Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 1-11.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00001

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS •     Next Articles

Properties of the Test Statistic under Null Hypothesis and the Calculation of LOD Threshold in Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping

SUN Zi-Qi,LI Hui-Hui,ZHANG Lu-Yan,WANG Jian-Kang*   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / CIMMYT China Office, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2012-05-13 Revised:2012-09-05 Online:2013-01-12 Published:2012-11-14
  • Contact: 王建康, E-mail: wangjk@caas.net.cn, jkwang@cgiar.org, Tel: 010-82105846

Abstract:

Selecting an appropriate LOD threshold is of great interest in QTL mapping studies. Many approaches can be considered to calculate the critical value throughout a genome, such as simulation-based method, analytical approximation, and empirical method based on permutation test. Many tests are conducted in QTL mapping, which are not mutually independent because the linkage relationship of adjacent markers on chromosomes. In order to declare a significant QTL at a genome-wide significance level, it is necessary to understand the behavior of test statistic under null hypothesis in QTL mapping and to deal with the dependent multiple-test problem arising in the genome-wide test. Our objectives in this study were (1) to investigate the properties of LRT (likelihood ratio test) statistic of one-point scanning under null hypothesis in QTL mapping, (2) to determine the factors affecting the cumulative distribution of maximum LOD score, and (3) to identify the relationship between the effective number of independent tests and the length of chromosome by simulation method. Results indicated that the LRT test statistic in one-dimensional scanning of additive-dominant QTL and two-dimensional scanning of epistatic QTL followed chi-square distributions, and the degree of freedom (df) was equal to the number of genetic parameters to be estimated. For example, degree of freedom in recombinant inbred lines (RIL) population was equal to 1 in one dimensional or two dimensional scanning. Degree of freedom in F2 populations was equal to 2 in one-dimensional scanning and 4 in two-dimensional scanning. Number of chromosome, population size and phenotyping error variance did not have any effect on the distribution of LRT under null hypothesis, and therefore will not affect the selection of LOD threshold. On the contrary, population type, genome size and marker density had significant impacts. For BC1, RIL and F2 populations, the threshold was the smallest in BC1 population and the highest in F2 population. Higher marker density  and longer chromosome resulted in higher LOD threshold. It was identified that the effective number of independent tests (Meff) was proportional to the length of chromosome in one-dimensional scanning of additive-dominant QTL. In two-dimensional scanning of epistatic QTL, it was identified that Meffwas in a squared relationship to the length of chromosome. With the help of Bonferroni correction, we could acquire the relationship between point-wise and genome-wide significance levels. Therefore, it is convenient to calculate the threshold LOD in QTL mapping, given the genome-wide significance level, the population type, marker density and genome size.

Key words: QTL mapping, Likelihood ratio test, LOD score, Null hypothesis, Significance level, Number of independent tests

[1]Lander E S, Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 1989, 121: 185–199



[2]van Ooijen J W. LOD significance thresholds for QTL analysis in experimental populations of diploid species. Heredity, 1999, 83: 613–624



[3]Dupuis J, Siegmund D. Statistical methods for mapping quantitative trait loci from a dense set of markers. Genetics, 1999, 151: 373–386



[4]Feingold E, Brown P O, Siegmund D. Gaussian models for genetic linkage analysis using complete high-resolution maps of identity by descent. Am J Hum Genet, 1993, 53: 234–251



[5]Rebaï A, Goffinet B, Mangin B. Approximate thresh olds of interval mapping tests for QTL detection. Genetics, 1994, 138: 235–240



[6]Dupuis J. Statistical Problems Associated with Mapping Complex and Quantitative Traits from Genomic Mismatch Scanning Data. PhD Dissertation of Stanford University, 1994



[7]Kruglyak L, Lander E S. A nonparametric approach for mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1995, 139: 1421–1428



[8]Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nature Genet, 1995, 11: 241–247



[9]Piepho H P. A quick method for computing approximate thresholds for quantitative trait loci detection. Genetics, 2001, 157: 425–432



[10]Zou F, Fine J P, Hu J H, Lin D Y. An efficient resampling method for assessing genome-wide statistical significance in mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 2004, 168: 2307–2316



[11]Chang M N, Wu R, Wu S S, Casella G. Score statistics for mapping quantitative trait loci. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol, 2009, 8(1): Article 16



[12]Churchill G A, Doerge R W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 1994, 138: 963–971



[13]Cheverud J M. A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans. Heredity, 2001, 87: 52–58



[14]Nyholt D R. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet, 2004, 74: 765–769



[15]Li J, Ji L. Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity, 2005, 95: 221–227



[16]Gao X, Starmer J, Martin E R. A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetic Epidemiology, 2008, 32: 361–369



[17]Li H, Ribaut J M, Li Z, Wang J. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 116: 243–260



[18]Zhang L, Li H, Li Z, Wang J. Interactions between markers can be caused by the dominance effect of QTL. Genetics, 2008, 180: 1177–1190



[19]Zhang L, Li H, Wang J. Statistical power of inclusive composite interval mapping in detecting digenic epistasis showing common F2 segregation ratios. J Integr Plant Biol, 2012, 54: 270–279



[20]Doerge R W, Rebaï A. Significance thresholds for QTL interval mapping tests. Heredity, 1996, 76: 459–464



[21]Wang J, Chapman S C, Bonnett D G, Rebetzke G J. Simultaneous selection of major and minor genes: use of QTL to increase selection efficiency of coleoptiles length of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 119: 65–74



[22]Ribaut J M, Hoisington D A, Deutsch J A, Jiang C, González-de-León D. Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize: 1. Flowering parameters and the anthesis-silking interval. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 905–914



[23]Zhang L, Wang S, Li H, Deng Q, Zheng A, Li S, Li P, Li Z, Wang J. Effects of missing marker and segregation distortion on QTL mapping in F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 121: 1071–1082



[24]Li H, Ye G, Wang J. A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics, 2007, 175: 361–374



[25]Li H-H(李慧慧), Zhang L-Y(张鲁燕), Wang J-K(王建康). Analytical answers to frequently asked questions in quantitative trait locus mapping. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(6): 918–931 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] ZHANG Bo, PEI Rui-Qing, YANG Wei-Feng, ZHU Hai-Tao, LIU Gui-Fu, ZHANG Gui-Quan, WANG Shao-Kui. Mapping and identification QTLs controlling grain size in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by using single segment substitution lines derived from IAPAR9 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1472-1480.
[2] ZHOU Xin-Tong, GUO Qing-Qing, CHEN Xue, LI Jia-Na, WANG Rui. Construction of a high-density genetic map using genotyping by sequencing (GBS) for quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of pink petal trait in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 587-598.
[3] LI Shu-Yu, HUANG Yang, XIONG Jie, DING Ge, CHEN Lun-Lin, SONG Lai-Qiang. QTL mapping and candidate genes screening of earliness traits in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 626-637.
[4] SHEN Wen-Qiang, ZHAO Bing-Bing, YU Guo-Ling, LI Feng-Fei, ZHU Xiao-Yan, MA Fu-Ying, LI Yun-Feng, HE Guang-Hua, ZHAO Fang-Ming. Identification of an excellent rice chromosome segment substitution line Z746 and QTL mapping and verification of important agronomic traits [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(3): 451-461.
[5] Dai-Ling LIU,Jun-Feng XIE,Qian-Rui HE,Si-Wei CHEN,Yue HU,Jia ZHOU,Yue-Hui SHE,Wei-Guo LIU,Wen-Yu YANG,Xiao-Ling WU. QTL analysis for relative contents of glycinin and β-conglycinin fractions from storage protein in soybean seeds under monoculture and relay intercropping [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(3): 341-353.
[6] WU Hai-Tao, ZHANG Yong, SU Bo-Hong, Lamlom F Sobhi, QIU Li-Juan. Development of molecular markers and fine mapping of qBN-18 locus related to branch number in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1667-1677.
[7] WANG Cun-Hu,LIU Dong,XU Rui-Neng,YANG Yong-Qing,LIAO Hong. Mapping of QTLs for leafstalk angle in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 9-19.
[8] YANG Xiao-Meng, LI Xia, PU Xiao-Ying, DU Juan, Muhammad Kazim Ali, YANG Jia-Zhen, ZENG Ya-Wen, YANG Tao. QTL mapping for total grain anthocyanin content and 1000-kernel weight in barley recombinant inbred lines population [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 52-61.
[9] WANG Da-Chuan,WANG Hui,MA Fu-Ying,DU Jie,ZHANG Jia-Yu,XU Guang-Yi,HE Guang-Hua,LI Yun-Feng,LING Ying-Hua,ZHAO Fang-Ming. Identification of rice chromosome segment substitution Line Z747 with increased grain number and QTL mapping for related traits [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 140-146.
[10] Li-Juan WEI,Rui-Ying LIU,Li ZHANG,Zhi-You CHEN,Hong YANG,Qiang HUO,Jia-Na LI. Detection of stem height QTL and integration of the loci for plant height- related traits in B. napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(6): 818-828.
[11] YAN Chao,ZHENG Jian,DUAN Wen-Jing,NAN Wen-Bin,QIN Xiao-Jian,ZHANG Han-Ma,LIANG Yong-Shu. Locating QTL controlling yield traits in overwintering cultivated rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 522-537.
[12] ZHANG Chun-Xiao,LI Shu-Fang,JIN Feng-Xue,LIU Wen-Ping,LI Wan-Jun,LIU Jie,LI Xiao-Hui. QTL mapping of salt and alkaline tolerance-related traits at the germination and seedling stage in maize (Zea mays L.) using three analytical methods [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 508-521.
[13] LIU Jiang-Ning,WANG Chu-Xin,ZHANG Hong-GEN,MIAO Yi-Xu,GAO Hai-Lin,XU Zuo-Peng,LIU Qiao-Quan,TANG Shu-Zhu. Mapping of QTLs for resistance to rice black-streaked dwarf disease [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(11): 1664-1671.
[14] Wen-Xiang WANG,Wen CHU,De-Sheng MEI,Hong-Tao CHENG,Lin-Lin ZHU,Li FU,Qiong HU,Jia LIU. Quantitative trait loci mapping for branch angle and candidate gene screening in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(1): 37-45.
[15] Chao LI,Zhi-Kun LI,Qi-Shen GU,Jun YANG,Hui-Feng KE,Li-Qiang WU,Guo-Ning WANG,Yan ZHANG,Jin-Hua WU,Gui-Yin ZHANG,Yuan-Yuan YAN,Zhi-Ying MA,Xing-Fen WANG. Molecular Evaluation for Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines of Gossypium barbadense and QTL Mapping for Fiber Quality and Yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1114-1126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!