欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (04): 650-656.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00650

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同收获时期对油菜机械收获损失率及籽粒品质的影响

左青松1,2,黄海东1,曹石1,杨士芬1,廖庆喜1,冷锁虎2,吴江生1,周广生1,*   

  1. 1 华中农业大学植物科学技术学院，湖北武汉 430070；2 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室，江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-02 修回日期:2014-01-12 出版日期:2014-04-12 网络出版日期:2014-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 周广生, E-mail: zhougs@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31000685), 国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2010BAD01B09), 国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(201203096)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(nycytx-00510)资助。

Effects of Harvesting Date on Yield Loss Percentage of Mechanical Harvesting and Seed Quality in Rapeseed

ZUO Qing-Song1,2,HUANG Hai-Dong1,CAO Shi1,YANG Shi-Fen1,LIAO Qing-Xi1,LENG Suo-Hu2,WU Jiang-Sheng1,ZHOU Guang-Sheng1,*   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science and Technology of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2013-10-02 Revised:2014-01-12 Published:2014-04-12 Published online:2014-02-14
  • Contact: 周广生, E-mail: zhougs@mail.hzau.edu.cn

RichHTML

PDF

1649

被引次数

23

摘要：

以华油杂62为材料，测定70%油菜角果变黄至角果明显炸裂时期机械收获的产量损失、植株不同部位水分含量、粒重和籽粒含油量等指标，研究不同收c获时期对产量损失率和籽粒品质的影响。试验表明，机械收获的产量总损失率在7.00%~15.80%之间，随着收获时期逐渐推迟，总损失率先降低后增加。产量损失分为自然脱粒损失、割台损失和清选脱粒损失。割台损失率随收获时期推迟逐渐增加，占总损失率的比例为7.80%~31.01%；清选和脱粒损失率随收获时期推迟逐渐降低，是机械收获中最大的损失部分，占总损失率的56.87%~92.20%。总损失率与籽粒、角果皮、主花序和分枝水分含量均呈极显著正相关。籽粒水分含量为16.23%时千粒重和含油率最高，而后，随籽粒水分含量的下降，千粒重、含油率、全碳含量和C/N值均略有降低。油菜机械化收获以籽粒和角果皮水分含量在11%~13%之间时为宜，此期的千粒重、油分含量、机械收获产量和产油量均较高。

关键词: 油菜, 机械化收获, 损失率, 籽粒品质

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted at different harvesting periods ranging from 70% pod yellow to pod shattering significantly using a variety Huayouza 62 in 2012—2013. The yield loss, moisture content and seed quality were measured. The results showed that the total yield loss percentage ranged from 7.00% to 15.80% at different harvesting periods, and in the process of harvesting the total yield loss percentage decreased firstly and then increased. The total yield loss in mechanical harvesting was composed of the yield loss caused by shattering (SL), yield loss caused by combine header (CHL) and yield loss caused by cleaning and threshing (CTL). The percentage of CHL increased with lasting the harvesting date, and the ratio of CHL to the total yield loss ranged from 7.80% to 31.01%. Among them the percentage of CTL was the largest, which decreased with lasting the harvesting date, and the ratio of CTL to the total yield loss accounting for 56.87% to 92.90%. The total yield loss percentage had very significant and positive correlation with moisture contents of seed, shell, main inflorescence and branches. When the seed moisture content was 16.23%, the 1000-seed weight and oil content were the highest. With decreasing the seed moisture content further, 1000-seed weight, oil content, carbon content and C/N ratio decreased slightly. The period of mechanical harvesting with the seed or pod shell moisture content from 11% to 13% was suitable for getting relatively high 1000-seed weight, oil content, mechanical harvesting yield and oil yield.

Key words: Rapeseed, Mechanical harvesting, Yield loss percentage, Seed quality

[1]王汉中. 我国油菜产需形势分析及产业发展对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 101–105



Wang H Z. Strategy for rapeseed industry development based on the analysis of rapeseed production and demand in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29: 101–105 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]吴崇友, 易中懿. 我国油菜全程机械化技术路线的选择. 中国农机化, 2009, (2): 3–6



Wu C Y, Yi Z Y. Selection of technology route of oilseed rape mechanization in entire production proceeding in China. Chin Agric Mech, 2009, (2): 3–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]高建芹, 浦惠明, 龙卫华, 胡茂龙, 戚存扣. 高油酸甘蓝型油菜油酸积累动态. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34: 359–365



Gao J Q, Pu H M, Long W H, Hu M L, Qi C K. Dynamics of oleic acid contents in organs of high-oleic rapeseed lines. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2012, 34: 359–365 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]沈琼, 张思光. 我国油菜生产中科技进步与资源配置潜力分析. 农业现代化研究, 2005, 26: 358–361



Shen Q, Zhang S G. Potential on technology advanced and resources allocation of rapeseed production in China. Res Agric Modern, 2005, 26: 358–361 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]连银娟, 罗玉莲. 上海2BGKF–230U 型油菜直播机的研制与试验研究. 中国农机化, 2002, (5): 53–54



Lian Y J, Luo Y L. Development and test research on Shanghai 2BGKF–230U type rape direct seeder. Chin Agric Mech, 2002, (5): 53–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]张宇文, 邹剑, 张文超, 李秋孝. 油菜机械精量播种技术及多功能精量排种器的研制. 中国农机化, 2003, (2): 28–30



Zhang Y W, Zou J, Zhang W C, Li Q X. Precise seeding technology for rape and development of multi-functional precise seeding apparatus. Chin Agric Mech, 2003, (2): 28–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]吴明亮, 汤楚宙, 谢方平, 赵进辉, 张岚. 免耕悬挂式油菜籽条播机的设计. 湖南农业大学学报?自然科学版, 2004, 30: 371–373



Wu M L, Tang C Z, Xie F P, Zhao J H, Zhang L. The structure design of mounted sower for line seeding of rape in till-less paddy field. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2004, 30: 371–373 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]周广生, 左青松, 廖庆喜, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 我国油菜机械化生产现状、存在问题及对策. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52: 2153–2156



Zhou G S, Zuo Q S, Liao Q X, Wu J S, Fu T D. Mechanical production status, existing problems and stpercentagegy discussion of rapeseed in China. Hubei Agric Sci, 2013, 52: 2153–2156 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Squices T M, Gruwel M L H, Zhou R, Sokhansanj S, Abrams S R, Cutler A J. Dehydration and dehiscence in siliques of Brassica napus and Brassica rapa. Can J Bot, 2003, 81: 248–254



[10]谭小力, 张洁夫, 杨莉, 张志燕, 周佳, 姜松, 戚存扣. 油菜角果裂角力的定量测定. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(11): 40–43



Tan X L, Zhang J F, Yang L, Zhang Z Y, Zhou J, Jiang S, Qi C K. Quantitive determination of the strength of rapeseed pod dehiscence. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2006, 22(11): 40–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]文雁成, 傅廷栋, 涂金星, 马朝芝, 沈金雄, 张书芬. 甘蓝型油菜抗裂角品种(系)的筛选与分析. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 163–166



Wen Y C, Fu T D, Tu J X, Ma C Z, Shen J X, Zhang S F. Screening and analysis of resistance to silique shattering in rape (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 163–166 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Gan Y, Malhi S S, Brandt S A, McDonald C L. Assessment of seed shattering resistance and yield loss in five oilseed crops. Can J Plant Sci, 2008, 88: 267–270



[13]张建, 陈金城, 唐章林, 王瑞. 油菜茎秆理化性质与倒伏关系的研究. 西南农业大学学报?自然科学版, 2006, 28(5): 763–765



Zhang J, Chen J C, Tang Z L, Wang R. Study on the physico-chemical properties of stem as related to lodging in rape. J Southwest Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2006, 28(5): 763–765 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Irvine B, Lafond G P. Pushing canola instead of windrowing can be a viable alternative. Can J Plant Sci, 2010, 90: 145–152.



[15]李耀明, 周金芝, 徐立章, 邓玲黎. 油菜联合收割机脱粒分离装置的试验. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26: 281–284



Li Y M, Zhou J Z, Xu L Z, Deng L L. Experimental study on threshing and separating un it of rape combine. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2005, 26: 281–284 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]杜文勇, 黄海东, 樊啟洲. ANSYS在油菜联合收割机清选机构气流场中的应用. 农机化研究, 2007, (10): 174–175



Du W Y, Huang H D, Fan Q Z. Application of ANSYS in the flow field in the cleaning device of a rape’s combine harvester. J Agric Mech Res, 2007, (10): 174–175 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]薛雅琳, 田淑梅, 武占军. 油菜籽和菜籽油中叶绿素测定方法的确定. 中国油脂, 2003, 28(9): 33–34



Xue Y L, Tian S M, Wu J J. Determination method of chlorophyll content in rapeseed and rapeseed oil. China Oils Fats, 2003, 28(9): 33–34 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Vera C L, Downey R K, Woods S M, Raney J P, McGregor, D I, Elliott R H, Johnson E N. Yield and quality of canola seed as affected by stage of maturity at swathing. Can J Plant Sci, 2007, 87: 13–26



[19]伊淑丽, 梁颖, 代柳亭, 谌利, 柴友荣, 李加纳. 高温对甘蓝型油菜籽粒后熟相关特性的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(2): 48–50



Yi S L, Liang Y, Dai L T, Chen L, Chai Y R, Li J N. Effects of high temperature on post-harvest ripening-related characteristics in Brassica napus L. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2008, 30(2): 48–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]王余龙, 蔡建中, 徐永林, 华鹤良. 水稻籽粒受容活性及其控制途径: I. 籽粒含水率与受容活性的关系. 江苏农学院学报, 1990, 11(3): 25–29



Wang Y L, Cai J Z, Xu Y L, Hua H L. Activity of grain capacity and its regulation in rice: I. The relationship between grain water content and capacity activity. J Jiangsu Agric Coll, 1990, 11(3): 25–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]陈娟, 王忠, 莫亿伟, 马晓娟, 孙正超, 刁守雨. 水稻颖果充实与呼吸活性的关系. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2005, 26(2): 61–65



Chen J, Wang Z, Mo Y W, Ma X J, Sun Z C, Diao S Y. The relation sh ip between caryops is filling and respiratory percentage of rice. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric Life Sci Edn), 2005, 26(2): 61–65 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[7] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[8] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[9] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[10] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[11] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[12] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[13] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[14] 李炳霖, 叶晓磊, 肖红, 肖国滨, 吕伟生, 刘君权, 任涛, 陆志峰, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥用量对油菜产量和镁吸收量及因冻害减产程度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1850-1860.
[15] 董伟进, 张亚封, 李启云, 路杨, 张正坤, 隋丽. CO2浓度升高条件下球孢白僵菌定殖对玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1874-1886.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2