Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 514-528.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.34086

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles    

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC combined application on temporal distribution of cotton yield and fiber quality

LI Zhi-Kun1,2,**(), JIA Wen-Hua1,3,**(), ZHU Wei1, LIU Wei1,*(), MA Zong-Bin1,*()   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China
    2Zhejiang Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, China
    3Henan Province Seed Industry Development Center, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China
  • Received:2023-05-21 Accepted:2023-09-13 Online:2024-02-12 Published:2023-09-21
  • Contact: *E-mail: liuwei0205@henau.edu.cn; E-mail: zongbinma@henau.edu.cn
  • About author:**Contributed equally to this work
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Research Program of Henan Province(222102110435);Special Fund for Henan Agriculture Research System(S2013-07-G04)

Abstract:

The temporal and spatial distribution of cotton pre-summer boll, summer boll, early-autumn boll, and late-autumn boll (“four peaches”) are different, but there are few reports on the difference of their fiber yield and quality, as well as response to nitrogen (N) rates and mepiquat chloride (DPC) application. From 2015 to 2017, we employed a split-plot design in randomized complete blocks in this work in the Yellow River beach area of Zhengzhou city. The main plots were assigned to N fertilizer rates, namely no N application (N0), normal N (N1), and excessive N (N2), with the rate of 0, 225, and 450 N kg hm-2, respectively. And the subplots to DPC dosages, namely no DPC (D0), normal DPC (D1), and excessive DPC (D2), with the dosages of 0, 75, and 150 g hm-2, respectively. The effects of N fertilizer and DPC combined application on temporal distribution of cotton yield and fiber quality were studied. The results showed that: (1) The fiber yield of N1 treatment increased by 36.79% and 3.72% compared with N0 and N2 treatments, respectively, and N2 treatment did not significantly decrease the yield compared with N1. The fiber yield of D1 treatment increased by17.53% and 8.50% compared with D0 and D2 treatments, respectively, and D2 treatment decreased the yield significantly compared with D1. The fiber yield of N1D1 combined treatment was the highest, and yield of all the other combined treatments decreased by 1.15%-51.53% compared with N1D1. The proportions of fiber yield of pre-summer boll, summer boll, early-autumn boll, and late-autumn boll with N1D1 combined treatment were 8.89%, 45.35%, 33.41%, and 12.36%, respectively. Both summer boll and early-autumn boll were main yield components, but the early-autumn boll had the highest intensity of yield formation in particular. And with the increase of N application rates, the proportions of fiber yield of early-autumn boll and late-autumn boll increased, but DPC application dosages showed the opposite characteristics. (2) With the exception of the fiber elongation, fiber length, fiber length uniformity, fiber strength, and micronaire value of “four peaches” were significantly affected by N fertilizer rates and DPC dosages. The optimal fiber quality was harvested with N1 treatment compared with N0 and N2 treatments, and D1 treatment showed the highest-grade fiber compared with D0 and D2 treatments, but the fiber micronaire values with D0 treatment was the best. N and DPC combined treatments had significantly interaction effect on fiber strength and micronaire value, and N1D1 had the best fiber strength and micronaire value with “four peaches” among the different treatment combinations, while N2D2 showed opposite trend. Moreover, the excessive using of N fertilizer and DPC led to the degradation of fiber micronaire value. (3) The fiber quality of “four peaches” were different. The fiber length, fiber length uniformity, and fiber strength of pre-summer boll were poor, but its micronaire value was higher grade, and the fiber quality of summer boll and early-autumn boll had exactly the opposite effect. As for fiber quality of late autumn boll, the elongation was the best, and the other quality index were in the middle. These findings enriched the theoretical basis of the yield and quality difference of cotton “four peaches”, and provided scientific supports for rational application of N and DPC in cotton fields and reasonable utilization of the fiber of cotton “four peaches”.

Key words: cotton, nitrogen fertilizer, DPC, four peaches, fiber yield, fiber quality

Table 1

Fertility status of test soil"

年份
Year
有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)
全氮
Total nitrogen
(g kg-1)
碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen
(mg kg-1)
速效磷
Available phosphorus (mg kg-1)
速效钾
Available potassium
(mg kg-1)
pH
2015 9.60 0.56 56.0 4.6 83.0 8.3
2016 9.23 0.33 79.0 6.2 84.0 8.3
2017 9.42 0.58 57.0 4.3 92.0 8.4

Table 2

Monthly basic meteorological data of cotton growing stage in Henan Province from 2015 to 2017"

年份
Year
日均气温
Mean daily air
temperature
(℃)
温度比常年
Mean daily
temperature than
the normal year (℃)
月均降水量
Mean month
precipitation
(mm)
降水比常年
Mean month
precipitation than the normal year (mm)
月均日照时数
Mean month sunshine hours (h)
日照比常年
Mean month sunshine hours than the normal year (h)
2015 22.1 0.0 81.2 -10.8 159.8 -20.6
2016 22.9 0.7 103.6 11.6 158.8 -21.7
2017 22.3 0.8 105.0 12.8 174.5 -3.4

Table 3

Effect of the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on fiber yield of cotton “four peaches” (kg hm-2)"

年份
Year
N肥用量
N rate
DPC用量
DPC dosage
伏前桃
Pre-summer boll
伏桃
Summer boll
早秋桃
Early-autumn boll
晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
总产
Total yield
2015 N0 D0 84.56 d 453.06 e 239.12 e 107.93 d 884.67 d
D1 116.36 bcd 502.39 e 374.42 d 99.88 d 1093.04 cd
D2 136.80 abcd 536.36 de 475.16 c 102.04 d 1250.37 c
N1 D0 103.56 cd 727.90 ab 631.36 b 263.41 bc 1726.23 ab
D1 143.80 abc 785.28 a 769.66 a 241.10 c 1939.84 a
D2 173.72 a 749.25 ab 492.38 c 216.72 c 1632.06 b
N2 D0 118.18 abcd 469.21 e 637.20 b 347.60 a 1572.19 b
D1 167.61 ab 675.43 bc 714.48 ab 330.76 ab 1888.28 a
D2 155.61 abc 610.91 cd 615.89 b 201.06 c 1583.47 b
2016 N0 D0 112.51 b 526.11 c 185.78 c 120.84 cd 945.24 e
D1 186.22 a 645.01 c 372.77 bc 140.82 cd 1314.82 cd
D2 188.90 a 590.41 c 334.32 c 129.56 cd 1243.20 de
N1 D0 111.87 b 858.99 ab 363.23 bc 151.27 bcd 1485.39 cd
D1 193.54 a 1039.96 a 634.62 a 280.62 ab 2148.74 a
D2 192.43 a 961.56 a 535.18 ab 261.28 abc 1950.45 ab
N2 D0 180.25 b 687.62 c 551.70 ab 321.25 a 1655.81 bc
D1 191.08 a 896.86 ab 605.69 a 305.30 a 2050.05 a
D2 196.23 a 690.20 bc 539.52 ab 189.20 abcd 1615.15 bc
2017 N0 D0 117.22 b 493.17 c 237.99 c 150.53 cd 998.91 b
D1 165.97 ab 576.60 c 355.24 bc 130.74 de 1228.55 b
D2 172.21 ab 551.55 c 354.05 bc 91.65 e 1169.46 b
N1 D0 167.06 ab 788.61 ab 462.51 ab 157.22 cd 1575.40 a
D1 180.19 a 830.17 ab 545.75 ab 203.86 c 1759.97 a
D2 206.89 a 902.04 a 532.14 ab 164.11 cd 1805.17 a
N2 D0 148.87 ab 561.73 b 645.04 a 337.95 a 1693.59 a
D1 169.02 ab 783.42 ab 608.44 a 269.97 b 1830.84 a
D2 204.78 a 740.88 b 543.82 ab 171.29 cd 1660.77 a
平均值 N0 142.31 b 538.30 c 325.43 c 119.33 c 1125.36 b
Average N1 163.67 a 849.31 a 551.87 b 215.51 b 1780.36 a
N2 170.18 a 670.14 b 606.86 a 274.93 a 1722.11 a
D0 127.12 b 609.05 b 439.32 c 217.56 a 1393.05 c
D1 168.20 a 745.01 a 553.45 a 222.56 a 1689.22 a
D2 180.84 a 703.69 a 491.38 b 169.66 b 1545.57 b
变异来源 Y ** ** ** NS NS
Source of N ** ** ** ** **
variation D ** ** ** ** **
Y×N NS NS NS NS NS
Y×D NS NS NS NS NS
N×D NS NS ** ** *
Y×N×D NS NS NS NS NS

Table 4

Effect of the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on fiber length of cotton “four peaches” (mm)"

年份
Year
N肥用量
N rate
DPC用量
DPC dosage
伏前桃
Pre-summer boll
伏桃
Summer boll
早秋桃
Early-autumn boll
晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 29.63 a (c) 31.23 a (a) 30.17 abc (bc) 30.77 a (ab)
D1 29.94 a (a) 30.50 ab (a) 29.40 abc (a) 29.63 ab (a)
D2 29.80 a (a) 29.53 bc (a) 28.83 bc (a) 28.73 b (a)
N1 D0 29.97 a (a) 30.67 a (a) 30.50 ab (a) 30.67 a (a)
D1 29.73 a (a) 31.37 a (a) 30.73 a (a) 30.47 a (a)
D2 29.80 a (a) 28.83 c (a) 29.63 abc (a) 29.73 ab (a)
N2 D0 30.27 a (a) 30.60 a (a) 29.57 abc (a) 30.80 a (a)
D1 29.97 a (a) 30.37 ab (a) 29.50 abc (a) 29.97 ab (a)
D2 29.90 a (a) 28.90 c (a) 28.73 c (a) 29.70 ab (a)
2016 N0 D0 30.53 a (a) 30.87 ab (a) 30.30 a (a) 29.27 a (b)
D1 30.73 a (a) 30.40 ab (ab) 30.63 a (a) 29.07 a (b)
D2 30.47 a (a) 30.33 ab (a) 29.97 a (a) 28.90 a (a)
N1 D0 30.57 a (a) 30.73 ab (a) 30.80 a (a) 29.57 a (a)
D1 30.73 a (a) 29.93 ab (a) 30.60 a (a) 30.30 a (a)
D2 29.83 a (b) 29.63 b (b) 30.83 a (a) 28.77 a (c)
N2 D0 30.63 a (ab) 31.23 a (a) 30.13 a (ab) 29.37 a (b)
D1 29.63 a (a) 30.17 ab (a) 30.93 a (a) 30.13 a (a)
D2 29.83 a (ab) 30.33 ab (ab) 31.13 a (a) 29.07 a (b)
2017 N0 D0 27.97 a (a) 28.20 a (a) 28.13 a (a) 28.13 a (a)
D1 27.10 ab (a) 27.37 a (a) 27.97 a (a) 27.97 a (a)
D2 27.60 ab (a) 27.67 a (a) 28.00 a (a) 28.00 a (a)
N1 D0 26.63 b (b) 28.43 a (a) 27.47 a (ab) 27.57 a (ab)
D1 27.17 ab (b) 27.67 a (a) 27.33 a (ab) 27.33 a (ab)
D2 26.53 b (a) 27.20 a (a) 27.87 a (a) 27.87 a (a)
N2 D0 26.63 b (a) 27.27 a (a) 27.00 a (a) 27.00 a (a)
D1 27.07 ab (a) 27.10 a (a) 27.53 a (a) 27.53 a (a)
D2 26.47 b (a) 26.93 a (a) 27.57 a (a) 27.57 a (a)
平均值 N0 29.73 a 29.57 a 29.27 ab 28.94 a
Average N1 29.00 b 29.39 a 29.54 a 29.14 a
N2 28.93 b 29.21 a 29.12 b 29.01 a
D0 29.20 a 29.91 a 29.35 a 29.24 a
D1 29.54 a 29.43 b 29.40 a 29.16 ab
D2 28.91 a 28.82 c 29.17 a 28.70 b
变异来源 Y ** ** ** **
Source of N * NS NS NS
variation D NS ** NS *
Y×N NS NS * NS
Y×D NS * NS *
N×D NS NS NS NS
Y×N×D NS NS NS NS

Table 5

Effect of the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on fiber length uniformity of cotton “four peaches” (%)"

年份
Year
N肥用量
N rate
DPC用量
DPC dosage
伏前桃
Pre-summer boll
伏桃
Summer boll
早秋桃
Early-autumn boll
晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 78.47 ab (b) 82.37 c (a) 82.00 ab (a) 82.23 ab (a)
D1 79.80 a (b) 85.23 a (a) 81.03 abc (b) 81.13 c (b)
D2 79.67 a (ab) 82.47 c (a) 79.27 d (b) 80.07 d (ab)
N1 D0 79.10 ab (b) 83.63 b (a) 80.87 abcd (b) 82.93 a (a)
D1 80.97 a (c) 84.90 a (a) 82.63 a (b) 82.93 a (b)
D2 79.53 a (b) 82.80 bc (a) 80.13 cd (b) 82.80 ab (a)
N2 D0 79.77 a (b) 82.97 bc (a) 81.37 abc (ab) 81.67 bc (ab)
D1 79.97 a (b) 82.90 bc (a) 82.07 ab (a) 82.60 ab (a)
D2 76.87 b (b) 81.83 c (a) 80.73 bcd (a) 81.20 c (a)
2016 N0 D0 84.23 ab (a) 85.80 a (a) 85.40 a (a) 84.10 a (a)
D1 84.23 ab (ab) 84.83 ab (ab) 85.03 a (a) 82.60 a (b)
D2 84.43 ab (ab) 84.20 b (ab) 85.97 a (a) 80.47 a (b)
N1 D0 85.53 a (ab) 84.53 ab (bc) 86.40 a (a) 83.43 a (c)
D1 84.90 ab (a) 84.50 ab (a) 85.77 a (a) 84.27 a (a)
D2 84.90 ab (a) 84.90 ab (a) 85.37 a (a) 81.20 a (b)
N2 D0 85.07 ab (ab) 85.37 ab (a) 85.67 a (a) 83.403 a (b)
D1 84.90 ab (b) 84.67 ab (b) 86.17 a (a) 83.33 a (a)
D2 83.73 b (ab) 84.68 ab (ab) 86.33 a (a) 82.03 a (b)
2017 N0 D0 80.53 ab (a) 81.67 a (a) 80.03 b (a) 80.03 b (a)
D1 79.50 a (a) 78.77 b (a) 80.20 b (a) 80.20 b (a)
D2 79.40 a (ab) 79.23 b (b) 80.90 ab (a) 80.90 ab (a)
N1 D0 80.60 a (a) 79.90 ab (a) 80.50 ab (a) 80.50 ab (a)
D1 78.43 a (b) 80.50 ab (a) 81.13 ab (a) 81.13 ab (a)
D2 81.23 a (ab) 79.77 ab (b) 82.40 a (a) 82.40 a (a)
N2 D0 81.00 a (a) 80.30 ab (a) 81.23 ab (a) 81.23 ab (a)
D1 80.33 a (a) 78.57 b (a) 80.13 b (a) 80.13 b (a)
D2 78.57 a (b) 79.67 ab (ab) 81.93 ab (a) 81.93 ab (a)
平均值 N0 78.92 a 82.73 ab 82.20 b 81.30 b
Average N1 81.69 a 82.83 a 82.80 a 82.40 a
N2 81.13 a 82.33 b 82.85 a 81.97 ab
D0 79.37 a 82.95 a 82.61 a 82.19 a
D1 81.45 a 82.76 a 82.69 a 82.04 a
D2 80.93 a 82.17 b 82.56 a 81.44 a
变异来源 Y ** ** ** **
Sources of N NS NS * *
variation D NS ** NS NS
Y×N NS NS NS NS
Y×D NS ** ** **
N×D NS NS NS NS
Y×N×D NS * NS NS

Table 6

Effect of the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on fiber strength of cotton “four peaches” (cN tex-1)"

年份
Year
N肥用量
N rate
DPC用量
DPC dosage
伏前桃
Pre-summer boll
伏桃
Summer boll
早秋桃
Early-autumn boll
晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 26.10 de (b) 29.43 ab (a) 30.03 ab (a) 28.97 cd (a)
D1 27.50 bc (b) 29.40 ab (a) 29.70 ab (a) 30.13 bc (a)
D2 26.27 cde (b) 29.60 ab (a) 28.03 b (ab) 28.07 d (ab)
N1 D0 27.73 b (b) 31.07 a (a) 29.50 ab (a) 30.77 ab (a)
D1 29.73 a (b) 30.47 a (a) 29.50 ab (b) 31.87 a (a)
D2 27.03 bcd (b) 28.13 bc (b) 27.90 b (b) 30.57 ab (a)
N2 D0 26.60 bcde (b) 30.07 a (a) 29.30 ab (a) 30.73 ab (a)
D1 27.07 bcd (c) 27.37 c (bc) 30.40 a (a) 29.37 bcd (ab)
D2 25.60 e (c) 26.53 c (bc) 27.90 ab (ab) 29.27 bcd (a)
2016 N0 D0 26.73 d (b) 28.13 bc (ab) 30.03 ab (a) 30.77 ab (a)
D1 27.30 bcd (b) 28.40 bc (ab) 29.70 ab (a) 27.73 cd (ab)
D2 26.87 cd (ab) 26.40 c (ab) 28.03 b (a) 25.70 de (b)
N1 D0 28.47 ab (ab) 27.70 bc (b) 29.50 ab (a) 29.83 abc (a)
D1 29.10 a (b) 31.20 a (a) 29.50 ab (b) 31.90 a (a)
D2 28.07 abcd (a) 28.00 bc (a) 27.90 b (a) 27.63 cd (a)
N2 D0 28.37 abc (a) 28.90 b (a) 29.30 ab (a) 29.70 abc (a)
D1 29.10 a (a) 29.10 ab (a) 30.40 a (a) 28.63 bc (a)
D2 26.70 d (ab) 27.03 bc (ab) 27.90 ab (a) 25.17 e (b)
2017 N0 D0 26.30 b (a) 26.90 b (a) 25.70 b (a) 26.37 bc (a)
D1 26.90 b (a) 26.60 b (a) 26.43 b (a) 26.77 bc (a)
D2 25.70 b (b) 25.97 b (b) 25.50 b (b) 27.50 ab (a)
N1 D0 27.33 b (a) 27.33 b (a) 26.97 b (a) 26.97 bc (a)
D1 29.40 a (a) 30.03 a (a) 28.90 a (a) 28.57 a (a)
D2 26.60 b (a) 27.63 b (a) 27.13 b (a) 26.47 bc (a)
N2 D0 26.43 b (a) 26.43 b (a) 26.40 b (a) 26.40 bc (a)
D1 26.43 b (a) 27.43 b (a) 26.83 b (a) 26.83 bc (a)
D2 25.63 b (a) 26.40 b (a) 26.47 b (a) 25.60 c (a)
平均值 N0 26.63 b 27.87 b 28.09 b 28.00 b
Average N1 28.17 a 29.06 a 28.92 a 29.40 a
N2 26.88 b 27.70 b 28.30 ab 27.98 b
D0 27.12 b 28.44 a 28.53 b 28.94 a
D1 28.06 a 28.89 a 29.29 a 29.09 a
D2 26.50 c 27.30 b 27.58 c 27.33 b
变异来源 Y NS NS NS NS
Source of N ** ** * **
variation D ** ** ** **
Y×N NS * * NS
Y×D NS ** NS **
N×D NS * NS **
Y×N×D NS NS NS *

Table 7

Effect of the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on fiber micronaire value of cotton “four peaches”"

年份
Year
N肥用量
N rate
DPC用量
DPC dosage
伏前桃
Pre-summer boll
伏桃
Summer boll
早秋桃
Early-autumn boll
晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 4.63 cd (b) 5.07 a (a) 4.57 b (b) 4.43 c (b)
D1 5.07 a (a) 4.97 ab (ab) 4.97 a (ab) 4.87 ab (b)
D2 5.00 ab (a) 5.13 a (a) 5.17 a (a) 5.03 ab (a)
N1 D0 4.53 cde (a) 4.60 cde (a) 4.70 b (a) 4.77 bc (a)
D1 4.33 e (a) 4.40 e (a) 4.57 b (a) 4.43 c (a)
D2 4.93 ab (a) 4.93 ab (a) 5.10 a (a) 5.03 ab (a)
N2 D0 3.53 f (c) 4.57 de (b) 4.67 b (ab) 4.87 ab (a)
D1 4.43 de (b) 4.87 abc (a) 5.07 a (a) 5.03 ab (a)
D2 4.77 bc (b) 4.77 bcd (b) 5.13 a (a) 5.20 a (a)
2016 N0 D0 4.53 abc (ab) 4.83 a (a) 4.73 cd (a) 4.13 bcd (b)
D1 4.57 abc (a) 4.57 a (a) 4.80 cd (a) 3.73 d (b)
D2 4.60 abc (b) 4.87 a (ab) 5.20 ab (a) 3.87 cd (c)
N1 D0 4.30 c (ab) 4.43 a (a) 4.67 cd (a) 3.77 cd (b)
D1 4.37 bc (ab) 4.47 a (a) 4.53 d (a) 4.23 bc (b)
D2 4.87 ab (ab) 4.87 a (ab) 4.93 bc (a) 4.47 ab (b)
N2 D0 4.70 abc (ab) 4.70 a (a) 4.50 d (ab) 4.13 bcd (b)
D1 4.50 abc (b) 4.50 a (b) 4.97 abc (a) 4.57 ab (b)
D2 4.90 a (b) 4.90 a (b) 5.33 a (a) 4.77 a (b)
2017 N0 D0 4.53 cde (a) 4.67 d (a) 4.77 cd (a) 4.63 c (a)
D1 4.83 bcd (a) 4.73 cd (a) 5.00 abc (a) 4.93 abc (a)
D2 5.30 a (a) 5.10 abc (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.20 a (a)
N1 D0 4.40 e (a) 4.73 cd (a) 4.67 cd (a) 4.73 bc (a)
D1 4.27 e (b) 4.63 d (a) 4.63 d (a) 4.73 bc (a)
D2 4.87 bc (a) 4.87 bcd (a) 5.27 a (a) 5.07 ab (a)
N2 D0 4.47 de (c) 5.00 bcd (ab) 4.57 d (bc) 5.13 ab (a)
D1 4.80 bcd (a) 5.17 ab (a) 4.90 bcd (a) 5.17 a (a)
D2 5.17 ab (a) 5.43 a (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.20 a (a)
平均值 N0 4.79 a 4.88 a 4.93 a 4.54 b
Average N1 4.54 b 4.66 b 4.79 b 4.58 b
N2 4.59 b 4.88 a 4.93 a 4.90 a
D0 4.40 c 4.73 b 4.65 c 4.51 c
D1 4.57 b 4.70 b 4.83 b 4.63 b
D2 4.93 a 4.99 a 5.17 a 4.87 a
变异来源 Y * ** NS **
Source of N ** ** ** **
variation D ** ** ** **
Y×N ** ** NS NS
Y×D * NS NS NS
N×D ** NS ** NS
Y×N×D ** NS NS **

Table 8

Effect of the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on fiber elongation of cotton “four peaches” (%)"

年份
Year
N肥用量
N rate
DPC用量
DPC dosage
伏前桃
Pre-summer boll
伏桃
Summer boll
早秋桃
Early-autumn boll
晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 4.80 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.17 abc (a) 5.03 a (a)
D1 4.70 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.23 a (a) 5.13 a (a)
D2 4.77 a (b) 5.20 a (a) 5.10 bc (a) 5.10 a (a)
N1 D0 4.67 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.10 a (a)
D1 4.77 a (b) 5.13 a (a) 5.23 a (a) 5.17 a (a)
D2 4.60 a (b) 5.10 a (a) 5.17 abc (a) 5.10 a (a)
N2 D0 4.73 a (b) 5.20 a (a) 5.07 c (a) 5.13 a (a)
D1 4.70 a (b) 5.13 a (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.13 a (a)
D2 4.70 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.17 abc (a) 5.17 a (a)
2016 N0 D0 4.13 a (a) 4.77 a (a) 4.60 a (a) 4.83 a (a)
D1 4.20 a (b) 4.53 a (a) 4.93 a (a) 4.47 a (b)
D2 4.23 a (b) 4.83 a (a) 4.63 a (ab) 4.97 a (a)
N1 D0 4.20 a (a) 4.30 a (a) 4.87 a (a) 4.97 a (a)
D1 4.63 a (ab) 4.43 a (b) 4.70 a (ab) 5.10 a (a)
D2 4.67 a (a) 4.57 a (a) 4.40 a (a) 4.87 a (a)
N2 D0 4.37 a (a) 4.43 a (a) 4.73 a (a) 4.87 a (a)
D1 4.53 a (a) 4.70 a (a) 4.63 a (a) 4.60 a (a)
D2 4.23 a (c) 4.40 a (bc) 4.90 a (ab) 5.10 a (a)
2017 N0 D0 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D1 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D2 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a)
N1 D0 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a)
D1 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D2 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a)
N2 D0 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D1 6.50 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D2 6.50 a (a) 6.50 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a)
平均值 N0 5.17 a 5.48 a 5.48 a 5.46 a
Average N1 5.25 a 5.38 a 5.47 a 5.56 a
N2 5.21 a 5.40 a 5.48 a 5.51 a
D0 5.18 a 5.41 a 5.47 a 5.51 a
D1 5.24 a 5.41 a 5.50 a 5.47 a
D2 5.21 a 5.44 a 5.46 a 5.56 a
变异来源 Y ** ** ** **
Source of N NS NS NS NS
variation D NS NS NS NS
Y×N NS NS NS NS
Y×D NS NS NS NS
N×D NS NS NS NS
Y×N×D NS NS NS NS
[1] 毛树春, 马小艳, 程思贤, 王文魁, 张亚林, 黄群, 吴冬梅. 我国高品质棉花产需分析与发展建议. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(3): 1-5.
Mao S C, Ma X Y, Cheng S X, Wang W K, Zhang Y L, Huang Q, Wu D M. Analysis and strategy for the production and demand of high-quality cotton in China. China Cotton, 2020, 47(3): 1-5 (in Chinese).
[2] 李付广. 全产业链布局推进中国棉花提质增效及提升国际竞争力. 农学学报, 2019, 9(3): 6-10.
Li F G. China’s cotton industry through construction of the whole industrial chain: improving quality and performance and enhancing international competitiveness. J Agric, 2019, 9(3): 6-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 唐淑荣. 中国棉花纤维品质综合评价与区域特征分布研究. 南京农业大学博士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2017.
Tang S R. Comprehensive Evaluation and Study on Regional Characteristics Distribution of Cotton Fiber Quality in China. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 郭宏, 于霁雯, 裴文锋, 关永虎, 李航, 李长喜, 刘金伟, 王伟, 王宝全, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉杂种F2的遗传分析及遗传主效聚类. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 608-621.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24008
Guo H, Yu J W, Pei W F, Guan Y H, Li H, Li C X, Liu J W, Wang W, Wang B Q, Mei Y J. Genetic analysis of F2 generation of upland cotton hybrids and main effect clustering in Southern Xinjiang, China. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 608-621 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Sahar A, Zafar M M, Razzaq A, Manan A, Haroon M, Sajid S, Rehman A, Mo H J, Ashraf M, Ren M Z, Shakeel A, Yuan Y L. Genetic variability for yield and fiber related traits in genetically modified cotton. J Cotton Res, 2021, 4: 219-228.
[6] 韩慧君. 气候生态因素对棉花产量与纤维品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 1991, 24(5): 23-29.
Han H J. Effects of climatic-ecologic factors on cotton yield and fiber quality. Sci Agric Sin, 1991, 24(5): 23-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Asif I, Dong Q, Wang Z, Wang X R, Gui H P, Zhang H H, Pang N C, Zhang X L, Song M Z. Growth and nitrogen metabolism are associated with nitrogen-use efficiency in cotton genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 149: 61-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.002
[8] Mojtaba H, Sami U A, Ahad M. Cotton fiber quality response to nitrogen depends on source-sink process, boll growth habit, and weather condition. Ind Crops Prod, 2022, 186: 115279.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115279
[9] 马宗斌, 严根土, 刘桂珍, 黄群, 李伶俐, 朱伟. 施氮量对黄河滩区棉花叶片生理特性、干物质积累及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 849-857.
Ma Z B, Yan G T, Liu G Z, Huang Q, Li L L, Zhu W. Effects of nitrogen application rates on main physiological characteristics of leaves, dry matter accumulation and yield of cotton cultivated in the Yellow River bottomlands. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2013, 19: 849-857 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 熊宗伟, 王雪姣, 顾生浩, 张立祯, 周治国. 中国主产棉区气象因子和纤维品质的相关性研究. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(2): 95-104.
Xiong Z W, Wang X J, Gu S H, Zhang L Z, Zhou Z G. Correlation between meteorological factors and cotton fiber quality in major cotton-producing regions of China. Cotton Sci, 2014, 26(2): 95-104 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Luo Z, Hu Q Y, Tang W, Wang X W, Lu H Q, Zhang Z, Liu T, Kong X Q. Effects of N fertilizer rate and planting density on short-season cotton yield, N agronomic efficiency and soil N using 15N tracing technique. Eur J Agron, 2022, 138: 126546.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126546
[12] Ma K, Wang Z H, Li H Q, Wang T Y, Chen R. Effects of nitrogen application and brackish water irrigation on yield and quality of cotton. Agric Water Manag, 2022, 264: 107512.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107512
[13] Tung S A, Huang Y, Hafeez A, Ali S, Liu A D, Chattha M S, Ahmad S, Yang G Z. Morpho-physiological effects and molecular mode of action of mepiquat chloride application in cotton: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2020, 20: 2073-2086.
doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00276-0
[14] 娄善伟, 高飞, 王崇, 田晓莉, 杜明伟, 段留生. 不同甲哌鎓滴施剂型筛选及其对棉花生长发育调控效果研究. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 552-560.
Lou S W, Gao F, Wang C, Tian X L, Du M W, Duan L S. Screening of different dropping formulations about mepiquat chloride and their effects on cotton growth and development. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 552-560 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Mao L L, Zhang L Z, Jochem B E, Wopke V D W, Liu S D, Zhang S P, Wang B M, Li Z H. Yield components and quality of intercropped cotton in response to mepiquat chloride and plant density. Field Crops Res, 2015, 179: 63-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.011
[16] Shahbaz A T, Ying H, Saif A, Abdul H, Adnan N S, Ma X L, Shoaib A, Muhammad S C, Liu A D, Liu J H, Zhang Z, Yang G Z. Mepiquat chloride effects on potassium acquisition and functional leaf physiology as well as lint yield in highly dense late-sown cotton. Ind Crops Prod, 2019, 129: 142-155.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.056
[17] Ren X M, Zhang L Z, Dua M W, Jochem B E, Wopke W, Tian X L, Li Z H. Managing mepiquat chloride and plant density for optimal yield and quality of cotton. Field Crops Res, 2013, 149: 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.014
[18] Wilson D G, York A C, Edmisten K L. Narrow-row cotton response to mepiquat chloride. Cotton Sci, 2007, 11: 177-185.
[19] 何钟佩, 闵祥佳, 李丕明, 奚惠达. 植物生长延缓剂DPC对棉铃内源激素水平和棉铃发育影响的研究. 作物学报, 1990, 16: 252-258.
He Z P, Min X J, Li P M, Xi H D. Study on effects of DPC on endogenous hormone levels and the development of cotton bolls. Acta Agron Sin, 1990, 16: 252-258 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Chen B L, Yang H K, Song W C, Liu C Y, Xu J, Zhao W Q, Zhou Z G. Effect of N fertilization rate on soil alkali-hydrolyzable N, subtending leaf N concentration, fiber yield, and quality of cotton. Crop J, 2016, 4: 323-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.03.006
[21] 陈建平, 顾双平, 刘伟仲. 氮肥与化控配合应用对棉花产量和品质的影响. 棉花学报, 1993, 5(2): 49-54.
Chen J P, Gu S P, Liu W Z. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer combined with chemical control on lint yield, fiber quality of cotton. Cotton Sci, 1993, 5(2): 49-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 徐景丽. 氮素和缩节胺对小麦后直播棉产量及农艺性状的调节. 扬州大学硕士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2021.
Xu J L. Regulation of Both Nitrogen and DPC on the Yield and Agronomic Triats for Direct Seeding Cotton after Wheat Harvest. MS Thesis of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2021 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 白文强. 灌水量、 施氮量和缩节胺用量对南疆棉花生长和水氮利用的影响. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西杨凌, 2022.
Bai W Q. Effects of Irrigation Amount, Nitrogen Rate and Mepiquat Dose on Cotton Growth and Water-Nitrogen Utilization in Southern Xinjiang. MS Thesis of Northwest Agricultural & Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 396-409.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14026
Zhang T, Wang M F, Zhao Q. Effects of DPC and nitrogen fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield in cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 396-409 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14026
[25] 金桂红, 高璆, 金建松. 棉花优质高产看叶诊断栽培模式的研究II棉花生育展叶进程与优质高产的形成. 南京农业大学学报, 1988, 11(4): 11-16.
Jin G H, Gao Q, Jin J S. Cultural model of good quality and high yield by leaf diagnosis on cotton: II. Formation of yield in the leaf order process of cotton plants. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1988, 11(4): 11-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 李亦扬, 李远, 赵子胥, 张鼎顺, 杜嘉宁, 吴淑娟, 孙思琦, 陈媛, 张祥, 陈德华, 刘震宇. 土壤增氮对棉铃对位叶Bt杀虫蛋白含量影响及氮代谢机制. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 2505-2516.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24217
Li Y Y, Li Y, Zhao Z X, Zhang D S, Du J N, Wu S J, Sun S Q, Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen D H, Liu Z Y. Effects of increased nitrogen on Bt protein expression and nitrogen metabolism in the leaf subtending to cotton boll. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 2505-2516 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Li N, Yao N, Li Y, Chen J Q, Liu D L, Asim B, Li L C, Wang T X, Chen X G. A meta-analysis of the possible impact of climate change on global cotton yield based on crop simulation approaches. Agric Sys, 2021, 193: 103221.
doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103221
[28] Devendra P C, John L S, Lavesta C H, Phillip R, George V, Alessandro E, Guy D. C, Lorena N L, Yafit C, Amrit P, Ved P, Joshua M L. Cultivar, irrigation management, and mepiquat chloride strategy: Effects on cotton growth, maturity, yield, and fiber quality. Field Crops Res, 2022, 286: 108633.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108633
[29] 张婷婷. 新疆棉花马克隆值的影响因素分析及其与可纺性关系研究. 东华大学硕士学位论文, 上海, 2018.
Zhang T T. The Analysis of Influencing Factors on Cotton Micronaire Value and Relationship between Spinnability and Micronaire. MS Thesis of Donghua University, Shanghai, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Han W R, Liu S L, Lei Y P, Zhang Y J, Han Y C, Wang G P, Feng L, Li X F, Li Y B, Wang Z B. Climate warming accelerates cotton growth while cultivar shifts extend the growth period. Field Crops Res, 2023, 293: 108850.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108850
[1] DAI Yu-Yang, YUE Ye, LIU Zhen-Yu, HE Run, LIU Yu-Ting, CHEN Yuan, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN De-Hua. Effects of low temperature on the expression of insecticidal protein in Bt cotton fibers and its physiological mechanism [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(3): 709-720.
[2] KE Hui-Feng, SU Hong-Mei, SUN Zheng-Wen, GU Qi-Shen, YANG Jun, WANG Guo-Ning, XU Dong-Yong, WANG Hong-Zhe, WU Li-Qiang, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Gui-Yin, MA Zhi-Ying, WANG Xing-Fen. Identification for yield and fiber quality traits and evaluation of molecular markers in modern cotton varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
[3] GUO Jia-Xin, YE Yang, GUO Hui-Juan, MIN Wei. Effects and variability analysis of different salt and alkali stresses on the proteome of cotton leaves [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 219-236.
[4] XIAO Sheng-Hua, LU Yan, LI An-Zi, QIN Yao-Bin, LIAO Ming-Jing, BI Zhao-Fu, ZHUO Gan-Feng, ZHU Yong-Hong, ZHU Long-Fu. Function analysis of an AP2/ERF transcription factor GhTINY2 in cotton negatively regulating salt tolerance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 126-137.
[5] SHANG-GUAN Xiao-Xia, YANG Qin-Li, LI Huan-Li. Analysis of mutants developed by CRISPR/Cas9-based GhbHLH71 gene editing in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 138-148.
[6] TAN Zhi-Xin, XIE Liu-Wei, LI Hong-Ge, LI Fang-Jun, TIAN Xiao-Li, LI Zhao-Hu. Identification of cotton low potassium tolerance based on AHP-membership function method at cotyledonary stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 199-208.
[7] SUN Shang-Wen, SHU Hong-Mei, YANG Chang-Qin, ZHANG Guo-Wei, WANG Xiao-Jing, MENG Ya-Li, WANG You-Hua, LIU Rui-Xian. Mechanism of cyclanilide enhanced the defoliation efficiency of thidiazuron in cotton by regulating endogenous hormones under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 187-198.
[8] LIU Tao-Fen, LUO Dan, ZHANG Qi-Peng, SUN Yuan-Yuan, LI Pei-Song, TIAN Jing-Shan, ZHANG Wang-Feng, XIANG Dao, ZHANG Ya-Li, YANG Ming-Feng, GOU Ling. Ethephon ripening affects boll weight and fiber quality of machine-harvested cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 209-218.
[9] LI Yi-Yang, LI Yuan, ZHAO Zi-Xu, ZHANG Ding-Shun, DU Jia-Ning, WU Shu-Juan, SUN Si-Qi, CHEN Yuan, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN De-Hua, LIU Zhen-Yu. Effects of increased nitrogen on Bt protein expression and nitrogen metabolism in the leaf subtending to cotton boll [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(9): 2505-2516.
[10] SONG Yi, LI Jing, GU He-He, LU Zhi-Feng, LIAO Shi-Peng, LI Xiao-Kun, CONG Ri-Huan, REN Tao, LU Jian-Wei. Effects of application of nitrogen on seed yield and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 2002-2011.
[11] LI Hui, WANG Xu-Min, LIU Miao, LIU Peng-Zhao, LI Qiao-Li, WANG Xiao-Li, WANG Rui, LI Jun. Water and nitrogen reduction scheme optimization based on yield and nitrogen utilization of summer maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(5): 1292-1304.
[12] XU Nai-Yin, WANG Yang, WANG Dan-Tao, NING He-Jia, YANG Xiao-Ni, QIAO Yin-Tao. Construction of cotton fiber quality index and weighted genotype by trait (WGT) biplot analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(5): 1262-1271.
[13] WU Shi-Yu, CHEN Kuang-Ji, LYU Zun-Fu, XU Xi-Ming, PANG Lin-Jiang, LU Guo-Quan. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on starch contents and properties during storage root expansion in sweetpotato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 1090-1101.
[14] MENG Lu, DU Ming-Wei, LI Fang, QI Hai-Kun, LU Zheng-Ying, XU Dong-Yong, LI Cun-Dong, ZHANG Ming-Cai, TIAN Xiao-Li, LI Zhao-Hu. Relationship between cotton population, maturity, and the efficacy of harvest aids under high-density planting conditions in Central Hebei province, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 1028-1038.
[15] LEI Jian-Feng, LI Yue, DAI Pei-Hong, ZHAO Yi, YOU Yang-Zi, JIA Jian-Guo, ZHAO Shuai, QU Yan-Ying, LIU Xiao-Dong. Study on VIGE system mediated by different plant viruses in cotton [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 978-987.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Li Shaoqing, Li Yangsheng, Wu Fushun, Liao Jianglin, Li Damo. Optimum Fertilization and Its Corresponding Mechanism under Complete Submergence at Booting Stage in Rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] Wang Lanzhen;Mi Guohua;Chen Fanjun;Zhang Fusuo. Response to Phosphorus Deficiency of Two Winter Wheat Cultivars with Different Yield Components[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] YANG Jian-Chang;ZHANG Jian-Hua;WANG Zhi-Qin;ZH0U Qing-Sen. Changes in Contents of Polyamines in the Flag Leaf and Their Relationship with Drought-resistance of Rice Cultivars under Water Deficiency Stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] Yan Mei;Yang Guangsheng;Fu Tingdong;Yan Hongyan. Studies on the Ecotypical Male Sterile-fertile Line of Brassica napus L.Ⅲ. Sensitivity to Temperature of 8-8112AB and Its Inheritance[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] Wang Yongsheng;Wang Jing;Duan Jingya;Wang Jinfa;Liu Liangshi. Isolation and Genetic Research of a Dwarf Tiilering Mutant Rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] WANG Li-Yan;ZHAO Ke-Fu. Some Physiological Response of Zea mays under Salt-stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] TIAN Meng-Liang;HUNAG Yu-Bi;TAN Gong-Xie;LIU Yong-Jian;RONG Ting-Zhao. Sequence Polymorphism of waxy Genes in Landraces of Waxy Maize from Southwest China[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] HU Xi-Yuan;LI Jian-Ping;SONG Xi-Fang. Efficiency of Spatial Statistical Analysis in Superior Genotype Selection of Plant Breeding[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] WANG Yan;QIU Li-Ming;XIE Wen-Juan;HUANG Wei;YE Feng;ZHANG Fu-Chun;MA Ji. Cold Tolerance of Transgenic Tobacco Carrying Gene Encoding Insect Antifreeze Protein[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] ZHENG Xi;WU Jian-Guo;LOU Xiang-Yang;XU Hai-Ming;SHI Chun-Hai. Mapping and Analysis of QTLs on Maternal and Endosperm Genomes for Histidine and Arginine in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) across Environments[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .