欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1542-1548.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

半夏的光合特性

靳忠英1;彭正松1,*;李育明2;王梅2   

  1. 1西华师范大学环境科学与生物多样性保护省重点实验室;2国家甘薯改良中心南充分中心,四川南充637002
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-10-12 网络出版日期:2006-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 彭正松

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit.

JIN Zhong-Ying1,PENG Zheng-Song1*,LI Yu-Ming2,WANG Mei2   

  1. 1Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Biodiversity Conservation, China West Normal University; 2Nanchong Sub-center of National Sweet Potato Improvement, Nanchong 637002, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-11-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-10-12 Published online:2006-10-12
  • Contact: PENG Zheng-Song

摘要:

用LI-6400型便携式光合作用测定系统对半夏的光合特性进行研究。结果表明半夏是喜阴植物, 光补偿点为19.19 μmol photons·m-2·s-1。半夏的初始表观量子效率高, 因此对光的利用率高。光合作用受叶片内部气孔调节和外部空气相对湿度、光照强度等因子影响, 半夏净光合速率的日变化呈双峰曲线。相关性分析表明,光照强度和蒸腾速率是影响半夏净光合速率的主要因子。因此,在栽培时,可采取与其他作物间作的方式, 对其遮荫, 缓解午休现象, 提高光合作用日同化量。对来自不同地区的16个居群的净光合速率进行测定,用SPSS软件对测定结果进行统计分析,结果表明,不同居群间的净光合速率差异显著,以来自四川崇州的PT3居群的净光合速率最大,为22.4 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1;有14个居群内部个体的净光合速率差异不显著, 有两个居群(PT7和PT15)内部个体的净光合速率差异极显著。

关键词: 半夏, 光合特性, 净光合速率, 光照强度, 蒸腾速率

Abstract:

Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. is a wild medical plant. Their tubers were a crude drug of traditional Chinese medicine. For satisfying the demand of the drug market, some farmers began to cultivate this species in the field. The knowledge concerning physiological characteristics of P. ternata was an important guidance to its domestication, cultivation and cultivar breeding. This study focused on the photosynthetic characteristics of P. ternata, and expected to provide a scientific basis for choosing reasonable cultivation habitat and sieving preferential germplasm resource for field production of this crude drug.
The photosynthetic characteristics of live mature leaves in P. ternata plants were determined with the LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was measured under different light intensities condition, and then drawing the curve of Pn respond to light intensities according to the results. The diurnal variation of Pn was measured at sunny day from 7:00–7:00 pm. From 9:00–11:00 am was the time for measuring the Pn of P. ternata populations. Ten plants were chosen at choice from a population, and each plant was measured 3 times. The mean values were used to describe the Pn of the given populations. In all the measuring course, the photosynthetically active radiation was controlled stably at 1 000 μmol photons·m-2·s-1 with the red-blue light source provided by the LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system. Original data were dealt with by MS Excel 2000 and analyzed by SPSS 11.0.
The results showed that the light compensation point of P. ternata was 19.19 μmol photons·m-2·s-1(Fig.1), indicating that P. ternata is a shade-loving plant. The initial apparent quantum efficiency of P. ternata was high up to 0.0604, indicating its high use efficiency of the light. Leaf photosynthesis was regulated by stoma and affected by relative humidity and light intensity .The curve of diurnal variation of net photosynthetic rate from leaves of P. ternata had two peaks (Fig.2). Fig.3 showed the effect of light intensity (Fig.3-a), temperature (Fig.3-b), relative humidity (Fig.3-c), stomatal conductance (Fig.3-d), intercelluar CO2 concentration (Fig.3-e), transpiration rate (Fig.3-f) on Pn of P. ternata. And it was correlated significantly with light intensity and transpiration rate, with the correlation coefficient of 0.820 and 0.713 respectively (Table 1). It was suggested that intercropping of P. ternata with tall crops would get shadowy environment, decrease midday depression of photosynthesis, and increase photosynthetic daily assimilation amount. The light intensity is one of the main factors of influencing Pn of P. ternata, and the midday depression of this species was observed in this investigation. But what causes midday depression of P. ternata couldn’t be light intensity (Fig.3-a). Although the light intensity was high up to 1055.7 μmol photons·m-2·s-1 at midday, it was not too high to result in decrease Pn of P. ternata (Fig1 & Fig3-a). Pn of 16 populations of P. ternata was measured and analyzed by SPSS 11.0, showing the very significant difference among them (Table 3). The Pn of the population PT3 that derived from Chongzhou Country, Sichuan Province, was 22.4 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1, which was the maximum among all the investigated populations (Table 2). Besides, there were other two populations, PT4 and PT6 which respectively derived from Zhongjiang and Shehong, also expressed very high Pn value. Theses three populations were considered adaptive to cultivation in the field. There were 14 of 16 populations in which individual plants showed the same Pn in statistics in the same population, which indicating to some extent that genotypes of individual plants are homozygous in these populations. And the other two populations PT7 and PT15, which respectively derived from Luxian and Guangan, were statistically different in Pn of individual plant, which means that the genetic diversity exist in these two populations. Therefore, in order to get the consistent cultivation type of photosynthetic characteristic, artificial choice is necessary.

Key words: Pinellia ternate, Photosynthetic characteristics, Net photosynthetic rate, Light intensity, Transpiration rate

中图分类号: 

  • S567
[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[3] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[4] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[5] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[6] 李乔, 叶杨春, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 王艳杰, 杨玉双, 马瑞琦, 赵广才, 蔡瑞国, 张敏, 刘希伟. 花后高温干旱逆境对冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1077-1090.
[7] 王岩, 白春生, 李波, 范虹, 何蔚, 杨莉莉, 曹悦, 赵财. 覆膜免耕和灌水量对西北绿洲灌区玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 755-770.
[8] 赵黎明, 段绍彪, 项洪涛, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 沈雪峰. 干湿交替灌溉与植物生长调节剂对水稻光合特性及内源激素的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 174-188.
[9] 张振, 何建宁, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 行距和种植方式对小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2396-2407.
[10] 付景, 马梦娟, 张骐飞, 段居琦, 王越涛, 王付华, 王生轩, 白涛, 尹海庆, 王亚. 干湿交替灌溉和施氮量对粳稻光合特性和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1787-1804.
[11] 周香玉, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜苗期响应渍害胁迫的生理调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1015-1029.
[12] 张振, 赵俊晔, 石玉, 张永丽, 于振文. 不同播幅对小麦花后叶片光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 981-990.
[13] 蒋杨影, 唐铭均, 张林茜, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 生长前期光照强度对甘薯叶片光合生理和结薯的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2575-2585.
[14] 曹玉军, 刘志铭, 兰天娇, 刘小丹, 魏雯雯, 姚凡云, 吕艳杰, 王立春, 王永军. 吉林省不同年代玉米品种光合生理特性对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2183-2195.
[15] 雷新慧, 冷佳俊, 陶金才, 万晨茜, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 冯佰利, 王孟, 高金锋. 叶面喷施亚硒酸钠对甜荞光合特性、产量及硒积累效应的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1678-1689.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!