Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (01): 48-57.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00048

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING · GERMPLASM RESOURCES · MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Loci and Alleles Associated with Hybrid Yield in Soybean

YANG Jia-Yin1,2,HE Jian-Bo1,**,WANG Jin-She1,GUAN Rong-Zhan1,GAI Jun-Yi1,*   

  1. 1 Soybean Research Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University / National Center for Soybean Improvement / National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Xuhuai Region / Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Eco-Agricultural Biotechnology around Hongze Lake, Huaian 223001, China
  • Received:2010-04-14 Revised:2010-07-29 Online:2011-01-12 Published:2010-11-16
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi,E-mail:sri@njau.edu.cn,Tel:025-84395405

Abstract: Single marker regression analysis is a effective way to detect differences among genotypes associated with marker alleles in quantitative traits. Eight soybean parental materials, seven from Huang-Huai region in China and one from US with maturity group II–IV, were used to develop a set of diallel crosses according to Griffing’s Method II, including the eight parents and their twenty-eight crosses. The molecular data of 300 SSR markers on eight parental materials were obtained and analyzed for association between SSR markers and hybrid yield using the single marker regression analysis. The hybrid crosses were dissected into their allele constitution and the effects of alleles and genotypic values of single locus were estimated. The results showed that 38 SSR loci located on 17 linkage groups were identified to associate with hybrid yield in the diallel crosses with more loci on linkage groups D1a, M, etc., and eight of the 38 loci were located within a region of ±5 cM apart from a known QTL identified from family-based linkage (FBL) mapping in the literature. Each of the loci explained 11.95%–30.20% of the phenotypic variance of hybrid yield. The allele pairs of the hybrids were composed of four parts, i.e. positive dominant heterozygous loci, positive additive homozygous loci, negative additive homozygous loci and dominant heterozygous loci, with their relative importance in a descending order. Among the 38 loci associated with hybrid yield, nine elite loci such as Satt449, Satt233 and Satt631 and nine elite alleles such as Satt449–A311, Satt233–A217 and Satt631–A152 were identified. Meanwhile, nine heterozygous allele pairs such as Satt449–A291/311, Satt233–A202/207 and Satt631–A152/180 were detected. These results will provide some relevant information for understanding the genetic basis of heterosis and lay a foundation for hybrid soybean breeding by design.

Key words: Soybean, Diallel cross, Heterosis, Single marker analysis, Heterozygous loci, Homozygous loci

[1]Yu S B, Li J X, Xu C G, Tan Y F, Gao Y T, Li X H, Zhang Q F, Saghai-Maroof M A. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 9226–9231
[2]Lee M, Godshalk E B, Lamkey K R, Woodman W W. Association of restriction fragment length ploymorphisrns among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci, 1989, 29: 1067–1071
[3]Smith O S, Smith J S C, Bowen S L, Tenborg R A, Wall S R. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet, 1990, 80: 833–840
[4]Yuan L-X(袁力行), Fu J-H(傅骏骅), Liu X-Z(刘新芝), Peng Z-B(彭泽斌), Zhang S-H(张世煌), Li X-H(李新海), Li L-C(李连成). Study on prediction of heterosis in Maize (Zea mays L.) using the molecular markers. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(6): 6–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Cerna F J, Cianzio S R, Rafalski A, Tingey S, Dyer D. Relationship between seed yield heterosis and molecular heterozygosity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 460–467
[6]Bohn M, Utz H F, Melchinger A E. Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the base of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 228–237
[7]Zhang Q F, Gao Y J, Yang S H, Saghai-Maroof M A, Yang S H, Li J X. Molecular divergence and hybrid performance in rice. Mol Breed, 1995, 1: 133–142
[8]Wu Y-T(武耀廷), Zhang T-Z(张天真), Zhu X-F(朱协飞), Wang G-M(王广明). Relationship between F1, F2 yield, heterosis and genetic distance measured by molecular markers and parent performance in cotton. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(1): 22–28 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Zhang Q, Zhou Z Q, Yang G P, Xu C G, Liu K D, Saghai-Maroof M A. Molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in indica and japonica rice. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93: 1218–1224
[10]He G-H(何光华), Hou L(侯磊), Li D-M(李德谋), Luo X-Y(罗小英), Liu G-Q(刘国清), Tang M(唐梅), Pei Y(裴炎). Prediction of yield and yield components in hybrid rice by using molecular markers. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2002, 29 (5): 438–444 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Liu X C, Koshun I, Wang W X. Identification of AFLP markers favorable to heterosis in hybrid rice. Breed Sci, 2002, 52: 201–206
[12]Cho Y I, Park C W, Kwon S W, Chin J H, Ji H S, Park K J, McCouch S, Koh H J. Key DNA markers for predicting heterosis in F1 hybrids of japonica rice. Breed Sci, 2004, 54: 389–397
[13]Liu R, Qian W, Meng J. Association of RFLP markers and biomass heterosis in trigenomic hybrids of oilseed rape (Brassica napus × B. campestris). Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 105: 1050–1057
[14]Xu X-F(徐新福), Tang Z-L(唐章林), Li J-N(李加纳), Chai Y-R(柴友荣), Wang R(王瑞), Chen L(谌利). Prediction model of hybrid performance using molecular marker based on additive-dominant effects. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2008, 41(10): 2963–2972 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Stuber C W, Lincoln S E, Wolff D W, Helentjaris T, Lander E S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823–839
[16]Xiao J H, Li J M, Yuan L P, Tanksley S D. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics, 1995, 140: 745–754
[17]Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q f. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 2574–2579
[18]Soller M, Brody T, Genizi A. On the power of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet, 1976, 47: 35–39
[19]Doyle J J, Doyle J L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 1990, 12: 13–15
[20]Yang J-Y(杨加银), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Heterosis, combining ability and their genetic basis of yield among key parental materials of soybean in Huang-Huai Valleys. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(4): 620–630 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Mansur L M, Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Cregan P B, Lark K G. Genetic mapping of agronomic traits using recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Crop Sci, 1996, 36: 1327–1336
[22]Orf J H, Chase K, Adler F R, Mansur L M, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: II. Interactions between yield quantitative trait loci in soybean. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1652–1657
[23]Specht J E, Chase K, Macrander M, Graef G L, Chung J, Markwell J P, Germann M, Orf J H, Lark K G. Soybean response to water: a QTL analysis of drought tolerance. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 493–509
[24]Kabelka E A, Diers B W, Fehr W R, LeRoy A R, Baianu I C, You T, Neece D J, Nelson R L. Putative alleles for increased yield from soybean plant introductions. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 784–791
[25]Wang D, Graef G L, Procopiuk A M, Diers B W. Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 108: 458–467
[26]Zhang X-Y(张学勇), Tong Y-P(童依平), You G-X(游光霞), Hao C-Y(郝晨阳), Ge H-M(盖红梅), Wang L-F(王兰芬), Li B(李滨), Dong Y-C(董玉琛), Li Z-S(李振声). Hitchhiking effect mapping: a new approach for discovering agronomic important genes. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2006, 39(8): 1526–1535 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]Yang J-Y(杨加银), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Studies on hybrid heterosis and parental combining ability of yield and quality traits in early generations of soybean. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(7): 2280–2290 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]Orf J H, Diers B W, Boerna H R. Genetic Improvement: Conventional and Molecular Based Strategies. In: Boerna H R, Specht J E, eds. Soybean: Improvement, Production and Uses. 3rd edn. Agronomy Monograph. Vo1.16. ASA and CSSA, Madison, WI, USA. 2004. pp 417–450
[29]Pathan M S, Sleper D A. Advances in Soybean Breeding. In: Stacey G ed. Genetics and Genomics of Soybean. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 2008. pp 117–122
[30]Yang J-Y(杨加银), He J-B(贺建波), Guan R-Z(管荣展), Yang S-P(杨守萍), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Genetic analysis in terms of major-minor locus group constitutions of yield in hybrid soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(9): 1468–1475 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]Zhang J(张军), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Inheritance of elite alleles of yield and quality traits in the pedigrees of major cultivar families released in Huanghuai Valleys and Southern China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(2): 191–202 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Tang Kuan-Qiang, Li Gong-Yun, Song Mei-Yi, Zhao Xue, Chang Chun-Ling. Genome-wide association analysis and prediction model construction for soybean plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[2] Yao Shu, Guo Kai-Yue, Zhai Hui-Hui, Yao Jia-Hui, Deng Wen-Qi, Yan Ling, Huang Chi, Gao Yang, Yu Yan-Ran, Zhao Zhen-Bang, Li Ying-Hui, Wang Xiao-Bo, Li Jia-Jia. Comprehensive evaluation of low-iron tolerance and screening of elite germplasm at the soybean seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[3] Zhang Qing, Yang Yu, Guo Qian, Yue Pei-Yao, Yin Cong-Cong, Niu Jing-Ping, Zhao Jin-Zhong, Du Wei-Jun, Yue Ai-Qin. Cloning and functional analysis of the soybean GmARA6a gene in response to salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[4] HE Hong-Li, ZHANG Yu-Han, YANG Jing, CHENG Yun-Qing, ZHAO Yang, LI Xing-Nuo, SI Hong-Liang, ZHANG Xing-Zheng, YANG Xiang-Dong. Creation and physiological analysis of an e1-as gene mutant in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[5] WANG Ke-Jing, LI Xiang-Hua. Endangerment assessment of the perennial species G. tabacina and G. tomentella of the genus Glycine Willd. in China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[6] MENG Ran, LI Zhao-Jia, FENG Wei, CHEN Yue, LIU Lu-Ping, YANG Chun-Yan, LU Xue-Lin, WANG Xiu-Ping. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance at different growth stages of soybean and screening of salt-tolerant germplasm [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[7] HU Meng, SHA Dan, ZHANG Sheng-Rui, GU Yong-Zhe, ZHANG Shi-Bi, LI Jing, SUN Jun-Ming, QIU Li-Juan, LI Bin. QTL mapping and candidate gene screening for branch number in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[8] WANG Qiong, ZOU Dan-Xia, CHEN Xing-Yun, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Hong-Mei, LIU Xiao-Qing, JIA Qian-Ru, WEI Li-Bin, CUI Xiao-Yan, CHEN Xin, WANG Xue-Jun, CHEN Hua-Tao. Genome-wide association analysis and candidate genes prediction of flowering time and maturity date traits in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[9] YIN Cong-Cong, LI Rui-Qi, YUE Pei-Yao, LI Chen, NIU Jing-Ping, ZHAO Jin-Zhong, DU Wei-Jun, YUE Ai-Qin. Establishment and application of a visual detection method for soybean mosaic virus SC15 based on closed dumbbell mediated isothermal amplification [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[10] XU Rui, HE Miao-Hua, WANG Hao, LI Wei, REN Jie, XIA Zhi-Qiang. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of soybean embryonic responses to X-ray irradiation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[11] LIN Yang, SHI Xiao-Lei, CHEN Qiang, LIU Bing-Qiang, YANG Qing, YU Hui-Juan, YAN Long, WU Xiao-Xia, YANG Chun-Yan. QTL mapping of soybean protein, oil, and fatty acid components [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
[12] LI Wei, ZHU Yu-Peng, SUN Bin-Cheng, WEN You-Xiang, WU Zong-Sheng, XU Yi-Fan, SONG Wen-Wen, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang. Transgenic soybean combined with no-tillage flat planting promotes the simplification of soybean production in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(10): 2738-2749.
[13] CHEN Min, JIA Rong, ZHANG Jin-Chuan, ZHANG Chen-Yu, CHU Jun-Cong, YAO Wei, GE Jun-Yong, WANG Xing-Yu, YANG Ya-Dong, ZENG Zhao-Hai, ZANG Hua-Dong. Yield advantages and nitrogen utilization characteristics of oat and legume strip intercropping in semi-arid zones [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(10): 2727-2737.
[14] QIAN Yu-Ping, SU Bing-Bing, GAO Ji-Xing, RUAN Fen-Hua, LI Ya-Wei, MAO Lin-Chun. Effects of maize and soybean intercropping on soil physicochemical properties and microbial carbon metabolism in karst region [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 273-284.
[15] DING Shu-Qi, CHENG Tong, WANG Bi-Kun, YU De-Bin, RAO De-Min, MENG Fan-Gang, ZHAO Yin-Kai, WANG Xiao-Hui, ZHANG Wei. Effects of planting density on photosynthetic production and yield formation of soybean varieties from different eras [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 161-173.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!