基于不同发育阶段协同的小麦品种抗旱性综合评判

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21008

Abstract

Abstract:

Screening of drought resistance identification indicators and establishment of evaluation models can provide a basis for the selection and optimization of drought-resistant wheat varieties. Taking 23 winter wheat varieties mainly promoted in Huanghuaihai wheat area as the test materials, setting two treatments of drought and full irrigation, measuring 12 morphological and physiological parameters of wheat at the jointing, booting, flowering, and grain filling stages, and calculating drought resistance coefficient for each morphological and physiological trait. Principal component analysis, membership function method, grey relational degree method, cluster analysis, and stepwise regression analysis were used to comprehensively evaluate the drought resistance of wheat varieties. The results showed that under drought stress, the variation range of traits at booting and filling stages was relatively large (7.4%-41.7%), while the variation range of traits at jointing and flowering stage was relatively small (9.63%-31.63%). The correlation analysis revealed that there was a significant or extremely significant correlation between the measured agronomic parameters at each growth stage. Further, principal component analysis was used to convert the 12 trait parameters into 6 mutually independent comprehensive indicators at jointing, booting, and flowering stages, and 5 mutually independent comprehensive indicators at filling stage, and the cumulative contribution rate reached 89.03%, 88.69%, 87.68%, and 85.83% for above four stages, respectively. The membership function method was introduced to calculate the comprehensive drought resistance evaluation value (SD value) for each growth stage, and the quantitative relationship between SD value and yield drought resistance index (DRI) was analyzed, and the fitting precision of the simulation equation were the highest 0.744 at anthesis and the lowest 0.679 at filling. In order to better integrate the information of drought resistance at different stages, the first four parameters with the highest correlation with SD value at each stage were selected through the grey correlation degree and combined to form an evaluation index system for the whole growth period. The principal component and membership function analysis were carried out again to calculate the comprehensive evaluation value of drought resistance based on whole growth stages (MD), and this derived MD value can explain 87.8% of DRI variation, which represented an 18.1% increase over determinative coefficient of the best single stage. According to MD value, the varieties can be divided into four categories, moderate drought resistance, moderately weak drought resistance, weak drought resistance, and extremely weak drought resistance. A comprehensive evaluation mathematical model (R²=0.995) for the whole growth stage was established through the stepwise regression analysis, and the plant height and leaf water content at jointing, proline, plant height, and chlorophyll a at booting, chlorophyll a and soluble sugar at anthesis, and proline and leaf water content at filling were selected as a set of screening indicators. This study provides the theoretical guidance and information support for the early selection of drought-resistant material of wheat and the identification and promotion in suitable areas.

Key words: winter wheat, drought resistance, principal component analysis, different stage, comprehensive evaluation

MENG Yu, TIAN Wen-Zhong, WEN Peng-Fei, DING Zhi-Qiang, ZHANG Xue-Pin, HE Li, DUAN Jian-Zhao, LIU Wan-Dai, GUO Tian-Cai, FENG Wei. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of wheat varieties based on synergy of different developmental stages[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(2): 570-582.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Yield and drought resistance index of different drought-resistant wheat varieties"

品种 Cultivar	2017-2018			2018-2019			2020-2021
	产量GY (kg hm^-2)		抗旱指数 DI	产量GY (kg hm^-2)		抗旱指数 DI	产量GY (kg hm^-2)		抗旱指数 DI
	干旱 Drought	对照 Control	抗旱指数 DI	干旱 Drought	对照 Control	抗旱指数 DI	干旱 Drought	对照 Control	抗旱指数 DI
洛旱19 Luohan 19	4116.30	6511.65	0.98	4497.41	9626.30	1.08	5232.84	7924.74	1.07
洛旱22 Luohan 22	4465.50	6712.65	1.12	4629.63	9771.00	1.13	5512.60	8426.90	1.11
洛麦26 Luomai 26	3865.50	6796.95	0.83	4188.70	9740.74	0.93	4964.37	9015.75	0.84
中麦175 Zhongmai 175	3715.80	6522.45	0.80	4001.85	9718.52	0.85	4849.92	8381.60	0.87
百农207 Bainong 207	3622.80	6265.35	0.79	3914.44	8518.52	0.93	4730.24	7771.28	0.89
晋麦47 Jinmai 47	4136.10	6463.05	1.00	4000.01	8259.26	1.00	5175.54	8279.02	1.00
周麦27 Zhoumai 27	2899.65	6366.45	0.50	4015.93	9037.04	0.92	5177.82	8639.05	0.96
中麦895 Zhongmai 895	2485.65	4782.45	0.49	3407.41	8740.74	0.69	4458.67	8921.62	0.69
新科麦169 Xinkemai 169	2955.45	5914.20	0.56	3949.81	8370.37	0.96	4817.19	8981.66	0.80
安农0711 Annong 0711	3843.60	6191.40	0.90	4007.96	8925.93	0.93	5133.58	9256.37	0.88
良星99 Liangxing 99	3801.30	6188.40	0.88	4327.22	9048.70	1.07	4387.07	8062.51	0.74
化成3366 Huacheng 3366	2661.45	5985.45	0.45	3942.78	9296.30	0.86	4411.63	7524.62	0.80
丰德存麦21 Fengdecunmai 21	4082.96	6714.92	0.94	4208.15	9777.78	0.93	4385.17	8371.15	0.71
淮麦33 Huaimai 33	3895.80	5870.10	0.98	3870.37	9185.19	0.84	4646.40	7279.30	0.94
丰德存麦5号 Fengdecunmai 5	3595.80	6722.10	0.73	4008.89	9185.19	0.90	4522.10	7446.05	0.92
郑麦136 Zhengmai 136	3358.35	6592.05	0.65	4031.85	9185.19	0.91	—	—	—
新麦36 Xinmai 36	—	—	—	3481.48	9222.22	0.68	5135.30	9311.73	0.88
丰德存麦1号 Fengdecunmai 1	—	—	—	4177.22	9296.30	0.97	5206.64	8760.67	0.96
周麦32 Zhoumai 32	3159.15	6426.45	0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—
郑麦7698 Zhoumai 7698	3153.45	5208.60	0.72	—	—	—	—	—	—
洛旱7号 Luohan 7	3958.35	6261.45	0.95	—	—	—	—	—	—
郑麦369 Zhengmai 369	—	—	—	3670.19	9407.41	0.74	—	—	—
豫农516 Yunong 516	—	—	—	4011.48	9477.27	0.88	—	—	—

Table 1

Table 2

Effects of drought treatment on the main traits of wheat"

植株性状 Plant trait	处理 Treatment	拔节期 Jointing		孕穗期 Booting		开花期 Anthesis		灌浆期 Filling
植株性状 Plant trait	处理 Treatment	均值±标准差 Mean±SD	变异系数 CV (%)	均值±标准差 Mean±SD	变异系数 CV (%)	均值±标准差 Mean±SD	变异系数 CV (%)	均值±标准差 Mean±SD	变异系数 CV (%)
株高	干旱处理 Drought	36.80±10.55	28.66	61.8±23.19	37.52	79.07±11.64	14.78	80.27±13.03	16.22
Plant height (cm)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	40.20±4.63	11.51	72.93±10.87	14.91	82.67±6.71	8.12	84.33±8.90	10.55
脯氨酸	干旱处理 Drought	132.28±34.40	26.01	150.04±43.16	28.77	172.40±47.31	27.44	212.85±88.81	41.72
Proline (mg g^‒1)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	75.79±11.77	15.53	78.68±15.43	19.62	86.06±15.65	17.49	103.43±21.68	20.97
游离氨基酸	干旱处理 Drought	0.60±0.11	16.94	0.63±0.09	15.65	0.55±0.11	21.22	0.65±0.17	27.01
Free amino acids (mg g^‒1)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	0.49±0.05	9.43	0.49±0.07	14.54	0.45±0.07	16.42	0.57±0.10	17.62
可溶性糖	干旱处理 Drought	42.06±8.98	21.37	59.37±11.23	18.93	66.63±15.65	23.52	80.93±21.67	26.77
Soluble sugar (mg g^‒1)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	27.56±5.16	18.72	38.24±6.20	16.21	46.67±8.88	19.02	54.83±8.86	16.17
叶氮含量	干旱处理 Drought	2.45±0.33	13.42	2.98±0.22	7.4	2.60±0.25	9.63	2.57±0.27	10.56
Leaf N content (%)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	3.00±0.30	10.12	3.25±0.29	8.86	3.27±0.28	8.78	3.15±0.26	8.74
叶水含量	干旱处理 Drought	77.57±24.54	31.63	72.78±15.47	21.26	68.95±13.60	19.72	63.51±22.39	35.26
Leaf water content (%)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	81.65±14.39	17.63	78.38±9.69	12.36	75.07±8.09	10.78	72.33±14.27	19.73
叶面积指数	干旱处理 Drought	1.78±0.30	16.9	2.16±0.37	17.09	1.88±0.30	16.09	1.71±0.31	18.46
Leaf area index	灌溉处理 Irrigation	1.93±0.28	15.01	2.36±0.35	14.86	2.38±0.29	12.13	2.43±0.36	14.81
植株含水量	干旱处理 Drought	79.55±17.54	22.05	74.94±13.85	18.48	67.03±12.99	19.38	62.69±12.59	20.09
Plant water content (%)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	81.08±8.67	10.69	77.95±7.69	9.86	72.59±8.63	11.9	69.24±8.91	12.87
地上干物质	干旱处理 Drought	2474.80±359.09	13.57	4488.80±609.33	14.51	5769.76±725.44	12.57	5304.62±746.69	14.08
Aboveground biomass (kg hm^‒2)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	2735.80±264.02	16.46	4998.50±768.06	9.65	6325.79±1147.03	18.13	6267.79±753.72	12.03
叶绿素a含量	干旱处理 Drought	1.83±0.40	21.77	2.01±0.54	27.08	2.55±0.79	31.14	2.36±0.57	24.23
Chlorophyll a (mg g^‒1)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	2.29±0.31	13.46	2.74±0.43	15.57	3.37±0.66	19.61	3.17±0.46	14.47
类胡萝卜素	干旱处理 Drought	0.39±0.07	17.39	0.39±0.07	18.38	0.47±0.09	19.15	0.41±0.08	18.43
Carotenoids (mg g^‒1)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	0.46±0.05	11.64	0.52±0.07	13.87	0.57±0.07	12.48	0.63±0.09	14.82
等效水厚度	干旱处理 Drought	0.13±0.02	16.8	0.07±0.01	18.86	0.07±0.02	26.83	0.05±0.01	25.71
Equivalent water thickness (g cm^‒2)	灌溉处理 Irrigation	0.14±0.02	11.74	0.08±0.01	13.38	0.09±0.02	21.95	0.06±0.01	20.42

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 4

Fig. 4

Table 5

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

References 38

[1]	Davidson D. Gaps in agricultural climate adaptation research. Nat Clim Chang, 2016, 6: 433-435. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3007
[2]	Erice G, Louahlia S, Irigoyen J J, Sanchez-Diaz M, Avice J C. Biomass partitioning, morphology and water status of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. J Plant Physiol, 2010, 167: 114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.016
[3]	Mo X G, Hu S, Lin Z H, Liu S X, Xia J. Impacts of climate change on agricultural water resources and adaptation on the North China Plain. Adv Clim Chang Res, 2017, 8: 93-98.
[4]	Curtis T, Halford N G. Food security: the challenge of increasing wheat yield and the importance of not compromising food safety. Ann Appl Biol, 2014, 164: 354-372. pmid: 25540461
[5]	Guo Z J, Shi Y, Yu Z W, Zhang Y L. Supplemental irrigation affected flag leaves senescence post-anthesis and grain yield of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Field Crops Res, 2015, 180: 100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.015
[6]	李瑞雪, 孙任洁, 汪泰初, 陈丹丹, 李荣芳, 李龙, 赵卫国. 植物抗旱性鉴定评价方法及抗旱机制研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(7): 40-48. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0023
	Li R X, Sun R J, Wang T C, Chen D D, Li R F, Li L, Zhao W G. Research progress on identification and evaluation methods, and mechanism of drought resistance in plants. Biotechnol Bull, 2017, 33(7): 44-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust J Agric Res, 2005, 56: 1159-1168. doi: 10.1071/AR05069
[8]	Nouri-ganbalani A, Nouri-ganbalani G, Hassanpanah D. Effects of drought stress condition on the yield and yield components of advanced wheat genotypes in Ardabil, Iran. J Food Agric Environ, 2009, 7: 228-234.
[9]	Almeselmani M, Deshmukh P S, Sairam R K, Kushwaha S R, Singh T P. Protective role of antioxidant enzymes under high temperature stress. Plant Sci, 2006, 171: 382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.04.009 pmid: 22980208
[10]	赵佳佳, 乔玲, 武棒棒, 葛川, 乔麟轶, 张树伟, 闫素仙, 郑兴卫, 郑军. 山西省小麦苗期根系性状及抗旱特性分析. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 714-727. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01048
	Zhao J J, Qiao L, Wu B B, Ge C, Qiao L Y, Zhang S W, Yan S X, Zheng X W, Zheng J. Seedling root characteristics and drought resistance of wheat in Shanxi province. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 714-727. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01048
[11]	李阳阳, 李驰, 任俊洋, 李志, 张晋峰, 吕蓉蓉, 张恒, 吴丹, 王芹, 周清元, 殷家明, 李加纳, 刘列钊, 唐章林. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐旱性综合评价与耐旱性鉴定指标筛选. 中国生态农业学报, 2021, 29: 1327-1338.
	Li Y Y, Li C, Ren J Y, Li Z, Zhang J F, Lyu R R, Zhang H, Wu D, Wang Q, Zhou Q Y, Yin J M, Li J N, Liu L Z, Tang Z L. Comprehensive evaluation and identification trait selection of drought resistance at the seedling stage of Brassica napus L. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2021, 29: 1327-1338 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 姚元虎, 贾延春, 任诚, 火克仓, 陈文庆, 赵锋, 包奇军, 张华瑜. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 448-461. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.91031
	Xu Y P, Pan Y D, Liu Q D, Yao Y H, Jia Y C, Ren C, Huo K C, Chen W Q, Zhao F, Bao Q J, Zhang H Y. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indexes screening of barley resources at mature period. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 448-461. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.91031
[13]	冯朋飞, 远红杰, 郭晋杰, 冯佳, 赵永锋, 陈景堂, 祝丽英. 不同玉米自交系苗期抗旱性鉴定. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(9): 9-13.
	Feng P F, Yuan H J, Guo J J, Feng J, Zhao Y F, Chen J T, Zhu L Y. Evaluation for seeding drought resistance of different genotype maize inbred lines. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2013, 40(9): 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	罗俊杰, 欧巧明, 叶春雷, 王方, 王镛臻, 陈玉梁. 重要胡麻栽培品种的抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1259-1273.
	Luo J J, Ou H J, Ye C L, Wang F, Wang Y Z, Chen Y L. Comprehensive valuation of drought resistance and screening of indices of important flax cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1259-1273. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01259
[15]	李龙, 毛新国, 王景一, 昌小平, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲. 小麦种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 988-999.
	Li L, Miao X G, Wang J Y, Chang X P, Liu Y P, Jing R L. Drought tolerance evaluation of wheat germplasm resources. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 988-999. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00988
[16]	Shamsun N, Lingaraj S, Bhaben T. Screening of drought tolerant rice through morpho-physiological and biochemical approaches. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 2018, 15: 150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.06.002
[17]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. pp 184-185, 195-197, 261-263.
	Li H S. Technique on Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. pp 184-185, 195-197, 261-263. (in Chinese)
[18]	中国科学院上海植物生理研究所. 现代植物生理学实验指南, 北京: 科学出版社, 1999. p 303.
	Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Modern Plant Physiology Laboratory Manual. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. p 303.(in Chinese)
[19]	王士强, 胡银岗, 佘奎军, 周琳璘, 孟凡磊. 小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析. 中国农业科学, 2007, 11: 2452-2459.
	Wang S Q, Hu Y G, She K J, Zhou L L, Meng F L. Gray relational grade analysis of agronomical and physi-biochemical traits related to drought tolerance in wheat. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 11: 2452-2459. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Ahmed K, Shabbir G, Ahmed M, Shah K N. Phenotyping for drought resistance in bread wheat using physiological and biochemical traits. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 729: 139082. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139082
[21]	Mardeh A S S, Ahmadi A, Poustini K, Mohammadi V. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Res, 2006, 98: 222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001
[22]	徐蕊, 王启柏, 张春庆, 吴承来. 玉米自交系抗旱性评价指标体系的建立. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 72-84.
	Xu R, Wang Q B, Zhang C Q, Wu C L. Drought-resistance evaluation system of maize inbred. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 72-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	胡标林, 余守武, 万勇, 张铮, 邱兵余, 谢建坤. 东乡普通野生稻全生育期抗旱性鉴定. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 425-432.
	Hu B L, Yu S W, Wan Y, Zhang Z, Qiu B Y, Xie J K. Drought-resistance identification of Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff) in whole growth period. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 425-432. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Sairam R K, Chandrasekhar V, Srivastava G C. Comparison of hexaploid and tetraploid wheat cultivars in their responses to water stress. Biol Plant, 2001, 44: 89-94. doi: 10.1023/A:1017926522514
[25]	Zou J, Hu W, Li Y X, He J Q, Zhu H H, Zhou Z G. Screening of drought resistance indices and evaluation of drought resistance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Integr Agric, 2020, 19: 495-508. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62696-1
[26]	周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 朱旭彤. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36: 1378-1382.
	Zhou G S, Mei F Z, Zhou Z Q, Zhu X T. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of waterlogging resistance of different wheat varieties. Sci Agric Sin, 2003, 36: 1378-1382. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Biju S, Fuentes S, Gupta D. The use of infrared thermal imaging as a non-destructive screening tool for identifying drought- tolerant lentil genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2018, 127: 11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.005
[28]	Liu C Y, Yang Z Y, Hu Y G. Drought resistance of wheat alien chromosome addition lines evaluated by membership function value based on multiple traits and drought resistance index of grain yield. Field Crops Res, 2015, 179: 103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.016
[29]	王曙光, 朱俊刚, 孙黛珍, 史雨刚, 曹亚萍, 范华, 贾寿山. 山西小麦地方品种幼苗期抗旱性的鉴定. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(1): 39-45.
	Wang S G, Zhu J G, Sun D Z, Shi Y G, Cao Y P, Fan H, Jia S S. Analysis of drought resistance of Shanxi wheat at seedling stage. J China Agric Univ, 2013, 18(1): 39-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Feng S W, Gu S B, Zhang H B, Wang D. Root vertical distribution is important to improve water use efficiency and grain yield of wheat. Field Crops Res, 2017, 214: 131-141. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.007
[31]	孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 张惠媛, 徐长兵, 邸一桓, 韩龙植, 张辉. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1656-1663. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.92012
	Sun X J, Jiang Q Y, Hu Z, Zhang H Y, Xu C B, Di Y H, Han L Z, Zhang H. Screening and identification of salt-tolerant rice germplasm in whole growth period. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1656-1663. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	胡雯媚, 王思宇, 樊高琼, 刘运军, 郑文, 王强生, 马宏亮. 西南麦区小麦品种苗期抗旱性鉴定及其指标筛选. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36: 182-189.
	Hu W M, Wang S Y, Fan G Q, Liu Y J, Zheng W, Wang Q S, Ma H L. Analysis on the drought resistance and screening of drought resistance appraisal indexes of wheat cultivars in seedling stage in southwest area. J Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36: 182-189. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	Song Q H, Liu C Y, Bachir D G, Chen L, Hu Y G. Drought resistance of new synthetic hexaploid wheat accessions evaluated by multiple traits and antioxidant enzyme activity. Field Crops Res, 2017, 210: 91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.028
[34]	张龙龙, 杨明明, 董剑, 赵万春, 高翔, 陈冬阳. 三个小麦新品种不同生育阶段抗旱性的综合评价. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36: 426-434.
	Zhang L L, Yang M M, Dong J, Zhao W C, Gao X, Chen D Y. Comprehensive analysis of drought resistance of three new wheat cultivars at different growth stage. J Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36: 426-434. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	武仙山, 王正航, 昌小平, 景蕊莲. 用株高旱胁迫系数分析小麦发育中的抗旱性动态. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 2010-2018. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02010
	Wu X S, Wang Z H, Chang X P, Jing R L. Dynamics of drought resistance based on drought stress coefficient derived from plant height in wheat development. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 2010-2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02010
[36]	Komivi D, Louis W Y, Benoit C L L N, Diaga D, Boshou L, Zhang X R, Ndiaga C, Joseph M B. Comprehensive screening of some west and central African sesame genotypes for drought resistance probing by agromorphological, physiological, biochemical and seed quality traits. Agronomy, 2017, 7: 83. doi: 10.3390/agronomy7040083
[37]	李德全, 郭清福, 张以勤, 邹琦, 程炳嵩. 冬小麦抗旱生理特性的研究. 作物学报, 1993, 19: 125-132.
	Li D Q, Guo Q F, Zhang Y Q, Zou Q, Cheng B S. Studies on the physiological characteristics of drought resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 1993, 19: 125-132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	Chen K, Horton R M, Bader D A, Lesk C, Jiang L W, Jones B, Zhou L, Chen X D, Bi J, Kinney P L. Impact of climate change on heat-related mortality in Jiangsu province, China. Environ Pollut, 2017, 224: 317-325. doi: S0269-7491(16)31930-3 pmid: 28237309

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

生育时期 Growth stage	项目 Item	主成分Principal component
生育时期 Growth stage	项目 Item	CI₁	CI₂	CI₃	CI₄	CI₅	CI₆
拔节期 Jointing	特征值 Eigenvalue	6.377	1.217	0.992	0.826	0.708	0.564
拔节期 Jointing	贡献率 Contribution rate (%)	53.141	10.141	8.269	6.880	5.897	4.700
	累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate (%)	53.141	63.282	71.552	78.432	84.329	89.030
	权重Index weight (W_j)	0.597	0.114	0.093	0.077	0.066	0.053
孕穗期 Booting	特征值 Eigenvalue	6.171	1.416	0.955	0.795	0.684	0.623
孕穗期 Booting	贡献率 Contribution rate (%)	51.422	11.799	7.955	6.626	5.702	5.188
	累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate (%)	51.422	63.221	71.176	77.802	83.504	88.692
	权重Index weight (W_j)	0.580	0.133	0.090	0.075	0.064	0.058
开花期 Anthesis	特征值 Eigenvalue	5.918	1.636	1.024	0.752	0.691	0.501
开花期 Anthesis	贡献率 Contribution rate (%)	49.317	13.636	8.529	6.263	5.759	4.174
	累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate (%)	49.317	62.953	71.482	77.746	83.505	87.679
	权重Index weight (W_j)	0.562	0.156	0.097	0.071	0.066	0.048
灌浆期 Grain filling	特征值 Eigenvalue	5.606	2.418	0.969	0.721	0.586
灌浆期 Grain filling	贡献率 Contribution rate (%)	46.717	20.148	8.076	6.010	4.880
	累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate (%)	46.717	66.865	74.941	80.951	85.831
	权重Index weight (W_j)	0.544	0.235	0.094	0.070	0.057

性状 Trait	拔节期 Jointing		孕穗期 Booting		开花期 Anthesis		灌浆期 Filling
性状 Trait	关联度 Correlation degree	位次 Rank	关联度 Correlation degree	位次 Rank	关联度 Correlation degree	位次 Rank	关联度 Correlation degree	位次 Rank
株高 Plant height	0.7891	1	0.8328	2	0.6304	9	0.7004	7
脯氨酸 Proline	0.7177	7	0.7776	9	0.6574	4	0.7074	5
游离氨基酸 Free amino acids	0.7213	5	0.8426	1	0.6593	3	0.7421	1
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar	0.7002	9	0.7711	10	0.6457	6	0.7120	3
叶片氮含量 Leaf nitrogen content	0.6427	12	0.7067	12	0.6346	8	0.6877	8
叶片含水量 Leaf water content	0.7592	3	0.7921	4	0.6261	10	0.7333	2
叶面积系数 Leaf area index	0.7291	4	0.7164	11	0.6135	11	0.7008	6
植株含水量 Plant water content	0.6962	11	0.7846	7	0.5841	12	0.6846	9
地上部生物量 Aboveground biomass	0.7148	8	0.7835	8	0.6750	2	0.7084	4
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a	0.7886	2	0.8319	3	0.6978	1	0.6107	12
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids	0.6997	10	0.7876	5	0.6558	5	0.6492	10
等效水厚度 Equivalent water thickness	0.7181	6	0.7871	6	0.6423	7	0.6492	11

项目 Item	主成分Principal component
项目 Item	CI₁	CI₂	CI₃	CI₄	CI₅	CI₆
特征值 Eigenvalue	9.959	1.095	1.007	0.778	0.635	0.565
贡献率 Contribution rate (%)	62.243	6.842	6.294	4.862	3.967	3.528
累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate (%)	62.243	69.086	75.380	80.242	84.209	87.737
权重Index weight (W_j)	0.709	0.078	0.072	0.055	0.045	0.040

Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of wheat varieties based on synergy of different developmental stages

RichHTML407

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 38

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Ma Xiao-Qian, Qin Na, Dai Shu-Tao, Qin Jia-Fan, Li Xiao-Yan, Wang Shu-Ting, Liu Zhong-Ling, Li Jun-Xia. Phenotypic variation analysis of 175 foxtail millet (Setaria italica) germplasm accessions under two environments [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[2]	Yao Shu, Guo Kai-Yue, Zhai Hui-Hui, Yao Jia-Hui, Deng Wen-Qi, Yan Ling, Huang Chi, Gao Yang, Yu Yan-Ran, Zhao Zhen-Bang, Li Ying-Hui, Wang Xiao-Bo, Li Jia-Jia. Comprehensive evaluation of low-iron tolerance and screening of elite germplasm at the soybean seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[3]	Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[4]	Xu Jian-Xia, Ding Yan-Qing, Cao Ning, Cheng Bin, Gao Xu, Li Wen-Zhen, Wang Ruo-Ruo, Wang Lei, Zhang Li-Yi. Phenotypic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 397 sorghum germplasm resources in Guizhou, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[5]	Qiao Yu-Xin, Li Cheng-Yue, Kang Xiao-Yu, Zhang Xin-Qi, Jia Shao-Hui, Liu Qian, Cao Ya-Li, Shi Xin-Rui, Hao Xing-Yu, Li Ping. Study on the effects of long-term no-tillage straw mulching on wheat yield improvement in dryland areas based on the APSIM model [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[6]	Tan Wen-Qing, Hui Rong-Kui, Zhang Fan-Li, Qin Lei, Mao Shu-Xiang, Deng Li-Chao, Guo Yi-Ming, Qu Liang, Yan Ming-Li. Rapid identification of waterlogging tolerance and selection of high waterlogging tolerance germplasm resources of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[7]	Huang Li-Xia, Zhang Wei-Wei, Zhen Yi-Yue, Wang Qiu-Bao, Tian Hong-Ling, Li Guo-Dong, Liu Long-Long, Zhang Li-Jun. Evaluation of salinity tolerance and germplasm screening of buckwheat during germination under salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[8]	Wang Ya-Zhi, Yang Biao, Ji Xiang-Lin, Shi Ying, Zhang Li-Li. Identification of drought-resistant resources and preliminary screening of drought resistant genes in diploid potatoes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[9]	Wang Fei-Fei, Zhang Sheng-Zhong, Yang Gui-Hua, Miao Hua-Rong, Hu Xiao-Hui, Zhang Ze-Lin, Liu Sha-Sha, Qiao Li-Xian, Shan Shi-Hua, Chen Jing. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and identification of elite salt-tolerant germplasm in 331 peanut accessions at seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[10]	YIN Li-Na, ZHANG Rui, CHEN Guo-Huan, BAI Lei, LI Jun, GUO Hua-Chun, YANG Fang. Comparison of wound healing capacity of tubers of different potato varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2399-2411.
[11]	LI Yun-Xiang, GUO Qian-Qian, HOU Wan-Wei, ZHANG Xiao-Juan. Genome-wide association analysis of drought resistance traits in wheat seedlings introduced from ICARDA [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[12]	HU Run-Hui, WANG Jun-Cheng, SI Er-Jing, ZHANG Hong, LI Xing-Mao, MA Xiao-Le, MENG Ya-Xiong, WANG Hua-Jun, LIU Qing, YAO Li-Rong, LI Bao-Chun. Screening of drought and salt tolerant germplasm during wheat seedling stage and comprehensive evaluation of drought and salt tolerance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[13]	MENG Ran, LI Zhao-Jia, FENG Wei, CHEN Yue, LIU Lu-Ping, YANG Chun-Yan, LU Xue-Lin, WANG Xiu-Ping. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance at different growth stages of soybean and screening of salt-tolerant germplasm [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[14]	CHEN Ru-Xue, SUN Li-Fang, ZHANG Xin-Yuan, MU Hai-Meng, ZHANG Yong-Xin, YUAN Li-Xue, PENG Shi-Le, WANG Zhuang-Zhuang, WANG Yong-Hua. Effects of combined straw returning and microbial inoculant application on carbon-nitrogen metabolism in flag leaves and yield formation in winter wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[15]	WU Liu-Ge, CHEN Jian, ZHANG Xin, DENG Ai-Xing, SONG Zhen-Wei, ZHENG Cheng-Yan, ZHANG Wei-Jian. Changes in yield and quality traits of nationally approved winter wheat varieties in China over last twenty years [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.