小麦品系CH7034中耐盐QTL定位

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11074

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 2654-2662.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11074

小麦品系CH7034中耐盐QTL定位

张潇文¹(), 李世姣¹, 张晓军², 李欣², 杨足君³, 张树伟², 陈芳², 常利芳², 郭慧娟², 畅志坚²^,^*(), 乔麟轶²^,^*()

¹山西大学生命科学学院, 山西太原 030006
²山西农业大学农学院 / 作物遗传与分子改良山西省重点实验室 / 省部共建有机旱作农业国家重点实验室(筹), 山西太原 030031
³电子科技大学生命科学与技术学院, 四川成都 610054

收稿日期:2021-08-22 接受日期:2022-01-06 出版日期:2022-10-12 网络出版日期:2022-02-24
通讯作者: 畅志坚,乔麟轶
作者简介:第一作者联系方式: E-mail: zxw18435139058@126.com
基金资助:
山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(2021-070);山西农业大学博士科研启动项目(2021BQ39);山西农业大学省部共建有机旱作农业国家重点实验室自主研发项目(202002-3)

QTL mapping for salt tolerance in wheat line CH7034

ZHANG Xiao-Wen¹(), LI Shi-Jiao¹, ZHANG Xiao-Jun², LI Xin², YANG Zu-Jun³, ZHANG Shu-Wei², CHEN Fang², CHANG Li-Fang², GUO Hui-Juan², CHANG Zhi-Jian²^,^*(), QIAO Lin-Yi²^,^*()

¹College of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
²College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University / Shanxi Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Molecular Improvement / State Key Laboratory of Sustainable Dryland Agriculture (in preparation), Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
³College of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, Sichuan, China

Received:2021-08-22 Accepted:2022-01-06 Published:2022-10-12 Published online:2022-02-24
Contact: CHANG Zhi-Jian,QIAO Lin-Yi
Supported by:
Shanxi Scholarship Council of China(2021-070);Shanxi Agricultural University Research Project for Doctor(2021BQ39);State Key Laboratory of Sustainable Dryland Agriculture (in preparation) of Shanxi Agricultural University(202002-3)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

鉴定小麦耐盐种质对于充分利用盐碱地和保障粮食安全具有重要意义。CH7034是本实验室自育的1份小麦耐盐品系, 为了明确其耐盐性遗传规律和控制位点, 利用CH7034与盐敏感品种SY95-71的重组自交系群体进行QTL分析。基于SNP芯片数据和盐害指数(salt injury index), 在2A、2D、4B和5A染色体上共检测出6个QTL, 分别为QSI.sxau_2A、QSI.sxau_2D、QSI.sxau_4B.1、QSI.sxau_4B.2、QSI.sxau_5A.1和QSI.sxau_5A.2。其中, QSI.sxau_5A.1在3次盐胁迫试验中均能被检测到, 具有最高的表型变异解释率(15.73%~20.18%), 且不同于5AL染色体上已报道的其他耐盐位点。在QSI.sxau_5A.1区间开发并整合了7个SSR标记, 将LOD峰值进一步确定在SSR-D1处。基于转录组数据库, 从QSI.sxau_5A.1区段内筛选了12个响应盐胁迫的高置信基因。研究结果为CH7034耐盐位点的精细定位乃至克隆奠定了基础, 也为小麦耐盐品种选育提供了新种质和分子标记。

关键词: 小麦, 盐胁迫, 盐害指数, SNP标记, QTL定位

Abstract:

The identification of wheat salt-tolerant germplasm is of great significance for making full use of saline land and ensuring food security. CH7034 is a wheat salt-tolerant line bred by our laboratory. In order to clarify the genetic rules and control loci for salt tolerance, QTL analysis was conducted using a recombinant inbred lines population crossed by CH7034 and salt-sensitive variety SY95-71. Based on the SNP microarray data and salt injury index, six QTL were detected on chromosomes 2A, 2D, 4B, and 5A, including QSI.sxau_2A, QSI.sxau_2D, QSI.sxau_4B.1, QSI.sxau_4B.2, QSI.sxau_5A.1, and QSI.sxau_5A.2. Among them, QSI.sxau_5A.1 was detected in all three salt stress experiments and had the highest phenotypic variance explained (15.73%-20.18%), which was different from other salt-tolerance loci reported on chromosome 5AL. Seven SSR markers were developed and integrated in the QSI.sxau_5A.1 interval, and the peak of LOD was further determined at SSR-D1. Based on the transcriptome database, 12 high-confidence genes in response to salt stress were screened from the QSI.sxau_5A.1 section. These results lay the foundation for the fine mapping and even cloning of the salt tolerance loci of CH7034, and provide new germplasm and molecular markers for the selection and breeding of wheat salt-tolerant varieties.

Key words: wheat, salt stress, salt injury index, SNP marker, QTL mapping

张潇文, 李世姣, 张晓军, 李欣, 杨足君, 张树伟, 陈芳, 常利芳, 郭慧娟, 畅志坚, 乔麟轶. 小麦品系CH7034中耐盐QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(10): 2654-2662.

ZHANG Xiao-Wen, LI Shi-Jiao, ZHANG Xiao-Jun, LI Xin, YANG Zu-Jun, ZHANG Shu-Wei, CHEN Fang, CHANG Li-Fang, GUO Hui-Juan, CHANG Zhi-Jian, QIAO Lin-Yi. QTL mapping for salt tolerance in wheat line CH7034[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(10): 2654-2662.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11074

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2022/V48/I10/2654

图/表 10

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

表3

图4

图5

表4

表5

参考文献 37

[1]	全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998. p 650.
	The National Soil Survey Office. Soils of China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998. p 650. (in Chinese)
[2]	Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2008, 59: 651-681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 pmid: 18444910
[3]	Yu S Z, Wu J H, Wang M, Shi W M, Xia G M, Jia J Z, Kang Z S, Han D J. Haplotype variations in QTL for salt tolerance in Chinese wheat accessions identified by marker-based and pedigree-based kinship analyses. Crop J, 2020, 8: 1011-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2020.03.007
[4]	Gorham J, Hardy C, Jones R, Joppa L R, Law C N. Chromosomal location of a K/Na discrimination character in the D genome of wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 1987, 74: 584-588. doi: 10.1007/BF00288856 pmid: 24240213
[5]	Dubcovsky J, María G S, Epstein E, Luo M C, Dvořák J. Mapping of the K⁺/Na⁺ discrimination locus Kna1 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 448-454. doi: 10.1007/BF00223692 pmid: 24166270
[6]	James R A, Davenport R J, Munns R. Physiological characterization of two genes for Na⁺ exclusion in durum wheat, Nax1 and Nax2. Plant Physiol, 2006, 142: 1537-1547. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086538
[7]	Munns R, James R A, Xu B, Athman A, Conn S J, Jordans C, Byrt C S, Hare R A, Tyerman S D, Tester M, Plett D, Gilliham M. Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na⁺ transporter gene. Nat Biotechnol, 2012, 30: 360-364. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2120 pmid: 22407351
[8]	Turki N, Shehzad T, Harrabi M, Okuno K. Detection of QTLs associated with salinity tolerance in durum wheat based on association analysis. Euphytica, 2015, 201: 29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1164-7
[9]	单雷, 赵双宜, 陈芳, 夏光敏. 小麦体细胞杂种山融3号耐盐相关SSR标记的筛选和初步定位. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39: 225-230.
	Shan L, Zhao S Y, Chen F, Xia G M. Screening and localization of SSR markers related to salt tolerance of somatic hybrid wheat Shanrong No. 3. Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39: 225-230. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	车婧. 山融3号小麦BC₂代群体耐盐主效QTL相关分子标记的筛选定位. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2010. pp 39-41.
	Che J. The Major Salt-Relative QTL Located by Molecular Markers in Salt-Tolerance Introgression BC₂ Population of SR3 with Jinan 177. MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2010. pp 39-41 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Jahani M, Mohammadi-Nejad G, Nakhoda B, Rieseberg L H. Genetic dissection of epistatic and QTL by environment interaction effects in three bread wheat genetic backgrounds for yield-related traits under saline conditions. Euphytica, 2019, 215: 103.
[12]	Asif M A, Garcia M, Tilbrook J, Brien C, Pearson A S. Identification of salt tolerance QTL in a wheat RIL mapping population using destructive and non-destructive phenotyping. Funct Plant Biol, 2021, 48: 131-140. doi: 10.1071/FP20167
[13]	Ge R C, Chen G P, Zhao B C, Shen Y Z, Huang Z J. Cloning and functional characterization of a wheat serine/threonine kinase gene (TaSTK) related to salt-resistance. Plant Sci, 2007, 173: 55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.04.005
[14]	Liu S, Liu S, Wang M, Wei T, Meng C, Wang M, Xia G. A wheat SIMILAR TO RCD-ONE gene enhances seedling growth and abiotic stress resistance by modulating redox homeostasis and maintaining genomic integrity. Plant Cell, 2014, 26: 164-180 doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.118687
[15]	吕伟东, 徐鹏彬, 蒲训. 偃麦草属种质资源在普通小麦育种中的应用现状简介. 草业学报, 2007, 16(6): 136-140.
	Lyu W D, Xu P B, Pu X. Summary of situation for applying genetic resources from Elytrigia in Triticum aestivum breeding. Acta Pratac Sin, 2007, 16(6): 136-140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	畅志坚, 赵怀生, 李生海. 小麦与天蓝偃麦草远缘杂交中结实性的研究. 山西农业科学, 1992, 20(2): 7-10.
	Chang Z J, Zhao H S, Li S H. Study on the fruitfulness of a distant cross between winter wheat and Agropyron glaucum. Shanxi Agric Sci, 1992, 20(2): 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	畅志坚. 几个小麦-偃麦草新种质的创制及分子细胞遗传学分析. 四川农业大学博士论文, 四川雅安, 1999. pp 23-26.
	Chang Z J. Creation and Creation and Molecular Cytogenetics Analysis of Several New Wheat-Thinopyrum Germplasm. PhD Dissertation of Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan, China, 1999. pp 23-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Chang Z J, Zhang X J, Yang Z J, Zhan H X, Li X, Liu C, Zhang C Z. Characterization of a partial wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploid and its reaction to fungal diseases of wheat. Heredita, 2010, 147: 304-312. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2010.02156.x
[19]	乔麟轶, 张潇文, 李世姣, 陈芳, 李欣, 郭慧娟, 张树伟, 常利芳, 张晓军, 畅志坚. 小偃麦渗入系苗期耐盐鉴定与分子标记评价. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(5): 69-73.
	Qiao L Y, Zhang X W, Li S J, Chen F, Li X, Guo H J, Zhang S W, Chang L F, Zhang X J, Chang Z J. Salt-tolerance identification at seedling stage and molecular marker evaluation of wheat- Thinopyrum intermedium introgression lines. Shandong Agric Sci, 2021, 53(5): 69-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	张蕾, 侯雅静, 张晓军, 李欣, 乔麟轶, 畅志坚. 小偃麦渗入系耐盐性鉴定及其在F₂群体中的遗传分析. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44: 281-283.
	Zhang L, Hou Y J, Zhang X J, Li X, Qiao L Y, Chang Z J. Identification and genetic analysis for salt-tolerance of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium introgression line and its F₂ population. Shanxi Agric Sci, 2016, 44: 281-283. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	舒焕麟, 杨足君, 李光蓉. 创新诱发材料SY95-71选育和利用价值研究. 四川农业大学学报, 1999, 17: 249-253.
	Shu H L, Yang Z J, Li G R. Selection and evaluation of a wheat line SY95-71 as new yellow rust spreader. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 1999, 17: 249-253. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Amirbakhtiar N, Ismaili A, Ghaffari M, Mansuri R M, Sanjari S, Shobbar Z. Transcriptome analysis of bread wheat leaves in response to salt stress. PLoS One, 2021, 16: e0254189.
[23]	乔麟轶. 小麦材料CH7034中抗白粉病和抗条锈病QTL定位. 山西大学博士学位论文, 山西太原, 2018. pp 31-32.
	Qiao L Y. Mapping of Resistance Loci to Powdery Mildew and Stripe Rust in Wheat Cultivar CH7034. PhD Dissertation of Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 2018. pp 31-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Chinpongpanich A, Limruengroj K, Phean-O-Pas S, Limpaseni T, Buaboocha T. Expression analysis of calmodulin and calmodulin- like genes from rice, Oryza sativa L. BMC Res Notes, 2012, 5: 625.
[25]	Kim B G, Waadt R, Yong H C, Pandey G K, Sheng L. The calcium sensor CBL10 mediates salt tolerance by regulating ion homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2007, 52: 473-484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03249.x
[26]	Tang R J, Liu H, Yang Y, Yang L, Gao X S, Garcia V J, Luan S, Zhang H X. Tonoplast calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 control plant growth and ion homeostasis through regulating V-ATPase activity in Arabidopsis. Cell Res, 2012, 22: 1650-1665. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.161
[27]	Li P, Li Y J, Zhang F J, Zhang G Z, Jiang X Y, Yu H M, Hou B K. The Arabidopsis UDP-glycosyltransferases UGT79B2 and UGT79B3, contribute to cold, salt and drought stress tolerance via modulating anthocyanin accumulation. Plant J, 2017, 89: 85-103. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13324
[28]	Zhao C Z, Wang X M, Wang X Y, Wu K L, Li P, Chang N, Wang J F, Wang F, Li J L, Bi Y R. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and alternative oxidase are involved in the cross tolerance of highland barley to salt stress and UV-B radiation. J Plant Physiol, 2015, 181: 83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.03.016
[29]	Bhatia Y, Mishra S, Bisaria V S. Microbial-glucosidases: cloning, properties, and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2002, 22: 375-407. pmid: 12487426
[30]	Lee J M, Kim Y R, Kim J K, Jeong G T, Ha J C, Kong I S. Characterization of salt-tolerant β-glucosidase with increased thermostability under high salinity conditions from Bacillus sp. SJ-10 isolated from jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2015, 38: 1335-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00449-015-1375-x
[31]	Cai L N, Xu S N, Lu T, Lin D Q, Yao S J. Directed expression of halophilic and acidophilic β-glucosidases by introducing homologous constitutive expression cassettes in marine Aspergillus niger. J Biotechnol, 2019, 292: 12-22. doi: S0168-1656(19)30004-5 pmid: 30664896
[32]	Dutta A, Sen J, Deswal R. New evidences about strictosidine synthase (Str) regulation by salinity, cold stress and nitric oxide in Catharanthus roseus. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol, 2013, 22: 124-131. doi: 10.1007/s13562-012-0118-1
[33]	Khan N A, Nazar R, Anjum N A. Growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars differing in ATP-sulfurylase activity under salinity stress. Sci Hortic, 2009, 122: 455-460. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.05.020
[34]	Niu C F, Wei W, Zhou Q Y, Tian A G, Hao Y J, Zhang W K, Ma B, Lin Q, Zhang Z B, Zhang J S, Chen S Y. Wheat WRKY genes TaWRKY2 and TaWRKY19 regulate abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Environ, 2012, 35: 1156-1170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02480.x
[35]	Wang X T, Zeng J, Li Y, Rong X L, Sun J T, Sun T, Li M, Wang L Z, Feng Y, Chai R H, Chen M J, Chang J L, Li K X, Yang G X, He G Y. Expression of TaWRKY44, a wheat WRKY gene, in transgenic tobacco confers multiple abiotic stress tolerances. Front Plant Sci, 2015, 6: 615.
[36]	Li X, Tang Y, Zhou C, Zhang L, Lyu J. A wheat WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY46 enhances tolerance to osmotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21: 1321.
[37]	Ye H, Qiao L Y, Guo H Y, Guo L P, Ren F, Bai J F, Wang Y K. Genome-wide identification of wheat WRKY gene family reveals that TaWRKY75-A is referred to drought and salt resistances. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 663118.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

标记名称 Marker name	上游引物 Forward sequence (5'-3')	下游引物 Reverse sequence (5'-3')	产物长度 Product size (bp)	退火温度 Annealing temperature (℃)
SSR-U7	GGTCATGTTGGAATGTTGATCAAG	GCTTTTATGTTTCCAACTCTAGTCAA	127	58
SSR-D28	GGGAAATCCCAACGCCTG	GAGTCATCATGAAAGAAAGCATAAAT	144	58
SSR-D5	GCCCACGTTTCCTCTTAATG	TCATCGAACATGATGCACTATC	94	58
SSR-D1	GAGAATAAATCCACTCTCCATGC	CGATATGTTCCTGTCTCCTTGT	180	58
SSR-D4	CCGTGTAGTAGAACACTGCATGT	GCTCGAGCTGTAGCCCAG	193	54
SSR-U2	AAGCAGAATCATGGAAGGGAC	CACTTATTCAAGTCATTAAGCATTCAAT	102	58
SSR-U5	CAGTATCCATCTTTGCCATTCAG	CTCCTACCTCGACGACAC	116	58
cslinkNax2	TCTCCATCATTCAACATCAATCG	TGTAGCTCGTCGGGGTGTGTTGC	170	58
Xgwm304	AGGAAACAGAAATATCGCGG	AGGACTGTGGGGAATGAATG	176	58
Xbarc144	GCGTTTTAGGTGGACGACATAGATAGA	GCGCCACGGGCATTTCTCATAC	191	58
Xwmc110	GCAGATGAGTTGAGTTGGATTG	GTACTTGGAAACTGTGTTTGGG	127	58

材料 Material	总株数 Total number of plants	盐害级别及株数 Salt injury level and number of plants					盐害指数 Salt injury index (%)
材料 Material	总株数 Total number of plants	0	1	2	3	4	盐害指数 Salt injury index (%)
CH7034-1	16		7	8	1		32.5
CH7034-2	16		8	6	2		32.5
CH7034-3	16		8	8			30.0
平均值 Mean							31.7
SY97-71-1	16				2	14	77.5
SY97-71-2	16				3	13	76.3
SY97-71-3	16				2	14	77.5
平均值 Mean							77.1

试验编号 Test number	数量性状位点 QTL	染色体 Chr.	图谱位置 Position (cM)	标记区间 Marker region	LOD值 LOD score	表型变异解释率 PVE (%)	加性效应 Add.
SI-1	QSI.sxau_2D	2D	0	992489-992489	3.57	5.60	-2.42
	QSI.sxau_4B.1	4B	112	1265612-3954524	6.38	10.50	-3.31
	QSI.sxau_5A.1	5A	73	1049519-4911066	6.63	15.73	-3.81
SI-2	QSI.sxau_2A	2A	9	3532866-1090021	2.96	5.24	-2.71
	QSI.sxau_4B.2	4B	43	1862515-1059340	3.41	6.36	-2.96
	QSI.sxau_5A.1	5A	71	1049519-1215538	10.29	20.18	-5.49
SI-3	QSI.sxau_5A.1	5A	71	1049519-1215538	10.15	17.62	-4.50
	QSI.sxau_5A.2	5A	116	1125437-1228444	4.27	15.73	-3.09

基因/QTL Gene/QTL	参考文献 Reference	耐盐表型 Phenotype	来源 Source	连锁标记 Linkage marker
基因/QTL Gene/QTL	参考文献 Reference	耐盐表型 Phenotype	来源 Source	标记名称 Name	亲本多态性 Polymorphism in parents	与表型连锁Linked to phenotype
TmHKT1;5-A	[6,7]	叶片K⁺/Na⁺ K⁺/Na⁺ ratio of leaf	Triticum durum	cslinkNax2	+	-
QTL-SR3	[9]	叶片盐害级别 Salt injury level of leaf	wheat	Xgwm304	-	-
QTL-SR3	[10]	叶片盐害级别 Salt injury level of leaf	wheat	Xbarc144	+	-
qNL5, qLL5	[8]	叶数, 叶长 Leaf number, leaf length	Triticum durum	Xwmc110	-	-
QHAI.5A-2	[11]	盐碱地收获指数 Harvest index in salt land	wheat	wPt-3334
QG(1-5).asl-5A	[12]	相对生长率 Relative growth rate (RGR) salt/RGR control	wheat	TP14539

差异表达基因 DEGs	基因组位置 Genomic location	差异倍数 log₂ (Fold Change)	响应类别 Response type	编码蛋白注释 Protein-encoding annotation
TraesCS5A01G382800	580799964-580801653	1.71	上调 Upregulate	钙调素相关钙感应蛋白 Calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein
TraesCS5A01G382900	580803022-580805966	-1.44	下调 Downregulate	ATP硫酸化酶 ATP sulfurylase
TraesCS5A01G386500	584049719-584058870	-1.08	下调 Downregulate	肌球蛋白 Myosin protein
TraesCS5A01G388300	585018687-585021441	1.26	上调 Upregulate	β-葡萄糖苷酶前体 β-glucosidase precursor
TraesCS5A01G389000	585232865-585236702	1.26	上调 Upregulate	β-葡萄糖苷酶前体 β-glucosidase precursor
TraesCS5A01G390200	585488957-585491921	1.01	上调 Upregulate	胡豆苷合酶 Strictosidine synthase
TraesCS5A01G392100	588416260-588416877	4.68	上调 Upregulate	无 None
TraesCS5A01G393900	589311576-589313132	2.25	上调 Upregulate	UDP-葡萄糖基转移酶 UDP-glucosyl transferase
TraesCS5A01G394500	589584058-589585518	1.38	上调 Upregulate	UDP-葡萄糖基转移酶 UDP-glucosyl transferase
TraesCS5A01G394900	590540043-590541485	1.38	上调 Upregulate	UDP-葡萄糖6-磷酸脱氢酶 UDP-glucose 6-phosphatedehydrogenase
TraesCS5A01G397600	591976101-591977663	-1.85	下调 Downregulate	脂肪酶3类家族蛋白 Lipase class 3 family protein
TraesCS5A01G402600	595371952-595372493	-1.01	下调 Downregulate	细胞色素6f复合亚基 Cytochrome b6f complex subunit

小麦品系CH7034中耐盐QTL定位

QTL mapping for salt tolerance in wheat line CH7034

RichHTML

PDF

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

[1]	毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3]	陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4]	高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5]	郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[6]	邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[7]	张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8]	翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[9]	习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[10]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[11]	何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[12]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[13]	侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14]	尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15]	宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.