欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1542-1548.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

半夏的光合特性

靳忠英1;彭正松1,*;李育明2;王梅2   

  1. 1西华师范大学环境科学与生物多样性保护省重点实验室;2国家甘薯改良中心南充分中心,四川南充637002
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-10-12 网络出版日期:2006-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 彭正松

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit.

JIN Zhong-Ying1,PENG Zheng-Song1*,LI Yu-Ming2,WANG Mei2   

  1. 1Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Biodiversity Conservation, China West Normal University; 2Nanchong Sub-center of National Sweet Potato Improvement, Nanchong 637002, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-11-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-10-12 Published online:2006-10-12
  • Contact: PENG Zheng-Song

摘要:

用LI-6400型便携式光合作用测定系统对半夏的光合特性进行研究。结果表明半夏是喜阴植物, 光补偿点为19.19 μmol photons·m-2·s-1。半夏的初始表观量子效率高, 因此对光的利用率高。光合作用受叶片内部气孔调节和外部空气相对湿度、光照强度等因子影响, 半夏净光合速率的日变化呈双峰曲线。相关性分析表明,光照强度和蒸腾速率是影响半夏净光合速率的主要因子。因此,在栽培时,可采取与其他作物间作的方式, 对其遮荫, 缓解午休现象, 提高光合作用日同化量。对来自不同地区的16个居群的净光合速率进行测定,用SPSS软件对测定结果进行统计分析,结果表明,不同居群间的净光合速率差异显著,以来自四川崇州的PT3居群的净光合速率最大,为22.4 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1;有14个居群内部个体的净光合速率差异不显著, 有两个居群(PT7和PT15)内部个体的净光合速率差异极显著。

关键词: 半夏, 光合特性, 净光合速率, 光照强度, 蒸腾速率

Abstract:

Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. is a wild medical plant. Their tubers were a crude drug of traditional Chinese medicine. For satisfying the demand of the drug market, some farmers began to cultivate this species in the field. The knowledge concerning physiological characteristics of P. ternata was an important guidance to its domestication, cultivation and cultivar breeding. This study focused on the photosynthetic characteristics of P. ternata, and expected to provide a scientific basis for choosing reasonable cultivation habitat and sieving preferential germplasm resource for field production of this crude drug.
The photosynthetic characteristics of live mature leaves in P. ternata plants were determined with the LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was measured under different light intensities condition, and then drawing the curve of Pn respond to light intensities according to the results. The diurnal variation of Pn was measured at sunny day from 7:00–7:00 pm. From 9:00–11:00 am was the time for measuring the Pn of P. ternata populations. Ten plants were chosen at choice from a population, and each plant was measured 3 times. The mean values were used to describe the Pn of the given populations. In all the measuring course, the photosynthetically active radiation was controlled stably at 1 000 μmol photons·m-2·s-1 with the red-blue light source provided by the LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system. Original data were dealt with by MS Excel 2000 and analyzed by SPSS 11.0.
The results showed that the light compensation point of P. ternata was 19.19 μmol photons·m-2·s-1(Fig.1), indicating that P. ternata is a shade-loving plant. The initial apparent quantum efficiency of P. ternata was high up to 0.0604, indicating its high use efficiency of the light. Leaf photosynthesis was regulated by stoma and affected by relative humidity and light intensity .The curve of diurnal variation of net photosynthetic rate from leaves of P. ternata had two peaks (Fig.2). Fig.3 showed the effect of light intensity (Fig.3-a), temperature (Fig.3-b), relative humidity (Fig.3-c), stomatal conductance (Fig.3-d), intercelluar CO2 concentration (Fig.3-e), transpiration rate (Fig.3-f) on Pn of P. ternata. And it was correlated significantly with light intensity and transpiration rate, with the correlation coefficient of 0.820 and 0.713 respectively (Table 1). It was suggested that intercropping of P. ternata with tall crops would get shadowy environment, decrease midday depression of photosynthesis, and increase photosynthetic daily assimilation amount. The light intensity is one of the main factors of influencing Pn of P. ternata, and the midday depression of this species was observed in this investigation. But what causes midday depression of P. ternata couldn’t be light intensity (Fig.3-a). Although the light intensity was high up to 1055.7 μmol photons·m-2·s-1 at midday, it was not too high to result in decrease Pn of P. ternata (Fig1 & Fig3-a). Pn of 16 populations of P. ternata was measured and analyzed by SPSS 11.0, showing the very significant difference among them (Table 3). The Pn of the population PT3 that derived from Chongzhou Country, Sichuan Province, was 22.4 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1, which was the maximum among all the investigated populations (Table 2). Besides, there were other two populations, PT4 and PT6 which respectively derived from Zhongjiang and Shehong, also expressed very high Pn value. Theses three populations were considered adaptive to cultivation in the field. There were 14 of 16 populations in which individual plants showed the same Pn in statistics in the same population, which indicating to some extent that genotypes of individual plants are homozygous in these populations. And the other two populations PT7 and PT15, which respectively derived from Luxian and Guangan, were statistically different in Pn of individual plant, which means that the genetic diversity exist in these two populations. Therefore, in order to get the consistent cultivation type of photosynthetic characteristic, artificial choice is necessary.

Key words: Pinellia ternate, Photosynthetic characteristics, Net photosynthetic rate, Light intensity, Transpiration rate

中图分类号: 

  • S567
[1] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[2] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[3] 党科, 宫香伟, 吕思明, 赵冠, 田礼欣, 靳飞, 杨璞, 冯佰利, 高小丽. 糜子/绿豆间作模式下施氮量对绿豆叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1175-1187.
[4] 张云, 王丹媚, 王孝源, 任晴雯, 唐可, 张丽宇, 吴玉环, 刘鹏. 外源茉莉酸对菊芋镉胁迫下光合特性及镉积累的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2490-2500.
[5] 何潇, 刘兴, 辛正琦, 谢海艳, 辛余凤, 吴能表. 半夏PtPAL基因的克隆、表达与酶动力学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1941-1952.
[6] 冯克云, 王宁, 南宏宇, 高建刚. 水分亏缺下化肥减量配施有机肥对棉花光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 125-137.
[7] 马正波, 董学瑞, 唐会会, 闫鹏, 卢霖, 王庆燕, 房孟颖, 王琦, 董志强. 四甲基戊二酸对夏玉米光合生产特征的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1617-1627.
[8] 杜进勇,柴强,王一帆,范虹,胡发龙,殷文,李登业. 地上地下互作强度对小麦间作玉米光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1398-1406.
[9] 李朝苏,吴晓丽,汤永禄,李俊,马孝玲,李式昭,黄明波,刘淼. 小麦产量对中后期氮素胁迫的响应及品种间差异[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1260-1269.
[10] 严青青,张巨松,代健敏,窦巧巧. 甜菜碱对盐碱胁迫下海岛棉幼苗光合作用及生物量积累的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1128-1135.
[11] 任永福,陈国鹏,蒲甜,陈诚,曾瑾汐,彭霄,马艳玮,杨文钰,王小春. 玉米-大豆带状种植中套作高光效玉米窄行穂位叶光合特性对弱光胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 728-739.
[12] 鱼海跃,闫岩,张钰石,张明才,李召虎. 不同灌溉条件下冠菌素对大豆光合特性与产量的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(12): 1851-1858.
[13] 石洪亮,严青青,张巨松,李春艳,窦海涛. 氮肥对非充分灌溉下棉花花铃期光合特性及产量的补偿作用[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8): 1196-1204.
[14] 程亚娇,范元芳,谌俊旭,王仲林,谭婷婷,李佳凤,李盛蓝,杨峰,杨文钰. 光照强度对大豆叶片光合特性及同化物的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1867-1874.
[15] 徐田军, 吕天放, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 陈传永, 刘月娥, 刘秀芝, 王元东, 刘春阁. 玉米生产上3个主推品种光合特性、干物质积累转运及灌浆特性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(03): 414-422.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!