欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1864-1870.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01864

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同滴灌制度对棉花/马铃薯模式中马铃薯产量和WUE的影响

王丽霞1,陈源泉1,李超2,师江涛2,陶志强1,聂紫瑾1,张建省1,隋鹏1,*   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京 100193; 2 中国农业大学吴桥试验站,河北吴桥061800
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-01 修回日期:2013-06-10 出版日期:2013-10-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 隋鹏, E-mail: suipeng@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62731163
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201103001)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD14B03)资助。

Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Systems on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Potato in Intercropping System of Cotton and Potato

WANG Li-Xia1,CHEN Yuan-Quan1,LI Chao2,SHI Jiang-Tao2,TAO Zhi-Qiang1,NIE Zi-Jin1,ZHANG Jian-Sheng1,SUI Peng1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Wuqiao Experimental Station, China Agricultural University, Hebei 061800, China
  • Received:2013-03-01 Revised:2013-06-10 Published:2013-10-12 Published online:2013-08-01
  • Contact: 隋鹏, E-mail: suipeng@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62731163

摘要:

为了探索华北地区棉花与马铃薯套作模式下节水高效的灌溉制度,20112012年,连续两年研究了不同滴灌定额(7590105120 mm)对棉花/马铃薯模式中马铃薯产量及水分利用效率的影响。结果表明,马铃薯的产量与滴灌定额呈正比,且与块茎形成期和块茎膨大期的降雨、灌溉定额显著相关,20112012年其相关系数分别为r=0.960 (P<0.05)r=0.998 (P<0.01)2011年,不同处理的马铃薯产量差异不显著,2012年,滴灌120 mm处理的马铃薯产量最高,达到24 921.2 kg hm–2,比滴灌75 mm处理提高了15.2%,差异显著;马铃薯的耗水量随滴灌定额的增加而增加,不同处理之间差异显著,但不同处理的马铃薯水分利用效率差异不明显。初步表明,适当增加滴灌定额、合理调整灌溉时间结构有利于马铃薯产量和水分利用效率的提高。

关键词: 滴灌, 马铃薯, 产量, 水分利用效率

Abstract:

In order to explore the efficient water-saving irrigation system for the intercropping mode of cotton and potato, the research on potato with drip irrigation in intercropping system was conducted in 2011 and 2012, and the influences of different drip irrigation norms (75 mm /90 mm / 105 mm / 120 mm) on the potato yield and water use efficiency were analyzed.The results showed that the potato yield was proportional to the drip irrigation norm and significantly correlated with the precipitation and irrigation quota at tuber initiation stage and tuber growth stage, with the correlation coefficient of 0.960 and 0.998 respectively in 2011 and 2012. The potato yield didn't show significant differences between different treatments in 2011. The treatment with 120 mm irrigation exhibited the highest yield of 24 921.2 kg ha–1 in 2012. It was 15.2% higher than that of the treatment irrigated 75 mm, with significant difference between them. The water consumption increased with the irrigation quota increasing, showing significant differences among different treatments. But the water use efficiency showed no significant differences. The research preliminarily indicated that increasing drip irrigation norm in potato and adjusting the irrigation structure rationally are beneficial to improving yield and water use efficiency.

Key words: Drip irrigation, Potato, Yield, Water use efficiency

[1]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Yang S, Rengel Z. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res, 2001, 71: 1123–1137



[2]Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen E S. Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops-a field study employing 32P technique. Plant Soil, 2001, 236: 63–74



[3]Sun C-Y(孙成钰), Gang W-S(高旺盛), Chen Y-Q(陈源泉), Hu B-Z(胡碧珍), Shi J-T(师江涛), Sui P(隋鹏). Water use efficiency analysis of different cotton multiple cropping pattern in Hebei Province. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2011, 27(18): 110–115 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Xiao J-F(肖俊夫), Liu Z-G(刘祖贵), Sun J-S(孙景生), Duan A-W(段爱旺), Zhang J-Y(张寄阳). Influences of water stress at different growing stages on growth, development and yield in cotton. Irrig Drain (灌溉排水), 1999, 18(1): 23–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Nan J-F(南建福), Liu E-K(刘恩科), Wang J-P(王计平), Xu S-S(徐珊珊). Effect of drought duration and fertilizer at seedling period on cotton devel-opment. Cotton Sci (棉花学报), 2005, 17(6): 339–342 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Bian H-B(卞海彬). Water resources present situation and forecast analysis in Cangzhou. Water Conserv Sci Technol Econ (水利科技与经济), 2011, 17(2): 57–58 (in Chinese)



[7]Wu Z-B(武朝宝), Ren G(任罡), Li J-Y(李金玉). Experimental study on water requirements and irrigation schedule of potato. J Irrig Drain (灌溉排水学报), 2009, 28(3): 93–95 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Liu Z-D(刘战东), Xiao J-F(肖俊夫), Yu X-Q(于秀琴). Effects of different soil moisture treatments on morphological index, water consumption and yield of potatoes. China Rural Water Hydr (中国农村水利水电), 2010, (8): 1–3, 7 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Tian Y(田英), Hang Z-G(黄志刚), Yu X-Q(于秀芹). Potato water demand rule experimental research. Mod Agric Sci Technol (现代农业科技), 2011, (8): 91–94 (in Chinese)



[10]Vanloon C D. The effect of water stress on potato growth, development and yield. Am J Potato Res, 1981, 58: 51–69



[11]Lynch D R, Foroud N, Kozub G C, Fames B C. The effect of moisture stress at three growth stages on the yield, components of yield and processing quality of eight potato cultivars. Am J Potato Res, 1995, 72: 375–386



[12]Eldredge E P, Holmes Z A, Mosley A R, Shock C C, Stieber T D. The effects of transitory water stress on potato tuber stem-end reducing sugar and fry color. Am J Potato Res, 1996, 73: 517–530



[13]Mai Z-Z(买自珍), Jiang R-L(蒋儒龄), Lu J-W(陆俊武). Key technology research on potato membrane drip irrigation. Ningxia Agric For Sci Technol (宁夏农林科技), 2010, (2): 7–9 (in Chinese)



[14]Wang F-X(王凤新), Kang Y-H(康跃虎), Liu S-P(刘士平). Patterns of water consumption and requirements of potato under dropping irrigation. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2005, 23(1): 9–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Han W-F(韩文锋), Jin G-H(金光辉). Effects of different drip irrigation modes on yield and quality of potato. Chin Potato J (中国马铃薯), 2010, 24(5): 263–266 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Børgesen C D, Jacobsen O H, Hansen S, Schaap M G. Soil hydraulic properties near saturation, an improved conductivity model. J Hydrol, 2006, 324: 40–50



[17]Hu X T, Chen H, Wang J, Meng X B, Chen F H. Effects of soil water content on cotton root growth and distribution under mulched drip irrigation. Agric Sci China, 2009, 8: 709–716



[18]Kang Y-H(康跃虎), Wang F-X(王凤新), Liu S-P(刘士平), Sun H-H(孙红红). Effects of water regulation under drip irrigation on potato growth. Trans CSAE, 2004, 20: 66–72



[19]Shock C C, Zalewski J C, Stieber T D, Burnett D S. Impact of early-season water deficits on russet Burbank plant development, tuber yield and quality. Am J Potato Res, 1992, 69: 793–803



[20]Shock C C, Feibert E B G, Saunders L D. Potato yield and quality response to deficit irrigation. Hortic Sci, 1998, 33: 655–659



[21]Fabeiro C F, Martin S O, de Juan J A. Yield and size of deficit irrigated potatoes. Agric Water Manag, 2001, 48: 255–266



[22]Guo C(郭琛), Qi T(祁通), Hou Z-A(侯振安). Effects of irrigation amount and frequency on the growth and yield of hybrid cotton under drip irrigation. Xinjiang Agric Sci (新疆农业科学), 2010, 47(9): 1872–1877 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Liu Y-L(刘一龙), Zhang Z-X(张忠学), Guo Y-F(郭亚芬), Wang Z-B(王忠波). Corn yield and water using efficiency of different irrigation schedule with the drip irrigation under mulch. J Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2010, 41(10): 53–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Liu M-X(刘梅先), Yang J-S(杨劲松), Li X-M(李晓明), Yu M(余美), Wang J(王进). Effect of irrigation amount and frequency on soil water distribution and water use efficiency in a cotton field under mulched drip irrigation. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2011, 22(12): 3203–3210 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 陈国欢, 张锐, 李艳迪, 赵佳琪, 任湧涛, 张天赐, 郭华春, 李俊, 杨芳. 外源硒叶面喷施对浅紫色马铃薯块茎花青素合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1876-1890.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[5] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[10] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[14] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[15] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!