欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1944-1951.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01944

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦TaWRKY44基因的克隆、表达分析及功能鉴定

王瑞1,2,**,吴华玲3,**,王会芳1,2,黄珂1,2,霍春艳1,2,倪中福1,2,孙其信1,2,*   

  1. 1农业生物技术国家重点实验室 / 北京市作物遗传改良重点实验室 / 中国农业大学, 北京 100193; 2国家植物基因研究北京中心, 北京 100193; 3广东省农业科学院茶叶研究所, 广东广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-18 修回日期:2013-06-25 出版日期:2013-11-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 孙其信, E-mail: qxsun@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家转基因生物新品种培育科技重大专项(2011ZX08009-084B)资助,国家自然科学基金重大项目(31290210)和国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2012AA10A309)资助。

Cloning, Characterization, and Functional Analysis of TaWRKY44 Gene from Wheat

WANG Rui1,2,**,WU Hua-Ling3,**,WANG Hui-Fang1,2,HUANG Ke1,2,HUO Chun-Yan1,2,NI Zhong-Fu1,2,SUN Qi-Xin1,2,*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement / China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 National Plant Gene Research Centre (Beijing), Beijing 100193, China; 3 Tea Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
  • Received:2013-03-18 Revised:2013-06-25 Published:2013-11-12 Published online:2013-08-12
  • Contact: 孙其信, E-mail: qxsun@cau.edu.cn

摘要:

WRKY是植物特有的转录因子基因, 在植物对外界胁迫响应及生长发育的过程中发挥重要作用。本研究克隆了一个新的小麦WRKY转录因子基因TaWRKY44, 获得其全长cDNA, 其中开放阅读框长度为897 bp, 编码298个氨基酸。半定量RT-PCR的结果表明, TaWRKY44在叶片中表达水平较高, 并且受干旱和低温胁迫诱导表达。转基因功能分析结果表明, TaWRKY44的拟南芥超表达株系叶片变小, 叶柄缩短, 并且叶片细胞也明显小于野生型。另外, 转基因系对ABA、干旱和盐等胁迫处理的敏感性也高于野生型, 说明该基因可能作为一个转录抑制子参与逆境胁迫信号转导过程。

关键词: 小麦, WRKY, 基因表达, 叶片, 逆境胁迫, 功能分析

Abstract:

WRKY transcription factors are specific in plants and related in response to stress as well as plant development. In this study, we cloned the full-length cDNA of a new WRKY transcription factor gene, TaWRKY44, from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The open reading frame of TaWRKY44 is 897 bp in length, which encodes 298 animo acid residues. The semi-quantitative RT-PCR result indicated that TaWRKY44 was highly expressed in leaf, and responsive to drought and clod stresses. TaWRKY44 over-expressed lines of Arabidopsis exhibited smaller leaves, shorter leaf petioles, and smaller leaf epidermis cell than the wild type. In addition, the transgenic lines were more sensitive to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stresses. These results indicated TaWRKY44 could be a negative regulator in stress signal transduction pathway.

Key words: Wheat, WRKY, Gene expression, Leaf, Abiotic stress, Functional analysis

[1]Rushton P J, Macdonald H, Huttly A K, Lazarus C M, Hooley R. Members of a new family of DNA-binding proteins bind to a conserved cis-element in the promoters of alpha-AMY2 genes. Plant Mol Biol, 1995, 29: 691–702



[2]Wu K L, Guo Z J, Wang H H, Li J. The WRKY family of transcription factors in rice and Arabidopsis and their origins. DNA Res, 2005, 12: 9–26



[3]Wei K F, Chen J, Chen Y F, Wu L J, Xie D X. Molecular phylogenetic and expression analysis of the complete WRKY transcription factor family in maize. DNA Res, 2012, pp. 1–12



[4]Niu C F, Wei W, Zhou Q Y, Tian A G, Hao Y J, Zhang W K, Ma B, Lin Q, Zhang Z B, Zhang J S, Chen S Y. Wheat WRKY genes TaWRKY2 and TaWRKY19 regulate abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Environ, 2012, 35: 1156–1170



[5]Wu H, Ni Z, Yao Y, Guo G, Sun Q. Cloning and expression profiles of 15 genes encoding WRKY transcription factor in wheat (Triticum aestivem L.). Pro Nat Sci, 2008, 18: 697–705



[6]Mare C, Mazzucotelli E, Crosatti C, Francia E, Stanca A M, Cattivelli L. Hv-WRKY38: a new transcription factor involved in cold- and drought-response in barley. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 55: 399–416



[7]Hu Y, Chen L, Wang H, Zhang L, Wang F, Yu D. Arabidopsis transcription factor WRKY8 functions antagonistically with its interacting partner VQ9 to modulate salinity stress tolerance. Plant J, 2013, DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12159



[8]Xu Y H, Wang J W, Wang S, Wang J Y, Chen X Y. Characterization of GaWRKY1, a cotton transcription factor that regulates the sesquiterpene synthase gene (+)-delta-cadinene synthase-A. Plant Physiol, 2004, 135: 507–515



[9]Hinderhofer K, Zentgraf U. Identification of a transcription factor specifically expressed at the onset of leaf senescence. Planta, 2001, 213: 469-473



[10]Robatzek S, Somssich I E. A new member of the Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factor family, AtWRKY6, is associated with both senescence- and defence-related processes. Plant J, 2001, 28: 123–133



[11]Tsuge T, Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H. Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development, 1996, 122: 1589–1600



[12]Kim G T, Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H. The ROTUNDIFOLIA3 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a new member of the cytochrome P-450 family that is required for the regulated polar elongation of leaf cells. Genes Dev, 1998, 12: 2381–2391



[13]Kim G T, Tsukaya H, Saito Y, Uchimiya H. Changes in the shapes of leaves and flowers upon overexpression of cytochrome P450 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 9433–9437



[14]Cho H T, Cosgrove D J. Altered expression of expansin modulates leaf growth and pedicel abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97: 9783–9788



[15]Kim G T, Shoda K, Tsuge T, Cho K H, Uchimiya H, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K, Tsukaya H. The ANGUSTIFOLIA gene of Arabidopsis, a plant CtBP gene, regulates leaf-cell expansion, the arrangement of cortical microtubules in leaf cells and expression of a gene involved in cell-wall formation. EMBO J, 2002, 21: 1267–1279



[16]Hu Y, Poh H M, Chua N H. The Arabidopsis ARGOS-LIKE gene regulates cell expansion during organ growth. Plant J, 2006, 7: 1–9



[17]Szecsi J, Joly C, Bordji K, Varaud E, Cock J M, Dumas C, Bendahmane M. BIGPETALp, a bHLH transcription factor is involved in the control of Arabidopsis petal size. EMBO J, 2006, 5: 3912–3920



[18]Kurepa J, Wang S, Li Y, Zaitlin D, Pierce A J, Smalle J A. Loss of 26S proteasome function leads to increased cell size and decreased cell number in Arabidopsis shoot organs. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 178–189



[19]Sonoda Y, Sako K, Maki Y, Yamazaki N, Yamamoto H, Ikeda A, Yamaguchi J. Regulation of leaf organ size by the Arabidopsis RPT2a 19S proteasome subunit. Plant J, 2009, 60: 68–78



[20]Qiu D, Xiao J, Ding X, Xiong M, Cai M, Cao Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S. OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2007, 20: 492–499



[21]Kang K, Park S, Natsagdorj U, Kim Y S, Back K. Methanol is an endogenous elicitor molecule for the synthesis of tryptophan and tryptophan-derived secondary metabolites upon senescence of detached rice leaves. Plant J, 2011, 66: 247–257

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[6] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[7] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[8] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[12] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[13] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!