mapping of Yield under Irrigation and Rainfed Field Conditions for Advanced Backcrossing Introgression Lines in Rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(09): 1536 -1542 .
[8] WU Ying ; SONG Feng-Sun ; LU Xu-Zhong; ZHAO Wei; YANG Jian-Bo; LI Li ;. Detecting Genetically Modified Soybean by Real-time Quantitative PCR Technique[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(10): 1733 -1737 .
[9] GOU Ling ; HUANG Jian-Jun; ZHANG Bin; LI Tao; SUN Rui; ZHAO Ming ;. Effects of Population Density on Stalk Lodging Resistant Mechanism and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(10): 1688 -1695 .
[10] YU Jing;ZHANG Lin;CUI Hong;ZHANG Yong-Xia;CANG Jing;HAO Zai-Bin;LI Zhuo-Fu. Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Dongnongdongmai 1 before Wintering in High-Cold Area[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(11): 2019 -2025 .