欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (04): 665-674.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00665

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定评价方法研究

祁旭升1,**，刘章雄2,**，关荣霞2,**，王兴荣1，苟作旺1，常汝镇2，邱丽娟2,*   

  1. 1 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所, 甘肃兰州 730070；2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-27 修回日期:2011-12-19 出版日期:2012-04-12 网络出版日期:2012-02-13
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部保种项目 [NB08-2130315-(25-31)-06, NB07-2130315-(25-30)-06, NB06-07040(22-27)-05], 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2009CB118400)和甘肃省科技支撑计划(1104NKCA076), 甘肃省农科院农业科技创新专项(2009GAAS22)资助。

Comparison of Evaluation Methods for Drought-resistance at Soybean Adult Stage

QI Xu-Sheng1,**,LIU Zhang-Xiong2,**,GUAN Rong-Xia2,**,WANG Xing-Rong1,GOU Zuo-Wang1,CHANG Ru-Zhen2,QIU Li-Juan2,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2011-04-27 Revised:2011-12-19 Published:2012-04-12 Published online:2012-02-13
  • Contact: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net

PDF

1461

被引次数

49

摘要： 以我国不同地区育成的77个大豆品种(系)为供试材料、以晋豆21为对照, 在年降雨量不足40 mm的甘肃敦煌市, 设干旱胁迫和正常灌水2个处理, 考察与产量相关的8个农艺性状, 应用简单相关、等级相关等统计学方法, 筛选优异的抗旱种质资源, 旨在明确大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定指标和评价方法。9种抗旱性评价方法比较结果表明, 基于抗旱系数法、伤害指数和敏感指数对供试材料的抗旱性评价结果完全一致, 基于生物产量、单株粒数和单株荚数的综合评价方法与基于产量的直接评价方法比并无优势。经典的抗旱系数法适宜于筛选抗旱资源, 但不一定能筛选出正常条件下的丰产资源, 而本文提出的改进抗旱指数法可筛选到抗旱性和丰产性兼备的品种, 为抗旱育种和生产应用服务；通过划分不同品种熟期组, 筛选到不同熟期类型的抗旱、丰产品种。本研究为制订“大豆抗旱性鉴定评价技术规范”提供了理论依据, 对大豆资源的抗旱性鉴定和抗旱性育种具有重要的意义。

关键词: 大豆, 成株期, 抗旱性, 鉴定指标, 评价方法

Abstract: Drought is a very important abiotic stress for soybean production in China. A number of methods have been used to evaluate drought tolerance of soybean. In this study, 77 soybean varieties with Jindou 21 as the controlwere planted under drought stress and normal irrigationin Dunhuang City, Gansu, where the annual rainfall is less than 40 mm. The identification criterions for drought-resistance wereselected fromeightyield-related agronomic traits, and different evaluation methods were compared by simple correlation, spearman correlation, stepwise regression and gray correlation.The result showed that the evaluation method of drought resistance coefficient had the same effect as that of index of damage and drought resistance index. The comprehensive evaluation methods based on biomass, grain number per plant and pod number per plant had no advantages than the direct evaluation method based on yield. Drought resistance rather than high yield could be selected by traditional drought resistance coefficient method. The soybean varieties with drought resistance and stable yield under both drought and normal conditions could be selected using the improved drought resistance index created in this study, such as Xudou 12, Zhongzuo 00-683, and Zhonghuang 24, which would be elite soybean germplasm for soybean production in dry area. We might select drought resistant soybean germplasm with different ecotypes by dividing varieties with different growing periods. This study provided a theoretical basis for evaluating drought resistant soybean germplasm and for establishing the “standard evaluation system for drought resistant soybean”.

Key words: Soybean, Adult stage, Drought resistance, Identification criterion, Evaluation method

[1]Liu X-Y(刘学义). Drought. In: Lam H-M(林汉明), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Shao G-H(邵桂花), Liu Z-T(刘忠堂), eds. Soybean Stress Tolerance Research in China (中国大豆耐逆研究). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. pp 1–60 (in Chinese)

[2]Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), Zhu C-F(朱长甫), Miao Y-N(苗以农). Water Physiology and Irrigation-drainage of Soybean. In: Wang L-Z(王连铮), Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), eds. Modern China Soybean (现代中国大豆). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. pp 485–546 (in Chinese)

[3]Chen Y-Z(陈应志). The production and research progress of world soybean (Cont-1). Soybean Bull (大豆通报), 2005, (1): 26–30

[4]Brazil will first release commercial genetically modified soybean by Embrapa company. 2006(1-10) http://www.esunny.com.cn

[5]Liang J-Q(梁建秋), Zhang M-R(张明荣), Wu H-Y(吴海英). Advances in drought tolerance of soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2010, 29(2): 341–346 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Oya T, Nepomuceno A L, Neumaier N. Drought tolerance characteristics of Brazilian soybean cultivars- evaluation and characterization of drought tolerance of various Brazilian soybean cultivars in the field. Plant Prod Sci, 2004, 7: 129–137

[7]Davies W J, Zhang J H. Root signs and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 55–76

[8]Vadez V, Sinclair T R. Leaf ureide degradation and N2 fixation tolerance to water deficit in soybean. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 153–159

[9]Boyer J S, Wong S C, Farquhar G D. CO2 and water vapor exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Physiol, 1997, 114: 185–191

[10]Lodwig E M, Hosie A H F, Bordes A, Findlay K, Allaway D, Karunakaran R, Downie J A, Poole P S. Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Nature, 2003, 422: 722–726

[11]Lü C-X(吕彩霞), Guo J-Q(郭建秋), Wang Y(王英), Leng J-T(冷建田), Yang G-M(杨光明), Hou W-S(侯文胜), Wu C-X(吴存祥), Han T-F(韩天富). Identification, Inheritance analysis, and QTL mapping of root and shoot traits in soybean variety PI471938 with tolerance to wilting. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(9): 1476–1483(in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wu S-J(吴慎杰), Li G-Q(李贵全), Li J(李捷), Du W-J(杜维俊), Yue A-Q(岳爱琴), Wu Y-S(武云帅). Selecting targets and markers in drought-resistant breeding of soybean. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2003, 21(1): 139–142 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Zhang H-Y(张海燕), Jiao B-C(焦碧婵), Li G-Q(李贵权). Study on selecting targets in drought-resistant breeding of soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2005, 24(3): 183–188 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Wang Q-M(王启明), Xu X-C(徐心诚), Ma Y-S(马原松), Wu S-G(吴诗光). Influences of drought stress on physiological and biochemical characters of different soybean varieties in flowering period. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2005, 23(4): 98–102 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Lu G-H(路贵和), Liu X-Y(刘学义), Ren X-J(任小俊), Shi H(史红). Diversity in soybean germplasm with drought-resistance in Huang-Huai-Hai valleys. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2001, 34(3): 251–255 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Fischer R A , Maurer R. Drought-resistance in spring wheat cultivars 1: Grain Yield Responses. Aust J Agric Res, 1978, 29: 897–912

[17]Blum A, Jordan W R. Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Crit Rev Plant Sci, 1985, 2: 199–238

[18]Lan J-S(兰巨生), Hu F-S(胡福顺), Zhang J-R(张景瑞). The concept and statistical method of drought-resistance index in crops. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1990, 5(2): 20–25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Liu X-Y(刘学义). Discussion of drought resistance methods on soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 1986, (4): 23–26 (in Chinese)

[20]Qiu L-J(邱丽娟), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), eds. Descriptors and Data Standard for Soybean (Glycine spp.)(大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. pp 49–83 (in Chinese)

[21]Li G-Q(李贵全), Zhang H-Y(张海燕), Ji L(季兰), Zhao E-K(赵二开), Liu J-B(刘建兵), Li L(李玲), Zhang J-R(张家榕). Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of different soybean varieties. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(12): 2408–2412 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Tang Q-Y(唐启义). DPS Data Processing System—Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining(Second Edition)(DPS 数据处理系统-实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘)(第2版). Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 633–829 (in Chinese)

[23]Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Hu R-H(胡荣海), Zhang C-J(张灿军), Zhu Z-H(朱志华), Chang X-P(昌小平), Wang J-L(王娟玲). Technical Specification of Identification and Evaluation for Drought Resistance in Wheat (小麦抗旱性鉴定评价技术规范). Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008. pp 1–5 (in Chinese)

[24]Hu B-L(胡标林), Yu S-W(余守武), Wan Y(万勇), Zhang Z(张铮), Qiu B-Y(邱兵余), Xie J-K(谢建坤). Drought-resistance identification of Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) in whole growth period. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(3): 425–432 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Xu R(徐蕊), Wang J-B(王启柏), Zhang C-Q(张春庆), Wu C-L(吴承来). Drought-resistance evaluation soybean of maize inbred. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(1): 72–84 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]Wang Q-D(王钦德), Feng S-J(冯锁江). The demonstration and application about calculating formula of spearman coefficient. J Shanxi Univ (山西农业大学学报), 1993, 13(1): 30–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]Lu G-H(路贵和), Dai J-R(戴景瑞), Zhang S-K(张书奎), Li W-M(李文明), Chen S-J(陈绍江), E L-Z(鄂立柱), Zhang Y-R(张义荣). Drought-resistance of elite maize inbred lines in different water stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(10): 1284–1288 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28]Wang J-L(王金陵). Preliminary observation of soybean root. Acta Agric Sin (农业学报), 1955, 6(3): 331–334 (in Chinese)
[1] 陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 宋健, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[3] 王炫栋, 杨孙玉悦, 高润杰, 余俊杰, 郑丹沛, 倪峰, 蒋冬花. 拮抗大豆斑疹病菌放线菌菌株的筛选和促生作用及防效研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1546-1557.
[4] 王兴荣, 李玥, 张彦军, 李永生, 汪军成, 徐银萍, 祁旭升. 青稞种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1279-1287.
[5] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[6] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[7] 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[8] 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[9] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[10] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[11] 周悦, 赵志华, 张宏宁, 孔佑宾. 大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶基因GmPAP14启动子克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[12] 王娟, 张彦威, 焦铸锦, 刘盼盼, 常玮. 利用PyBSASeq算法挖掘大豆百粒重相关位点与候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[13] 董衍坤, 黄定全, 高震, 陈栩. 大豆PIN-Like (PILS)基因家族的鉴定、表达分析及在根瘤共生固氮过程中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 353-366.
[14] 张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 冯向阳, 张巧, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 秦桢, 段文学. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[15] 张国伟, 李凯, 李思嘉, 王晓婧, 杨长琴, 刘瑞显. 减库对大豆叶片碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2