Acta Agron Sin ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05): 761-766.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00761
• REVIEW • Next Articles
MEI Xu-Rong,ZHONG Xiu-Li,LIU Xiao-Ying
[1]Tanner C B, Sinclair T R. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Taylor H M, Jordan W R, Sinclair T R, eds. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy, 1983. pp 1–27[2]Condon A G, Richards R A, Rebetzke G J, Farquhar G D. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 122–131[3]Turner N C. Water use efficiency of crop plants: potential for improvement. In: Buxton I D R ed. International Crop Science. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: Crop Science Society of America, 1993. pp 75–82[4]Wallace J S, Batchelor C H. Managing water resources for crop production. Philos T R Soc B, 1997, 352: 937–947[5]Shan L, Deng X P, Zhang S Q. Advance in biological water-saving research: challenge and perspectives. Sci Found China, 2006, 2: 66–71[6]Zhang Z B, Xu P, Shao H B, Liu M J, Fu Z Y, Chu L Y. Advances and prospects: Biotechnologically improving crop water use efficiency. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2011, 31: 281–293 [7]Zhang X Y, Chen S Y, Liu M Y, Pei D, Sun H Y. Improved water use efficiency associated with cultivars and agronomic management in the North China Plain. Agron J, 2005, 97: 783–790[8]Polley W H. Implications of atmospheric and climatic change for crop yield and water use efficiency. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 131–140[9]Morgan J A, LeCain D R. Leaf gas exchange and related leaf traits among 15 winter wheat genotypes. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 443–448[10]Johnson R C. Carbon isotope discrimination, water relations, and photosynthesis in tall fescue. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 169–174[11]Abbate P E, Dardanelli J L, Cantarero M G, Maturano M, Melchiori R J M, Suero E E. Climatic and water availability effects on water-use efficiency in wheat. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 474–483[12]Van Den Boogaard R, Alewijnse D, Veneklaas E J, Lambers H. Growth and water-use efficiency of 10 Triticum aestivum cultivars at different availability in relation to allocation of biomass. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20: 200–210[13]Krishnamurthy L, Vadez V, Devi M J, Serraj R, Nigam S N, Sheshshayee M S, Chandra S, Aruna R. Variation in transpiration efficiency and its related traits in a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mapping population. Field Crops Res, 2007, 103: 189–197[14]Hatfield J L, Sauer T J, Prueger J H. Managing soil to achieve great water use efficiency: a review. Agron J, 2001, 93: 271–280[15]Farquhar G D, Richards R A. Isotope composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotype. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1984, 11: 539–552[16]Anyia A O, Herzog H. Water use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under midseason drought. Eur J Agron, 2004, 20: 327–339[17]Rao R C N, Wright G C. Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environments in peanut. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 98–103[18]Condon A G, Farquhar G D, Richards R A. Genotypic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in wheat. Leaf gas exchange and whole plant studies. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990, 17: 9–22[19]Martin B, Kebede H, Rilling C. Photosynthetic differences among Lycopersicon species and Tricum aestivum cultivars. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 113–118 [20]Morgan J A, LeCain D R, McCaig T N, Quick J S. Gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and productivity in winter wheat. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 178–186[21]Ehleringer J R, Klassen S, Clayton C, Sherrill D, Fuller-Holbrook M, Fu Q A, Cooper T A. Carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in common bean. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1611–1615[22]Vyas S P, Garg B K, Kathju S, Lahiri A N. Influence of potassium on water relations, photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and yield of cluster bean under soil moisture stress. Indian J Plant Physiol, 2001, 6: 30–37[23]Siemens J A, Zwiazek J J. Effect of water deficit stress and recovery on the root water relations of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings. Plant Sci, 2003, 165: 113–120[24]Bota J, Flexas J, Medrano H. Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grapevine cultivar. Ann Appl Biol, 2001, 138: 353–361[25]Devi M J, Sinclair T R, Vadez V. Genotypic variation in peanut for transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit. Crop Sci, 2010, 50: 191–196[26]Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Devi M J, Reddy D S, Lavanya M, Vadez V, Serraj R, Shinozaki K Y, Sharma K K. Stress-inducible expression of At DREB1A in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) increases transpiration efficiency under water-limiting conditions. Plant Cell Rep, 2007, 26: 2071–2082[27]Khazaei H, Monneveux P, Shao H, Mohammady S. Variation for stomatal characteristics and water use efficiency among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Iranian wheat landraces. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2010, 57: 307–314[28]Farquhar G D, Ehleringer J R, Hubick K T. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1989, 40: 503–537[29]Hubick K T, Farquhar G D, Shorter R. Correlation between water use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in diverse peanut (Arachis) germplasm. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1986, 13: 803–816[30]Nageswara Rao R C, Williams J H, Wadia K D R, Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Crop growth, water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes under end-of-season drought conditions. Ann Appl Biol, 1993, 122: 357–367[31]Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Devi M J, Vadez V, Sharma K K. Differential antioxidative responses in transgenic peanut bear no relationship to their superior transpiration efficiency under drought stress. J Plant Physiol, 2009, 166: 1207–1217[33]Devi M J, Sinclair T R, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L. Peanut genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency and decreased transpiration during progressive soil drying. Field Crops Res, 2009, 114: 280–285[34]Devi M J, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sharma K K, Serraj R, Anwar S Y, Vadez V. Relationships between transpiration efficiency (TE) and its surrogate traits in the rd29A:DREB1A transgenic groundnut). J Agron Crop Sci, 2011, 197: 272–283[35]Liu F L, Andersen M N, Jacobsen S E, Jensen C R. Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying. Environ Exp Bot, 2005, 54: 33–40[36]Anyia A O, Slaski J J, Nyachiro J M, Archambault D J, Juskiw P. Relationship of carbon isotope discrimination to water use efficiency and productivity of Barley under field and green house conditions. J Agron Crop Sci, 2007, 193: 313–323[37]Jaleel C A, Gopi R, Sankar B, Gomathinayagam M, Panneerselvam R. Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress. C R Biologies, 2008, 331: 42-47[38]Ratnakumar P, Vadez V, Nigam S N, Krishnamurthy L. Assessment of transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought using a lysimeter system. Plant Biol, 2009, 11(suppl-1): 124–130[39]Vadez V, Rao S, Kholova J, krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Ratnakumar P, Sharma K K, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Basu P S. Root research for drought tolerance in legumes: Qua vadis? J Food Legumes, 2008, 21: 77–85[40]Wang H, Zhang L, Dawes W R, Liu C. Improving water use efficiency of irrigated crops in the North China Plain-measurements and modeling. Agric Water Manage, 2001, 48: 151–167 [41]Guo J-X(郭家选), Li Y-Z(李玉中), Yan C-R(严昌荣), Zhao Q-S(赵全胜), Mei X-R(梅旭荣). Evapotranspiration of winter wheat field in the North China Plain. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17: 2357–2362 (in Chinese with English abstract) [42]Zhao F, Yu G, Li S, Ren C, Sun X, Mi N, Li J, Ou-Yang Z. Canopy water use efficiency of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manage, 2007, 93: 99–108[43]Bolger T P, Turner N C. Transpiration efficiency of three Mediterranean annual pasture species and wheat. Oecologia, 1998, 115: 32–38[44]Jarvis P G, McNaughton K G. Stomatal control of transpiration: Scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res, 1986, 15: 1–49[45]Farquhar G D, O’Leary M H, Berry J A. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1982, 9: 121–137[46]Ehdaie B, Hall A E, Farquhar G D, Nguyen H T, Waines J G. Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1282–1288[47]Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Carbon isotope discrimination and the ratio of carbon gained to water lost in barley genotypes. Plant Cell Environ, 1989, 12: 795–804[48]Condon A G, Richards R A, Farquhar G D. Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat. Crop Sci, 1987, 27: 996–1001[49]Johnson D A, Asay K H, Tieszen L L, Ehleringer J R, Jefferson P G. Carbon isotope discrimination: potential in screening cool-season grasses for water-limited environments. Crop Sci, 1990, 30: 338–343[50]White J W, Castillo J A, Ehleringer J. Association between productivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Phaseolus vulgaris under water deficit. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990, 17: 189–198[51]Voltas J I, Romagosa I, Lafarga A, Armesto A P, Sombrero A, Araus J L. Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain. Aust J Agric Res, 1999, 50: 1263–1271[52]Merah O, Deleens E, Souyris I, Nachit M, Monneveux P. Stability of isotope discrimination and grain yield in durum wheat. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 677–681[53]Jiang Q, Roche D, Hole D J. Carbon isotope discrimination of two-rowed and six-rowed barley genotypes and under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Can J Plant Sci, 2006, 86: 433–441[54]Wright C G, Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Discrimination in carbon isotopes of leaves correlates with water-use efficiency of field-grown peanut cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1988, 15: 815–825 [55]Hubick K T. Effects of nitrogen source and water limitation on growth, transpiration efficiency, and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990, 17: 413–430[56]Rebetzke G J, Condon A G, Richards R A, Farquhar G J. Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 739–745[57]Lambrides C J, Chapman S C, Shorter R. Surveys of carbon isotope discrimination in sunflower reveal considerable genetic variation, a strong association with transpiration efficiency and evidence of cytoplasmic inheritance. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 1642–1653[58]Stiller W N, Read J J, Constable G A, Reid P E. Selection for water use efficiency traits in cotton breeding programme: genotype differences. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 1107–1113[59]Richards R A. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manag, 2006, 80: 197–211 |
[1] | WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450. |
[2] | WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462. |
[3] | YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475. |
[4] | YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487. |
[5] | CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515. |
[6] | LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545. |
[7] | SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297. |
[8] | YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247. |
[9] | KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016. |
[10] | LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951. |
[11] | WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961. |
[12] | DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571. |
[13] | CHEN Yun, LI Si-Yu, ZHU An, LIU Kun, ZHANG Ya-Jun, ZHANG Hao, GU Jun-Fei, ZHANG Wei-Yang, LIU Li-Jun, YANG Jian-Chang. Effects of seeding rates and panicle nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and quality in good taste rice cultivars under direct sowing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 656-666. |
[14] | YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681. |
[15] | DING Hong, XU Yang, ZHANG Guan-Chu, QIN Fei-Fei, DAI Liang-Xiang, ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Effects of drought at different growth stages and nitrogen application on nitrogen absorption and utilization in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 695-703. |
|