Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 552-560.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24034

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening of different dropping formulations about mepiquat chloride and their effects on cotton growth and development

LOU Shan-Wei1,2(), GAO Fei3, WANG Chong3, TIAN Xiao-Li1, DU Ming-Wei1, DUAN Liu-Sheng1,4,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    2China National Cotton R&D Center, Urumqi 830091, Xinjiang, China
    3Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    4College of Plant Science and Technology Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2022-02-02 Accepted:2022-06-07 Online:2022-07-08 Published:2022-07-08
  • Contact: DUAN Liu-Sheng E-mail:wei.lou@163.com;duanlsh@cau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Independent Cultivation Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(nkyzztd-002);Xinjiang Central Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development

RichHTML407

11

PDF

238

Abstract:

The drop method of mepiquat chloride is an important research field in cotton. In order to explore the new sustained-release dropping formulation and its effect on cotton regulation, the following experiments were carried out. The dropping formulations were screened by pot cultivation with five kinds (H1, H2, H3, H4, and H5) of dripping application form, and common mepiquat chloride (S) and water as the control (CK). To investigate the screening of different dosage forms and the effect of regulating cotton agronomic characters and yield, two concentration levels of low and high (90.0 g hm-2 and 180.0 g hm-2) were set in the field. The results showed that under pot conditions, the uniformity of five different formulations of mepiquat chloride was basically above 66%, and the seedling growth rate greatly affected by the variety mostly between 40% and 70%. Plant height was reduced by 32%-41% and 24%-35%, respectively, and there was significantly different in plant height after 25 days. Under field conditions, treatment S had the best height control effect, CK increased the fastest, and all treatments had better height control effects at high concentrations of sustained-release mepiquat chloride and were significantly different from CK. At low concentrations, plant height of H5 was 61.0 cm. The effect was similar to S and had no significant difference, and other treatments had no significant difference with CK. Cotton plant width, stem diameter, the number of leaves in main stem, and the number of fruit branches were 26.0-35.0 cm, 9.5-11.5 mm, 13-14 pieces, and 7-8 sets, respectively, which had no significant difference with CK and S. The new type of sustained-release mepiquat chloride could promote bud initiation and increase boll numbers. By June 28 (peak flowering stage), the total number of flowers and bolls in two concentration levels of H1 were 12.7 and 11.5 per plant, respectively, which were 2.0 and 0.8 higher than that of S. The final yield of all treatments at low concentration was higher than that of high concentration. And the yield of H5 was the highest (7267.26 kg hm-2), which was 40% and 33% higher than CK and S, respectively, followed by H1. In conclusion, dropping formulations of H1 and H5 control plant height, shape plant type and yield performance was better, and further related experimental research can be carried out.

Key words: cotton, sustained release mepiquat, drip application, regulation, agronomic characters

Table 1

Design of experiment"

处理
Treatment		 6月4日第1次灌根
Frist time root watering on June 4
(g hm-2)		 6月28日第二次灌根
Second time root watering on June 28
(g hm-2)		 总量
Total
(g hm-2)
低浓度 LC 高浓度 HC 低浓度 LC 高浓度 HC 低浓度 LC 高浓度 HC
H1 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H2 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H3 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H4 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
H5 30.0 60.0 60.0 120.0 90.0 180.0
S 30.0 60.0 90.0
CK — — —

Table 2

Effects of different dosage forms of Mepiquat on seedling uniformity and growth of potted cotton (%)"

处理
Treatment		 苗整齐率Neat rate of cotton seedling 壮苗率Strong seedling rate
新陆早78号
Xinluzao 78		 鲁棉研22号
Lumianyan 22		 新陆早78号
Xinluzao 78		 鲁棉研22号
Lumianyan 22
H1 66.7 100.0 50.0 66.7
H2 100.0 66.7 16.7 66.7
H3 66.7 66.7 50.0 83.3
H4 50.0 66.7 50.0 33.3
H5 100.0 100.0 33.3 100.0
S 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
CK 66.7 100.0 33.3 83.3

Fig. 1

Changes of plant height of different cotton varieties Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Fig. 2

Cotton morphology in different batches of potted plants Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Fig. 3

Plant height under field treatment with different concentrations Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Fig. 4

Plant height of field treatment with different concentrations Values followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1."

Table 3

Main agronomic characters of cotton under different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 株宽
Plant height (cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)		 主茎叶片数
No. of leaf		 果枝台数
No. of fruit branch		 果枝始节高
Height of first branch (cm)
低浓度
LC		 H1 33.0 a 10.9 a 14.0 a 7.3 a 25.3 a
H2 34.3 a 10.2 a 14.0 a 8.0 a 26.5 a
H3 32.8 a 10.5 a 13.2 a 8.0 a 27.5 a
H4 33.2 a 9.8 a 14.0 a 8.3 a 22.8 a
H5 29.5 a 10.1 a 13.5 a 7.7 a 23.3 a
S 33.8 a 10.4 a 13.3 a 8.0 a 21.2 a
CK 31.3 a 10.1 a 13.0 a 7.2 a 24.2 a
高浓度
HC		 H1 26.0 a 11.0 a 13.0 a 6.8 a 25.5 a
H2 23.0 a 10.6 a 12.7 a 7.0 a 22.2 a
H3 27.2 a 10.8 a 13.8 a 7.8 a 21.0 a
H4 28.2 a 10.1 a 13.5 a 7.7 a 21.8 a
H5 32.3 a 10.5 a 13.3 a 7.8 a 19.0 a
S 33.8 a 10.4 a 13.3 a 8.0 a 21.2 a
CK 31.3 a 10.1 a 13.0 a 7.2 a 24.2 a
DPC剂量之间
Between DPC doses		 H1 ns ns ns ns ns
H2 * ns ns ns ns
H3 ns ns ns ns *
H4 ns ns ns ns ns
H5 * ns ns ns *

Fig. 5

Changes of bud and boll flowers under different treatments Treatments are the same as those given in Table 1. Values followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level."

Table 4

Effects of different treatments on cotton constituent factors"

处理
Treatment		 收获株数
Harvest plant of land
(×104 plant hm-2)		 单株结铃数
Boll No. per plant		 单铃重
Boll weight (g)		 籽棉产量
Seed cotton yield (kg hm-2)
低浓度
LC		 H1 22.20 a 6.0 a 5.21 a 6939.72 ab
H2 20.70 a 5.7 a 5.29 a 6205.17 ab
H3 22.80 a 5.2 a 5.18 a 6102.04 ab
H4 17.40 a 5.7 a 5.27 a 5196.22 b
H5 23.10 a 6.0 a 5.24 a 7267.26 a
S 21.20 a 5.7 a 5.22 a 6266.96 ab
CK 23.40 a 4.5 a 5.18 a 5451.03 b
高浓度
HC		 H1 22.50 a 4.8 a 5.25 a 5705.75 a
H2 23.70 a 4.3 a 5.21 a 5354.09 a
H3 21.90 a 4.3 a 5.29 a 5020.21 a
H4 21.75 a 4.8 a 5.25 a 5515.56 a
H5 24.00 a 5.0 a 5.20 a 6244.00 a
S 21.20 a 5.7 a 5.22 a 6266.96 a
CK 23.40 a 4.5 a 5.18 a 5451.03 a
[1] 范希峰, 田晓莉, 李召虎, 何钟佩, 翟志席, 段留生. 应用ICP-MS研究甲哌鎓对转Bt基因抗虫棉棉籽中无机元素含量的影响. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2009, 29: 1119-1122.
Fan X F, Tian X L, Li Z H, He Z P, Zhai H X, Duan L S. Effects of mepiquat chloride on inorganic elements contents in seeds of transgenic insect-resistant cotton determined by ICP-MS. Spectr Spectral Anal, 2009, 29: 1119-1122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Rademacher W. Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 51: 501-531.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.501
[3] 李保同. 甲哌啶在棉田土壤中的残留及动态研究. 农药, 1994, 4(22): 40-41.
Li B T. Residue and dynamics of meperidine in soil of cotton field. Pesticide, 1994, 4(22): 40-41 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 娄善伟, 董合忠, 田晓莉, 田立文. 新疆棉花“矮、密、早”栽培历史、现状和展望. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 720-732.
Lou S W, Dong H Z, Tian X L, Tian L W. The “short, dense and early” cultivation of cotton in Xinjiang: history, current situation and prospect. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 720-732. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1220-1226.
Zhang T, Wang M F, Zhao Q. Effects of DPC and nitrogen fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield of cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1220-1226 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 马素钧. 棉花喷施缩节胺的机理与技术. 河北农业科技, 1993, (6): 10.
Ma S J. Mechanism and technology of spraying DPC on cotton. Hebei Agric Sci Technol, 1993, (6): 10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 段留生, 张一, 唐祚舜, 何钟佩, 翟志席. 甲哌鎓对棉花幼苗侧根发生的诱导效应和机理研究. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22: 877-882.
Duan L S, Zhang Y, Tang Z S, He Z P, Zhai Z X. Effects of mepiquat chloride on lateral roots initiation of cotton seedling and its mechanism. Acta Bota Boreali-Occident Sin, 2002, 22: 877-882. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Almeida A Q D, Rosolem C A. Cotton root and shoot growth as affected by application of mepiquat chloride to cotton seeds. Acta Sci Agron, 2012, 34: 61-65.
[9] 张凤娇. 不同打顶剂对棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响. 塔里木大学硕士学位论文, 新疆阿拉尔, 2021.
Zhang F J. Effects of Different Topping Agents on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton. MS Thesis of Tarim University, Alar, Xinjiang, China, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 罗宏海, 赵瑞海, 韩春丽, 张旺锋. 缩节胺(DPC)对不同密度下棉花冠层结构特征与产量性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2011, 23: 334-340.
Luo H H, Zhao R H, Han C L, Zhang W F. Effects of growth regulators (DPC) on canopy architecture and yield characteristics of cotton under different planting densities. Cotton Sci, 2011, 23: 334-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 陈晓娇. DPC浸种促进棉花侧根发育的激素机制及结合态ABAscFv的制备. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2017.
Chen X J. The Hormone Mechanism of DPC Promoting Lateral Root Formationin Cotton Seedling and the Preparation of Conjugated ABA scFv. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 王宁, 田晓莉, 段留生, 严根土, 黄群, 李召虎. 缩节胺浸种提高棉花幼苗根系活力中的活性氧代谢. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1220-1226.
Wang N, Tian X L, Duan L S, Yan G T, Huang Q, Li Z H. Metabolism of reactive oxygen species involved in increasing root vigor of cotton seedlings by soaking seeds with mepiquat chloride. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1220-1226. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 赵文超, 杜明伟, 黎芳, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 应用缩节安(DPC)调控棉花株型的定位定量效应研究. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1059-1069.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84162
Zhao W C, Du M W, Li F, Tian X L, Li Z H. Location- and quantity-based effects of mepiquat chloride application on cotton plant-type. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1059-1069. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 李颖, 陈金湘, 李垚垚, 易九红. 缩节胺在棉花上的应用概况. 作物研究, 2008, 22(增刊1): 457-459.
Li Y, Chen X J, Li Y Y, Yi J H. Application of DPC in cotton. Crop Res, 2008, 22(S1): 457-459 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 李雪琴, 郭新萍. 用缩节胺处理棉种不断完善棉花系统化调技术. 农村科技, 1997, (6): 4.
Li X Q, Guo X P. Treatment of cotton seeds with DPC and continuous improvement of cotton systematic adjustment technology. Rural Sci Technol, 1997, (6): 4. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 雷斌, 恽友兰, 张云生, 周春江, 蔡红梅, 徐公赦, 黄乐平. 根用多功能缓释缩节胺在棉花上的应用研究. 新疆农业科学, 2007, 44: 502-505.
Lei B, Yun Y L, Zhang Y S, Zhou C J, Cai H M, Xu G S, Huang L P. Application of the multifunctional and slowly releasing of root use shrink-burl-amine to cotton. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2007, 44: 502-505. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 杨建荣, 马富裕, 尹小龙, 慕志新, 朱家辉. 随水滴施缩节安和多效唑对棉花幼苗生长发育的影响. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 5(4): 284-287.
Yang J R, Ma F Y, Yin X L, Mu Z X, Zhu J H. A study on the effect of DPC and PP333 dissolved in water during irrigation on the growth of cotton seedling. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci), 2001, 5(4): 284-287. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 赵强, 张巨松, 田晓莉, 彭小峰, 李斌, 艾买提江, 周春江. 南疆棉花种子包衣缓释缩节胺化控技术的初步研究. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47: 25-30.
Zhao Q, Zhang J S, Tian X L, Peng X F, Li B, Aimaitijiang, Zhou C J. Chemical treatment of slow-release mepiquat chloride from coated cotton seed in South Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2010, 47: 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 周春江, 田晓莉, 李松林, 恽友兰. 缓释缩节胺包衣处理对棉花农艺及经济性状的调控效果. 中国棉花, 2004, 31(9): 14-16.
Zhou C J, Tian X L, Li S L, Yun Y L. Effect of slow release DPC coating on Agronomic and economic characters of cotton. China Cotton, 2004, 31(9): 14-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 田晓莉, 谢湘毅, 周春江, 杨培珠, 王保民, 段留生, 李松林, 恽友兰, 何钟佩, 李召虎. 植物生长调节剂甲哌鎓在土壤中的降解及其影响因子. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27: 1726-1731.
Tian X L, Xie X Y, Zhou C J, Yang P Z, Wang B M, Duan L S, Li S L, Yun Y L, He Z P, Li Z H. Factors affecting the degradation of mepiquat chloride in soil. journal of agro-environment science. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2008, 27: 1726-1731. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 何钟佩, 李丕明, 奚惠达, 李召虎, 白玉良. DPC化控技术在棉花上的应用和发展——从防止徒长到系统的定向诱导. 北京农业大学学报, 1991, (S1): 58-63.
He Z P, Li P M, Xi H D, Li Z H, Bai Y L. The using and development of DPC chemical controlling technique in cotton culture. J Beijing Agric Univ, 1991, (S1): 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 刘翠, 张巨松, 魏鑫, 徐新霞. 甲哌鎓化控对南疆杂交棉功能叶生理指标及产量性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2014, 26: 122-129.
Liu C, Zhang J S, Wei X, Xu X X. Effects of mepiquat chloride on physiological indicators of leaf function and characteristics of yield of hybrid cotton in South Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2014, 26: 122-129. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 李松林, 恽友兰, 田晓莉. 化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺和经济性状的影响. 棉花学报, 2011, 23: 329-333.
Zhao Q, Zhou C J, Zhang J S, Li S L, Yun Y L, Tian X L. Effect of chemical detopping on the canopy and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in south Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2011, 23: 329-333. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 韩焕勇, 杜明伟, 王方永, 陈兵, 田晓莉. 北疆棉区增效缩节胺应用剂量对棉花农艺和经济性状的影响. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32: 327-330.
Han H Y, Du M W, Wang F Y, Chen B, Tian X L. Effects of DPC+ Application dose on agronomic and economic traits of cotton in northern Xinjiang. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2019, 32: 327-330. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 廖宝鹏, 任晓明, 杜明伟, Egrinya Eneji A, 徐东永, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 缩节胺系统化控促进棉花产量器官发育的研究. 见:第十九届中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集, 2020. p 321.
Liao B P, Ren X M, Du M W, Egrinya Eneji A, Xu Y D, Tian X L, Li Z H. Study on promoting the development of yield organs of cotton by systematic and chemical control of ketamine. In:Proceedings of 19th Annual Academic Conference of the Crop Science Society of China, 2020. p 321. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 徐新霞, 苏丽丽, 魏鑫, 刘翠, 张巨松. DPC对杂交棉生长发育调控效应研究. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52: 1237-1242.
Xu X X, Su L L, Wei X, Liu C, Zhang J S. Regulating effect of DPC on hybrid cotton growing development. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2015, 52: 1237-1242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 石治鹏, 李敏, 林忠旭, 李晓方, 李定国. 缩节胺对棉花生长发育的调控效应研究进展. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(7): 1-8.
Shi Z P, Li M, Lin Z X, Li X F, Li D G. Research progress on regulating effect of DPC on cotton growth and development. J Henan Agric Sci, 2017, 46(7): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] GUO Hong, YU Ji-Wen, PEI Wen-Feng, GUAN Yong-Hu, LI Hang, LI Chang-Xi, LIU Jin-Wei, WANG Wei, WANG Bao-Quan, MEI Yong-Jun. Genetic analysis of F2 generation of upland cotton hybrids and main effect clustering in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(3): 608-621.
[2] HAN Bei, SUN Si-Min, SUN Wei-Nan, YANG Xi-Yan, ZHANG Xian-Long. Molecular mechanisms of somatic embryogenesis in plants [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(2): 299-309.
[3] SUN Zhi-Chao, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Physiological mechanism and regulation effect of low light on maize yield formation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(1): 12-23.
[4] KE Hui-Feng, ZHANG Zhen, GU Qi-Shen, ZHAO Yan, LI Pei-Yu, ZHANG Dong-Mei, CUI Yan-Ru, WANG Xing-Fen, WU Li-Qiang, ZHANG Gui-Yin, MA Zhi-Ying, SUN Zheng-Wen. Genome-wide association study of root biomass related traits at seeding stage under low phosphorus stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2168-2179.
[5] LI Ming-Jiang, LEI Jian-Feng, ZULIPIYE·Tuoheniyazi , DAI Pei-Hong, LIU Chao, LIU Xiao-Dong. Cloning and functional verification of GhIQM1 gene of cotton in response to Verticillium wilt [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2265-2273.
[6] GUO Yao, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, FAN Hong. Research progress of photosynthetic physiological mechanism and approaches to application in dense planting maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 1871-1883.
[7] GUO Jia-Xin, LU Xiao-Yu, TAO Yi-Fan, GUO Hui-Juan, MIN Wei. Analysis of metabolites and pathways in cotton under salt and alkali stresses [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 2100-2114.
[8] ZHU Ling-Xiao, SONG Shi-Jia, LI Hao-Ran, SUN Hong-Chun, ZHANG Yong-Jiang, BAI Zhi-Ying, ZHANG Ke, LI An-Chang, LIU Lian-Tao, LI Cun-Dong. Screening of low nitrogen tolerant cultivars based on low nitrogen tolerance comprehensive index at seeding stage in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(7): 1800-1812.
[9] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[10] YANG Jian-Chang, LI Chao-Qing, JIANG Yi. Contents and compositions of amino acids in rice grains and their regulation: a review [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[11] ZHOU Jing-Yuan, KONG Xiang-Qiang, ZHANG Yan-Jun, LI Xue-Yuan, ZHANG Dong-Mei, DONG He-Zhong. Mechanism and technology of stand establishment improvements through regulating the apical hook formation and hypocotyl growth during seed germination and emergence in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[12] SUN Si-Min, HAN Bei, CHEN Lin, SUN Wei-Nan, ZHANG Xian-Long, YANG Xi-Yan. Root system architecture analysis and genome-wide association study of root system architecture related traits in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[13] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[14] ZHENG Shu-Feng, LIU Xiao-Ling, WANG Wei, XU Dao-Qing, KAN Hua-Chun, CHEN Min, LI Shu-Ying. On the green and light-simplified and mechanized cultivation of cotton in a cotton-based double cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 541-552.
[15] ZHANG Yan-Bo, WANG Yuan, FENG Gan-Yu, DUAN Hui-Rong, LIU Hai-Ying. QTLs analysis of oil and three main fatty acid contents in cottonseeds [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 380-395.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd