欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 795-802.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00795

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

旱作和灌溉条件下小麦籽粒淀粉粒粒度的分布特征

戴忠民1,2;尹燕枰1;张敏1;李文阳1;闫素辉1;蔡瑞国1;王振林1,*   

  1. 1 山东农业大学农学院作物生物学国家重点实验室/农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室, 山东泰安271018; 2 德州学院, 山东德州253023
  • 收稿日期:2007-09-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-05-12 网络出版日期:2008-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Starch Granule Size Distribution in Wheat Grains under Irrigated and Rainfed Conditions

DAI Zhong-Min12,YIN Yan-Ping1,ZHANG Min1,LI Wen-Yang1,YAN Su-Hui1,CAI Rui-Guo1,WANG Zhen-Lin1*   

  1. 1 National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2 Dezhou College, Dezhou 253023, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-09-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-05-12 Published online:2008-05-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要: 在灌溉和旱作2种栽培条件下, 以籽粒淀粉含量不同的小麦品种鲁麦21和德99-3为试验材料, 研究了籽粒淀粉粒的分布特征及基因型差异。结果表明, 与灌溉栽培相比, 旱作栽培条件下2个小麦品种籽粒B型淀粉粒(2.0~9.8 mm和<9.8 mm)的体积、表面积百分比显著增加, 而粒径>18.8 mm的A型淀粉粒的体积、表面积百分比明显减少。水分亏缺降低了2个品种的籽粒直链淀粉和总淀粉含量, 而增加了籽粒蛋白质含量、峰值黏度和最终黏度, 这表明旱作栽培有利于小麦籽粒品质的改善。相关分析表明, 2个品种籽粒的直链淀粉和总淀粉含量均与2.0~9.8 μm和<9.8 mm的淀粉粒体积百分比呈负相关, 与9.8~18.8 mm的淀粉粒体积百分比呈正相关, 籽粒蛋白质含量与2.0~9.8 mm和<9.8 mm的淀粉粒呈显著和极显著正相关, 而与9.8~18.8 mm的淀粉粒呈负相关。表明小淀粉粒(2.0~9.8 mm和<9.8 mm)的直链淀粉和总淀粉含量较低、蛋白质含量较高, 而大淀粉粒(9.8~18.8 mm和>9.8 mm)具有较高的直链淀粉和总淀粉含量。

关键词: 小麦, 籽粒, 淀粉粒, 粒度分布, 灌溉, 旱作

Abstract: Starch granules comprise A and B types in mature wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains, which are different in chemical composition and functional properties. The granule size distribution of wheat starch is affected by both genotype and environment factors. Currently little information is available about the different distribution of starch granule size in wheat under different cultivation conditions. We used two wheat cultivars, Lumai 21 (starch content 68.9%) and De 99-3 (starch content 64.6%), to investigate the distribution of grain starch granule size under irrigated and rainfed conditions at Tai’an and Dezhou of Shandong Province in 2004–2005 growth season. The irrigated treatment received 3 irrigations with the total water amount of 2 250 m2 ha-1 during the whole growth period (750 m3 ha-1 each at before sowing, pre-wintering, and jointing stages, respectively), while the rainfed treatment had no irrigation. In mature grains, the diameter of starch granules ranged from 0.37 to 52.60 mm, and the percent volume distribution showed a 2-peak curve with the mean granule diameter of 5 (B type) and 25 mm (A type) at each peak. The volume percentages of A and B types were 56.1–65.5% and 34.5–43.9%, respectively. A 2-peak curve was also shown in percent surface area distribution of starch granules, but only one peak in percent number, because the number of B-type granules accounted for over 99% of the total starch granules. As compared with irrigated treatment, rainfed treatment affected the distribution of starch granules in grains of both cultivars through increasing the percent volume and percent surface area of 2.0-9.8 mm and <9.8 mm starch granules and decreasing those of >18.8 mm starch granules. The soil water deficit also decreased the contents of amylose and starch in grains and increased protein content, peak viscosity and final viscosity, suggesting that rianfed treatment may improve wheat grain quality. The contents of amylose, starch, and protein in grains were significantly correlated with the percent volume of starch granules with different diameter ranges. For starch, the r was -0.560*, -0.831** (2.0-9.8 mm) and -0.597*, -0.812** (<9.8 mm); and for protein, the r was 0.799**, 0.603*, (2.0-9.8 mm) and 0.799**, 0.578* (<9.8 mm), respectively. The result suggested that small starch granules (2.0-9.8 mm and <9.8 μm) are low in contents of amylose and starch, and high in protein content, whereas big starch granules (9.8–18.8 mm and >9.8 μm) high in contents of amylose and starch.

Key words: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Grain, Distribution of Starch, Granule size, Irrigation, Rainfed cultivation

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[3] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[4] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[5] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[6] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[7] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[8] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[9] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[10] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[11] 杨谨, 白爱宁, 白雪, 陈娟, 郭林, 刘春明. 水稻胚胎和胚乳双缺陷突变体eed1的表型与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 292-303.
[12] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[13] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[14] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[15] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!