欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 2066-2079.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14163

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同花生品种芽期耐寒性鉴定及评价指标筛选

白冬梅1,*(), 薛云云1, 黄莉2, 淮东欣2, 田跃霞1, 王鹏冬1, 张鑫1, 张蕙琪1, 李娜1, 姜慧芳2, 廖伯寿2,*()   

  1. 1山西农业大学经济作物研究所, 山西太原 030031
    2中国农业科学院油料作物研究所 / 农业农村部油料作物生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430062
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-07 接受日期:2021-11-29 出版日期:2022-08-12 网络出版日期:2021-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 白冬梅,廖伯寿
  • 作者简介:E-mail: baidm1221@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31871662);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-13);国家自然科学基金培育项目(YGJPY1901);山西农业大学生物育种工程项目(YZGC049);山西省农业科学院优秀青年基金项目(YCX2020YQ33)

Assessment of cold tolerance of different peanut varieties and screening of evaluation indexes at germination stage

BAI Dong-Mei1,*(), XUE Yun-Yun1, HUANG Li2, HUAI Dong-Xin2, TIAN Yue-Xia1, WANG Peng-Dong1, ZHANG Xin1, ZHANG Hui-Qi1, LI Na1, JIANG Hui-Fang2, LIAO Bo-Shou2,*()   

  1. 1Industrial Crop Research Institute, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
    2Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China
  • Received:2021-09-07 Accepted:2021-11-29 Published:2022-08-12 Published online:2021-12-15
  • Contact: BAI Dong-Mei,LIAO Bo-Shou
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31871662);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-13);Cultivation Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(YGJPY1901);Biological Breeding Project of Shanxi Academy University(YZGC049);Outstanding Youth Fund Project of Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences(YCX2020YQ33)

RichHTML

30

PDF

459

摘要：

低温寒害是限制花生产业发展的重要非生物胁迫因子之一。花生品种芽期耐寒能力的强弱是决定花生出苗整齐度和高产高质的重要保障。本研究利用品种综合指标值、权重、隶属函数值、D值对62个花生品种芽期耐寒性进行综合评价。结果表明, D值越大, 其耐寒性越强, 反之耐寒性越弱。系统聚类分析可将62个品种分为5类, 第I类为高耐寒型; 第II类为耐寒型; 第III类为中间型; 第IV类为敏感型, 第V类为高感型。相关性分析表明, 油酸含量与D值及其他4个耐寒性指标值的相关性未达到显著水平, 说明花生油酸含量和花生芽期耐寒性强弱无关; 各相对指标值与D值及各相对指标值间均呈极显著正相关, 说明花生芽期耐寒性相对指标值之间具有一致性。通过对相对指标特征值、贡献值及权重分析表明, 相对发芽率可作为花生芽期耐寒性鉴定的正向指标, 相对发芽率越大, 其芽期耐寒性能力越强, 反之耐寒性能力越弱。本研究筛选出5个高耐寒性品种, 建立了以相对发芽率作为花生芽期耐寒性的评价指标, 对花生芽期耐寒性的高效鉴定和耐寒性新品种培育及其相关理论研究提供基础材料和高效鉴定方法。

关键词: 花生品种, 低温胁迫, 芽期耐寒性, 评价指标

Abstract:

Cold temperature and cold damage is one of the important abiotic stress factors restricting the development of peanut industry. The ability of peanut varieties to tolerate cold at germination stage is an important guarantee to determine the uniformity of seeding emergence, high yield, and high quality. In this research, 62 peanut varieties with different genotypes were comprehensively assessed for cold tolerance at germination stage by using comprehensive index value, weight, membership function value, and D-value of each variety. The results showed that the higher the D-value, the stronger the cold tolerance, and vice versa. The 62 varieties were divided into five categories by systematic cluster analysis: the first category was high cold-tolerant, the second was cold-tolerant, the third was intermediate cold-tolerant, the fourth was sensitive, and the fifth was highly sensitive. Correlation analysis revealed that the correlations between oleic acid content and D-value and other four indexes of cold tolerance did not reach a significant level, indicating that the acid content of peanut oil had nothing to do with the cold tolerance in peanut germination stage. A significant positive correlation between each relative index value and D-value indicated that there was consistency among the relative index values of cold tolerance in peanut germination stage. The analysis of its relative index characteristic value, contribution value, and weight demonstrated that the relative germination rate could be used as the positive index of cold tolerance identification in peanut bud period, that is, the greater the relative germination rate, the stronger its cold tolerance at germination stage, and vice versa. Five varieties with high cold-tolerance were selected, and the relative germination rate as the evaluation index of cold-tolerance in peanut germination stage was established in this study, providing basic materials and efficient assessing methods for the quick assessment of cold-tolerant peanut germplasm in peanut germination stage, cultivation of new varieties with cold-tolerance and related theoretical researches.

Key words: peanut varieties, cold stress, cold-tolerance at germination stage, evaluation indexes

表1

供试花生品种(系)信息"

编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 油酸含量
Oleic acid content (%)		 编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 油酸含量
Oleic acid content (%)
1 花育20 Huayu 20 42.40 32 农大636 Nongda 636 37.00
2 徐0124 Xu 0124 36.50 33 豫花151 Yuhua 151 79.20
3 花育6802 Huayu 6802 48.10 34 濮花67 Puhua 67 47.10
4 金花19 Jinhua 19 41.70 35 徐花24 Xuhua 24 80.50
5 豫航花7号Yuhanghua 7 51.10 36 徐花23 Xuhua 23 78.70
6 农大402 Nongda 402 47.60 37 花育6811 Huayu 6811 51.80
7 冀040-11 Ji 040-11 80.80 38 濮花70 Puhua 70 40.00
8 商花5号Shanghua 5 43.00 39 豫花158 Yuhua 158 42.20
9 冀农G94 Jinong G94 78.60 40 花育6808 Huayu 6808 40.70
10 冀5059 Ji 5059 46.40 41 冀农花19 Jinonghua 19 78.50
11 濮花56 Puhua 56 48.30 42 豫花157 Yuhua 157 80.70
12 皖花4号Wanhua 4 38.50 43 花育655 Huayu 655 77.50
13 农大R366 Nongda R366 38.80 44 漯花22 Luohua 22 46.50
14 开农92 Kainong 92 51.30 45 冀农花16 Jinonghua 16 78.90
15 远杂9102 Yuanza 9102 36.40 46 13R526 49.40
16 豫花80 Yuhua 80 81.00 47 花育6312 Huayu 6312 45.30
17 宇花16 Yuhua 16 42.60 48 花育6311 Huayu 6311 38.70
18 冀11-17 Ji 11-17 41.80 49 豫花177 Yuhua 177 79.80
19 漯花18 Luohua 18 43.70 50 郑农26 Zhengnong 26 41.60
20 豫花136 Yuhua 136 41.90 51 山花35 Shanhua 35 40.70
21 冀914 Ji 914 81.00 52 开农313 Kainong 313 78.50
22 豫花138 Yuhua 138 79.10 53 皖花14 Wanhua 14 39.40
23 豫花124 Yuhua 124 77.50 54 济花8号 Jihua 8 79.90
24 商花40 Shanghua 40 41.80 55 驻花6号 Zhuhua 6 40.30
25 徐0231 Xu 0231 38.10 56 济花5号Jihua 5 80.90
26 花育6306 Huayu 6306 41.50 57 开农112 Kainong 112 38.10
27 花育6805 Huayu 6805 48.10 58 晋花10 Jinhua 10 49.20
28 花育613 Huayu 613 40.70 59 汾花12 Fenhua 12 46.40
29 冀5038 Ji 5038 43.60 60 DF12 77.81
30 宛花6号Wanhua 6 40.20 61 花育44 Huayu 44 49.22
31 农大141 Nongda 141 39.70 62 徐68-4 Xu 68-4 46.41

图1

常温和低温胁迫后9个品种的发芽情况"

图2

62个品种常温和低温胁迫后各指标值"

表2

不同花生品种芽期各指标的差异"

指标
Index		 最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 平均值
Average		 标准偏差
Standard deviation		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 变异系数
Coefficient variation
常温发芽率NTGR (%) 45.00 100.00 76.56 13.34 -0.27 -0.56 0.17
低温发芽率LTGR ( %) 0 90.00 35.67 21.37 0.61 -0.05 0.60
相对发芽率RGR (%) 0 93.75 45.07 23.79 0.18 -0.74 0.53
常温发芽指数NTGI 4.08 9.81 7.23 1.35 -0.24 -0.37 0.19
低温发芽指数LTGI 0 7.29 2.81 1.35 0.63 -0.21 0.64
相对发芽指数RGI (%) 0 85.16 37.56 21.55 0.32 -0.66 0.57
常温发芽势NTGP (%) 31.67 95.00 65.05 14.25 -0.18 0.03 0.22
低温发芽势LTGP (%) 0 75.00 28.81 18.69 0.60 -0.35 0.65
相对发芽势RGP (%) 0 95.12 42.80 25.67 0.34 -0.68 0.58
常温芽长NTSL (mm) 296.21 1027.17 578.08 163.15 0.49 -0.02 0.28
低温芽长LTSL (mm) 0 738.31 241.80 168.61 0.78 0.13 0.70
相对芽长RSL (%) 0 95.66 40.54 24.52 0.41 -0.56 0.60

表3

不同花生品种芽期耐寒性指标值"

编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 相对发芽率
RGR		 相对发芽指数
RGI		 相对发芽势
RGP		 相对芽长
RSL
1 花育20 Huayu 20 64.53 48.21 61.76 46.98
2 徐0124 Xu 0124 23.94 17.15 21.43 16.75
3 花育6802 Huayu 6802 51.72 42.99 46.15 34.70
4 金花19 Jinhua 19 26.02 19.94 28.38 20.68
5 豫航花7号 Yuhanghua 7 48.08 43.84 47.73 51.61
6 农大402 Nongda 402 22.67 14.38 10.71 17.08
7 冀040-11 Ji 040-11 91.07 74.28 86.67 81.14
8 商花5号 Shanghua 5 23.44 17.22 22.06 15.64
9 冀农G94 Jinong G94 11.41 7.85 8.11 7.79
10 冀5059 Ji 5059 20.09 13.25 13.64 9.27
11 濮花56 Puhua 56 34.76 25.00 30.88 30.02
12 皖花4号 Wanhua 4 62.50 46.53 61.67 60.05
13 农大R366 Nongda R366 21.20 17.15 23.68 13.82
14 开农92 Kainong 92 5.17 3.80 7.14 3.19
15 远杂9102 Yuanza 9102 93.75 77.62 91.30 81.29
16 豫花80 Yuhua 80 5.36 3.23 2.27 2.19
17 宇花16 Yuhua 16 55.00 36.20 37.50 47.08
18 冀11-17 Ji 11-17 0 0 0 0
19 漯花18 Luohua 18 60.00 50.57 57.89 55.65
20 豫花136 Yuhua 136 17.31 14.45 16.41 18.00
21 冀914 Ji 914 20.83 17.10 17.31 21.06
22 豫花138 Yuhua 138 18.37 13.43 15.79 14.50
23 豫花124 Yuhua 124 18.00 12.77 16.88 14.47
24 商花40 Shanghua 40 32.93 27.04 34.29 27.93
25 徐0231 Xu 0231 20.45 15.77 21.71 10.69
26 花育6306 Huayu 6306 51.39 41.04 46.28 48.70
27 花育6805 Huayu 6805 73.66 57.13 61.22 57.01
28 花育613 Huayu 613 53.80 44.15 53.05 38.60
29 冀5038 Ji 5038 10.42 7.21 6.82 6.64
30 宛花6号 Wanhua 6 41.18 29.48 30.68 29.74
31 农大141 Nongda 141 45.00 32.60 36.59 33.56
32 农大636 Nongda 636 36.06 23.44 18.75 27.86
33 豫花151 Yuhua 151 45.00 34.85 40.71 38.41
34 濮花67 Puhua 67 51.79 39.78 41.25 48.53
35 徐花24 Xuhua 24 68.64 58.84 62.95 71.06
36 徐花23 Xuhua 23 35.63 30.33 36.36 30.15
37 花育6811 Huayu 6811 69.77 62.72 87.10 63.57
38 濮花70 Puhua 70 25.61 18.13 15.79 19.81
39 豫花158 Yuhua 158 59.69 52.26 60.33 51.08
40 花育6808 Huayu 6808 58.50 47.41 54.88 52.34
41 冀农花19 Jinonghua 19 41.25 34.44 34.46 36.33
42 豫花157 Yuhua 157 29.72 24.84 27.94 26.61
43 花育655 Huayu 655 55.88 46.97 49.43 42.33
44 漯花22 Luohua 22 79.25 67.60 76.60 84.97
编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 相对发芽率
RGR		 相对发芽指数
RGI		 相对发芽势
RGP		 相对芽长
RSL
45 冀农花16 Jinonghua 16 58.59 51.74 55.00 44.59
46 13R526 68.33 63.39 77.03 67.91
47 花育6312 Huayu 6312 73.40 59.95 61.05 62.44
48 花育6311 Huayu 6311 75.00 70.81 77.42 58.44
49 豫花177 Yuhua 177 42.67 36.16 38.21 36.34
50 郑农26 Zhengnong 26 55.81 48.00 50.00 48.05
51 山花35 Shanhua 35 89.36 82.34 86.93 92.53
52 开农313 Kainong 313 49.22 44.44 51.32 57.43
53 皖花14 Wanhua 14 65.38 59.60 66.18 74.34
54 济花8号 Jihua 8 37.50 38.84 53.57 50.85
55 驻花6号 Zhuhua 6 84.38 85.16 95.12 95.66
56 济花5号 Jihua 5 11.11 8.67 11.25 9.74
57 开农112 Kainong 112 28.64 27.71 29.69 35.64
58 晋花10 Jinhua 10 52.66 47.60 60.81 51.78
59 汾花12 Fenhua 12 58.93 51.37 54.17 69.06
60 DF12 36.16 30.85 36.70 32.58
61 花育44 Huayu 44 93.10 80.28 93.75 93.61
62 徐68-4 Xu 68-4 33.33 28.75 33.14 23.73

表4

各品种的综合指标值、权重、μ(X)、D值及综合评价"

图3

62份花生品种芽期耐寒性综合聚类分析"

表5

花生芽期耐寒性各指标值及油酸含量的相关性分析"

性状
Trait		 油酸含量
Oleate (%)		 相对发芽率
RGR (%)		 相对发芽指数RGI (%) 相对发芽势
RGP (%)		 相对芽长
RSL (%)		 D值
D-value
油酸含量 Oleate (%) 1
相对发芽率 RGR (%) -0.185 1
相对发芽指数 RGI (%) -0.157 0.985** 1
相对发芽势 RGP (%) -0.156 0.968** 0.986** 1
相对芽长 RSL (%) -0.134 0.953** 0.968** 0.953** 1
D值 D-value -0.160 0.988** 0.996** 0.987** 0.982** 1
[1] 廖伯寿. 我国花生生产发展现状与潜力分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42: 1-6.
Liao B S. A review on progress and prospects of peanut industry in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2020, 42: 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 张鹤, 蒋春姬, 殷冬梅, 董佳乐, 任婧瑶, 赵新华, 钟超, 王晓光, 于海秋. 花生耐冷综合评价体系构建及耐冷种质筛选. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 1753-1767.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04182
Zhang H, Jiang C J, Yin D M, Dong J L, Ren J Y, Zhao X H, Zhong C, Wang X G, Yu H Q. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system for cold tolerance and screening of cold tolerance germplasm in peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 1753-1767. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 于树涛, 于洪波, 苏君伟, 赵立仁, 史普想, 赵艳, 唐月异, 王秀贞, 吴琪, 王传堂. 低温胁迫下花生差异表达基因的分离与分析. 核农学报, 2014, 28: 569-576.
Yu S T, Yu H B, Su J W, Zhao L R, Shi P X, Zhao Y, Tang Y Y, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Wang C T. Isolation and analysis of gifferentially expressed genes from peanut under low-temperature stress. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2014, 28: 569-576. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 王晶珊, 封海胜, 栾文琪. 低温对花生出苗的影响及耐低温种质的筛选. 中国油料, 1985, (3): 28-32.
Wang J S, Feng H S, Luan W Q. Effect of low temperature on seed emergence and screening low temperature resistance germplasm. Chin Oil Crop Sci, 1985, (3): 28-32. (in Chinese)
[5] 封海胜. 花生种子吸胀期间耐低温性鉴定. 中国油料, 1991, (1): 67-70.
Feng H S. Identification on low temperature resistance of peanut seed during imbibition stage. Chin Oil Crop Sci, 1991, (1): 67-70. (in Chinese)
[6] Upadhyaya H D, Reddy L J, Dwivedi S L, Gowda C L L, Singh S. Phenotypic diversity in cold-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 2009, 165: 278-291.
[7] 刘海龙, 陈小姝, 杨富军, 白冬梅, 孙晓苹, 吕永超, 任小平, 姜慧芳, 高华援. 花生种质资源耐低温表型鉴定方法研究. 花生学报, 2017, 46(3): 20-25.
Liu H L, Chen X S, Yang F J, Bai D M, Sun X P, Lyu Y C, Ren X P, Jiang H F, Gao H Y. Research of identification method on low temperature resistance of peanut germplasm resources phenotype. J Peanut Sci, 2017, 46(3): 20-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 吕建伟, 马天进, 李正强, 陈锋, 姜慧芳. 花生种质资源出苗期耐低温性鉴定方法及应用. 花生学报, 2014, 43(3): 13-18.
Lyu J W, Ma T J, Li Z Q, Chen F, Jiang H F. Identification method of low temperature tolerance on peanut germplasm resource. J Peanut Sci, 2014, 43(3): 13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 唐月异, 王传堂, 高华媛, 凤桐, 张树伟, 王秀贞, 张建成, 禹山林. 花生种子吸胀期间耐低温性及其与品质性状的相关研究. 核农学报, 2011, 25: 436-442.
Tang Y Y, Wang C T, Gao H Y, Feng T, Zhang S W, Wang X Z, Zhang J C, Yu S L. Low temperature tolerance during seed imbibition and its relationship to main quality in peanut. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2011, 25: 436-442. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 白冬梅, 薛云云, 赵姣姣, 黄莉, 田跃霞, 权宝全, 姜慧芳. 山西花生地方品种芽期耐寒性鉴定及SSR遗传多样性. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 1459-1467.
Bai D M, Xue Y Y, Zhao J J, Huang L, Tian Y X, Quan B Q, Jiang H F. Identification of cold-tolerance during germination stage and genetic diversity of SSR markers in peanut landraces of Shanxi province. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 1459-1467. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01459
[11] 常博文, 钟鹏, 刘杰, 唐中华, 高亚冰, 于洪久, 郭玮. 低温胁迫和赤霉素对花生种子萌发和幼苗生理响应的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 118-130.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84043
Chang B W, Zhong P, Liu J, Tang Z H, Gao Y B, Yu H J, Guo W. Effects of low temperature stress and gibberellin on seed germination and seedling physiological response of peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 118-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84043
[12] 陈昊, 徐日荣, 陈湘瑜, 张玉梅, 胡润芳, 蓝新隆, 唐兆秀, 林国强. 花生种子萌发吸胀阶段冷害抗性的鉴定及耐冷种质的筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21: 192-200.
Chen H, Xu R R, Chen X Y, Zhang Y M, Hu R F, Lan X L, Tang Z X, Lin G Q. Identification of imbibitional chilling injury resistance for peanut and screening of imbibitional chilling-tolerance germplasm. J Plant Genet Resour, 2020, 21: 192-200. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 薛云云, 白冬梅, 田跃霞, 权宝全. 24份山西花生资源芽期和苗期耐寒性鉴定. 核农学报, 2018, 32: 582-590.
Xue Y Y, Bai D M, Tian Y X, Quan B Q. Cold tolerance identification for 24 peanut resources from Shanxi province at the stage of germination and seedling. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2018, 32: 582-590. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 陈娜, 程果, 潘丽娟, 陈明娜, 张小燕, 王冕, 王通, 许静, 禹山林, 孙泓希, 于树涛, 迟晓元. 东北地区收获期低温对花生品质影响及耐低温品种筛选. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56: 2417-2427.
Chen N, Cheng G, Pan L J, Chen M N, Zhang X Y, Wang M, Wang T, Xu J, Yu S L, Sun H X, Yu S T, Chi X Y. Effects of low temperature on peanut quality and selection of low temperature tolerant varieties in northeast China. Plant Physiol J, 2020, 56: 2417-2427. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 孙东雷, 卞能飞, 王幸, 邢兴华, 沈一, 徐泽俊, 齐玉军, 王晓军. 高油酸花生萌发期耐冷性综合评价及种质筛选. 核农学报, 2021, 35: 1263-1272.
Sun D L, Bian N F, Wang X, Xing X H, Shen Y, Xu Z J, Qi Y J, Wang X J. Comprehensive evaluation of cold tolerance and germplasm screening of high oleic acid peanut at germination stage. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2021, 35: 1263-1272. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 谢志坚. 农业科学中的模糊数学方法. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1983. pp 99-193.
Xie Z J. Method of Fuzzy Mathematics in Agricultural Science. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 1983. pp 99-193. (in Chinese)
[17] 颜启传. 种子学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001. pp 91-102.
Yan Q C. Seed Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001. pp 97-102. (in Chinese)
[18] Bell M J, Gillespie T J, Roy R C, Michaels T E, Tollenaar M. Peanut leaf photosynthetic activity in cool field environments. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1023-1029.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040035x
[19] 王俊娟, 王德龙, 阴祖军, 王帅, 樊伟丽, 陆许可, 穆敏, 郭丽雪, 叶武威, 喻树迅. 陆地棉萌发至幼苗期抗冷性的鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49: 3332-3346.
Wang J J, Wang D L, Yin Z J, Wang S, Fan W L, Lu X K, Mu M, Guo L X, Ye W W, Yu S X. Identification of the chilling resistance from germination stage to seedling stage in upland cotton. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49: 3332-3346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 武辉, 侯丽丽, 周艳飞, 范志超, 石俊毅, 阿丽艳·肉孜, 张巨松. 不同棉花基因型幼苗耐寒性分析及其鉴定指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 1703-1713.
Wu H, Hou L L, Zhou Y F, Fan Z C, Shi J Y, Aliyan R Z, Zhang J S. Analysis of chilling-tolerance and determination of chillingtolerance evaluation indicators in cotton of different genotypes. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 1703-1713. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 张陇艳, 程功敏, 魏恒玲, 王寒涛, 芦建华, 马峙英, 喻树迅. 陆地棉种子萌发期对低温胁迫的响应及耐冷性鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 19-33.
Zhang L Y, Chang G M, Wei H L, Wang H T, Lu J H, Ma Z Y, Yu S X. Chilling tolerance identification and response to cold stress of Gossypium hirsutum varieties (lines) during germination stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 19-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 全国农业技术推广服务中心. 高油酸花生产业纵论. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2019.
National Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center. An Overview of High Oleic Acid Peanut Industry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
[23] 王传堂, 唐月异, 王秀贞, 吴琪, 王志伟, 宫清轩, 冯昊, 杜祖波, 李秋. 高油酸花生新品系丰产性与播种出苗期耐低温高湿田间评价. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(9): 110-114.
Wang C T, Tang Y Y, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Wang Z W, Gong Q X, Peng H, Du Z Q, Li Q. Evaluation on productivity of new high oleic peanut lines and field tolerance to low temperature and high moisture during sowing to emergence period. Shandong Agric Sci, 2019, 51(9): 110-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 王传堂, 张建成, 唐月异, 于树涛, 王强, 刘峰, 李秋. 中国高油酸花生育种现状与展望. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(6): 171-176.
Wang C T, Zhang J C, Tang Y Y, Yu S T, Wang Q, Liu F, Li Q. Current situation and future directions of high oleic peanut breeding in China. Shandong Agric Sci, 2018, 50(6): 171-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Wang C T, Tang Y Y, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Guan S Y, Yang W Q, Wang P W. Development and characterization of four new high oleate peanut lines. Res Crops, 2013, 14: 845-849.
[26] 张明威, 于国庆, 于树涛, 于洪波, 史普想. 辽宁高油酸花生种植技术. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(8): 53.
Zhang M W, Yu G Q, Yu S T, Yu H B, Shi P X. Planting technology of high oleic peanut in Liaoning province. Agric Eng Technol, 2018, 38(8): 53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 于树涛, 于国庆, 孙泓希, 仸亮, 王虹, 赵立仁, 于洪波. 高油酸花生品种(品系)的遗传多态性分析. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15: 4033-4039.
Yu S T, Yu G Q, Sun H X, Ren L, Wang H, Zhao L R, Yu H B. Genetic diversity analysis on high oleic acid peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties and strains. Mol Plant Breed, 2017, 15: 4033-4039. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 薛晓梦, 吴洁, 王欣, 白冬梅, 胡美玲, 晏立英, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 低温胁迫对普通和高油酸花生种子萌发的影响研究. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 1768-1778.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04170
Xue X M, Wu J, Wang X, Bai D M, Hu M L, Yan L Y, Chen Y N, Kang Y P, Wang Z H, Huai D X, Lei Y, Liao B S. Effects of cold stress on germination in peanut cultivars with normal and high content of oleic acid. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 1768-1778. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 薛晓梦, 李建国, 白冬梅, 晏立英, 万丽云, 康彦平, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 花生FAD2基因家族表达分析及其低温胁迫的响应. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1586-1594.
Xue X M, Li J G, Bai D M, Yan L Y, Wan L Y, Kang Y P, Huai D X, Lei Y, Liao B S. Expression profiles of FAD2 genes and their responses to cold stress in peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1586-1594. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 朱春权, 魏倩倩, 项兴佳, 胡文君, 徐青山, 曹小闯, 朱练峰, 孔亚丽, 刘佳, 金千瑜, 张均华. 褪黑素和茉莉酸甲酯基质育秧对水稻耐低温胁迫的调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2016-2027.
[2] 祝令晓, 宋世佳, 李浩然, 孙红春, 张永江, 白志英, 张科, 李安昌, 刘连涛, 李存东. 基于耐低氮综合指数的棉花苗期耐低氮品种筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1800-1812.
[3] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[4] 赵雪, 周顺利. 玉米抗茎倒伏能力相关性状与评价研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 15-26.
[5] 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 汪颖, 潘小怡, 赖华江, 李向东, 杨东清. 北方主栽花生品种的源库特征及其分类[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1712-1723.
[6] 薛晓梦, 吴洁, 王欣, 白冬梅, 胡美玲, 晏立英, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 低温胁迫对普通和高油酸花生种子萌发的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1768-1778.
[7] 马晓寒,张杰,张环纬,陈彪,温心怡,许自成. 通过外源MeJA抑制H2O2积累提高烟草的耐冷性[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 411-418.
[8] 薛晓梦,李建国,白冬梅,晏立英,万丽云,康彦平,淮东欣,雷永,廖伯寿. 花生FAD2基因家族表达分析及其对低温胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1586-1594.
[9] 常博文,钟鹏,刘杰,唐中华,高亚冰,于洪久,郭炜. 低温胁迫和赤霉素对花生种子萌发和幼苗生理响应的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(1): 118-130.
[10] 王道平,徐江,牟永莹,闫文秀,赵梦洁,马博,李群,张丽娜,潘映红. 表油菜素内酯影响水稻幼苗响应低温胁迫的蛋白质组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 897-908.
[11] 白冬梅,薛云云,赵姣姣,黄莉,田跃霞,权宝全,姜慧芳. 山西花生地方品种芽期耐寒性鉴定及SSR遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10): 1459-1467.
[12] 郝心愿,岳川,唐湖,钱文俊,王玉春,王璐,王新超,杨亚军. 茶树β-淀粉酶基因CsBAM3的克隆及其响应低温的表达模式[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(10): 1417-1425.
[13] 杨慧菊,郭华春*. 低温胁迫下马铃薯的数字基因表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(03): 454-463.
[14] 李馨园,杨晔,张丽芳,左师宇,李丽杰,焦健,李晶. 外源ABA对低温胁迫下玉米幼苗内源激素含量及Asr1基因表达的调节[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(01): 141-148.
[15] 孙子淇,张新友,徐静,张忠信,刘华,严玫,董文召,黄冰艳,韩锁义,汤丰收,刘志勇. 河南省审定花生品种的指纹图谱构建[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(10): 1448-1461.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[2] 秦治翔;杨佑明;张春华;徐楚年;翟志席. 棉纤维次生壁增厚相关基因的cDNA克隆与分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 860 -866 .
[3] 倪大虎;易成新;李莉;汪秀峰;张毅;赵开军;王春连;章琦;王文相;杨剑波. 分子标记辅助培育水稻抗白叶枯病和稻瘟病三基因聚合系[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 100 -105 .
[4] 戴小军;梁满中;陈良碧. 栽培稻种内核糖体基因的ITS序列比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1874 -1878 .
[5] 汪保华;武耀廷;黄乃泰;郭旺珍;朱协飞;张天真. 陆地棉重组自交系产量及产量构成因子性状的上位性QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1755 -1762 .
[6] 王春梅;冯祎高;庄丽芳;曹亚萍;亓增军;别同德;曹爱忠;陈佩度. 普通小麦近缘物种黑麦1R、簇毛麦1V及鹅观草1Rk#1染色体特异分子标记的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1741 -1747 .
[7] 赵庆华;黄剑华;颜昌敬. 油菜花粉发芽的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1986, (01): 15 -20 .
[8] 周录英;李向东;王丽丽;汤笑;林英杰. 钙肥不同用量对花生生理特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 879 -885 .
[9] 郑天清;徐建龙;傅彬英;高用明;Satish VERUKA;Renee LAFITTE;翟虎渠;万建民;朱苓华;黎志康. 回交高代选择导入系的纹枯病抗性与抗旱性的遗传重叠研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(08): 1380 -1384 .
[10] 杨燕;赵献林;张勇;陈新民;何中虎;于卓;夏兰琴. 四个小麦抗穗发芽分子抗性标记有效性的验证与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 17 -24 .
京ICP备15008789号-2